It was. If they'd have moved at the speed of science, it would have been far slower and more careful. They moved at the speed of panicked politicians reacting to a crisis. They cut corners, took shortcuts, broke rules, ignored safeguards, and exploited the shit out of the system because they needed to be the first vaccine on the market. That was the vaccine that was going to grab the lion's share of the government contracts from nationalized health systems around the world.
Pfizer was first. Moderna was 3 weeks behind, and it never gained the same market share as Pfizer did. AstraZeneca was 3rd in the US and never got approval. FDA is still demanding more data from them despite having post-marketing data from over a billion people worldwide. J&J was 4th, got approval and was treated like the red-headed step-child despite being an objectively better vaccine: easy to store and transport (Pfizer required deep freeze), 1 dose instead of 2. NovaVax has a traditional vaccine made with the spike protein directly. Have you even heard of it? Probably not. It's approved, but FDA slow-walked it for a year and a half. They literally had the data for a year and a half, but didn't move a decision forward until we had gone through multiple waves of variants. Pfizer had to be first, so they "moved as the speed of Science™."
It's crystal clear the FDA was gatekeeping too. Even Moderna's vaccine has never been advanced for children, while Pfizer's has. And Moderna's comes with a warning about myocarditis, but Pfizer's doesn't. FDA has, at every turn, taken steps to swat the products of competitors and protect Pfizer's product. It's really reprehensible if you look at it.
And now all the covidian faithful are flooding the comments saying, “it was never meant to stop transmission” — which, 1) completely ignores the point of the mandates and passports, and 2) proves how incredibly powerful all the gaslighting, cognitive dissonance and brainwashing has been on these ‘bread and circus’ normies 😤🤬
Not to mention that "it was never meant to stop transmission" is just an outright lie. I can't remember the number of politicians, "doctors", "scientists", and other professionals, not to mention the amateur experts (media personalities, celebrities, and business decision makers - HR, management, etc., sheep in general), who wouldn't shut up about how if we would get vaxxed, it would keep everyone around us from getting sick.
I don't know what pisses me off more - the constant nagging and threats about what would happen to me if I didn't comply with their baseless claims, or the fact that they actually thought their idiotic scare tactics would work on me, because they thought I was as big an idiot as they were!
Yea... what happened to 95% effective, or Biden and Fauci both saying you won't get covid if you get vaccinated?
The level of narcissism and pride in these people who got duped is absolutely ridiculous. Where is the anger? Where is the feeling of betrayal and loss of trust?
Easier to fool someone than to convince them that they've been fooled- Twain
What will become of this? They LIED. Pfizer could have put arsenic in a vile and said the same thing. If precedent holds, Pfizer will be ordered to pay a fine just like all the other times. If anyone really wants to get a real good sense of the relationship Big Pharma has with government, look up all the times pharmaceutical companies have been caught for fraud and other crimes. It will absolutely blow you away with the vast number of times they got busted and allowed to continue operations after the repeated felonies they commit. Any other company would have a highly publicized arrest showing the CEO and VPs marched out of the building in handcuffs and tried in court, convicted, and sentenced to prison. Other companies would be shut down.
When will the people have enough of it and act to shut these criminal enterprises down?
SPARS 2025 timeline. We're not exactly on track, but it's pretty dang close. Now the question comes will the politicians choose to acknowledge the "bravery" of the people who took the shots, likening their choice to a heroic wartime sacrifice.
EVERYONE associated with propagating this huge lie/hoax/BS needs to be criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, in Nuremburg style trials, for the whole world to see.
Everyone, from the top decision makers, politicians, presidents, governors, WEF/NWO/WHO/CDC bastards, all the way down to the hospital administrators, doctors, nurses, pharmacy technicians, etc., who pushed the covid hoax, lied about masks and vaccines, killed with their remdisivir and ventilator protocols, and prevented access to harmless treatments such as HCQ and Ivermectin.
I don't care if their motivations were financial, political, world domination, or if they were just too scared, or too stupid, to speak out, and just went along with the flow.
