This case was originally filed back in January. It looks like it was moving ahead.

Keep in mind, this is NOT a case brought by the state legislature -- which still has done NOTHING to correct the election fraud.

It was brought by private parties. The judge appears to have been doing the right thing, by allowing the plaintiffs to sue the individuals who are accused of wrongdoing, but dimissing against the county is questionable.

Article from July:

https://vozwire.com/the-election-suit-against-fulton-county-was-dismissed-by-a-georgia-judge-but-the-claim-against-individual-officials-was-allowed/

I suspect there are a lot of lawsuits that are lost because the plaintiff (or their attorney) screwed it up, either by accident or on purpose.

The case law cited by this judge says that a "generalized" claim of vote dilution due to fraud does not provide standing to sue for "equal protection."

You can bet some or all of those previous cases were setups by corrupt judges and probably corrupt arrotneys who wanted to get these cases created as "settled law" for future claims like this one.

Let's see if these guys are the real deal. Do they appeal the decision? Do they go to Georgia Supreme Court and SCOTUS, if necessary?

This article explains it better --

https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia-ballot-inspection-case-dismissed-after-no-fraud-found/OUVOQ5I5ARHMBJ62CX3YBHRMYM/

Looks like the judge was trying to do the right thing. He allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the individuals they claimed were doing wrong.

He tried to get the ballots inspected, but there were roadblocks because nobody wanted to damage the evidence, and nobody seemed to have a good solution on how to do it without looking at the evidence.

Georgia "investigators" (government officials, I presume) said they did not find any evidence of counterfeit ballots.

... a decision that came a day after Georgia investigators told the court they were unable to find any counterfeit ballots.

If that is what the judge had to go on, then he didn't have much choice but to dismiss the case.

There needs to be a way to access the ballots in cases like this, by independent investigators, not corrupt government employees.

Maybe I am dumb, but how does this tie to MTG?

I see her mentioned nowhere in the motion papers.

Page 3-4: One of the witnesses worked for Georgia Tech and DARPA. This was a plaintiff witness.

Lin Wood is right about how much corruption there is in Georgia. I know people were skeptical about his grandiose claims he made. But so far Lin Wood has been consistently more right than wrong.

What did Lin and MTG have to say on the matter? Did they both make public statements recently?

Sometimes you have to unravel the onion to see what it is.

• Plaintiffs were not calling for an election audit.
• The word audit is thrown around, but that's not what this was.
• Plaintiffs were alleging that their votes were diluted due to election fraud, which they personally witnessed.
• They wanted to enter evidence to support their claim.
• The evidence they needed was in possession of the Defendants.
• The evidence they needed was an inspection of the absentee ballots in Fulton County.
• Fulton County did not want to produce the ballots.
• Plaintiffs and judge tried to figure out an alternative method to verify the evidence.
• Ultimately, an "inspection" by Georgia (officials?) claimed that no counterfeit ballots were found.
• Now, what do you do?
• The Plaintiffs need access to the evidence to show there was fraud, which diluted their vote, but they can't get that evidence.
• A Georgia "official" says that such evidence does not exist.
• If no evidence exists, then there is no evidence, and there is no case.
• Case dismissed.

But the problem is why should we believe the Georgia inspectors? What is THEIR evidence that they are telling the truth, or even that they did a proper inspection?

Besides all that ...

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE GEORGIA LEGISLATURE?

No balls to do what is right by the people who have the legal authority to do a real election audit.