Because to these people high school is the pinnacle of life & the world is a high school cafeteria and they do what they can to feel like one of the cool crowd.
Or just applied basic risk analysis that any sane, responsible parent would do. Even the CDC's bullshit data showed that children had a better chance at getting eaten by a shark than dying of covid. On the other hand you have a fast-tracked gene therapy with no short, medium or long term safety data made by a corrupt pharm industry that has massive amounts of control over the federal government.
Pretty easy fucking decision.
And yet God knows how many parents traded an infinitesimally small risk for an utterly unknown risk.
I try to be a good Christian. I genuinely try to not have hate in my heart towards anyone. But the anger and malice I feel towards the parents that made their children get this shot knows no bounds.
While I can understand your righteous indignation towards the idiot parents, we shouldn't have hate in our hearts for these morons that just followed instructions and couldn't see the truth.
The true hate should be reserved solely for the evil perpetrators who created the entire Scamdemic, loosed the virus purposefully, filed patents for the COVID-19 vaccine years before it was released, pushed fake news story after fake news story and actively suppressed and pushed against Ivermectin and other proven, safe treatments and to fire any and all physicians who took a risk and spoke out to the public. They deserve the full fury and rage of the world. And it's coming.
Youre right, every parent tries to do whats best for their child, but its hard to discern what that is and make a fully informed decision when you are being lied to by the pharmaceutical companies, government, medical bodies and media.
Though justifiable, there is no place in this movement for hate. In the end even the cabal may repent and be saved (though not saved from justice in this world).
Love & light will win this. Hardening ones own heart does no good.
And I know parents in quantitative type professions and have given their kids the shot without much research. Holy shit if they can’t even run the numbers for their own kids...
Anyone who advocates for or pushes to vaccinate children with this is straight evil and retarded. Note that there is no "or". When it comes to children, parents (and healthcare) have an absolute and irrevocable duty instilled in them to make the correct decisions for them.
Yes, you know, you might make the wrong decision between public/private school, you might move to the wrong place and it might cost them friends or so on.
But when it comes to basic risk assessment, as you say, when the risk to children is known by many sources and studies to be incredibly small, maybe don't fucking inject them with experimental medicine that is unproven.
I protected the children still living at home, but some of my older children were pressured by their employers. We gave them ivermectin straight away, but the worry remains...
you would think so wouldn't you unfortunately these people have been programmed from birth to obey authority. Funny when they think they are rebels though.
I'm the one who downvoted you. I used to be a retard that believed false things. I have kids. I cannot wish death on children just because the parents are idiots.
And yet, I am still a crazy conspiracy theorist. However, I did save 3 kid’s lives by forbidding them from taking it. I can put into my back pocket and nobody can take that away from me.
While not an anti vaxxer per se (still a stupid socially taboo label from the party of labels) the trust in vaccinations have been sorely eroded and I will never advocate for any until such a time that independent studies are performed across the world and all sides are heard.
The scientific method readily invites criticism and contrarian findings, because a conclusion cannot truly be reached until no one can posit substantial evidence to the contrary.
What we saw with this vaccine and virus were the destruction of the livelihoods and revocation of licenses as well as threats towards any scientists' funding if they didn't "find" what they were told to "find".
That strikes a deep blow in science, and anyone who has any belief in the scientific method should be disgusted and viciously repulsed by this happening.
It was so obviously gross negligence at best followed by a cover up at all levels in a massive conspiracy, and at worst a plot to enact a depopulation scheme. Neither are acceptable standards for science.
So can i ask you, how would independent studies get the required funding and more importantly get the required materials for an experimental drug/injection? Your talking about millions of dollars and thousands/tens of thousands of doses.
This is not academia that is manufacturing these products and pharma is all interconnected. At the same time the FDA and CDC have shown their true colors.
Well, therein lies the rub, no? Science has been funded by government and private industries since basically forever.
It's only really become a problem when the government and private industry became intertwined in such a way that they realized they could profit off of each other's corruption.
Additionally, we've never really been at such a point before where elections didn't matter and world governments were so infiltrated that there was no one to stand against the narratives.
This is also why the World Health Organization is probably the biggest crime syndicate on its face; they have way more sway than they should, and affect far more countries than they should, and hold a lot of science hostage.
That's why I propose a cleansing of governments (obviously) but in the future providing funding only if research is progressing and iterative, with frequent auditing by different people.
E.g. in the smaller scale singular country scale, one year you might have an auditing team from California, and another year an auditing team from Texas, and then another an auditing team from Florida, New York, so on to ensure that research being done at these labs are meaningful and moving forward, and also to ensure that the results are as stated -- whether negative or positive.
So, in this idealistic methodology, science wouldn't follow a narrative; science would follow science.
