Some of us enjoy not being a part of the crowd, not being noticed, not being around others, not being "accepted, understood or liked". We are typically the personalities who don't like other people, period. So why would we give 2 shits if other people like us? We don't. We actually prefer if they didn't. Then they'll stay the fuck away from us.
As opposed to a blanket statement that says, by way of wording, that free thinkers are ALL like that. "except for". That they do not give a shit. Which is obviously and patently false. As explained.
I have one friend that doesn't include my small family. One person I can hang out with and I can tell you that even if I had 100 friends, none would be as special to me this person is.
I think it's a masterfull troll. Whenever you're looking to exhaust someone, it typically works. Just lead off with it and be real obnoxious about it. And then after 15 minutes say "Yeah just kidding. Of course the world is spherical. Anyway, so let's go over the VAERS data."
My intention was not get off the topic - ( what the hell was the topic ??? ) but i see that i did just that !!! Woopsie !!! and ; I completely agree with you - that's what happened. ( not a troll ) My post is what popped into my head when i saw the MEME. My verdict is still out on weather the earth is flat , or round. My verdict is still out on weather Mr Trump is the real deal . Same for Reagan and Kennedy. I'm still doing my homework , and probably always will be.
Their examples of "evidence" are laughable. It's like they are trying to argue with people that the color purple doesn't exist because it's just red and blue overlapping, and you're like, yeah, that's called purple, that's literally how this works. And then they say, "you just haven't looked into it!"
oops I thought your reply was to another comment I made. Lets not discuss the dumb shit regarding flat earth like that. Lets discuss some tangible evidence points- ones based in science.
is the earths curve measurable? should it be? have people attempted to measure it? what were the results? was there an error in the methodology? if the curve is undetectable, does that mean the parameters we've been taught for the earth's shape/size are invalid? what does that mean exactly for us? Furthermore, what evidence can you provide for the shape of the earth being a sphere? Is all that evidence coming from one source? What is the history of that source? The true history?
finally, what are your thoughts on this experiment:
that's why im here to let you all know that Austin Steinbart is an important part of this movement. but there needs to be more free thinkers here to get on board with him before we can move forward.
Youre listening to General Flynn too much. The truth about this matter is not going to come from any mainstream, famous figures- especially not ones with security clearances which prevents them from talking about or even acknowledging classified operations. The truth is going to come when we pry it out, and standing behind someone like Austin is one way to do that.
humor yourself and actually pay attention to him in this interview. Come back and tell me what you disagree with. and remember, this was a hit piece on him- and he still managed to maneuver it with skill.
life itself is a live action role-play so that's not really an argument against him and what he espouses. Nobody else in the movement has a message that even comes close to Austin's (and theres a good reason for this), all you have to do is listen and pay attention.
Why exactly is he a fraud? Do you have anything to back up that claim? Why did Q give Austin two proofs? Are you aware of the the Above&Beyond proof? Is everything that Q says the gospel to you? Where is your discernment? Is disinformation necessary? When do you start thinking for yourself? If Q told you not to trust president trump, would you obey or would you think for yourself? Is Q your master? Did Q say to trust sessions? To trust Barr?
Hmmmm. I don't really think that the one's on board with Mr S, are free thinkers.
Kinda like the sheeple that think THEY are the rational ones, who follow the science and are applying logic.
Well, yes, they are, within a tiny, winey itty bitty little locked off space, one that they cannot conceive outside of. In that little space, they imagine they are free thinkers.
Steinbart, like all conjurors, relies on your emotional defects in order to capture your attention and affection.
youre speaking in generalizations. why is that? is there something specifically you can point to that supports what youre saying? If steinbart was anonymous, would you then consider his information for evaluating? Why do you refuse to evaluate it? Is it because you dislike the messenger? Would you ignore good, pertinent information just because you dont like the source? does that make sense?
my emotions play no role in my consumption and analysis of information. Vacuum it all up, use discernment to find my truth. Truth resonates deeply within. Q should have taught you that. We dont need gatekeepers or arbiters of truth. Free thinking is about learning the truth on your own. Refusing to look into steinbart is counterproductive to learning the truth.
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information. There is a solid contingent of people on this sub that are vehemently opposed to speaking about, or looking into anything steinbart says. These people are behaving like the mockingbird media.
