Pfizer leak "If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided."
(threadreaderapp.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Any official who signed that agreement on behalf of taxpayers is guilty of malfeasance. It's so one sided that it's a ridiculous contract, there's really no need to even sign it from the aspect of the purchaser. There are zero protections afforded the purchasing side, they may as well have just handed them the money and hoped they would get whatever was promised. You'd have to be an idiot to sign that contract.
Either an idiot, or a member of an evil global Cabal would sign that.
That ain’t quite true mate.... unfortunately the majority of the players or bad actors are not and have no part in the Cabal or Deep State, indeed I am certain there are a good few Patriots that are also indirectly connected, like these guys to the Cabal.
The guys that sign these contracts are generally doing so on advice from an attorney, especially from a Professional Indemnity perspective and also as a matter of an organisations Policies and Procedures....
The guy that signed this might well be the most devoted patriot, that’s why what the Cabal do is so much more nuanced than just blackmailing everyone.... most of those involved in these sort of contracts have no idea what they are signing or it’s implications..... and those that do could easily be bought off with a few good lunches and building of rapport maybe invite to sports game, concert, etc or maybe a few grand or a paid off mortgage etc etc and even then those guys will have no idea just who is really behind their benefits, etc
WWG1WGA
Anyone who signs a contract with a clause like that - on behalf of a nation - falls under the "idiot" category, I think.
I wonder how big their executive bonuses will be this year and next ....
Their BONUS will be an extended vacation in HELL.
Sure, sure.
That is indeed the process of rationalization that in some greater or lesser degree your "majority of the players or bad actors" indulge in before and during the process of becoming suborned by Big Pharma.
And Big Pharma, Pfizer especially, is an adjunct. an instrument, of the cabal.
You are entirely wrong, at least in this case.
Trudeau bought 60mil doses. Hello Pfizer pls help me launder billions of other ppls tax money
Pfizer: Yes.
Nuremberg trials await.....
I was thinking this very thing as I read through it. There’s no reason to agree to such a contract unless you just blindly accept it because the sole focus is: “Must save lives!”. Pfizer is flexing their power.
I agree with what someone else here said though: contracts are made to be broken. Biden broke the contract for the Keystone Pipeline and I think there were some contracts in place with Texas finishing their southern border wall that Biden axed as well. So, USA: time to break the contract with Pfizer!
Video in tweet below.
https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1419992103116025858
"PFIZERLEAK: NEW CONTRACT / NEW COUNTRY !
EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT. (thread)
For those who wanted a proof that the #Pfizer contract is real - here 100% proof: ANOTHER contract, this time validated using a digital signature.
IT IS REAL!"
https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1420072293942927360
"Cryptography section (nerd alert!)
Please find enclosed the proof for the validity of the Brazilian document, via the proving that the digital signature which was used to sign the document are valid.
This document be used as evidence in a court of law.
#Pfizer #PfizerLeak"
You guys remember a bunch of hydroxychloriquine factories in places like India and Taiwan burning down?
Remember the couple from Canada who owned Apotex, largest producer of HCQ, found murdered in their home?
[Their] plan was hatched long, long ago.
Well that was a twofer, because they were also involved with the Clintons in Haiti.
So many coincidences, huh?
"coincidences"
And Mexico, Australia & USA. Pepe Farms remembers. 👍🏽
Thats still a crime against humanity. Surpressing the cure when its totally needed
FBI archives from 2009
https://archive.is/NOi1V
The superlatives were flying at today’s press conference announcing that pharmaceutical giant Pfizer has agreed to pay $2.3 billion to resolve charges of illegal and fraudulent promotion of its products:
The largest health care fraud settlement in Department of Justice history;
The largest criminal fine of any kind imposed in the U.S.;
The largest ever civil fraud settlement against a pharmaceutical company.
Ooo an article to go with my book page. Thanks for sharing great content!
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJLDFiy1/phizer-history-from-page-27-dead/c/
This surely solidifies the RICO dimension. Pure racketeering. Sure, crimes against humanity, medical genocide, bioweapon development, treason, sedition and many other big ticket items are all still on the table. But like Elliott Ness and Al Capone in The Untouchables movie - they go after the “low level” tax evasion crimes first.
That’s got to be a major WIN of the day! Thanks, Fren!🙏🏻
Att: u/WinsAnon & u/Puncake150 => this!
This statement doesn't make any sense. The contract says it cannot be voided if Ivermectin is effective. So there would be no need to suppress it.
The suppression is only because of the EUA. Available treatments would have invalidated the EUA.
There’s that funny word “available”. Could be substituted with “known”.
Hmm if there's no escape from the contract why bother suppressing ivermectin?
Because if Ivermectin is ruled effective, the government is stuck paying for a bunch of vaccine it can't use. If they have Ivermectin ruled ineffective, they can use the vaccine and minimize their financial loss.
Gotcha thank you couldn't think my way there for some reason
I recall seeing a comparison of CV to TB. TB is a highly infectious respiratory disease and about 1.5 million due each year from it. (Remember, it was just a couple if years ago it was showing up in the US and our betters did nothing about it.) The difference is that TB vaccines are $2.
More pieces to the puzzle 🧩
Moral high ground sometimes is expensive. The people who would suppress a cure over a contract are the lowest of the low.
This way class action lawsuits can begin against signees to expose them. Then when exposed, the criminal aspect will void the contracts. This leaves the Clot Shot developers open to punishment.
Sure okay, even if a drug will be found to treat COVID-19 the contract cannot be voided.
What's the penalty for voiding the contract?
If a treatment was found (already found) does the contract states the treatment must be voided in favor of the vaccines?
Then the countries that knows this are completely in the wrong. They are murdering people.
Contracts are made to be broken. Tell them to ball up already.
Stop making excuses for these people. They suppressed this because they wanted more dead bodies.
How the hell is this really allowed?
Archived
https://archive.is/gd7Bt
This isn't a fair contract in any way, shape or form. Hell, this is a shotgun wedding.
Holy mcfuck. This is the biggest crime against humanity ever comitted.
Turds!! They're ALL complicit.
"this contract makes your country a slave to us, suck it world". Spread this one everywhere
Murdering people for money. Money that no one can take with them.
Enjoy eternal death, demons.
So that's what it looks like when a captive nation bends over and spreads 'em.
Exactly
I hope someone with connections to them will get this to Bret Weinstein and Alex Berenson
There is nothing there that would force the government(s) to suppress Ivermectin. Nothing that would say: "You have to ban alternative treatments". Yes, it protects the vaccine sales even if the other treatments are effective while vaccine isn't. Yes, it's ridiculous, but it doesn't require to suppress anything else. The government could buy the required 250k of vaccine doses and then buy 10,000,000 of Ivermectin or Hydoxychoroquine too.
I don't understand how anyone in their right mind would sign that contract. It was also missing a "kickbacks" section, that must be covered elsewhere.
They've spent money on worse. Make the payment and throw the shit out.