Same here. Its easy. Calc out the fibonacci sequence out to 72 ‘steps’/‘periods’/‘generations’. Digit sum each number. U find they repeat every 24 steps. The if u stack the first second and third 8ths and sum down, then digit sum … u get either 3,6, or 9. When u digitsum across … you get 9 for each one. Tesla said 3,6,9 are gods numbers.
The last number for each step repeats every 60 steps. Thats insane.
Fibonacci is how u get Phi number 1.618033.
This is the ratio/rate at which the systems inside of all living things “expand”. Thats why a trees branches bottom to top look like animal lungs
Go forth, be fruitful, and multiply. God gave plants, animals, and humans this command and empowered them to do so through their relative relationships. This applies to everything. So go forth and be fruitful in your relationships, your work, and build the body of Christ. Don’t be the guy who goes and buries God’s investment in you. It didn’t work out to well for that guy. Remember what Jesus did to the fig tree that bore no fruit. He cursed it and it withered and died. I’m sure that tree looked healthy and fine but it got caught with no fruit. This is not to say works can save you but you will be known by how your will aligns with God’s. You must die to live. God bless you all and walk close with Jesus.
"Having an invisible friend" is something that a surprising number of children go through, and I didn't mean to lever that fact into implying that logically it is therefore childish to believe in god. Was not trying to be disrespectful; I just like to talk about things I don''t understand.
It's ramadan; my muslim friends believe in allah and I don't. I assume you don't either. So what I am getting at is please explain why you would like me to share your belief but not that of the muslims?
Good question! I'm not sure,but the student would most likely be tangling with the science and research Stephen Hawking has done, not Hawking himself, per se.
Wasn't he also a notorious piece of shit? I forget which famous smart people are and aren't these days. They green lit a movie about him and his wife and that almost always means revising history using pedowood.
I've never seen Stephen Hawking, I don't believe he exists.
"B-but he's written books!"
Oh yeah? How?
"He dictates to people, and they write down what he says!"
It could just as easily be someone writing their own books and attributing it to Professor Hawking.
Hawking has never written a single word. People only write in his name.
So how do we know he exists?
"B-b-but Stephen Hawking has appeared on film!"
Could just as easily be a random cripple they hooked a TTS to the chair of.
I can set up a sound stage, and have a guy come out dressed as Jesus to validate the Bible, and you wouldn't accept that as evidence. Why should I accept that Hawking is just some cripple in a wheelchair that's somehow superintelligent?
He had a long history in academics and the sciences before he was ever confined to a wheelchair. So he has a history of being brilliant long before his health went really downhill. And he wrote books and papers by using a computer that would track his eye movements near the end of his life, and could then pick out the letters he was tracking with his eyes.
Your line of logic could be essentially said about anything you don't strictly see occur with your own eyes and ears, so basically everything in existence except the room you're currently in. It makes for a pretty weak argument on the whole.
Funny how Hawking never came across or mentioned the probability of the universe creating itself out of nothing by itself is: 10^10^123 power. There's so many zeroes it's actually impossible to get to the end of them.
Kek. So wrong but so funny only because hawking is an absolute ass. Tyson too. I'm actually convinced those guys aren't really intelligent and they are just propped up completely. You can't be as intelligent as they supposedly are yet say or post the stupid shit some of them have said over the years.
Same here. Its easy. Calc out the fibonacci sequence out to 72 ‘steps’/‘periods’/‘generations’. Digit sum each number. U find they repeat every 24 steps. The if u stack the first second and third 8ths and sum down, then digit sum … u get either 3,6, or 9. When u digitsum across … you get 9 for each one. Tesla said 3,6,9 are gods numbers.
The last number for each step repeats every 60 steps. Thats insane.
Fibonacci is how u get Phi number 1.618033.
