That’s what I immediately thought when I first saw this post late last night, definitely a letdown when I realized it wasn’t that.
*I don’t think we will see public/private partnerships being forced to open their research to the public because if that happens you will bankrupt good and bad players. I don’t think the plan includes bankrupting a million companies with the result being a massive depression.
...if that happens you will bankrupt good and bad players.
At this point, I would be willing to make exceptions for good players. If we made a list of them...wait, is it possible to make a list of good corporations that hold patents that were funded off the backs of tax paying citizen's? Is there even a such thing?
Thats pretty crazy, someone should now dig for the covid-19 spike genome sequencing by liu bing that was mentioned in the documentary/talk “watch the water”
Cure for cancer is probably to do nothing. The medical industry has no problem jabbing everyone over a rebranded flu. What if cancer is just an excuse to pump people full of radiation and charge them for fucking them over?
More than that: Always do your own research (in addition to getting professional opinions) because -- certainly with serious medical issues -- the best options may be ignored and (when that doesn't work) actively slandered by the medical profession; e.g., HCQ, Ivermectin, high-dose vitamin C, and a thousand other things.
Interesting potential hint as to how long full disclosure of all lies may take to reveal. When Trump is POTUS in 2026, he can now say "Hey, I didn't sign this executive order Biden did. But LOOK!"
You're right that we can't attribute everything to them, but they've also been playing this game a long time and we already know that they plan well ahead.
Also, the entire year of an election is prime for campaigning.
"No later than literally New Year's Eve before 2026" is a lot of time for an "immediate" release of information.
Even the mentally obtuse can pet the dog successfully, upon a time.
I think the parties who benefit by the prior arrangement simply failed to get his attention in time. "Oh, fuck! Now what did he do!" But as one commenter says, if this only has effect in 2026, there is plenty of time to walk it back...and no one will recall much about it.
Patriots in control. 💯🔥🔥🔥
Always has been
Now do the same with all publicly funded patents.
Wait wait tell us more
That’s what I immediately thought when I first saw this post late last night, definitely a letdown when I realized it wasn’t that.
*I don’t think we will see public/private partnerships being forced to open their research to the public because if that happens you will bankrupt good and bad players. I don’t think the plan includes bankrupting a million companies with the result being a massive depression.
Though, nothing would surprise me at this point.
At this point, I would be willing to make exceptions for good players. If we made a list of them...wait, is it possible to make a list of good corporations that hold patents that were funded off the backs of tax paying citizen's? Is there even a such thing?
Probably not, but if there’s only one,, even more of a reason to protect their ass.
Thats pretty crazy, someone should now dig for the covid-19 spike genome sequencing by liu bing that was mentioned in the documentary/talk “watch the water”
Nice!
Nice catch. Also, thanks for the Aaron Schwartz (who was likely murdered) reference.
Definitely murdered. Something like the cure for cancer has got to be in that jstor database.
I think Swartz may have found some Epstein evidence on MIT servers...
Cure for cancer is probably to do nothing. The medical industry has no problem jabbing everyone over a rebranded flu. What if cancer is just an excuse to pump people full of radiation and charge them for fucking them over?
I agree. People pay them to kill them. My B-I-L died Wednesday after 18 months of poisoning.
Always get a second and third opinion.
Always get a second and third opinion.
More than that: Always do your own research (in addition to getting professional opinions) because -- certainly with serious medical issues -- the best options may be ignored and (when that doesn't work) actively slandered by the medical profession; e.g., HCQ, Ivermectin, high-dose vitamin C, and a thousand other things.
Policy takes effect in 2026.
Interesting potential hint as to how long full disclosure of all lies may take to reveal. When Trump is POTUS in 2026, he can now say "Hey, I didn't sign this executive order Biden did. But LOOK!"
Just in time for midterm elections
Every even year is an election, so we can’t attribute everything happening in an even year to elections.
Jan 1st 2026 is much different than some random day a week or two before elections. Context is needed.
Edit: “no later than December 31, 2025.”
You're right that we can't attribute everything to them, but they've also been playing this game a long time and we already know that they plan well ahead.
Also, the entire year of an election is prime for campaigning.
"No later than literally New Year's Eve before 2026" is a lot of time for an "immediate" release of information.
I'm assuming this includes everything MIT does, but not DARPA
Even the mentally obtuse can pet the dog successfully, upon a time.
I think the parties who benefit by the prior arrangement simply failed to get his attention in time. "Oh, fuck! Now what did he do!" But as one commenter says, if this only has effect in 2026, there is plenty of time to walk it back...and no one will recall much about it.
Unredacted?
All research that is publicly funded?...... except national security, dual purpose, that sort of thingy?
That could turn a drip to a flood?
Good observation.