There, I said it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (122)
sorted by:
Agreed. And NO dual citizenship. And NO offshore accounts. Heavy, heavy penalties and forfeit of office for either of the last two.
Now we're making sense.
What about Dr. Oz though? Even though he has Turkish citizenship, he was President Trump's pick for the Pennsylvania Senate. Sometimes people from outside of America are the only ones who can truly understand what makes this country great.
Sorry, I'll stick with US born citizens without any outside allegiances.
No, this is how we lose.
Q said to trust the plan. President Trump backed Dr. OZ. That is the plan. I don't know why you're here if you're not a part of this.
Oz is a master bullshitter and snake oil guzzler who has been exposed more than once. Trump's endorsement is either a mistake or Oz has something to hide. I don't know but I do know that the guy and his opinions are to be desperately avoided.
Yeah, just watch his tv show for a few weeks. If that doesn’t make you question IDK what will. Oh yeah he’s an Oprah buddy.
We all come from different walks of life. Sometimes you need a good bullshitter on the team. I don't think President Trump makes mistakes, we have to trust the plan.
And Elon Musk
Trump has made several shitty picks, one of the being Oz.
Turkey will never allow citizenship to be relinquished. Morocco does the same. And they proscribe the names a child born of Turkish/ Moroccan citizens can have. This way, they sneakily create a long arm, and can exercise influence on politics ....
Dr. Oz could renounce it though.
You want to solve 99% of our problems... ban lawyers from serving in congress or as POTUS/VP. Pass the BAR you are instantly disqualified. Problem solved.
^^^THIS^^^
Don't forget hard labor.
And I call dual citizenship 'dueling citizenship'.
James 1:8 -- A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
Could you explain double minded?
In the scriptural sense, it means to have two allegiances, one to God, one to the world, which is an internal battle that ultimately destroys a person as their is no focus in life. One cannot live correctly if you are a part time believer, and a part time. Can you continuously be a liar, a thief, a murder, adulterer and claim to live a life that strives for righteousness following Godly principles? The short answer is no as those are diametrically opposed, every decision will be compromised, granted if you earnestly stopped living the life of a thief, murderer and so forth, that is completely different. You can't follow two opposite like that without a lot of internal contention, and that will be shown in every aspect of your actions.
How would you enforce no offshore accounts without a total violation of personal privacy?
And what is the reasoning for that? No avoidance of taxes? Well taxation is theft so why would we not abolish that as well?
Not sure how but their funding needs to be 100% transparent to heck with privacy when you hold public office. Includes close family members as well. That is the ONLY way to ever have them answer to We the People. Same way I have zero concern for DiFi's privacy as she canoodles with her Chinese spy chauffer for years.
Ah I misunderstood that this was only pertaining to office holders. I agree that anyone holding public office should have to give up their financial privacy.
Here's an idea: governments have to do everything in bitcoin, that way there is 100% transparency.
You no longer get your rights if you sign up for the military - you get an alternate set of rights.
So, why do we care if the privacy of elected officials is curtailed for the public good? Or even beurecrats? This is a nation for the people, not whomever can cram the most gibs for their dynasties into the maw of the spending season.
It should be that everyone working for any level of government must stipulate all incomes, ownerships, beneficiary, or any other word meaning they gained stuff and then be required to relinquish or repatriate everything off soil as a condition of employment or being elected.
Every government employee has to do this. Disclosure of all financial ties to foreign businesses, foreign banks, ownership of foreign companies or ANY monetary gain from any source outside of the US. Anyone with a security clearance is required to disclose any contacts with ANY foreign nationals period. Our exalted office holders are not required to do any of this. Most of them could not pass a background check to even obtain a security clearance. If we want to make it a requirement that every single elected office holder must be investigated up to a TS-SCI level, this would be the way. The investigations are very thorough and polygraphs should be required every 6 months for every elected official and appointee. This is how we stop corrupt POS' from getting into office and weeding out the ones that do get there. Every single one should be required to undergo a psychological evaluation to also weed out the psychopaths and sociopaths. There are many more out there than you think. They are predominantly at the highest levels of government.
Every government employee I don't agree with. There's a certain level that it definitely has to happen - but the current ties to report are foreign. I say all finances. Everything - and not just you, anything you are in charge of or can make use of.
As for psychological profiling, it's all a crock. We all share traits that are dubious and we all have moments we give into them. The actions taken are the only judgement we should go for.
I misunderstood that this would only pertain to office holders. I agree with all of your points.