Indeed. Everyone here knows George Soros. Does everyone here know Sheldon Adelson? Why is it Zionists fund both sides? Adelson so badly wanted to move the embassy to Jerusalem, why? Its all about prophecies with these people. They subvert the world and then say "oh look a prophecy came true - see, we really are God's chosen!".
How much money has Trump taken from Adelson? Who bailed him out when he went bankrupt? Who is Roy Cohn?
You're watching a movie. The real question is..
Who's movie are you actually watching?
Just a friendly reminder - that Kushner's Dad owned building 666 in Manhattan... just saying. And that 666 was LOUDLY displayed on the corner of that building - a little weird... and LUCENT technologies was in that building as well... just sayin'...
Bannon chat gets hammered by people obviously posting antisemitic materials specifically to impugn certain communities of patriotic individuals. Likely part of someone's playbook / tactics to get people blocked / interfere with free speech. It's so fucking obvious.
Yes handshake I can say without a doubt as soon as you talk stalking your “oh muh gerd it’s the Joo’s” I can speak for GAW and tell you to get the fuck outta here with your bigoted faggotry.
This was brought about on TheDonald subreddit and explored in depth.
You’re just parroting Clinton talking points about Trump pre-election. Most of these have been answered albeit some unanswerable.
Did you also know Trump donated to Clinton and many other Dem politicians over the decades? HE MUST BE A DEMOCRAT! We must explore this in depth!
See? You have nothing new to add handshake. This has been covered by us first and many times by shills acting like they’re the bringer of new information.
I love people who believe "scientists are all noble and good!" Think back to 1950's sci-fi, most of their scientists were straight up evil or at least untrustworthy. Now, after decades of Hollywood programming the public thinks certain career fields will never have evil people in them. Evil people are in every job, every industry. That why laws / decisions that have been handed 100% to the medical community are so terrifying.
The question of the OP was concerning Musk. How did this thread degrade into some old taking points in a completely different direction? To bring it back to the original question, I for one will say I don't trust Musk. He speaks like the frontman for an agenda backed by others. He is onboard with the agenda for the most part but has moments where his own thoughts on the matter come through - or it could all be just disinformation to make some based people think he is really on their side. So much in his life speaks that he is no different than the rest. You will know a tree by its fruit. He is heavily invested in neuralink tech and has previously stated we need to be upgraded in order to compete with AI - transhumanism.
His AI transhumanism crap is what makes me not trust him over anything else. Anyone who wants to put chips in our brains and make us be like computers is bad news bears. I know it’s probably a tad more complicated than that but he lost me at “microchip in the brain”. 🤷🏼♀️
I am right there with you. I know some people almost worship the ground he walks on, especially the younger crypto crowd. But like you, when he started down the neuralink transhuman trail, that is when he completely lost me. Then again, I was never a fan to begin with and never really trusted him. Some really unsettling stuff for sure
Yes indeedy. If I say this about him I get the Boomer insults which is so REEE. Nobody says much about The Boring Co either? I’d LOVE to see a rundown of all those contracts & where (his) tunnels went.
No kidding. Back in the days of VOAT we had a few goats looking into the tunnels. Lots of crap there for sure. He is not a clean as some think. Actually, he is pretty weird.
Exactly. The fruit that man has produced is questionable for sure - that is if he really is a man. Sometimes I wonder. Like Zuk, he doesn't look right.
No one is censoring here. Nothing wrong with debating the value or lack thereof of a particular speaker, group or topic. That's literally letting everyone speak.
me? Not a fan of Stew P, and I do not give him credibility. Guests he engages may or may not have credibility, regardless of who he is, imo.
The interesting thing about some of the prominent voices who have emerged out of nowhere is that any time questions are raised about the dubious nature of these people, their followers consistently provide a toxic response thus providing further demonstration that these voices are not really part of our movement.
You're a pseud lad, I don't know Stew Peters or care to but when you frame things as "party 1 credibility means party 2 is/not credible" without any consideration to the information being transmitted then you're a mong, it's quite literally a junior high logical fallacy.
Tens of millions of people believe Joe Rogan is a fool, does that make whatever Dr happens to be on his show an automatic retard. Also "Part of our movement", who is "our" mate?
For a prof, he's fucking retarded dumb. Everyone knows it isn't the CCP who approves Nobel Prize awards.
I do have questions about this. I don’t trust Kushner
Indeed. Everyone here knows George Soros. Does everyone here know Sheldon Adelson? Why is it Zionists fund both sides? Adelson so badly wanted to move the embassy to Jerusalem, why? Its all about prophecies with these people. They subvert the world and then say "oh look a prophecy came true - see, we really are God's chosen!".
How much money has Trump taken from Adelson? Who bailed him out when he went bankrupt? Who is Roy Cohn?
You're watching a movie. The real question is.. Who's movie are you actually watching?
Well, Sheldon Adelson is dead for starters. And two, i recall that Trump pissed off Adelson as well.
Well the whole thing could be a DS civil war. They have their own factions…
Just a friendly reminder - that Kushner's Dad owned building 666 in Manhattan... just saying. And that 666 was LOUDLY displayed on the corner of that building - a little weird... and LUCENT technologies was in that building as well... just sayin'...
His dad..not kushner. Bibi slept in kushners bed when he came visiting when kushner was a kid. According tovmeganon...
Fuck off handshake.
Sorry handshake we here at GAW don’t get triggered. We just call it like we see it.
