The stars are not black - They are backlit
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
ITS BLACK = Nothing Can Stop Whats Coming
ITS NOT BLACK = NCSWIC
https://youtu.be/BsZxF9BFhzM
It is obvious that they intended it to look black. Stop arguing about it. It is a Q reference and that's all we need to know right now.
Well, think about the symbolism, while a starless flag is what everyone originally sees, the stars are there, but hidden. If that starless flag represents the occupation via the Cabal, the whole shebang could easily represent "a hostile occupation is what everyone sees, but the observant see the truth of the hidden Q operation"
BINGO!!!!!
That should put it to rest lol
Should. We'll see lol
Well, that sucks.
Two more weeks! Seriously though, I still think military is in charge.
The "queen" was put to rest too.
That's what I said too but WTF is with that Q post, flag with no stars, etc
Just as an off-the-cuff thought...
Stars are pentagrams. Upside-down they represent Baphomet.
Could be comms for eliminating the satanists from all 50 states.
You're partially correct. I've seen Satanist play with star angles to claim "they aren't Satanists."
Take a look at this place: https://www.thedragonsmantle.com/
Their logo is clearly an upside down pentagram, but if you pointed it out, they'd turn the shield in their logo from 45° to 90° and say "Oh, hahaha. We get that all the time, but I assure you, this is not the case."
Anywho, the stars on the flag arent upside down, when I hang my flag properly. (Blue square in top left corner), but I like the idea you are going with. :)
I mentioned upside-down mainly because some newfags might not pick up on the connection between stars and satanism. Most people are familiar with the goat's head inside of an upside-down star.
Also, the DNC used the star in their 2020 logo:
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/02/24/dnc-2020-logo-honors-wisconsin-motto-hoan-bridge-beer-and-cheese/4856359002/
Note how they depict the star. Rotate it to the right and you have the Baphomet star, even down to the coloration that highlights the head of the goat.
Hmm, kind of like the magic shop, I pointed out too...
I believe these are both on purpose.
I believe you are correct.
The upside down pentagram, just like the upside down cross and the upside town tree of life do represent black magic, "evil" and the upright version points towards the heavens - the pentagram itself is a representation of the perfect human.
Yes, I am that deep in symbology.
Or, to paraphrase Dr. Freud, "Sometimes a cigar, is just a cigar".
Earth, Air, Fire, Water + The Fifth Element.
Pythagorean math + Solomonic Alchemy,
A quick look.over that page and it's obvious they're pretending to not be a facade of what they really are.
Still on purpose.
So they're back lit and only show white while under Trump's shadow. That sounds like a message in itself.
I can see WAPO running with this.
"They think you will follow the stars..."
u/#q953
Can we stop wasting time on analyzing "glowing gloves" and "disappearing stars" that are clearly lighting related ?
So they're backlit, and frontlit by the way.
It still doesn't address the main point. There is something covering the Stars. The fabric covering the Stars is different than the rest of the flag.
And under certain lighting conditions the Stars dimly show through the thin black fabric that's covering the Stars.
This thread is a microcosm of why the Kingdom of God is NOT a democracy
Obviously not the same flag as the one in Ohio...
This photo is from the Alaska rally. Not the Ohio rally with the screwed up/missing stars. Please pay attention.
I paid attention very well. There were also posts here and elsewhere about the Alaska rally having the same flag with the "black" stars, treating the OH and AK flags as the same flag or as the same phenomena.
I was at the Alaska rally. The stars on the flag were not the same as on the Ohio flag. We were sitting directly opposite the entrance where the flag was hanging and noticed nothing unusual about the flag. I have a picture but can't for the life of me figure out how to paste it here.
I’m losing IQ points( of the few remaining) trying to rationalize these arguments. Some time out in the fresh air would do us all good.
Kek I agree
this whole stars thing feels like a big time glowie slide.
Yes indeed that should absolutely put it to rest, unquestionably, indisputably…. Sort of. In a focused, forelit pic, The stitching and bunching of the fabric of the field of stars clearly indicate, this is not just a standard flag, cleverly “backlit” with some quantum stage magic. Fact is its impossible to tell from any of the screenshots the exact details and physical attributes, until this very flag is thoroughly interrogated in person, most of these absolute proof comments are pure speculation. Fabrics are not solid, they are porous and light passes through with a mesh effect, a black fabric star, backlit with white light, in a foreground shadow, would appear to be a “shade” of white. If it were a blue backlight, it would appear to be a shade of blue. What is obvious is that this flag was intended to have a peculiar appearance as viewed from the front. The time and effort poured into this posse speculatus was mostly wasted energy. This should definitely put the subject to unrest. So were the gold and silver stripes some sort of lighting sorcery as well? Just to be clear I have NO anti-Great Awakening intent, just an alternative view.
So they put a veiling cloth over the field of stars. When the cloth is lit by exterior light, only the veiling cloth is seen. But in the shadow of the exterior light, the stars can be seen through the veiling cloth by being back-lit. Would this be the trick?
Look again at the other picture from the rally. There is clearly a quilted fabric over the stars and the stripes material is the same as the above picture.
The above picture the star field looks to be the same material as the stripes unlike the one from the rally that had a quilted blue field and the same stripes as above.
Why’s it matter?
So no gold fringe around the flags now, right?
You're not logically processing that the stars should be visible regardless of lighting. Even when turned around. Nice try though.
To me it looks like it's laid over something. I don't think anyone was logically processing they were "black", just not visible. Which is correct from perspective. So really what is the point of this post? Lots of things get misinterpreted as signals. That's okay, it's going to happen. No one knows the ultimate plan fully.
The stars are visible. The simply appear black when backlit.
If that flag was backlit, then it was deliberately backlit and the flag was intended to look as though it had no stars.
The flag has stars printed/stitched on both sides.