"Oy vey! dont look at that information goyim! its poison for your mind! go watch x22 and Jordan Sather to get the inside scoop and make sure to donate some shekels! shalom"
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
"There is a solid contingent of people on this sub are vehemently opposed..."
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
because you're clearly not arguing in good faith.
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
its someone who is open to all sources of information. Message over messenger. Most people here are unwilling to listen to him because they disapprove of the message. Shame because his message is far better than anything coming from any other supposed Q influence or politician for that matter. Watch one of his recent interviews, and actually pay attention. try this one with will Sommer, which was designed as a hit piece and watch how Austin redpills on video:
We do give a shit So much so that we sacrifice a social life so the sheep are free to roam without so many predators hiding in tje bushes.
And we're thanked by the sheep so graciously for our sacrifice.
I often think that the NWO are on the right side... just get rid of all the sheep. Cleanse it.
Then I remember I'm not evil and go back to arguing with idiots.
"CHOP CHOP" Karate Bob !!! I'm right there with ya !!!
zactly.
Honeybadgers vs Lemmings
Yes, how can I help you?
Because honey badgers don't give a shit?
Exactly!
Actually, not quite true, not 100%.
Many free thinkers want to be accept, understood and liked. That's human nature. It's actually an important part of being human.
The real point is that free thinkers will not sacrifice truth or freedom for comfort, or for merely being liked and accepted.
Some of us enjoy not being a part of the crowd, not being noticed, not being around others, not being "accepted, understood or liked". We are typically the personalities who don't like other people, period. So why would we give 2 shits if other people like us? We don't. We actually prefer if they didn't. Then they'll stay the fuck away from us.
Indeed.
Note: "Not quite", "not 100%", "many"
As opposed to a blanket statement that says, by way of wording, that free thinkers are ALL like that. "except for". That they do not give a shit. Which is obviously and patently false. As explained.
Carry on.
99 Luftballons 🎈
I just had a flashback, kek.
FREETHINKERS - FREEFACES - FREEBLOODS
UNITE!
I want to be understood, however I don't care if I am liked or accepted. My circle is VERY small.
Right now my circle is a dot.
LOL! You're right!
I have one friend that doesn't include my small family. One person I can hang out with and I can tell you that even if I had 100 friends, none would be as special to me this person is.
Idealism is a strong wind. Make it have purpose.
Absolutely loved this one thanks!
How free are we when NASA's 63-million-dollars-per-year relationship with Disney goes unquestioned?
Freethinkers don't NEED feet
I shared this with my family. This is exactly how I see myself. They all agreed!
After a lifetime of truth seeking I find now is our time to shine. WW3 is going to claim more lives, but not anyone that listened to me.
WW3 has been happening already for a while now.
Hear Hear !!! Agreed.
We are that lonely voice in the wilderness, crying out...
Idk. I think this might finally be a decent meme from the left. Words are right. Image implies we’re dumb fucks.
We are Freethinkers they are lemmings who will fall off a cliff when SHTF !
Was just recently trying to explain this to my 12 year old.
Looks like he's going up to get his own view and fulfill his curiosity of weather the world is round ? or flat ? Definitely , a free thinker.
sorry
I thought covid stopped handshakes?...Guess not.
people here see to think the earth being flat is impossible. many of them have never looked into it.
That's because it's not only impossible, it's retarded.
I think it's a masterfull troll. Whenever you're looking to exhaust someone, it typically works. Just lead off with it and be real obnoxious about it. And then after 15 minutes say "Yeah just kidding. Of course the world is spherical. Anyway, so let's go over the VAERS data."
My intention was not get off the topic - ( what the hell was the topic ??? ) but i see that i did just that !!! Woopsie !!! and ; I completely agree with you - that's what happened. ( not a troll ) My post is what popped into my head when i saw the MEME. My verdict is still out on weather the earth is flat , or round. My verdict is still out on weather Mr Trump is the real deal . Same for Reagan and Kennedy. I'm still doing my homework , and probably always will be.
It's so retarded, someone should hijack WankerPedoYeah's definition and put this as the first example of retarded behaviour.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retard_(pejorative)
neither of those are arguments. Why specifically do you say that?
