So Truss was just a pacifier...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
So now I'm seeing her political opponent gain the seat he ran against her for. I am starting to believe that, Liz Truss ran and got elected as what the people "wanted" even though her and Rishi are both cut from the same cloth.
But it seems she got elected, to sate the people's desire for a, "conservative"... Because if I remember correctly, Rishi is basically a UK RINO. Apparently Truss is too just had a different acting part to play. So then after she steps down, her douchy opponent that no one wanted gets appointed??
One was Elected and stepped down, so that the Appointed one could take over.
This is insanity.
Yep, just like Brexit...
The UK is cesspool of degeneracy, completely irredeemable. I think at this point the white hats are simple just trying to bury it in the ground. The entire Brexit plan is simple efficient logic, isolate then exterminate. Soon the Pound will be barely worth a Peso. All of the DS assets that have been around since the days of Empire will be neutered by the economic damage and effectively taken out of play. They tipped their hand when President Trump wasn't invited to the funeral for the so called "Queen". And now we and they know how screwed they are.
Yank here, but semi-follow UK's politics and day-to-day to "keep in touch", as it were. Used to love visiting, but havent been back since the influx of "migrants".
That said, I can't dispute anything you said from what I've seen, read, or watched.
Great Britain isn't so Great anymore, it would seem. Just....Britain.
I hope so
She even tried to play ball with [them] and [they] still screwed her. This is not an endorsement of Liz Truss, but it's clear she got fooked. If that's not "in your face" enough to wake the Brits up, I'm not sure what is.
Could it be due to the fact that PMs are entitled to an allowance of up to £115,000 (~$130,000) a year to cover the costs of their ongoing public engagements?
That made me so mad. You spend a few months in a position, and you're taken care of for life even if you quit??? The hell??
And how everyone in the MSM kept claiming that she would was on to bigger and better afterwards... It's like she played her part exactly, and is now thinking she is golden following in the footsteps of her formers, I really hope she knows it's changing. And not in her favor...
Anyway, short rant over. But good point bringing that up Anon!! Solid Observation!!
It was actually reported by MSM (but when I heard it, I thought they said $750,000/yr, rather than the $150,000/yr :) )
Meaning she did it to gain access to that allowance even if she only served 44 days? Smells like a payoff if that is what you are implying....
Exactly what I implied. Who wouldn't do a job like that for less than 3 months knowing that you can just quit and get more than $100K/yr the rest of your life?
I facetiously joke with people that they should run for House of Reps solely because apparently you can pocket up to 150k of campaign donations to pay yourself each year you run. Seems like someone could make quite a racket out of running every 2 years and earn up to an average of 75k.
Great Writeup about these two...dumbasses!!!💩💩
Probably, they're not a real democracy
Wow
The old vote and switch!! If this doesn't prove that people are only selected and def not elected, I don't know what will at this point! Was this another red pill for the normies?
Normies won’t care until sportsball and entertainment stop.
Or they close the pubs again like during Covid!
It seems as so. I don't even live there, but if I did I would be dispensing this everywhere today.
Same!
Same! This almost looks like the evolution of cheating methods being employed here. That's a lot of work for the DS to recruit and turn and compromise 2 people per seat, groom one to play one role and the other to play another. But these people are stupid, we know. So maybe this is white hats playing show n tell?
Put up the next lettuce and start the timer. The People can do this more times than the DS, as finding suckers to sell out the citizens will become increasingly difficult.
https://files.catbox.moe/t1q0zn.png
When was that posted?
https://archive.ph/Vw9kl
Thanks! July 9, 2022.
Domain registered as he said:
https://whois.domaintools.com/readyforrishi.com
u/#pratt
From Wiki:
Sunak was born on 12 May 1980 in Southampton[10][11] to African-born Hindu parents of Punjabi Indian descent,[12][13] Yashvir and Usha Sunak. He is the eldest of three siblings. His father was born and raised in the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya (present-day Kenya), while his mother was born in Tanganyika (which later became part of Tanzania).[14] His grandfathers were born in Punjab province, British India, and migrated from East Africa with their families to the UK in the 1960s.
This is their Obama.