Bannon chat gets hammered by people obviously posting antisemitic materials specifically to impugn certain communities of patriotic individuals. Likely part of someone's playbook / tactics to get people blocked / interfere with free speech. It's so fucking obvious.
I know right! Instead of contending with facts that are glaring at your face just call people a nazi and get it over with.
Not a Nazi...more like glowie
No one called anyone a Nazi.
Yes handshake I can say without a doubt as soon as you talk stalking your “oh muh gerd it’s the Joo’s” I can speak for GAW and tell you to get the fuck outta here with your bigoted faggotry.
Uh huh, it's just a cabal that happens to be 95% Jewish.
No but you’re 5 - 6 years late kid.
This was brought about on TheDonald subreddit and explored in depth.
You’re just parroting Clinton talking points about Trump pre-election. Most of these have been answered albeit some unanswerable.
Did you also know Trump donated to Clinton and many other Dem politicians over the decades? HE MUST BE A DEMOCRAT! We must explore this in depth!
See? You have nothing new to add handshake. This has been covered by us first and many times by shills acting like they’re the bringer of new information.
Who owned it prior? Why was it purchased when it was?
This is old news, shill.
I suppose Arizona Wilder or Fritz Springmeier are deepstate as well. They were part of the cabal admittedly so.
What about Jesus? He was Jewish as well.
Are all jews zionists?
Not the Chosen One, Jesus. Rather as he said, "The synagogue of Satan" ones seem to be behind a lot of dark ops.
Didn't he change the address as soon as he bought it?
I love people who believe "scientists are all noble and good!" Think back to 1950's sci-fi, most of their scientists were straight up evil or at least untrustworthy. Now, after decades of Hollywood programming the public thinks certain career fields will never have evil people in them. Evil people are in every job, every industry. That why laws / decisions that have been handed 100% to the medical community are so terrifying.
I blame Star Trek - made people think all this trick-nology would be wonderful and everyone wielding it would be so admirable.
The question of the OP was concerning Musk. How did this thread degrade into some old taking points in a completely different direction? To bring it back to the original question, I for one will say I don't trust Musk. He speaks like the frontman for an agenda backed by others. He is onboard with the agenda for the most part but has moments where his own thoughts on the matter come through - or it could all be just disinformation to make some based people think he is really on their side. So much in his life speaks that he is no different than the rest. You will know a tree by its fruit. He is heavily invested in neuralink tech and has previously stated we need to be upgraded in order to compete with AI - transhumanism.
I don't trust him either. I dont think hes a white hat at all, but it sure is funny when he talks shit on twitter.
But of course, he does this so we like him.
True that.
His AI transhumanism crap is what makes me not trust him over anything else. Anyone who wants to put chips in our brains and make us be like computers is bad news bears. I know it’s probably a tad more complicated than that but he lost me at “microchip in the brain”. 🤷🏼♀️
I am right there with you. I know some people almost worship the ground he walks on, especially the younger crypto crowd. But like you, when he started down the neuralink transhuman trail, that is when he completely lost me. Then again, I was never a fan to begin with and never really trusted him. Some really unsettling stuff for sure
Yes indeedy. If I say this about him I get the Boomer insults which is so REEE. Nobody says much about The Boring Co either? I’d LOVE to see a rundown of all those contracts & where (his) tunnels went.
No kidding. Back in the days of VOAT we had a few goats looking into the tunnels. Lots of crap there for sure. He is not a clean as some think. Actually, he is pretty weird.
Oh yeah. Just look at his “ex” who he’s not really estranged from. And who TF names their child like some Borg???
Exactly. The fruit that man has produced is questionable for sure - that is if he really is a man. Sometimes I wonder. Like Zuk, he doesn't look right.
I hear he’s quite the toxic Boss too? 🤡 🌏
Look at his parents
Seriously - I don't trust transhumanists AT ALL.
SMART
Well, that explains how Musk got with Grimes. Grimes was his handler. That evil cunt!
Disgusting, vile cretins to be sure!
Oof. I find the lack of DecodingSymbol Comms readers in this entire thread, disturbing.
https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Charles+M.+Lieber&sort=new
Have these nano wires been seen and/or discussed by anyone credible (IMHO Stew Peters is not credible)?
Stew Peters is the host. Credibility is based on the guest who comes on his show.
Credible hosts bring on credible guests.
It is damaging to make claims that cannot be backed up or reproduced though.
No one is censoring here. Nothing wrong with debating the value or lack thereof of a particular speaker, group or topic. That's literally letting everyone speak.
me? Not a fan of Stew P, and I do not give him credibility. Guests he engages may or may not have credibility, regardless of who he is, imo.
What a spectacularly retarded take, I take it you never did a junior years workshop on critical thinking.
The interesting thing about some of the prominent voices who have emerged out of nowhere is that any time questions are raised about the dubious nature of these people, their followers consistently provide a toxic response thus providing further demonstration that these voices are not really part of our movement.
You're a pseud lad, I don't know Stew Peters or care to but when you frame things as "party 1 credibility means party 2 is/not credible" without any consideration to the information being transmitted then you're a mong, it's quite literally a junior high logical fallacy.
Tens of millions of people believe Joe Rogan is a fool, does that make whatever Dr happens to be on his show an automatic retard. Also "Part of our movement", who is "our" mate?
Anyone have trouble watching this? My connection keeps dropping and I have to keep re-loading. Odd.