The day i woke up ..... image 1
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (79)
sorted by:
It's just such a shame that all the accounting paperwork detailing the trillions in missing Pentagon budget just so happened to be exactly where the "plane" hit! What a travesty.
Luckily that section of the building had been under construction and empty. No major politicians were killed. What a lucky coincidence.
Yep. Same goes for the FBI info that was stored in WTC7.
Because it was a missile.
Missile Hitting the Pentagon on 9/11: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5O1fGmscMc
Missile Hit the Pentagon on 9/11: https://newspunch.com/white-house-rumsfeld-interview-says-missile-hit-pentagon-on-911/ Look at the bottom video.
There was most definitely a plane. Look at the pictures. There are photos of a smoldering plane engine 2 walls deep into the pentagon and debris all over the lawn. Witnesses also saw the plane on approach.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that the plane was remotely piloted or A.I. piloted. I suspect all the planes were. The highjackers probably never had control.
And then all the pieces of it vanish into thin air.
Same with flight 93 in PA. No wreckage at all
Cause ya know, the plane hit the ground so hard it travelled 1000's of feet underground! Too far to retrieve any pieces! Or something. Just stop questioning it.
Right. Then the Uruk-Hai took them underground and figured out how to create new technology to capture the humans.
Yep, it went so far underground that the Earth's core actually melted it all down. That's why we can't find it.
So what really happened to the people on that plane and the plane? Was there never really a flight, just made up people? Or did they kill the people from the flight elsewhere?
The flight landed in Cleveland.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evLYYJDMUP4
But how could they get rid of so many people without someone seeing something?
There are eyewitness reports that it offloaded in a hangar. People have come forward including passengers and it's quickly scrubbed. 93 is the most obvious of the cover up.
Except a laminated piece of paper aka passport of the terrorist
"If you can believe this" was the comment the fake news caster said when the passport was found.
In my Elrond voice: I was there, 22 years ago!
I too was there.... in the dark days of AOL.com disks
People are obviously gullible.....
Yep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QycTzwV7c
I recall the photos of the “debris”, including various parts that were identified as having come from other types of planes. Also the hole later being enlarged via explosion.
Oh exactly. You have to believe what we said. That's what happened.
Not even a pilot. An "ISIS terrorist" with 20 hours of flight school, who, specifically didn't care about learning to land.
And it would have to be the most perfect "landing" ever attempted in the history of aviation.
And today's word of the day, boys and girls is "MISSILE".
A swing and a missle! 😋😉
Kek.
missile
Lmao. Damn spell check. Yea, that's it.
Can I have “Ground effect” for 200, Alex?
I was going to ask if anyone knew how a jet that size flying that close to the ground, at that speed, would behave. I'm presuming it would totally destabilize the flight. Can any jet pilots here chime in?
I work on Navy jets, but I'm not a pilot. The ground effect would be insane at 500mph as they claim the "plane" was going. Aside from the fact the plane couldn't do that at sea level, the air under the plane would create a pancaking effect, destabilizing the plane in horrific ways. It's simply not possible.
I suspect the aircraft at that reported speed and attitude would have trouble accomplishing the strike. I don’t think it could even get that low at that trajectory. That doesn’t even account for the obstacles. I think it was a missile, if anything struck the pentagon. u/PhDinNY
Yes, I think a cruise missile is what did it. Even supposedly conservative news outlets won't talk about it, or building #7
They won’t even talk about election fraud in 2020 but they all talked about it in 2016. Depends what narrative they have to drive home.
Oh they have cameras but fed fags took all the evidence.
was it the same camera company installed the cameras at the pentagon as at the manhattan federal detention center? it would be a federal contract, right? just asking
This is the first known case of being Epsteined.
I know that area very well, my daily commute into DC for years...
We have Reagan Nat'l Airport and that plane supposedly took off from the airport, ascended high enough then flew over a very low bridge over the Potomac. Then descended quickly just yards away from the Pentagon. All by inexperienced foreign pilots. This impossible fete would have taken a highly experienced pilot.
This was most likely a missile painted as an airplane. *This photo shows missile. It says the theory is debunked. Do they think we're stupid or what? https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-cruise-missile-painted-like-american-airlines.624/
Here is a plane crash that happened over the same bridge Potomac river from the eighties as reference. The plane was heavy with ice, but you get a prospective of the bridge/Potomac area I refer to above. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlrvnHMXJIQ
Here is a map of Pentagon & Reagan Nat'l Airport for reference point. https://www.amazon.com/Washington-Downtown-Nautical-Chart-Maryland-Virginia/dp/B073FNHLW2
There is no way that was a piloted plane on 9/11. Most likely a missile or early generation drone sub-type with explosives aboard.