This is the ratio/rate at which the systems inside of all living things “expand”. Thats why a trees branches bottom to top look like animal lungs
Go forth, be fruitful, and multiply. God gave plants, animals, and humans this command and empowered them to do so through their relative relationships. This applies to everything. So go forth and be fruitful in your relationships, your work, and build the body of Christ. Don’t be the guy who goes and buries God’s investment in you. It didn’t work out to well for that guy. Remember what Jesus did to the fig tree that bore no fruit. He cursed it and it withered and died. I’m sure that tree looked healthy and fine but it got caught with no fruit. This is not to say works can save you but you will be known by how your will aligns with God’s. You must die to live. God bless you all and walk close with Jesus.
I'd imagine arteries and blood vessels in general have a similar shape for the same reason.
Does mold grow in similar sequence as well? I'm curious.
how about sharing the way to prove God exists mathematically
Why do you assume that people who decline to believe in your Invisible Friend are "liberals"?
"Having an invisible friend" is something that a surprising number of children go through, and I didn't mean to lever that fact into implying that logically it is therefore childish to believe in god. Was not trying to be disrespectful; I just like to talk about things I don''t understand.
It's ramadan; my muslim friends believe in allah and I don't. I assume you don't either. So what I am getting at is please explain why you would like me to share your belief but not that of the muslims?
I'm listening
mathimatically?
are you sure thats hawkins or the dude that leans the wrong way that replaced him years ago
Good question! I'm not sure,but the student would most likely be tangling with the science and research Stephen Hawking has done, not Hawking himself, per se.
Especially since Hawking is dead...
How many years ago? Coz he's been dead atleast a few of them up to now
a number of years ago
they ran alot of scientific scams thru his presense being rolled out on the public stage
That's definitely sad & unfortunate...
most assuredly but before wide internet use these tricks were very easy to pull off
Wasn't he also a notorious piece of shit? I forget which famous smart people are and aren't these days. They green lit a movie about him and his wife and that almost always means revising history using pedowood.
I've never seen Stephen Hawking, I don't believe he exists.
Oh yeah? How?
It could just as easily be someone writing their own books and attributing it to Professor Hawking.
Hawking has never written a single word. People only write in his name.
So how do we know he exists?
Could just as easily be a random cripple they hooked a TTS to the chair of.
I can set up a sound stage, and have a guy come out dressed as Jesus to validate the Bible, and you wouldn't accept that as evidence. Why should I accept that Hawking is just some cripple in a wheelchair that's somehow superintelligent?
He had a long history in academics and the sciences before he was ever confined to a wheelchair. So he has a history of being brilliant long before his health went really downhill. And he wrote books and papers by using a computer that would track his eye movements near the end of his life, and could then pick out the letters he was tracking with his eyes.
Your line of logic could be essentially said about anything you don't strictly see occur with your own eyes and ears, so basically everything in existence except the room you're currently in. It makes for a pretty weak argument on the whole.
...That's...the point.
It's a parody of atheist arguments.
🤔
by Perry Marshall
https://evo2.org/prove-god-exists/
Still not proof
Why not?
Funny how Hawking never came across or mentioned the probability of the universe creating itself out of nothing by itself is: 10^10^123 power. There's so many zeroes it's actually impossible to get to the end of them.
Shouldn’t be too hard.
https://christinprophecy.org/articles/applying-the-science-of-probability-to-the-scriptures/
Here’s a great one, by Peter Stoner
How can you disprove 'hmermermermer.'
Kek. So wrong but so funny only because hawking is an absolute ass. Tyson too. I'm actually convinced those guys aren't really intelligent and they are just propped up completely. You can't be as intelligent as they supposedly are yet say or post the stupid shit some of them have said over the years.
There is old video of him 'talking' like I typed and a 'translator' speaking in English. It would be more surprising that he wasn't propped up.
NDT is the same but worse because he could choose not to be a mouthpiece.
That's rather insulting.
Stephen Hawking has a prop. That's what made his stupid ideas seem plausible. He was an actual retard though. He had a kick ass life.