Be Afraid, Be VERY Afraid
(media.gab.com)
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Only the true zombie would believe such a stupid thing. It's like saying my dogs have been vaccinated for rabies but going to dog park is a danger because there might be some unvaccinated dogs there causing rabies to mine.
The sad thing is that many people are stupid and believe this bullshit.
Doctors know it's bullshit as well, but they stay silent out of fear of losing their job and medical license.
All over the western world, doctors have been told that if they dare to question the government narrative then they will lose their medical license.
Fraudci is still saying that everyone should get boosted to reduce the spread - ignoring the fact that the vax manufacturers admit that the vax doen't prevent infection or tranmission!
I stop listening when he pushed mask.
Not listening to a word he said.
Unfortunately, my brain dead relatives would go for the 24th jab if he recommends that.
So would some of mine, do they watch MSN_BS?
of course they do.
That is the next network that needs to go off air talk about Lying Liars who Lie!
agree.
They don't let illogic silence their opinions.
Some told me I need to follow the SCIENCE.
It's scientifically accurate... But 9nly if the vaccine destroys immune systems.
If the vaccines cause immune failures, other vaccinated people carrying illnesses will be very sick, but unvaccinated people can show no symptoms thanks to a functional immune system.
That's what these stories all imply. They can only be scientifically accurate if the assumption is vaccinated people have no immunity.
They're slowly telling vaccinated people that they can get sick from healthy people, but unvaccinated people stay healthy.
Vaxxed spreaders would be visibly sick spreaders. They can't be asymptomatic because they get sick.
Only people who are actually immune can spread something and not get it. I think that's what this is implying.
It's not even"asymptomatic spread" like they used to talk about since something like Covid has to replicate itself in the body causing inflammation and symptoms as a natural part of the reputation process. Cells have to die to make more virus, meaning symptoms. This is discussing healthy people getting unhealthy people sick, and the healthy people staying healthy, meaning it's more like having something on your hands that can't be caught by anyone with a functional immune system.
They are saying vaccinations cause "Bubble Boy" syndrome, if this is scientifically accurate. "Bubble Boy" could interact with other Bubble Boy immune compromised people safely without the bubble and not catching something because if they had anything, he'd know. They would too. They would be very sick from it.
If immune compromised gets mainstream, bubbles might become normal. It's the next step after 12 mask
So why would anybody want to get vaccinated if it just makes you more vulnerable?
As if the sheep have the mental capacity to even come to that conclusion
All their little minds go to when reading stuff like this is:
They don't think that far. They just see what the DS wants them to believe, and in true moron fashion, they believe it.
Logical.
They fail to disclose that the Author is one of the highly paid pharmaceutical shills from the University of Toronto. And former member of the so called science table, responsible for the most draconian restrictions in the world for the past 2 years. Fucker should be in jail.
Replace it with "black people" and fling the articles back.
Damn, it would super ridiculous. Most zombies would believe though. :(
It's not just articles lol
lol
I suppose technically they are correct.
If people with compromised immune systems mix with people who have a healthy immune system, then there is clearly a risk to the immuno-compromised.
It's what they don't say that's important here.
For example..
Absolute, utter bs.
The concept of jabs protecting the jabbed, REGARDLESS OF OTHERS' JAB STATUS has, AGAIN, been disregarded in favor of the same ol' fear-inducing, division-creating narrative that:
the jab and the jabbed protect OTHERS (i.e., the jab doesn't protect the jabbed),
OTHERS have the ability, duty and responsibility to protect the obedient/jabbed (by getting jabbed) and
if the unjabbed don't fulfill their duty/responsibility to get jabbed, the obedient/jabbed will suffer/die.
Only NOW, the concept of the unjabbed associating/mixing with the jabbed is being cited as a ("the") primary risk ("cause") for infections among the jabbed.
This is the sort of thing that begets violence…be vigilant.
Ummm, these people know they sound completely idiotic, right?
Trying to tear families apart with their propaganda… the price will be very high
It's surprisingly easy to do. The vaccinated will grab on to anything that "proves" the unvaxxed are harming them. They either can't or won't look at this logically because they don't want to know they are now in harm's way from being obedient sheep. Shunning family members? No problem, TV said I should.
LOL - what a crock of shit the MSM is pumping out. Here's some jaw-dropping stats captured by Lewis Herms that was published last week on the UK's own CDC-equivalent agency's website re: COVID deaths in vaxxed people vs. un-vaxxed people. In the UK's report for March 2022, the death ratio is 10-to-1 of vaxxed COVID deaths vs. un-vaxxed COVID deaths.