If we had two labs who said that these vaccines were safe for example, we might have three or four labs who say they aren't. Both provide their data, showing that funding has been used in good faith to progress their research and trials, but rather than suppressing what the narrative wants suppressed (negative research that shows that the vaccines aren't safe) and threatening to revoke their funding if the research doesn't change, both sets of research retain their funding until a conclusion is reached or the program is retooled to different research because it can't be demonstrated as safe.
Additionally, as a condition of public funding, I would restrict direct communication between different labs' scientists to limit collusion and maintain the integrity of different labs.
Now on the private sector front, Big Pharma isn't the only game in the business. It's just an oligopoly supported by governments. We, as the people who should make up these governments, have to put our foot down to prevent that. No getting in bed with large pharmaceutical companies; if you're a Pfizer, or a Moderna, or a J&J, etc. then you can fund your own research and be audited for several years of trials before you can make it to market.
Medicine is so integral to society and so important for people who need it that trust and corruption cannot be afforded to this industry.
For smaller companies that require funding for generic or new medicines, funding should absolutely be strictly and carefully applied based on well documented data reviewed by different teams of people.
Additionally, another change we need to see and we need to see stick is absolutely no ownership of stocks by any sitting Congressperson or Senator or any of their family. Immediate sale of all stocks upon winning your election. Additionally, your bank income should be public record for as long as you are in office.
All of these are pretty idealist in nature, but at this point I believe in absolutely no quarter, mercy or trust; medicine is too important, and these "representatives" in name only need to be forced to adhere to the will of their constituents, instead of what they're bribed to do, and should not be able to use their position to benefit themselves in any way. The only reason they're paid is so that they can do their job without having to make ends meet.
I've read so many of these articles, but can never find a direct link to the source. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, but I've only ever seen these charts on articles without links and twitter posts without links. This one has a link but to an unconfirmed excel spreadsheet.
Very well could be true, but not enough back up for me spread it around to friends and family.
Says what, the excel spreadsheet? I want a link directly from the office of national statistics, not a link to a random excel spreadsheet claiming to be something. Like I said, it could be, but not enough for me to preach as fact.
Thanks for the link but holy shit you are annoying as fuck. Just because your life is sad doesn't mean you have to take your anger out on friends. Which is what we are, friends. Now get your shit together and control your emotions like a man.
Calm down, it appears your cycle is synced with your friends. You provided a link and are freaking the fuck out. Soak that information in for a moment.
My son was teased for being one of the only kids in his class who wasn’t vaxxed. My son, who was 9 at the time, constantly asked me why I wasn’t getting him vaxxed with this experimental shot. He told me he trusted me and I told him to tell his friends that his vax status was nobody’s business.
If a child was already interacting with the medical community because they had a medical problem, the pharm machine surely insisted they get vaxxed as a condition of continued interaction. It follows that the whole population of "kids with something already wrong with them" is vaxxed, and surely that group of people is statistically more likely to die.
I'm confused by this headline and the article. It says they admitted this is happening, but when you read the article it says they are admitting it by leaving out a data set, but they include that data set.
If reading that right, triple jabbed kids risk is 1 in 300 chance to be dead in first year from the jab, and way more likely also to die from covid too.
Since it also destroys the immune system - the year 2 stats are going to be even more horrific, esp once they add 4th 5th 6th dose and monkeypox jabs and then avian flur jabs and HIV jabs and Ebola/marburg etc.
This is the way. Although, Nuremberg was a whitewash in and of itself. Most of the perpetrators walked, had their crimes scrubbed, and came to work for the CIA, NASA, etc.
Oops. Your vaccinated child now may die. You should have listened to all the antivaxxers.
“We’d rather laugh at the conspiracy theorists”
Because to these people high school is the pinnacle of life & the world is a high school cafeteria and they do what they can to feel like one of the cool crowd.
Until…..
“High school never ends”
Or just applied basic risk analysis that any sane, responsible parent would do. Even the CDC's bullshit data showed that children had a better chance at getting eaten by a shark than dying of covid. On the other hand you have a fast-tracked gene therapy with no short, medium or long term safety data made by a corrupt pharm industry that has massive amounts of control over the federal government.
Pretty easy fucking decision.
And yet God knows how many parents traded an infinitesimally small risk for an utterly unknown risk.
I try to be a good Christian. I genuinely try to not have hate in my heart towards anyone. But the anger and malice I feel towards the parents that made their children get this shot knows no bounds.
While I can understand your righteous indignation towards the idiot parents, we shouldn't have hate in our hearts for these morons that just followed instructions and couldn't see the truth.
