So many Obvious Truths the BLEATERS Never Question !!🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (55)
sorted by:
Exactly this...remember the space shuttle Columbia? Debris was found all over eastern Texas and western Louisiana. If debris from space shuttles can be found then debris from crashing planes can be found and should have been found everywhere. There were no planes...
Not only was the space shuttle debris found... but they moved it all to an aircraft hangar in Florida where it could be studied. They flew the other space shuttles in to the nearby hangars so parts could be identified and they could inspect the existing shuttles while going over the wreckage of the Columbia.
There were more than just a few pieces found. In fact, the first thing that happened was the Feds moved in and cordoned off large areas for the search. They made it VERY clear that anyone who found and kept any "mementos" or tried to sell any 'pieces' they found on EBAY would have an extremely short life span. Notice that not one piece went missing?
Strange they didn't do the same for the four airplanes from 9-11.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6822772B2/en
https://www.bbva.com/en/history-of-holography/
Why the hole in Shanksville? In what way did that further the narrative? Its seems excessive. Like too much detail in a lie.
I believe it was ordered "shot down".
It attacked America's economic and military symbols. The fourth plane was meant to create the narrative of Americans fighting back in the face of impossible odds.
Ponder the absolute destruction of the industrial kitchens at Windows on the World, the large restaurant on the TOP FLOOR of the North Tower. With nothing above them but the roof, those massive pieces of kitchen equipment were pulverized to dust merely from dropping from a height onto a pile of rubble beneath them. Where did they go?
Ooh good point!
Does propane from a Coleman Stove melt the steel grill?
Hint: propane burns hotter than jet fuel
I was getting conflicting info earlier regarding burn temp of jet fuel. It ranged from below 500F to over 2000F.
Funny how all the plane parts disappeared but they found some of the hijackers passports.
And some of the "hijackers" were found alive in Saudi Arabia and they were a little confused to say the least.
You got a sauce on that? That's spicy!
See, most people trusted that many of the sites that held sources would have remained active.
Alot of that stuff might exist in personal archives.
Been awhile since I looked it up, but maybe these will help. 1st page looks like a 90s GeoCities page. https://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/evidence/worldmessenger_alive.html
https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
Hard to find the original articles.
But what about the footage of the planes hitting the buildings? I know the Pentagon and the field in Pennsylvania where not planes but, I cannot get past the footage. I am pretty sure the Pentagon was a missle and the Twin Towers (and WTC 7) were done with demolition explosives. I just cannot say that what I saw on the television live that morning when the second plane hit didn't really happen.
The plane hitting the tower was cover for the explosives, too many witnesses in downtown NYC to fake it with a missile like the Pentagon or that field in the middle of nowhere in PA. I've seen videos from different angles and I doubt they faked every video that day plus in one it looked like some explosions went off just before the plane impacted.
So, what I am wondering, if you know, what happened to the flights all the people were on that supposedly died that day? If the planes didn't hit did something else happen to them--went down somewhere remotely, or in the water? Just asking because that is a lot of people that four planes will hold.
If you notice, all the broadcasts from the MSM, their "people on the ground" were all higher-ups. No people on the scene, maybe one or two in helicopters, but all those that phoned in were higher-ups.
Not demolition New technology https://www.drjudywood.com/towers/
Planes, you say?
When evaluating data, I always leave room for doubt that 'either side' could alter footage, but I can't discount two particular clips. Keep an eye out for the 'helicopter wide shot' (with fast zoom) and the 'nose cone re-emergence'.
https://rumble.com/v1jnzw1-nine-eleven-2019-documentary-banned-on-you-tube.html
Thank you for sharing this.
A nose cone made of a metal/alloy that is harder than steel lol. Please ignore the fact that the nose cone is made out of composite for the radar, or when a single bird impacts the nose cone, it makes quite a nice dent.
Here is more detail on the allegation of fake plane footage: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
Thank you for posting this video. I have never been able to find it after initially viewing it. Great video. Not going to lose it again. No planes ever hit the towers. The fools have been fooled.
Edit: not only does Ace debunk but debunks with style. Truly entertaining video. My favorite 9/11 truth video ever.
If you hadn't noticed, this video is part of a series, and the entire series is great although this particular episode is the best of the bunch.
How does one use that website?
Hmmmm not sure what is going on there seems to be missing a plug in. Try this Andrew Johnson is a British investigator usually into space stuff but has a lot of info on 9/11 and 7/7 in the UK he has hosted Dr Judy Wood in the UK on numerous occasions. Try this video if it works https://youtu.be/7xGdu3ySXj0
Or the website and then it is half way down the landing page
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/
I watched a video 2 days ago alleging mini nukes were used to bring down Towers 1 and 2. Kinda makes sense, at least in the sense of there should have been much more debris over there. Where did it all go? You had two buildings each over 100 stories tall, that's a hell of a lot of material. Where did it all go? Oh wait, most of it turned to dust. I wonder how that happened.
planes crashed into the twin towers, however they were rigged with explosives on all the main support beams
You really expect a few hundred Americans to be scared of a few towel heads with box cutters? https://greatawakening.win/p/15JU7vwIKo/x/c/4OdhYCTy0ql?d=50
They found plane parts though.