At the pace it's going now I can only hope it happens within our lifetimes. Three years in and we're getting obscure tweets while normies are still lining up for boosters.
I'm thinking about shorting the hell out of Pfizer. I think they're going bankrupt once people realize they are fraudulent, data was a lie. Their liability protection is gone. It's already out there.
I'm confused on this one. Her clip says "whether we knew about stopping immunization before it entered the market". I don't know what she's doing in that clip, but it seems to be an answer to another question, not the one posed.
We can’t have a true great awakening until the narrative they’ve been fed, and the beliefs they’re holding onto like a grudge for the past nearly 3 years, fully shatter.
This is politics and not science. They present irrelevant information as if it means anything.
The scientific basis for "it protects others" is not established with testing, especially not in the initial phase 3 clinical trials of a new drug. Those trials are designed to answer two questions:
Does the drug work? Does it prevent or treat the disease?
Is it safe? Does it cause nasty side effects or other harm that may offset potential benefits?
The Dutchman is asking an irrelevant question of the data. Of course Pfizer did not test the concept of herd immunity in their initial safety and efficacy tests. They tested safety and efficacy which is what the regulators wanted to know.
Herd immunity is an application of the efficacy data. You take the efficacy from the tests and use a statistical method to calculate rates of transmission. Then you determine what percentage of the population needs to be protected in order to reduce transmission to unvaccinated individuals. The higher the transmissibility of the virus, the higher the percentage you need to establish herd immunity. Again though, no one actually does a clinical trial to test herd immunity.
What happened in the EU was that sound, established science was co-opted by corrupt, authoritarian politicians to attempt a massive power grab in hopes of establishing police state authorities for themselves. The fault for that isn't Pfizer's. The fault for that lies with the politicians who abused well established scientific principles to push reprehensible policies while ignoring the moral and legal reasons why we don't do what they proposed - because it was a "crisis" and they needed to "do something."
Last thought:
Is the science itself correct? Does the statistical model behind herd immunity work? Yes, and in hundreds of infectious diseases, but with a caveat. We often assume that immunity is absolute. If you're vaccinated, you can't get the disease, so you can't spread the disease. With the COVID vaccines, that assumption is false. Even with the vaccinations, you can get the disease and you can shed virus. This completely messes up the herd immunity calculations. Further, with COVID, we never established a threshold that accounts for natural immunity from exposure to the disease itself, nor included these people in the herd immunity calculations. We took a good model, plugged garbage into it and got garbage out.
Again, it was the politicians who abused the science, and some willful blindness on the part of government scientists (ie Fauci, et al) who didn't check their assumptions and validate their model that caused this, not that the core concept of herd immunity was wrong. They do this with climate models all the time too: plug in garbage numbers, getting garbage results.
The scientific basis for "it protects others" is not established with testing
Pfizer WAS pushing the idea that the "vaccine" would prevent TRANSMISSION. That was one of the big reasons for the push: Keep your family safe.
They did not study transmission at all, that is true, but they DID push it AS IF it had been studied.
Of course Pfizer did not test the concept of herd immunity in their initial safety and efficacy tests.
Herd immunity is not the same thing as transmission, necessarily. They did not test "herd immunity," true, but they DID SAY that it would prevent transmission, and that was NOT ever tested. Even to today, it has never been tested.
initial phase 3 clinical trials
It was not a REAL Phase 3 trial, because there was never a REAL Phase 1 or Phase 2. They lumped all of them together, due to "Warp Speed."
They tested safety and efficacy which is what the regulators wanted to know.
NO ... THEY DID NOT.
They NEVER tested safety.
They NEVER tested efficacy.
They ran a 100% fraudulent experiment.
They had participants self-describe any SYMPTOM of illness, such as headache, and for those who self-described, they gave a bogus PCR "test."
And they didn't even do that for all. They STOPPED giving even the bogus PCR "test" to the vaccinated group, likely due to results they did not want to see.
