Whilst you were distracted by Boris’s trip to Kyiv, the UK Gov. quietly published data confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 92% of all Covid-19 Deaths in March
(dailyexpose.uk)
☠️ WE TRIED TO WARN YOU 💉
Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population.
But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.
I don’t wanna sound like a dick, but I will. If most of Britain is vaxed wouldnt that 92% be because almost all of Britain is vaxed. We can play with stats all day.
I’m not for the shot by no means, but making a big deal about numbers like this doesn’t seem to be a big deal.
If you look further down in the article they break it down in age groups of vax/unvax and put the rates as per 100,000 people in each group. Still much higher rates in the vaxed. Read the whole article. But you do make a good point.
I'm looking at table 14 on page 45. I see cases higher in vaxxed, but almost everything else (hospitalizations & deaths) the vaxxed are either a teensy bit better off (generally for people aged <50) or significantly better off (generally ages 50+) than unvaxxed. Personally, as someone under 50, I don't feel the improved outcomes is worth the risk, so I'm keeping my pureblood status. However, to make a big deal of this study as if the vax is causing population collapse.... well, that's not happening... yet.
And the number of cases is misleading, as the omitted footer of the table that was explains. People who are not vaccinated are also less likely to get tested when they have a sniffle so their rates are skewed very low. When things actually get bad, they show up at the hospital in higher numbers per capita.
These posts are almost always wrong because they cherry pick specific data and don't show you what you don't want to see.
The most important point, regardless, is that unvaccinated folks are going to hospital more and are dying more. That fact was omitted on purpose by the posted article, which is super misleading.
Do you have some evidence to the contrary?
The original document that is misquoted and misrepresented in this article points out several reasons why these unadjusted numbers should not be used to gauge vaccine efficiency:
I'm fine with taking a new look at data but this article wilfully omits key findings that make it look very misleading.
If anything, the unvaxxed are being forced to test more, not less.
The original document that is misquoted and misrepresented in this article points out several reasons why these unadjusted numbers should not be used to gauge vaccine efficiency:
Look, I think it is good to question wild assertions. However, even on the dodgy as fuck data that is available (which probably overstates clot-shot rates) https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=GBR
If 92% of Covid related deaths are vaxxed, then that is a heavy over-representation for a population that is only 73% fully vaxxed.
Which seems like a big deal. Given that we were told endlessly the death shots were "safe and effective". Especially as it is going to take a wall of different data and influences to save any of the sheep from poisoning themselves any more. Maybe I'm missing something as to why you are dismissing evidence that seems to increasingly align with what sane voices like McCullough and Malone were saying all the way along.
What demographic tends to be the most vaccinated? The most at-risk: the elderly and those with serious health issues. The vax did not save them as promised, so they're the ones dying. However, the data would not (yet) suggest that the vax is causing people to die from COVID at a higher rate.
Well to a certain extent that assumption might hold water to a small degree. But I think getting vaxxed is more closely related to degree of brainwashing rather than health status. Pro sports people can hardly be described as the most at risk, young people can hardly be described as most at risk - yet they are all getting vaxxed. Obviously we have no data for that, but there is equally nothing to suggest that only chronically sick people are getting vaxxed (I might be slightly going to contradict myself for a second by saying that in NZ - our corrupt govt only counts people who have been in contact with their regional medical authority in the past 12 months in their %age counts of vaccination - and you could tenuously argue that you see the Dr more often then you could be ill, but you could also have regular sports injuries, or be preggers, or be hypochondriac etc). Interesting points and I agree we need to be sure of our data and avoid the wildly unprovable assertions that libtards live for. Still I think it's hard to see over representation of death with Covid among the vaxxed as not an indication of some causation. If it was say 90% vaxxed and 90.5% death rate among vaxxed - then sure - the argument is tenuous. But the disparity is much higher. Still - I do agree on the need to be cautious and not be hyperbolic.
The big deal is that the kill shot kills.
If it's an MSM news boy position to want to represent the facts accurately, then I guess I'm an MSM news boy. You do realize that pushing bogus data just ends up making us look stupid, right
You are correct. Even the chart they show later with rates per 100,000 has important footer information and columns removed. They show more reported cases among vaccinated individuals, who are more likely to get tested, and the missing columns show higher rates of hospitalization and death among the unvaxed.