The true hate should be reserved solely for the evil perpetrators who created the entire Scamdemic, loosed the virus purposefully, filed patents for the COVID-19 vaccine years before it was released, pushed fake news story after fake news story and actively suppressed and pushed against Ivermectin and other proven, safe treatments and to fire any and all physicians who took a risk and spoke out to the public. They deserve the full fury and rage of the world. And it's coming.
Youre right, every parent tries to do whats best for their child, but its hard to discern what that is and make a fully informed decision when you are being lied to by the pharmaceutical companies, government, medical bodies and media.
Though justifiable, there is no place in this movement for hate. In the end even the cabal may repent and be saved (though not saved from justice in this world).
Love & light will win this. Hardening ones own heart does no good.
Amen.
And I know parents in quantitative type professions and have given their kids the shot without much research. Holy shit if they can’t even run the numbers for their own kids...
What are we as parents if we can't make the most basic decisions to protect our children? I have nothing but contempt for these people.
Anyone who advocates for or pushes to vaccinate children with this is straight evil and retarded. Note that there is no "or". When it comes to children, parents (and healthcare) have an absolute and irrevocable duty instilled in them to make the correct decisions for them.
Yes, you know, you might make the wrong decision between public/private school, you might move to the wrong place and it might cost them friends or so on.
But when it comes to basic risk assessment, as you say, when the risk to children is known by many sources and studies to be incredibly small, maybe don't fucking inject them with experimental medicine that is unproven.
I protected the children still living at home, but some of my older children were pressured by their employers. We gave them ivermectin straight away, but the worry remains...
Nothing you can do about the ones that are grown up, Sadness. You did the RIGHT thing with your children at home, and that's all you can do.
I can't help but think that "suicide weekend" will be the parents of these children who come to realize what they have done to their little ones.
you would think so wouldn't you unfortunately these people have been programmed from birth to obey authority. Funny when they think they are rebels though.
I hate to say it serves them right, but it serves them right.
I'm the one who downvoted you. I used to be a retard that believed false things. I have kids. I cannot wish death on children just because the parents are idiots.
The outcome for the child is not poetic justice.
I believe you could not be more accurate.
Jenny, your whole block is dumber thanks to your proximity to them.
This does not "serve the children right".
And yet, I am still a crazy conspiracy theorist. However, I did save 3 kid’s lives by forbidding them from taking it. I can put into my back pocket and nobody can take that away from me.
Being pureblood is the best decision one can make for a long time.
I don’t want any adult vaccines now.
While not an anti vaxxer per se (still a stupid socially taboo label from the party of labels) the trust in vaccinations have been sorely eroded and I will never advocate for any until such a time that independent studies are performed across the world and all sides are heard.
The scientific method readily invites criticism and contrarian findings, because a conclusion cannot truly be reached until no one can posit substantial evidence to the contrary.
What we saw with this vaccine and virus were the destruction of the livelihoods and revocation of licenses as well as threats towards any scientists' funding if they didn't "find" what they were told to "find".
That strikes a deep blow in science, and anyone who has any belief in the scientific method should be disgusted and viciously repulsed by this happening.
It was so obviously gross negligence at best followed by a cover up at all levels in a massive conspiracy, and at worst a plot to enact a depopulation scheme. Neither are acceptable standards for science.
So can i ask you, how would independent studies get the required funding and more importantly get the required materials for an experimental drug/injection? Your talking about millions of dollars and thousands/tens of thousands of doses.
This is not academia that is manufacturing these products and pharma is all interconnected. At the same time the FDA and CDC have shown their true colors.
Well, therein lies the rub, no? Science has been funded by government and private industries since basically forever.
It's only really become a problem when the government and private industry became intertwined in such a way that they realized they could profit off of each other's corruption.
Additionally, we've never really been at such a point before where elections didn't matter and world governments were so infiltrated that there was no one to stand against the narratives.
This is also why the World Health Organization is probably the biggest crime syndicate on its face; they have way more sway than they should, and affect far more countries than they should, and hold a lot of science hostage.
That's why I propose a cleansing of governments (obviously) but in the future providing funding only if research is progressing and iterative, with frequent auditing by different people.
E.g. in the smaller scale singular country scale, one year you might have an auditing team from California, and another year an auditing team from Texas, and then another an auditing team from Florida, New York, so on to ensure that research being done at these labs are meaningful and moving forward, and also to ensure that the results are as stated -- whether negative or positive.
So, in this idealistic methodology, science wouldn't follow a narrative; science would follow science.
If we had two labs who said that these vaccines were safe for example, we might have three or four labs who say they aren't. Both provide their data, showing that funding has been used in good faith to progress their research and trials, but rather than suppressing what the narrative wants suppressed (negative research that shows that the vaccines aren't safe) and threatening to revoke their funding if the research doesn't change, both sets of research retain their funding until a conclusion is reached or the program is retooled to different research because it can't be demonstrated as safe.