You take the efficacy from the tests and use a statistical method to calculate rates of transmission.
This is FRAUD. It is a surrogate of the real thing, and NOT the real thing.
There was NO efficacy results from the trial because the entire trial was based on two fraudulent concepts: (1) Self-described "symptoms of illness" and (2) PCR test that is NOT a diagnostic tool. They also stopping the PCR testing of the vaccinated but NOT the placebo group (problem #3).
Then after 3 months, they gave the jab to the placebo group AS WELL, thereby completely destroying any control group (problem #4). Yet 6 months later, they made claims about that control group.
The entire thing was a sham.
The higher the transmissibility of the virus
Tramissibility of THIS "virus" has NEVER been demonstrated clinically.
NEVER.
Therefore, ANY model based on ZERO real data is ... IRRELEVANT.
Again though, no one actually does a clinical trial to test herd immunity.
In THIS trial (Pfizer), they never tested for transmissibility, efficacy, OR safety.
What happened in the EU was that sound, established science was co-opted by corrupt, authoritarian politicians to attempt a massive power grab in hopes of establishing police state authorities for themselves.
There was NO "sound, established science" here. NONE.
The power grab was real, but it was based on fake, non-science.
The fault for that isn't Pfizer's.
Pfizer is most certainly at fault for FRAUD from the beginning.
Last thought: Is the science itself correct? Does the statistical model behind herd immunity work? Yes, and in hundreds of infectious diseases ...
No, the science is fraudulent.
It is ASSUMED that "infectious diseases" operate a certain way ... WITH ZERO RESEARCH TO PROVE IT ... and then models are created to arrive at conclusions. But those conclusions are not valid -- because the assumptions they are based on are not valid (they are just made-up speculation, and nothing more).
If you're vaccinated, you can't get the disease, so you can't spread the disease.
False. This has NEVER been proven CLINICALLY for ANY viral disease (possible for others, be we are talking about a supposedly viral disease here).
With the COVID vaccines, that assumption is false.
Correct.
Even with the vaccinations, you can get the disease and you can shed virus.
Not correct. The vaccines DO NOT WORK and CANNOT POSSIBLY work in the real world. FULL STOP.
There is NO shedding of a virus. FULL STOP.
It simply does NOT happen and has NEVER been PROVEN ... CLINICALLY.
NEVER.
Further, with COVID, we never established a threshold that accounts for natural immunity from exposure to the disease itself
That is because there is NO laboratory ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD ... that has a sample of SARS-CoV-2 virus. NOT ONE LAB.
Therefore, it COULD NOT be tested, and never was.
We took a good model, plugged garbage into it and got garbage out.
No, the model itself is garbage.
Again, it was the politicians who abused the science ...
No, it was the scientists who committed FRAUD, and the politicians swooped in to push tyranny, which was based on that fraud.
They do this with climate models all the time too: plug in garbage numbers, getting garbage results.
Actually, that is a good analogy. With so-called "climate models," they use a pre-determined set of ASSUMPTIONS, and then when they plug in numbers, they get results they want. Never mind that their prediction results NEVER come true. That is because their ASSUMPTIONS within their computer program are NOT VALID.
They use basically two variables (with many variations from there): (1) The direct effect, and the (2) feedback effect. It is the feedback effect that is ... ENTIRELY MADE UP WITH ZERO SCIENCE. Just a GUESS and ASSUMPTION that it somehow "must be valid." It is not, and it is why none of those models work.
Same is true for virology. They make ASSUMPTIONS and then base everything off of those assumptions. But the assumptions are NOT VALID, so none of their supposed results or models, etc. are valid, either.
I don't have time for debate of all the points here. So, I will leave you and others reading this with previous GAW posts where these ideas were discussed many months ago:
It seems the only thing Pfizer didn't lie about was their name on the paychecks.
How does one buy stock in ropes?
Hemp companies?
Death Penalty for Drug Dealers.
^^^ Yep — that’s immediately what I thought when Trump first made that comment
Oh, I never thought about it like this
"We had to move at the speed of Science..."
