Lack of FDA approval was just a convenience. I see many asking for links and other info on FDA shortcuts and other talking points to justify still not wanting the jab.
It was never about FDA approval (or lack thereof). It was always about a >98% survival rate - for a cough.
The argument is 1) you have an immune system, 2) you believe in natural immunity, 3) the substantial list of documented side-effects doesn't outweigh a 2% chance of dying from covid.
No my friend. It was never about the chance of survival. It was never about the efficacy of a vaccine. It was always about freedom.
The rest is a weak foundation. Death statistics can be manipulated. Emergency use can be elevated to full approval. Definitions can be changed. It is the moral battle that builds a strong foundation.
We didn't fight slavery because paying people is more productive. We didn't fight slavery because the crystal ball predicted giant combine harvesters that could do the work of a 1000 men. We didn't fight slavery because economists figured out it disincentivized investment in new labour saving technology. We did it because it was wrong. The rest was discovered only afterwards.
Freedom and truth. They are interdependent.
The truth will set you free!
And that Truth is Jesus Christ the Son of God.
John 8 and John 14 my dude.
When you can see everything he accomplished, my man, no one else is worthy. Not even close. Truly the Son of God Almighty. What else could he be? This battle we are in right now is one he started for us. We never had a clue or a chance. This world is blessed to know him.
Yes we are. God bless you with the Holy Ghost, sibling. In Jesus name amen!
Yes! They can change any data you want to argue but at the end of the day, even if it’s proven to be the safest medical treatment since bandaids, it is your right to decline if you wish! Your body, your choice!
Argument 4: IT IS YOUR BASIC HUMAN RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHAT GOES INTO YOUR BODY OR YOUR CHILDREN’S BODIES
This is the only argument that matters.
Word.
"I don't want to." Is all it should take.
No means no. My body my choice. We were practically handed the bodily autonomy handbook in the 60's
This changes nothing for our mission Pedes' Buckle up, we are prepared! Everyone here knew this was coming....Hold the line and stay the course....GOD WINS..
Blessings
Yep ! 🇺🇸
Many good drugs are FDA approved, many are not but should be. Many bad drugs have been FDA approved, some still are.
My health is my responsibility alone. My healthcare decisions are private and confidential, and are not the business of anyone else besides me and my doctors. I will take, or not take, whatever medical treatments, at my own discretion with the advice of my doctors.
It has always been about the total debasement of medical science for transparently politicized purposes.
And we’re again proven right.
It’s about freedom of choice and nothing else. This is America, bitches
My argument is: 1) It uses the flesh of murdered babies for the development, testing, and / or production of the vaccine. 2) The fact that they are trying to make sure that you can neither buy nor sell if you do not have the vaccine, makes it far to close to the mark of the beast for my comfort. Though I do not believe it to be the mark (yet) I do believe it is the preparation for the mark. People are now conditioned to believe it is okay for the government to force you to do something to your own body ("for everyone's protection") and to punish you if you do not follow the order to do so. So, no - I will not be taking the vaccine...
That's your reason for refusing the vaxx, and it's a good one, but it is not persuasive to those who don't care. You're making a moral argument to those who have none.
The argument also fails if the vaxx can be made with no fetus cells. But really, you do not have to justify your choice, because in the end it is yours, and only yours.
Not 2% but rather a .02% chance of dying from the wuflu...
2% is a generous mortality rate, much lower for under 65, and onder 35 it is almost non existent.
It amazes me that so many people who had previously questioned the healthcare industry, in part because of what [Hussein] did with HCA l, are now lining up to take the Clot Shots and Coof Boost.
Dying "with" something is far different than dying "from" something. This whole debate as been an argument based on principles. Principles of Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness vs Principles of Subjugation, Oppression, and Tyranny.
How come no mass die offs in homeless camps or the Amish and has single politician died
The argument is this: These fuckers slandered us and our president for 5 years, purposely released a virus in order to enslave us, and stole an election from us. They are never to be trusted again.
The legal battlefield has now opened up. It is going to be a rough ride but we will win.
Check, check, and check. Also, the fastest way to see me not do something is to tell me that I have to do something.
What about section 3 of the Code that mentions the animal testing? In this instance all the animals died, so that's a big fail.
forced is not legally the same as mandated
That's has no bearing especially in a right to work state. Don't like the vaccine, quit. That's their argument and it's a sound legal one.
My only qualm ever was and has been that we don’t know the long term effects of modifying your RNA.
Unless they have a time machine, that’s not changing any time soon
And 3) there are effective treatments
No amount of certification by a corrupted unConstitutional agency can change my mind that the vax is not needed, KungFlu never reached pandemic proportions, Ivermectin, HCQ, Zinc, D3, C and azithromycin work better than any other drug out there and that the vax is a death serum designed to depopulate and usher in transhumanism.
Experimental was a step of it but, only because, that is something that some who want to push it, could understand.
99.997*% which is using inflated deaths due to COVID-19 compensation for hospitals labeling people as COVID deaths versus flu or other deaths.
Nurumberg is tied to "Experimental" correct?
Approval does not address side effects.
As long as side effects exist their remains the avenue of malpractice.
The mis-information and restricting of valid treatments that eliminate the need for vaccination and push doctors into state(strike-that) CDC sponsored malpractice remains an issue.
No matter what they do now they cannot take back all of the data doctoring that brought us to this point.
FDA approval was NEVER one of my arguments. I'm still stuck on someone proving there's a new virus causing a new disease. That hasn't happened.
lol this "no virus" is still being pushed here, eh?