Crouching on a rooftop and firing military style? False Flag by a Fed confirmed?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Ukrainian imports, we send them money, they send mass murders.
Ukrainian [nazis] trained by US CIA.
Absolutely
I mean, nothing would surprise me at this point.
The fact that he is still at large leads me to believe that it was an inside job. Cops are everywhere during parades, especially in Illinois.
Just circumstantial, I realize...
Right, I was wondering where the cops were when this was happening.
But they found the high powered rifle!
Reminds me of what triggered the Maidan revolution in Ukraine in 2014…
Maybe that's their intention. Or maybe to make the day of independence one to be feared. I think they underestimate the willpower of the American people
((They)) are this stupid.
I’d also like to add incredibly wealthy. Both HP and Deerfield are where Chicagoland sports starts build their estates along with Drs and executives.
They need a civil war to open the gate to the great reset
just like the shat obama pulled off in the u kraine back in 2014
The argument that “firing while crouching confirms this is a fed” seems to suggest that the only competent shooters in the United States work for the federal government.
That would make the 2nd Amendment little more than a superficial courtesy. “Don’t worry, let them have the guns. No civilian has anywhere near the training or competency of a federal employee. They don’t even crouch while shooting a rifle.”
I’m not saying it’s impossible it’s a fed, but I wouldn’t say it’s “confirmed” based on the fact that this American knows how to shoot properly.
I simplified my argument to make a headline, so I’ll expand what my perspective on this here.
A « shooter on the roof » has been reported in multiple mass shootings in American history by witnesses, only to be brushed aside as conspiracy by federal investigative agencies.
Columbine reportedly had shooters on the roof. Shooters in the roof were reported for the Vegas massacre and Uvalde as well.
I merely meant there’s a very distinct pattern to these events, and that pattern needs to be examined. I lived through an hours long SWAT shootout with an ex-military member who snapped; despite shooting at people through his windows, for hours, nobody was injured or killed, and he didn’t magically descend his stairs into the ether.
We also should consider the fact Antifa was actively attempting to plan #FucktheFourth violence this weekend on discord and other channels.
As a personal aside, I have neighbors who specialized in base defense for the Army. They’ve previously told me tactical things such as shooting people from a roof are rarely accomplished by normal citizens, especially if they’re somehow able to flee down from a roof without getting caught by someone.
Upvoted.
This makes so much sense.
I can definitely agree with the take that information about these situations is often unreliable while in-progress.
I can think of innocuous reasons why this keeps happening, though. In the panic of a shooting, and with limited information, I can’t really blame officials for putting out anything that might conceivably help people on the ground avoid getting shot.
Maybe shooters being on the roof is over-reported. But if there is any evidence it could be true, warning people to get indoors and out of the open isn’t unwise advice.
In general, I expect officials to err on the side of caution until the shooting actually stops and there is a reasonable belief it won’t be restarted.
So in other words, even though I agree we should be skeptical of any details for a while, I am also think there are reasonable excuses for assuming the worst about lethal situations and making these kinds of mistakes, when they do happen.
I don’t think it necessarily requires malice for this potential error to occur, even if I accept the possibility of malice. So the only word I’m really questioning here, in light of your explanation, is the word “confirms.”
I’d wait a bit before using that word, is all.
Ah, I understand what you mean. I had hoped my use of question marks would’ve made it clear enough that I was asking more than asserting confirmation.
No problem. Your follow-up made your point clearer.
Sure seems like a lot of CIA/FBI plants across this country are coming out of the woodwork. Would make sense as we were told it was impossible to be cleaned.
Between this and Akron happening the same weekend, it seems some desperation is coming to the surface.
White man bad as orange man reeeeeeeee
Long hair -> wig (takes it off, he blends) Military stance -> black ops (Obama style) Age range 18-20 - > a 25 yr old can pass if wearing long hair.
This has Obama and his Soros money all over it.
No More Muslim Brotherhood.
Doesn't necessarily have to be a fed agent. Could be a mental Vet who was pushed to the brink by the Clowns. Which is more than likely what took place.
Almost one in the same as both are for purpose of overthrowing our country
Ah, a PoS "Helper" for the "Lone Shooter" narrative per the Deep State playbook.
No doubt has ties to the fbi and hates Trump. Msm narrative change will come fast.
Thats a "where's Waldo" outfit and he still sticks out Like a sore thumb in that crowd. Dude is a mess and MAGA doesn't party with a body looking like antifa soi Boi with tattoos on face type of trash. Guy is pure mkultra nutter loser commie. And since he is attacking a patriotic crowd he definitely isn't "one of us". Alphabets using this boy made obvious "trump" pics in an effort to connect him to us. The pics glow.
You glow. Nice try handshake.
Hate to judge by looks but CNN showed a mugshot of the guy and he looked gaunt with tats on his face and neck. Certainly looking like antifa.
He was smirking, too, so there's that mkultra aspect.
He's 120 pounds at 5'11". He barely could lift his arms.
💯 fucky
Probably heavy into war gaming online.
Muh white hats are in control
From the Chicago Sun:
Authorities continued to hunt late Monday afternoon for the shooter, who authorities said shortly before 5 p.m. that they had identified Robert E. “Bobby” Crimo III, 22, through “investigative leads” as a “person of interest.”