Deplorable.
Yeah, I've heard of the speed of light, speed of sound, and even the speed of thought, but never the speed of science.
I guess these idiots are too stupid to realize the more BS they make up, the more they expose themselves as the criminals that they are.
Have you heard of ludicrous speed?
It was. If they'd have moved at the speed of science, it would have been far slower and more careful. They moved at the speed of panicked politicians reacting to a crisis. They cut corners, took shortcuts, broke rules, ignored safeguards, and exploited the shit out of the system because they needed to be the first vaccine on the market. That was the vaccine that was going to grab the lion's share of the government contracts from nationalized health systems around the world.
Pfizer was first. Moderna was 3 weeks behind, and it never gained the same market share as Pfizer did. AstraZeneca was 3rd in the US and never got approval. FDA is still demanding more data from them despite having post-marketing data from over a billion people worldwide. J&J was 4th, got approval and was treated like the red-headed step-child despite being an objectively better vaccine: easy to store and transport (Pfizer required deep freeze), 1 dose instead of 2. NovaVax has a traditional vaccine made with the spike protein directly. Have you even heard of it? Probably not. It's approved, but FDA slow-walked it for a year and a half. They literally had the data for a year and a half, but didn't move a decision forward until we had gone through multiple waves of variants. Pfizer had to be first, so they "moved as the speed of Science™."
It's crystal clear the FDA was gatekeeping too. Even Moderna's vaccine has never been advanced for children, while Pfizer's has. And Moderna's comes with a warning about myocarditis, but Pfizer's doesn't. FDA has, at every turn, taken steps to swat the products of competitors and protect Pfizer's product. It's really reprehensible if you look at it.
Excused themselves and shielded themselves all in one statement.
The executive that came up with that phrase will get a multi-million dollar bonus this year.
And now all the covidian faithful are flooding the comments saying, “it was never meant to stop transmission” — which, 1) completely ignores the point of the mandates and passports, and 2) proves how incredibly powerful all the gaslighting, cognitive dissonance and brainwashing has been on these ‘bread and circus’ normies 😤🤬
Not to mention that "it was never meant to stop transmission" is just an outright lie. I can't remember the number of politicians, "doctors", "scientists", and other professionals, not to mention the amateur experts (media personalities, celebrities, and business decision makers - HR, management, etc., sheep in general), who wouldn't shut up about how if we would get vaxxed, it would keep everyone around us from getting sick.
I don't know what pisses me off more - the constant nagging and threats about what would happen to me if I didn't comply with their baseless claims, or the fact that they actually thought their idiotic scare tactics would work on me, because they thought I was as big an idiot as they were!
Yea... what happened to 95% effective, or Biden and Fauci both saying you won't get covid if you get vaccinated?
The level of narcissism and pride in these people who got duped is absolutely ridiculous. Where is the anger? Where is the feeling of betrayal and loss of trust?
Easier to fool someone than to convince them that they've been fooled- Twain
This statement is so true.
A meme in one the comments from someone else’s retweet of this:
Excellent and true.
Without any consequences, but with HUGE profits- why would you expect any business, professional or layman to ever tell the truth.
What will become of this? They LIED. Pfizer could have put arsenic in a vile and said the same thing. If precedent holds, Pfizer will be ordered to pay a fine just like all the other times. If anyone really wants to get a real good sense of the relationship Big Pharma has with government, look up all the times pharmaceutical companies have been caught for fraud and other crimes. It will absolutely blow you away with the vast number of times they got busted and allowed to continue operations after the repeated felonies they commit. Any other company would have a highly publicized arrest showing the CEO and VPs marched out of the building in handcuffs and tried in court, convicted, and sentenced to prison. Other companies would be shut down.
When will the people have enough of it and act to shut these criminal enterprises down?
As a few comments stated, why are they admitting this now?
Also, and possibly more importantly, why is a member of the European Parliament finally exposing this?
This wasn’t an oopsie.