What's ironic is a close family member was interviewed for a contract at the Pentagon just four months prior to 9/11. Ultimately, he chose another contract at a different site. That family member had an angel sitting on his shoulder, now we look back in retrospect!
The govt covered up a plane crash out of JFK. I saw the live footage from a news chopper. It was erased from the Internet. I can pinpoint the day because a fedex truck exploded in MO.
https://www.cnn.com/2002/US/Midwest/10/29/fedex.explosion/
Metabunk is a junk site.. Mick West is a lying shill.
WTC 7 has entered the chat.
And a hole in the building that was far too small for the plane to make. With this there was no plane debris initially on the lawn until the moving trucks moved in. And even these parts didn't match the purported hijacked airplane.
I would love to see a poll taken on how many people still believe Muslim terrorists were responsible for 911. And a poll on how many believe that Lee Harvey Oswald shot President Kennedy from the 6th floor. Or that Sandy Hook children were shot by Adam Lanza. Or that Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murra building in Oklahoma. When I see justice is when I truly trust the plan.
Pentagon was a big damn hoax! And I find it interesting the hi-jackers on the planes used box cutters to the pilots cockpit/cabin. Even if they had guns, the overwhelming number of men on the planes could've easily over taken 3-4 hi-jackers! And how about the passport of one of the hijackers conveniently found a couple of blocks from the twin towers? So many anomalies it's laughable. No, it's really sad and disgusting. When I think of what that perpetrated on the American people, sometimes it brings tears to my eyes...I go through so many emotions, still; years later.
And this guy Lucky Larry who made out on the tragic deal (crime) of the century!
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Jn6iHnLc/lucky-larry-/c/
anyone got that missile pic with the airplane logo on it?
The missile was fired from underneath the bridge.
Exactly, with only an intact wing remnant present. Wasn’t it that portion of the pentagon that had papers implicating Dick Cheney and missing money?
I remember watching an interview at the time, of a guy who said he saw an ‘apache style’ helicopter near the pentagon and moments later heard what he assumed was a missile being launched. I have never been able to find that video again. I wish that I’d been archiving videos back then.
What's with the angle of approach you guys are all showing?
Are you telling me the Pentagon had nothing in the way of a disaster recovery plan or redundant data systems??? N****r please.
Power poles sheared off? I hadn't heard that before. Does anyone have a photo of what the view of the Pentagon from that side looked like before and after the "plane" hit? That alone would totally destroy the official narrative.
https://ibb.co/JH9fwkX
https://ibb.co/N1HDvmL
Check out these two images. Notice in the picture before the construction crew arives there are two tall bushes/trees in line with the flight path and another next to the building where the wings should have hit.
Notice how there is nothing to suggest wings or large plane engines did damage to the building.
Also where is the Plane?
What is the big black spot to the right of the hole?
The fact that videos of this incident have been buried is all you need to know that it wasn't as they reported.
No way to know. I'd guess scorching from fire damage.
One of the higher resolution photos posted in this thread shows that the black spot is a tree that was burned to a crisp.
I love the perfrctly straight ling of destruction of the building on the left side. A perfectly STRAIGHT LINE. in 2nd pic.
Trees and poles not touched disproved this narrative right out of the gate.
Also, the camera footage you see is interesting because the post in front of this camera has an unobstructed view of the plane, but it's missing a frame...
The plane would have to be in a "STEEP" NOSE DIVE to get past the light towers...good catch on this!!!
Planes don't nosedive at that speed, lowering the nose increases lift, that's why they come in slow and flaps down with nose up to land.
Thank you! What happened to the twin towers is still up for debate, at least for me, but you would have to be an idiot to think a commercial jet hit the pentagon! How did they get MSM to totally ignore that blatant lie?
Because the MSM is part of the blatant lie.
Why couldn't at least ONE of the people involved have spilled the beans by now, through a "deadman switch", or through just a guilty conscience? Anyone have thoughts on how all involved could continue to be silent?
If you speak up we kill your family..
There must be a few people involved who don't have family, at least family they care enough about, and if it is a dead man switch, then the threats against family members would seem to be moot.