This is yet another misrepresentation of data that makes us look stupid when we try to use it.
That's only "strange" if you don't think the vaxx is poison. I do.
That's not what the data says at all.
Kiev.
Fixed it for ya. Drop the horse shit globalist speak.
Ya think he's in the bunker under the steel plant?
Who??
Boris
And what are they really dying of that they are labeling as “COVID-19”?
Couldn’t be strokes or blood clots or anything, right?
Normies shoot back with "that's because most people were vaccinated!!!"
Which is why we have to point out additionally how much of the population is fully vaxxed
Even those numbers are inflated to try to get more jabbed,
Wait!!!! Boris took a trip to Ukraine?! I'm sorry, I was too busy being distracted by Disney, "ghost gun" bans, a subway shooter, over paid athletes dropping like flies, and inflation.
Oh, and whatever lies and dumbass comments Peppermint Patty decides to vomit up and claim as truth.
Sorry.
You forgot the gas!
Lol. Me too, I was like what? I didn't know he went either.
And I was distracted wondering who is in the steel plant they are trying desperately to extract.... could it be Boris?
There's so much habbening they even had to make Gilbert Gottfreid die to clog that precious news cycle?
He died?
Hepatitis in children!? When will people wake up?
When society is destroyed or they are forced to see it.
Normies really only care about entertainment whether it’s sports, movies tv etc. That is the sad reality. When politics gets brought up they just regurgitate MSM talking points. Normies have to have their world destroyed in order for them to wake up. Unfortunately for us this process will suck but fortunately for us we can prepare.
Canadian government data was issued in past week, too. In that, triple vaxed people are FIVE times more likely than unvaxed people to die from covid.
INDEED...we tried to warn you!
Yes, indeed. Would love a good source for that if you have one handy. Here in SW Fla, since Jan, and even now, in April, Canadian snowbird friends still continue to "flee and show up" here ,a few at a time, when and if they can get out before the next "surge" is declared up there.
Go to rumble and get watch the water.
Hi, I received it in a text and don't know how to transfer to here. It is a chart with a few comments following. Source: Government of Canada Covid-19 Daily Epidemiology Update 31st Jan to 22nd Feb
Before the text comments, it says: tocaribnews.
Oh, there is a link at the bottom: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html
Thanks
It's the snake venom at work.
Be sure to get vaccinated and boosted, y'all!
Just stop. NO one here was distracted by anything.
What is the proportion of "vaccinated" in the UK? I see high percentages of "infected" people being "vaccinated" states very frequently, but unless paired with the portion of "vaccinated" people, it's not useful. If 92% of sick people were jabbed, but 92% of all people are jabbed, then we can't say that the jab makes you sick. If 97% of people were jabbed, one could almost say that the jab helps, if not for how close the numbers are.
However, the fact that so many people are still getting very sick or dying from COVID-19 IN SPITE of getting vaccinated, even triple vaxxed, is a far cry from the previously touted "95% reduction of chances of serious illness or dying from COVD-19." I've heard this quoted often enough by the media and even "medical experts". There is no way to stretch this into statistically significant reduction of serious illness even with the possible percentages you postulate.
Numbers from the original report that were not included in this article show that the vaccinated population has a lower chance of hospitalization or death than the unvaccinated population.
In other words, this article is misleading garbage.
They/re all gonna die, so don't get hung up on distinctions.
And the other 8 percent were remdisivir murders.
Did they test high for d-dimer? That's where snake venom shows up.
Tea time
Robust Protection. Nancy said so, why would she lie? Believe the sCienZe. Get your Booster(s).
Robust protection for the cabal and their plans....
We really need to stop posting this kind of stuff. These charts are all cherry picked from the linked reports, in some cases cutting off important footer information or whole columns.
For example, the "smoking gun" table that shows higher cases per 100,000 among vaccinated has a footer explaining that other statistical biases are not considered in those numbers. For example, people who have refused the shot are also less likely to get tested, so their numbers skew low. The columns omitted from that same chart show that unvaccinated individuals end up hospitalized or dead at higher rates across the board.
If it sounds too good to be true (though I'm not sure how it would be "good" if the vax is increasing covid severity), It probably isn't.