No...
They found so many plane parts, they were still finding them 11 years later.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/part-of-9-11-planes-landing-gear-found-in-nyc-alley-near-ground-zero
Fox lol, they're controlled opposition. And that looks more like elevator parts, they use steel cable, not aircraft landing gear, those are hydraulic.
One thing that I've never seen a good explanation of was something I saw in one of the home videos made that day. You can see sections of the metal structure of a tower falling through the air and suddenly turn into wisps of dust or smoke. Solid metal disintegrated in mid-air.
Nothing the government told us about 911 made any sense. They learned on 11/22/1963 they could get away with anything they say and the people (well, some) would believe it. It is nothing more than COVERUP AGENDA.
If the Zapruder film didn't exist they could have said absolutely anything and they tried even with the film.
The Zapruder film is clumsily altered. In high def its fakery is all the more clear.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=photo+of+plane+crash&form=HDRSC2&first=1&tsc=ImageHoverTitle
Its amazing isn't it, not like these plane crashed at all.
So I didn't realize this, but is it really true that they found practically ZERO remains of any of the passengers of Flight 93? The one that crashed in a field in PA?
I recently read something like that.... Gotta go research that.....
As for the pentagon; looking through these photos here, (I just searched "9/11 aircraft wreckage PA and this was one of the top links) you can literally count on one hand the number of "aircraft parts" that show up in these pics. And you could use a hand that's had fingers amputated.....:
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/photos/rare-photos-of-9-11-pentagon-wreckage/ss-BBN9lWr#image=2
Not a single engine; not a wing; not a set of landing gear; literally 3-4 scraps of metal that could possibly be from an aircraft, I guess....
And wouldn't you know it; 2 of the 3 pieces of "aircraft wreckage" depicted here have part of the "American Airlines" name on them......isn't that CRAZY that those pieces specifically survived?
But again; there's ZERO other identifiable pieces of "aircraft wreckage" out of 30 photos..... how TAF does that happen...???
There's no way the wreckage had been cleared by the time some of these photos were taken, is there??
Does anyone have a link to the surveillance footage of the pentagon?
There's literally a fucking missile visible, or if you want to NOT believe your own eyes, there is no surveillance camera footage from the pentagon showing an aircraft flying into the pentagon.... At least none I've ever heard of.....
ETA: Yep; seems I remembered correctly about virtually zero wreckage / remains found for Flight 93 that "crashed" in PA field: https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/02/the-boeing-757-that-magically-vaporized-in-shanksville-on-9-11/
x
If that's the case, I'd like to know how they got this plane engine into the Pentagon. And we literally saw the planes hit the Towers. So there's that. I 100% believe it was an inside job, but come on. The deep state spreads stuff like this to discredit the truth movement.
Seems unlikely that anyone did, given that missiles don't generally pack jet engines.
I'd like to know what happened to 4 flight data recorders. Odd, isn't it, how not a single one survived.
I'd also like to know how the nose cone on an aluminum airframe emerges out the other side of a building with literally hundreds of steel columns.
I'd also like to know how the single most secure/surveilled building on the planet has only a single frame of video from a single camera that shows anything at all striking the building, and why it doesn't even remotely resemble a jet aircraft.
How does a jet aircraft maintain a flight path two feet off the ground without leaving a swath of destruction in its wake?
How does a plane miraculously disappear into a crevice that pre-existed the "crash" site?
Inquiring minds want to know.
The questions that need answers.
That might be the engine for an APU. The engines on a 767 are fucking huge.
No Planes on 9/11. 9/11 was 100% TV Fakery. Watch "September Clues Definitive Edition." Read more on Cluesforum.
A passenger jet aircraft CANNOT and WILL NOT fly at 450-550 knots at Sea Level. It's IMPOSSIBLE. NO ONE died in the planes. Read Dean T. Hartwell books on 9/11 Passengers. Google and Read "The 9/11 Vicsim Report". Yes, "Vicsim".
Yeah, that was awesome...
Well not exactly parts of the plane, but weren't the only identifiable objects a passport from "one of the terrorists" and someone's wedding ring?
I definitely believe 9/11 was an inside job, but this kind of stuff makes us look like loons. We've all seen numerous videos and angles of the planes hitting WTC buildings. The field and pentagon, now that is up for debate. But not WTC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRCDUlo798k
You're not seriously trying to argue that "it must be true because we saw it on TV," are you?
I will never be convinced that Flight 93 that "landed" in Shanksville, PA . I believe it was ordered shot down. Gov. cover up. Cheney probably gave the order.
I was there! 22 yeats ago.