SPARS 2025 timeline. We're not exactly on track, but it's pretty dang close. Now the question comes will the politicians choose to acknowledge the "bravery" of the people who took the shots, likening their choice to a heroic wartime sacrifice.
Those fines are a token slap on the wrist.
EVERYONE associated with propagating this huge lie/hoax/BS needs to be criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, in Nuremburg style trials, for the whole world to see.
Everyone, from the top decision makers, politicians, presidents, governors, WEF/NWO/WHO/CDC bastards, all the way down to the hospital administrators, doctors, nurses, pharmacy technicians, etc., who pushed the covid hoax, lied about masks and vaccines, killed with their remdisivir and ventilator protocols, and prevented access to harmless treatments such as HCQ and Ivermectin.
I don't care if their motivations were financial, political, world domination, or if they were just too scared, or too stupid, to speak out, and just went along with the flow.
At the pace it's going now I can only hope it happens within our lifetimes. Three years in and we're getting obscure tweets while normies are still lining up for boosters.
💯
I'm thinking about shorting the hell out of Pfizer. I think they're going bankrupt once people realize they are fraudulent, data was a lie. Their liability protection is gone. It's already out there.
Lawsuits up the ass. Bankrupt level lawsuits.
Go for it and become stupid rich.
I'm confused on this one. Her clip says "whether we knew about stopping immunization before it entered the market". I don't know what she's doing in that clip, but it seems to be an answer to another question, not the one posed.
I caught that too
She’s using sales language — it was about being first to market to cash in on all their blood money.
We here at GAW have known this from early on:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJPv3MkS/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFGJhbXD/
Normies don’t — or refuse to believe it.
This is important to break through the narrative.
We can’t have a true great awakening until the narrative they’ve been fed, and the beliefs they’re holding onto like a grudge for the past nearly 3 years, fully shatter.
Is "duh" an appropriate reply?
when we win big they will try to pin the jab deaths on him.
This is politics and not science. They present irrelevant information as if it means anything.
The scientific basis for "it protects others" is not established with testing, especially not in the initial phase 3 clinical trials of a new drug. Those trials are designed to answer two questions:
The Dutchman is asking an irrelevant question of the data. Of course Pfizer did not test the concept of herd immunity in their initial safety and efficacy tests. They tested safety and efficacy which is what the regulators wanted to know.
Herd immunity is an application of the efficacy data. You take the efficacy from the tests and use a statistical method to calculate rates of transmission. Then you determine what percentage of the population needs to be protected in order to reduce transmission to unvaccinated individuals. The higher the transmissibility of the virus, the higher the percentage you need to establish herd immunity. Again though, no one actually does a clinical trial to test herd immunity.
What happened in the EU was that sound, established science was co-opted by corrupt, authoritarian politicians to attempt a massive power grab in hopes of establishing police state authorities for themselves. The fault for that isn't Pfizer's. The fault for that lies with the politicians who abused well established scientific principles to push reprehensible policies while ignoring the moral and legal reasons why we don't do what they proposed - because it was a "crisis" and they needed to "do something."
Last thought: Is the science itself correct? Does the statistical model behind herd immunity work? Yes, and in hundreds of infectious diseases, but with a caveat. We often assume that immunity is absolute. If you're vaccinated, you can't get the disease, so you can't spread the disease. With the COVID vaccines, that assumption is false. Even with the vaccinations, you can get the disease and you can shed virus. This completely messes up the herd immunity calculations. Further, with COVID, we never established a threshold that accounts for natural immunity from exposure to the disease itself, nor included these people in the herd immunity calculations. We took a good model, plugged garbage into it and got garbage out.
Again, it was the politicians who abused the science, and some willful blindness on the part of government scientists (ie Fauci, et al) who didn't check their assumptions and validate their model that caused this, not that the core concept of herd immunity was wrong. They do this with climate models all the time too: plug in garbage numbers, getting garbage results.
Not true.
Pfizer WAS pushing the idea that the "vaccine" would prevent TRANSMISSION. That was one of the big reasons for the push: Keep your family safe.