Their examples of "evidence" are laughable. It's like they are trying to argue with people that the color purple doesn't exist because it's just red and blue overlapping, and you're like, yeah, that's called purple, that's literally how this works. And then they say, "you just haven't looked into it!"
alright, so provide a specific example of something you find to be totally fucking retarded from him. ill wait.
oops I thought your reply was to another comment I made. Lets not discuss the dumb shit regarding flat earth like that. Lets discuss some tangible evidence points- ones based in science.
is the earths curve measurable? should it be? have people attempted to measure it? what were the results? was there an error in the methodology? if the curve is undetectable, does that mean the parameters we've been taught for the earth's shape/size are invalid? what does that mean exactly for us? Furthermore, what evidence can you provide for the shape of the earth being a sphere? Is all that evidence coming from one source? What is the history of that source? The true history?
finally, what are your thoughts on this experiment:
https://fecore.org/final-results-fecore-measurements-disprove-the-wgs84-model-by-proving-flat-lake-surface/
Agreed !
that's why im here to let you all know that Austin Steinbart is an important part of this movement. but there needs to be more free thinkers here to get on board with him before we can move forward.
https://3speak.tv/user/austinsteinbart
lets see how many free thinkers downvote me ;)
First, he writes of QAnon. What is QAnon? Isn't that some fed bait fucktard stuff? Second, he needs to buy a decent microphone.
Youre listening to General Flynn too much. The truth about this matter is not going to come from any mainstream, famous figures- especially not ones with security clearances which prevents them from talking about or even acknowledging classified operations. The truth is going to come when we pry it out, and standing behind someone like Austin is one way to do that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
humor yourself and actually pay attention to him in this interview. Come back and tell me what you disagree with. and remember, this was a hit piece on him- and he still managed to maneuver it with skill.
Steinlarp is a fraud. FFS.
life itself is a live action role-play so that's not really an argument against him and what he espouses. Nobody else in the movement has a message that even comes close to Austin's (and theres a good reason for this), all you have to do is listen and pay attention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
go on buddy, give it a try.
Steinlarp is a FRAUD. What part of that do you not understand? Q even said so FFS.
Why exactly is he a fraud? Do you have anything to back up that claim? Why did Q give Austin two proofs? Are you aware of the the Above&Beyond proof? Is everything that Q says the gospel to you? Where is your discernment? Is disinformation necessary? When do you start thinking for yourself? If Q told you not to trust president trump, would you obey or would you think for yourself? Is Q your master? Did Q say to trust sessions? To trust Barr?
You're one of those Steintards. How unfortunate for you. Q NEVER gave shit to that felon.
BTW, what media company do you work for?
Hmmmm. I don't really think that the one's on board with Mr S, are free thinkers.
Kinda like the sheeple that think THEY are the rational ones, who follow the science and are applying logic.
Well, yes, they are, within a tiny, winey itty bitty little locked off space, one that they cannot conceive outside of. In that little space, they imagine they are free thinkers.
Steinbart, like all conjurors, relies on your emotional defects in order to capture your attention and affection.
youre speaking in generalizations. why is that? is there something specifically you can point to that supports what youre saying? If steinbart was anonymous, would you then consider his information for evaluating? Why do you refuse to evaluate it? Is it because you dislike the messenger? Would you ignore good, pertinent information just because you dont like the source? does that make sense?
my emotions play no role in my consumption and analysis of information. Vacuum it all up, use discernment to find my truth. Truth resonates deeply within. Q should have taught you that. We dont need gatekeepers or arbiters of truth. Free thinking is about learning the truth on your own. Refusing to look into steinbart is counterproductive to learning the truth.
my position is that free thinkers are open to all source of information. There is a solid contingent of people on this sub that are vehemently opposed to speaking about, or looking into anything steinbart says. These people are behaving like the mockingbird media.
"Oy vey! dont look at that information goyim! its poison for your mind! go watch x22 and Jordan Sather to get the inside scoop and make sure to donate some shekels! shalom"
You're welcome to your position.
"Open to all sources of information" implies that all sources are equal, and that all forms of information are equal. They are not.
Information messages contain a variety of components (elements). They include the external aspect - the 'information' content - ideas, concepts, thought constructs - but they also include an internal aspect - the 'purpose' content - the intent, origin, direction and objective with which the info aspect is created and then released.
