🔥 HOPE THIS MOMMA-BEAR RUNS FOR OFFICE. ! ! !🔥
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
This post is dumb as shit. No sauce, calling for some rando to run for office because of violence.
Yes, pedophiles are scum. I'm not mad she did this.
However, being in government is not an award. Get a grip.
Commenters are right. This is some straight sheepposting right here.
everyone arguing over pedos. this is a screenshot of two photos and a paragraph of text......is no one gonna ask for sauce?
thx for the sauce. glad he got burned.
That's barbaric. Her daughter is scarred from rape and now scarred from seeing her father burned alive.
These posts justify reproduction being a privilege not a natural right. They're both demented
And you want her to run for office??? Please get on Q and start THINKING
Anything goes against pedophiles.
It's ok. They're not human.
If I ended up on the jury, she would walk free.
Yeah, I hope he actually survived. Survived with the disfiguring scarring so that he looks like an abomination. Survived with the agonizing pain that never really goes away. Under those conditions, I hope he survived.
Well said. Not a fan of torture or burning criminals alive. Forget "deserving" or "not human because pedophile". I get it. Would you burn any other non-human animal alive?
Even (or maybe especially) if you've been abused as a child,...would you really want to add enjoyment of people being burned alive to your psychic resumé?
Guys- geez first no date on the damn picture! Are we that gullible? Gaw101 post the fucking date/sauce or don’t post!
Can you not understand that she’s just one rung on the consciousness ladder above a pedo? She married this guy in the first place. And you want her running our lives. Great foresight there. What could go wrong? Look at her face and ask yourself if she should be in charge.
Disagree...
Taking out any and ALL
PEDOS ARE NECESSARY..
Your comment is invalid
LOL you're in no position to be invalidating anything. Your POST is invalid.
Get over yourself, OP.
Well, seeing as your OP, I don’t expect you to understand my criticism, otherwise you wouldn’t be suggesting she be in government in the first place. You know what, maybe you’re right, maybe she should be in government making decisions for us.
To be fair if I someone rape my child or any child I wouldn't be handing them over to police so they can serve a couple years in prison and be released.
I wouldn't of burnt them alive in a public display but they would definitely be removed from the earth.
I don't know what the woman is like and can't defend her holding office but seeing how she treats pedophiles I think putting her in the same room as the pedos that rule over us is a great idea.
She would not pussy foot and will clean house the first day. Which is what the meme and OP is trying to say, that was lost on you.
It could have been a joke, with OP not serious that she should run run office, just some kill pedos fun, but he didn’t clarify that in his reply to me, so I’m going to continue thinking that OP actually wants her to be in office.
You're free to do that fren, but it is a meme it's meant to prove some point about reality in a humorous and truthful way.
The OP might vote for her I don't know just as I don't know what her policies would be. Don't take it to serious, it was simply saying government is full of them and we should send her to delete them.
Sometimes I think the hatred of pedos is one of our strongest bonds :) Well, clearly it’s love of children, and even more g really the sanctity of life.
It's the one thing that everyone can agree on and it's a great evil especially if they're killing and eating them. It's needs to be exposed for it to stop and our weapon is the meme.
Don't need to split hairs over this as she's not running for office its just OP letting out a little steam.
Why are you telling me that he wasn’t a known pedo at the time? When you rebut someone’s assessment, do you just routinely assume that they have not considered even the most fundamental points of the case? Why would you present such a simple point as ‘evidence’ against my assessment? My assessment is in spite of this point, obviously. So the fact the she married a pedo is still an undisputed point against her being appropriate for ‘running for office’.
The ‘running our lives’ comment by me was in response to someone suggesting she run for office. I don’t see how that’s a leap, seeing as people if office effectively ‘run our lives’ to some degree at this point in time.
Your original assertion was that she should be held liable for knowingly marrying a pedo. Then when you failed miserably defending your point, you moved the goalpost.
She shouldn't be held liable for something that wasn't known to her. You agree with me, else you would have found some reason to maintain your original assertion without moving the goalpost.
Well that's really fucking brutal.
Is it bad i laugh? Lol
She should have just shot him. Now she is likely to end up in prison. A whole lot of people just won't go along with burning someone alive.
Not enough, apparently, from reading this damn thread.
No.