He is also a Hindu:
Abomination for a country where the monarch is supposed to be "defender of the faith." (That faith being Christianity.) Even Henry VIII is rolling in his grave, along with some others.
The Satanists rule in UK..always have
Lol this guy sounds like another Obama with his background
The faith was never Christianity.
Understood. Christendom and the faith of Christ are two different things, although there are superficial similarities. In terms of history and tradition, however, the Church of England is significant, and I don't believe the monarch is supposed to be defending Hinduism, even though Charles has said he wants to be "defender of [all] faith[s]."
As for Obama, he may as well have taken his oath on a Koran, although that would not have gone over well.
What the scripture says is that the Church of Christ would be attacked by a growing apostasy, and events like these are certainly signs of it.
Eh, that "faith" was really a "king's rights vs pope's rights" battle that was a long time in the making; it just happened to be that the straw that broke the camel's back on this was Henry VIII needing a male heir and a wife who wasn't post-menopausal to help him with that.
Of course.
If his Spanish Catholic wife had given him a male heir, Britain might have remained majority Catholic. As it was, everything worked out to put Queen Elizabeth I on the throne, and she is considered to have been one of England's greatest monarchs. She also put an end to Bloody Mary's persecutions of Protestants. The Catholic vs Protestant divide is a significant struggle, and a decision was made to side with the Reformation rather than the Pope, for which I am grateful. The coronation of the monarch is meant to be a Christian style ceremony, not a Hindu or Buddhist or Islamic ritual. Charles is reported to be planning to reduce the ceremony from 3 hours to 1, so let's hope he isn't planning to reduce the basic Christian elements. The history of Europe is influenced by Christian culture, and it is better imo if it remains that way, at least in form.
It should become clear to everyone, including the ones who thought they were awake, that the commie and globalist agenda is still pushing full steam ahead and if we think we are able to gain an inch, we must not let up the pressure and push to gain a mile and more until commies and globalists are dead.
Their tactics has always been: -Push hard until met with resistance -Relax the pressure, go back halfway, and wait for opportunities -Push hard again until met with more resistance, but the goalpost has been moved past the marker set the first time -Relax the pressure and go back 1/3 of the way -Rinse and repeat.
They never give up, which is why the only way to win is to make sure they are dead in the end.
Communist playbook 101.
This is why evil must be recognized and immediately rebuked at the onset. Otherwise, you've just let the enemy through the front door.
“Dead” = dealt with according to the full weight of the law (the real law). Abe Lincoln said that making his enemies his friends destroyed his enemies. No doubt many will turn and be converted to the light.
Yes, that's what I meant. Commies and globalists must be lawfully executed. It will also serve as a deterrent for anyone trying to push the commie agenda on the people again.
Whooooo that's a good quote! I like it!
I’ll admit I don’t know UK politics at more than a superficial level. Over the past two years we have seen the American Deep State exposing itself in ways we previously thought was not possible. It has been painful to go through, while at the same time, it has caused people to wake up.
Are we seeing the same thing with the NWO in the UK? The NWO embedded in the Conservative Party are shedding their disguises to fast track the globalist agenda?
Is Nigel Farage really seeing an opportunity to replace the Conservative Party, or is it wishful thinking?
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/10/18/farage-conservative-party-is-now-dead-globalist-hunt-and-labour-virtually-identical/
Would that be a placeholder?
There's no England now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsLhNxzwK1Y&t=6s
How does that even happen? I mean what’s his election isn’t there a certain appointed time that person would be in office. Is it different in Britain? Apparently?
We don't vote for people we vote for the red party or the blue party. The colours are opposite to those in USA. The leader of the party gets to be HNIC. They can change the party leader as often as they want, once elected.
Wow that’s crazy, but actually… Could be a good thing here in America. We could replace our leaders set of having to wait until the next two or four years. I could see the problems that this could have as well, as we see her out in less than two months. There’s so much more manipulation that could be had, with this type of system. So basically there’s a illusion that you could devote for a side, when there is basically a uniParty.
I have no idea, but it makes it glaringly clear that the UK guvt. Doesn't give even a half a shit about their people.