They did not study transmission at all, that is true, but they DID push it AS IF it had been studied.
Herd immunity is not the same thing as transmission, necessarily. They did not test "herd immunity," true, but they DID SAY that it would prevent transmission, and that was NOT ever tested. Even to today, it has never been tested.
It was not a REAL Phase 3 trial, because there was never a REAL Phase 1 or Phase 2. They lumped all of them together, due to "Warp Speed."
NO ... THEY DID NOT.
They NEVER tested safety.
They NEVER tested efficacy.
They ran a 100% fraudulent experiment.
They had participants self-describe any SYMPTOM of illness, such as headache, and for those who self-described, they gave a bogus PCR "test."
And they didn't even do that for all. They STOPPED giving even the bogus PCR "test" to the vaccinated group, likely due to results they did not want to see.
This is FRAUD. It is a surrogate of the real thing, and NOT the real thing.
There was NO efficacy results from the trial because the entire trial was based on two fraudulent concepts: (1) Self-described "symptoms of illness" and (2) PCR test that is NOT a diagnostic tool. They also stopping the PCR testing of the vaccinated but NOT the placebo group (problem #3).
Then after 3 months, they gave the jab to the placebo group AS WELL, thereby completely destroying any control group (problem #4). Yet 6 months later, they made claims about that control group.
The entire thing was a sham.
Tramissibility of THIS "virus" has NEVER been demonstrated clinically.
NEVER.
Therefore, ANY model based on ZERO real data is ... IRRELEVANT.
In THIS trial (Pfizer), they never tested for transmissibility, efficacy, OR safety.
There was NO "sound, established science" here. NONE.
The power grab was real, but it was based on fake, non-science.
Pfizer is most certainly at fault for FRAUD from the beginning.
No, the science is fraudulent.
It is ASSUMED that "infectious diseases" operate a certain way ... WITH ZERO RESEARCH TO PROVE IT ... and then models are created to arrive at conclusions. But those conclusions are not valid -- because the assumptions they are based on are not valid (they are just made-up speculation, and nothing more).
False. This has NEVER been proven CLINICALLY for ANY viral disease (possible for others, be we are talking about a supposedly viral disease here).
Correct.
Not correct. The vaccines DO NOT WORK and CANNOT POSSIBLY work in the real world. FULL STOP.
There is NO shedding of a virus. FULL STOP.
It simply does NOT happen and has NEVER been PROVEN ... CLINICALLY.
NEVER.
That is because there is NO laboratory ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD ... that has a sample of SARS-CoV-2 virus. NOT ONE LAB.
Therefore, it COULD NOT be tested, and never was.
No, the model itself is garbage.
No, it was the scientists who committed FRAUD, and the politicians swooped in to push tyranny, which was based on that fraud.
Actually, that is a good analogy. With so-called "climate models," they use a pre-determined set of ASSUMPTIONS, and then when they plug in numbers, they get results they want. Never mind that their prediction results NEVER come true. That is because their ASSUMPTIONS within their computer program are NOT VALID.
They use basically two variables (with many variations from there): (1) The direct effect, and the (2) feedback effect. It is the feedback effect that is ... ENTIRELY MADE UP WITH ZERO SCIENCE. Just a GUESS and ASSUMPTION that it somehow "must be valid." It is not, and it is why none of those models work.
Same is true for virology. They make ASSUMPTIONS and then base everything off of those assumptions. But the assumptions are NOT VALID, so none of their supposed results or models, etc. are valid, either.
I don't have time for debate of all the points here. So, I will leave you and others reading this with previous GAW posts where these ideas were discussed many months ago:
Pfizer's fraudulent study --
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJPv3MkS/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/
Vaccines do not work (and never will) --
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFGJhbXD/
The Covid "virus" is nothing but a scam and incompetence by "virologists" who do not understand what they are really looking at --
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg0MRBxt/
Ya don't say..
an ex-pharma girl with some truth
https://gwenolsen.com/videos/