Lewis Herms captured some amazing data that documents the massive number of vax-induced deaths, which was very briefly posted (for 1.5 days) on the UK government's website last week. They kept moving the content around the website repeatedly so people couldn't find it and they took it down really quickly, per Herms. See his website for more detailed info at: https://freedominaction.net/proof/
In a sample size of 63 million (which is humongous - studies of merely 1,000 people make it valid) in the UK govt's "COVID deaths" March 2022 monthly report, the number of "COVID deaths" in vaxxed patients is a 10-to-1 ratio over non-vaccinated COVID patients. And the vax-related body count of people dying directly resulting from the vax alone (without even getting the 'coof' or being diagnosed with "COVID") aren't even part of these stats - these are strictly COVID-diagnosed patients that died who had been jabbed vs. non-jabbed.
In the UK's Health Security Agency's published March 2022 Report (see the chart on page 3 at: https://freedominaction.net/library/?slug=A245 ), the number of "COVID deaths" in the UK among vaxxed patients within 60 day of taking the kill shot(s) was 3,736 vs. un-vaxxed "COVID deaths" totaling 321. These death toll stats reflect just a 2.5-week period (report's date range is March 9-27 of 2022) - not even a full month.
Data from all over the world showing negative efficacy for the faux-vaccine, zero evidence of asymptomatic transmission and they are still desperate to shoot everyone up with this shit. Now add in all of the documented risk and actual harm the gene therapy is causing, all for a virus that is no worse than the flu, and one should be very troubled by this illogical action accompanied by such manic urgency. It simply cannot be about disease or human health,
UK govt just published a study showing 1 in 10 covid deaths are unvaxxed.
Here comes the pressure again.
Watch how many ignorant fucktards believe this shit.
This ain't over. This is only "on pause".
It will come back.
This is how I knew the vaccine kills people
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Bk7JP7kUY
Its a cull of the stooopid.
Remember when your vaccination card was called an "IMMUNIZATION CARD", meaning you were immune to the diseases you were vaccinated against?
The 'CLOTSHOT' makes you more susceptible to Covid.
Then you shouldn’t have gotten vaccinated.
Just the opposite. Unvaccinated mixing with “vaccInated” increases health risks to unvaccinated. I am waiting for all the health care workers to get sick, die from the combo of Covid and flu shots, and pilots not being allowed to fly due to taking an EUA drug with significant risk for strokes, cardiac issues and clots. Both areas, health and airline industry, will be decimated.
Isn't this just comms reminding [them] that are TRIPLE boosted, COV-ID positive, and grateful that [their] circumstances (aka symptoms) could worsen if they continue to mingle with [their] "unvaxed" and presumably "ungrateful" 33 peers.
sadly, people will believe this shit!
How? How is that even possible? If the unvaxxed are carrying the Coof, but don't know it, and are asymptomatic, then that would mean we're all immune.
The real threat as ALWAYS, the underlying agenda for the kill shot.
They are relentless and will not stop, until WE stop them.
Ramping up the narrative to let people know they have "places" for the recalcitrant purebloods. Where will they put us, we who are now so "dangerous" to the quadruply vaxxed??
The real threat comes from the NIH, CDC and FDA and those others involved planning the next plandemic. This nonsense is to create a blame game that points the blame at those who refuse to be voluntarily targeted for extermination rather than than the true cause.
Maybe I missed it but one important thing was not mentioned in the comments. This was not a real study as people would imagine it. It was a computer model. For those who don't know what computer models are, they are basically:
Some dude wants a certain outcome so he keeps tweaking the parameters of the model and keeps running it until he gets the outcomes he wants.
Two things to consider:
Multiple real world studies show that the vaccinated are more likely to be super-spreaders. This contradicts this so-called model based study. The question is then, do we live in reality or the computer model of some hack?
In Ontario Canada, they based locking everyone in their houses on multiple "independent" computer models. When all was said and done, every single so-called "independent" computer model over-estimated COVID infections and deaths. How could all of these models actually be independent if not a single one of these models was even close to reality or underestimated the COVID infections and deaths. With actual multiple independent models you would actually expect some to be over and some to be under. By the way, that's also how "climate change" is real, in computer models which are also constantly wrong and only in one direction (the models always over-estimate the amount of climate change and they always some excuse as to why that is such as the oceans are absorbing more heat than anticipated).
What they don't say is that the risk increase is only because they are being exposed to a larger pool of potentially infected people. It's like saying going to the beach increases your risk of getting wet.