This is how seduction, deception, manipulation work. A manipulator can release factually correct information while the purpose, intent, is to swindle, deceive, ultimately, and gain an unlawful or immoral control or influence over the recipient.
Am I open to all sources of information? Absolutely not. "Open to all sources of information" is the siren song of the Satanists, the Luciferians, and their ilk. "Lucifer deserves a proper hearing, he has been improperly excluded"
This is always how the Marxists, the Communists, and their kind also operate.
This is also how shiesters, tricksters, and those whose motive, whether they know it themselves or not, are ego-centered, selfish, and driven by a selfish purpose.
Curious that you chose to descend into mockery, attack, and a money-driven projection in order to drive your point home. Curious indeed.
Curious that you opt for the victim mentality. "Vehemently opposed"? You give yourself far too much importance here.
The truth is: There is a solid contingent in GAW who don't give a crap about AS, and who know shills and bulldust when they see it.
im not going to waste much debating with you because youre clearly not arguing in good faith. nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. so lets try this a different way-
Austin steinbart has put out tons of factual information with sources to back it up
there are a lot of people on GAW that will try to convince you not to look at that information
the reasons they give for that position are weak eg "you might be manipulated emotionally, like the satanists and communists do to people using the truth!"
other people who provide no proprietary information, incorrect decodes, useless prognistication (like praying medic, Jordan Sather, x22, dustin nemos) do not experience the same objection from the people against steinbart even though they all have a financial stake in what they do and Austin does not (didnt q post about people profiting off this movement?)
My humor is an attempt to make people see this. "Ignore the guy giving free, provable information so you can donate to some people who give you nothing!"
what victim mentality? this comment thread is proof of what im saying. Any time anyone mentions Austin steinbart, theres a flood of downvotes and comments warning people he's a larp & to stay away. Strangely enough, none of these comments will touch on the information he shares, and if I attempt to initiate a dialogue with them about it, they ignore/deflect and tell me something about victim mentality. sound familiar?
What is Delta 6? What was McCains role in D6? Does US intelligence traffic drugs and children? Do they use the southern border? What corridor do they use in Yuma? What is the purpose of the Wall? What is MI6? What is the Treaty of Tordesillas? What does this have to do with the Queen Elizabeth? What is House Of Wettin?
I appreciate that. Let me know when you're finished?
Wait. Was I arguing with you? I don't think so. I was responding to your comment.
I have no interest in arguing this issue or any other for that matter.
Was I responding in good faith? What's YOUR definition of "good faith"? I responded in good faith - honestly, based on my own views, no intent to manipulate.
I've spent some time looking at Mr Steinbart. I'll do a heavy pass.
I do not spend my time attempting to convince people to "not look at that information". People can do what they want. If you have an issue with others trying to "convince others to not looking at ...", I suggest you take it up with them.
See 2 above. I have no interest in trying to "convince people to not look at ...." If you are somehow conflating my response with your assertion that some people (?) try to convince others not to look (?) because "you might be manipulated emotionally...", well, I appreciate that, because its a straight forward confirmation of my original evaluation of where you are coming from.
If in fact you somehow raised your point 3. in reference to MY comments, well, without being condescending, I have to say, you've 100% misinterpreted my comments.
But to make it clear: I have no interest in AS or in pursuing what AS offers, because I am already convinced from what I DO know that he is full of BS, or that whatever he's selling, frankly, I'm not interested.
You are complaining again, and drawing comparisons that do not enhance your argument, but which undermine it. Grow up.
No comment.
"What victim mentality?" Ah, OK. Hey, its been ok.
I know that you simply cannot see it, but your neediness, your attachment, and your emotionally distorted energy comes through like a loudspeaker. I do hope you find your way.
I doubt you know much about him. Cheers.
Yep. But as much as I want.
Cheers to you, too.
"There needs to be more freethinkers to follow this other person over there"
Do you not understand what a freethinker actually is?
its someone who is open to all sources of information. Message over messenger. Most people here are unwilling to listen to him because they disapprove of the message. Shame because his message is far better than anything coming from any other supposed Q influence or politician for that matter. Watch one of his recent interviews, and actually pay attention. try this one with will Sommer, which was designed as a hit piece and watch how Austin redpills on video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDT1uuLghk
tell me what you disagree with that he says ;)