Additionally, as a condition of public funding, I would restrict direct communication between different labs' scientists to limit collusion and maintain the integrity of different labs.
Now on the private sector front, Big Pharma isn't the only game in the business. It's just an oligopoly supported by governments. We, as the people who should make up these governments, have to put our foot down to prevent that. No getting in bed with large pharmaceutical companies; if you're a Pfizer, or a Moderna, or a J&J, etc. then you can fund your own research and be audited for several years of trials before you can make it to market.
Medicine is so integral to society and so important for people who need it that trust and corruption cannot be afforded to this industry.
For smaller companies that require funding for generic or new medicines, funding should absolutely be strictly and carefully applied based on well documented data reviewed by different teams of people.
Additionally, another change we need to see and we need to see stick is absolutely no ownership of stocks by any sitting Congressperson or Senator or any of their family. Immediate sale of all stocks upon winning your election. Additionally, your bank income should be public record for as long as you are in office.
All of these are pretty idealist in nature, but at this point I believe in absolutely no quarter, mercy or trust; medicine is too important, and these "representatives" in name only need to be forced to adhere to the will of their constituents, instead of what they're bribed to do, and should not be able to use their position to benefit themselves in any way. The only reason they're paid is so that they can do their job without having to make ends meet.
I don't any for my grandkids either. I have crossed over to the anti vax side
I've read so many of these articles, but can never find a direct link to the source. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, but I've only ever seen these charts on articles without links and twitter posts without links. This one has a link but to an unconfirmed excel spreadsheet.
Very well could be true, but not enough back up for me spread it around to friends and family.
Comes from UK Office for National Statistics
https://www.ons.gov.uk/
Link from artical "Source" :
https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween1january2021and31may2022/referencetable06072022accessible.xlsx
Can't open the file - first link.
Says what, the excel spreadsheet? I want a link directly from the office of national statistics, not a link to a random excel spreadsheet claiming to be something. Like I said, it could be, but not enough for me to preach as fact.
Thanks for the link but holy shit you are annoying as fuck. Just because your life is sad doesn't mean you have to take your anger out on friends. Which is what we are, friends. Now get your shit together and control your emotions like a man.
Calm down, it appears your cycle is synced with your friends. You provided a link and are freaking the fuck out. Soak that information in for a moment.
Sorry guys, I feel like I will die soon because I got sold
check my older posts
All part of the plan. Push for poison. Then pretend you didn’t know, push just a touch of the truth.
Truly terrifying. God help those children!
This is so very sad.
My son was teased for being one of the only kids in his class who wasn’t vaxxed. My son, who was 9 at the time, constantly asked me why I wasn’t getting him vaxxed with this experimental shot. He told me he trusted me and I told him to tell his friends that his vax status was nobody’s business.
"My son was teased for being one of the only kids in his class who was un-vaxxed."
Ftfy fren
Same in my daughters 4th grade class.
Downloadable Archive:
https://files.catbox.moe/r7z11h.pdf
This is the first time I converted an entire webpage to PDF. I think it worked and I think all the images are safely embedded.
nice
This is sad. I think the parents will be so upset they will tear Fauci piece by piece.
THIS IS DEVASTATING.
Their parents haven't gotten angry yet.
Let's hope they target the right people when they DO realize who murdered their kids.
If a child was already interacting with the medical community because they had a medical problem, the pharm machine surely insisted they get vaxxed as a condition of continued interaction. It follows that the whole population of "kids with something already wrong with them" is vaxxed, and surely that group of people is statistically more likely to die.
Um…if it were 100% wouldn’t it be indefinitely?
“Your child will die 44.23 times the way things are going” is what they mean.
Shocking?
No, I don't think so.
For fucks sake.
I'm confused by this headline and the article. It says they admitted this is happening, but when you read the article it says they are admitting it by leaving out a data set, but they include that data set.
Am I missing something?
If reading that right, triple jabbed kids risk is 1 in 300 chance to be dead in first year from the jab, and way more likely also to die from covid too.
Since it also destroys the immune system - the year 2 stats are going to be even more horrific, esp once they add 4th 5th 6th dose and monkeypox jabs and then avian flur jabs and HIV jabs and Ebola/marburg etc.
This winter is going to be a slaughter.
File can't be opened.
Just part in parcel of being replaced
This is the way. Although, Nuremberg was a whitewash in and of itself. Most of the perpetrators walked, had their crimes scrubbed, and came to work for the CIA, NASA, etc.
Ah, someone who did their due diligence on the subject. Fantastic.
Yes this is 100% verifiably true and factual.
High 5, pede!
Boomstick?
:)
Groovy