Coincidence?...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (38)
sorted by:
There were a bunch of rumors very early on by people who claimed to have inside knowledge that entire shipments were being replaced by saline because of the initial side effects, and they needed to keep the number of adverse reactions low, statistically.
The motivation certainly checks out, but there was no way to confirm whether or not those claims were true at the time (though we all hoped they were).
Turns out, they may have been true. Which means getting the real jab could have a MUCH higher rate of adverse reactions (or death).
When was this reported? My wife, who works at a lab in a hospital, got jabbed at the end of Jan/begining of Feb and she hasn't showed any side effects to my knowledge.
I don't remember any exact dates, I just remember the posts on the chans, here, and tdw, around the time the vaccines were first made available to the public.
At the time, I personally thought the claims seemed credible, but without any evidence, there's not much to do with that information.
After the 2020 election, we'll need to audit everyone involved with creating and administering the vaccines.
My aunt and uncle are the same. They had very little reactions to the vaccines.
There are dates on the articles pictured. I see dates between March and July.
even if not saline its likely that they had batches that were not very high side effect for their most loyal of followers... those that rush in line to immediately get the shot
Imagine getting paid billions or trillions for saline solution. Fucking brilliant. And I'd honestly prefer that were the whole story vs. the alternative.
Perhaps. It's all speculation of course.
There were plenty of "first vaxed" that did have negative side effects. But it was also strange that the initial reports showed that 80% of the negative side effects reported (including death) all came from the same like 12 or so locations -- which would imply that if they were swapping with saline, it may have been the vast majority of jabs. Alternatively, those locations just all had bad vials (though I'm not sure how it could be worse than what's supposed to be in it already).
I don't have that spreadsheet anymore that showed the adverse reaction table broken down by location, but it was circulating on the wins for a while. Someone else may still have it?
Significantly, an experiment (which is what this is) needs to have control groups, otherwise, it is impossible to know whether anything works anymore. In a double-blinded study, neither the subjects nor the experimenters know which subjects are in the tested or control groups. What these reporters are picking up on, is that there are saline shots. By definition there must be saline shots, otherwise one could not conduct a double-blinded randomized control experiment that is the gold standard. BUT, those who do not understand science are outraged by this, because they feel they have been ripped off somehow. If they are told that they are receiving an experimental shot, they feel that they must be able to demand that it is the test shot, not the control group shot. BUT that would defeat the purpose of double-blinding. This is the result of taking the experiment into the public before all the tests have been done.
Thank you for your input...
I can see it now.. "This would explain why there are so many breakthrough cases. The vaccines are very much effective, but due to these mix ups many will still get infected. Line up for your boosters!"
But it also makes me feel more strongly about the theory I mentioned in another post about Warp Speed.
Ding Ding Ding
This right here.
Kek. Then cough lol
Well, duh, it's a clinical trial. You have to have a control group.
Wake up, sheep.
How do they know which people received saline? Curious on this part.
I'm unsure about a control group type situation, but its more likely a simple "we don't want to have a large noticeable spike in deaths".
Not if they can spread out the deaths over successive booster shots.
Massive resistance is what they were trying to avoid.
I don't have the sauce, but I thought I heard that they found different types of shots in Japan.
It's quite possible there are several different "batches".
And we're uncertain about the exact number of saline shots there actually are.
True, I'll try find the article on the Japanese throwing out millions of vax
Lot numbers, no doubt.
Vax lot numbers.
If they give SALINE to almost everyone (the first time around), they still get ALL of their EVIL BENEFITS. Here's how...
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgXB5572/if-they-give-saline-to-almost-ev/
(A post from yesterday)
I think this could be the control group..
If you don’t think that some manufacturing lines or medical staff get what’s going on and are conducting acts of sabotage, then you are very naive.
That Clif High guy put out a video a few months ago stating that there were people sabotaging the vaccines. Dunno if true, but I enjoyed his linguistics lesson at the beginning. 🤓
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E70IS531rBe4/
Every one of my friends has taken the death jab...supposedly. However, I know of not one out of 20+ people who have had any side effects at all. If they are, they are not talking about it. Many of these people are pilots. In any case, based on what I have seen, it's my empirical opinion that indeed some people...I would say 50% at least are getting a placebo/saline injection. Can you imagine the backlash is they gave the full death jab to everyone and there was a mass die off...10x greater than we already have? People are at wits end with this shit as it is. I'm sure the cabal cucks planned it this way in order to warm us up to the real "PLAN."