Rhodes is a subvert. He started the infighting at Bundy Ranch. The Oathkeepers and Mountain Militia drew down on eachother and almost had a gun-fight on the ranch. Ammon and his guys never fully got a grip on the situation after that.
That’s my take as well. The FIBbies are pretty simple to track when we get down to it.
I’ve had many encounters and what makes it more obvious is when they are not taken in regularly. The FBI, in my experience, doesn’t casually sit back and observe. They are very weighty and tend to lean and make themselves known. One of my sources is a guy with autism and without giving too much away they couldn’t find a way to intimidate him that he would notice so they finally literally called his landlord and had him evicted to exert their pressure tactics. They also have made themselves known to me many times - first when I was in middle school. They literally pulled me out of class to speak to me. That wasn’t a negative interaction - it just did show me they were willing to do a lot to make it known they were around.
I don't see these subpoenas as a bombshell if they are to testify before a house committee consisting of anti Trump democrats and two turncoat republicans. Testimony is shaped by questions and you will not get an honest question from anyone on this committee.
That was my first thought, too. But his is not issued by the house unselect committee. This subpoena is issued by the defense team of an oathkeeper who is currently being prosecuted by the feds for allegedly inciting violence at the Jan 6 rally. Check the article for more details. Looks like good news to me.
I know not to comment without reading the article but failed to do so this time. Thanks for doing what I should have done and bringing the information to this forum. Having now read the article, I agree with you in that this could very well be good news.
"I don't recall. I don't recall. I don't recall." or "I plead the fifth, I plead the fifth, I plead the fifth." or maybe even a mixture of both.
You forgot "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
"What difference, at this point, does it make?"
Isn’t Rhodes FBI?
Aren't they all?
FIBbie whack-a-mole!!!
Rhodes is a subvert. He started the infighting at Bundy Ranch. The Oathkeepers and Mountain Militia drew down on eachother and almost had a gun-fight on the ranch. Ammon and his guys never fully got a grip on the situation after that.
Wherever Rhodes is at, there is a set-up coming.
That’s my take as well. The FIBbies are pretty simple to track when we get down to it.
I’ve had many encounters and what makes it more obvious is when they are not taken in regularly. The FBI, in my experience, doesn’t casually sit back and observe. They are very weighty and tend to lean and make themselves known. One of my sources is a guy with autism and without giving too much away they couldn’t find a way to intimidate him that he would notice so they finally literally called his landlord and had him evicted to exert their pressure tactics. They also have made themselves known to me many times - first when I was in middle school. They literally pulled me out of class to speak to me. That wasn’t a negative interaction - it just did show me they were willing to do a lot to make it known they were around.
Yes, I've seen it and heard it so many times. How could I not remember the full sentence? Thanks for the correction.
There's Bad Ass Shit Kickin mother fuckers with tats to remember that day, out with a vengeance for decisions that were made that day... damn
This silent war (infiltration) has taken many lives. Not counting the vaxx.
Define the word "is"
That was the day we should have scrapped our entire legal structure
Or he'll commit perjury
Ray Epps is a traitor and sold us out. What a sorry sack of crap.
True
I got the 17 on that one!
I don't see these subpoenas as a bombshell if they are to testify before a house committee consisting of anti Trump democrats and two turncoat republicans. Testimony is shaped by questions and you will not get an honest question from anyone on this committee.
That was my first thought, too. But his is not issued by the house unselect committee. This subpoena is issued by the defense team of an oathkeeper who is currently being prosecuted by the feds for allegedly inciting violence at the Jan 6 rally. Check the article for more details. Looks like good news to me.
I know not to comment without reading the article but failed to do so this time. Thanks for doing what I should have done and bringing the information to this forum. Having now read the article, I agree with you in that this could very well be good news.
It happens. At least it wasn't stuck halfway through a 45-minute video!
“Ray Epps was a traitor, and sold us out” was he known before all of this?
They will quash the subpoenas declaring "state secrets". Never gonna happen.
They'll try. Let's hope the time for cynicism is over...
John Sullivan took the money shot of the staged Ashlie Babbit shooting.
Is Ashley dead?
Was she ever alive?
Yes
We came we saw he's Dead oh shit wrong Country. Hmm if that Fucker wins we all Hang!
Is this a different case ... oath keepers case not insurrection?
Would this providee sweet discovery for the ashli babbit incident too?
Isn't John sullivan who was only feet From Ashli Babbitt the son of one Judge Emmet Sullivan?
The Oath Keepers has feds in it.
I wonder if the Feds have oath keepers in it?
Look at what has gone on the last 5 years. Reconcile
KEK!