I can't quite put my finger on it, but it doesn't seem like the same Q that we know here. Sure, they're touching the right topics and saying the correct things, but my intuition tells me something is a little...off. Remain skeptical, but nevertheless, I agree with the sentiment
NG can only be activated by president or a state governor.
So who did it?
Article has a strange error:
“What you notice is 54 states and territories—not everybody's doing it, and those that are have invested in cyber talent and cyber missions for years,” said Brig. Gen. Gent Welsh, the assistant adjutant general and commander of the Washington Air National Guard.
54 states?
Fourteen states have ongoing cyber and election security support: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Washington, and West Virginia.
Why would the corrupt Illinois governor (Pritzker) invite the military to watch his election in 2022? Is he really that desperate for sheep to see the race as legitimate. I don't buy that. Almost all of these states have democratic governors.
They wouldn't want more eyeballs on their cheat, they'd want less.
So who is it??? Any real patriot would know not to forge Q. It must either be someone who is laughing at us & wants to get their jollies off. OR is is the black hats
In either case they are a black hat
Evil is that which imitates good - to almost be the twin
I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
What? Waking up? We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
I just did a cursory search and not once has Q mentioned "white hats". Weird. Then again if someone hijacked the trip and is pretending to be Q, I would think Q would nip that in the bud?
Do we know it’s real?
I can't quite put my finger on it, but it doesn't seem like the same Q that we know here. Sure, they're touching the right topics and saying the correct things, but my intuition tells me something is a little...off. Remain skeptical, but nevertheless, I agree with the sentiment
It's highly sus
Very… way too much data when it’s not needed. Q was short and sweet where Q needs to be and didn’t force a whole load of direct info like this
But it does ask a very big question:
That's an excellent question.
https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2022/11/more-dozen-states-have-activated-national-guard-secure-midterm-elections/379412/
NG can only be activated by president or a state governor.
So who did it?
Article has a strange error:
54 states?
Why would the corrupt Illinois governor (Pritzker) invite the military to watch his election in 2022? Is he really that desperate for sheep to see the race as legitimate. I don't buy that. Almost all of these states have democratic governors.
They wouldn't want more eyeballs on their cheat, they'd want less.
So who is it??? Any real patriot would know not to forge Q. It must either be someone who is laughing at us & wants to get their jollies off. OR is is the black hats
In either case they are a black hat
Evil is that which imitates good - to almost be the twin
I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
Glad to see everyone waking up. 🙂
What? Waking up? We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
It also seemed not like how Q talks to me (granted Q is likely a collection of people).
That aside, this sentence alone is also concerning: "White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain" .... what?
When has q used the term “WhiteHats” in this manner? That Sentence is very strange.
Ya once I read "white hats" it seemed larpy
I just did a cursory search and not once has Q mentioned "white hats". Weird. Then again if someone hijacked the trip and is pretending to be Q, I would think Q would nip that in the bud?
Exactly, I’m like whaaaat? Problems remain? That’s like completely opposite of earlier Q posts.
Completely contradicts 'White Hats in Control'.
So Imma believe fake.
Nevertheless, Vote.
The wording is why I don't believe it.
It's too on the nose and simple.
WhiteHats is a phrase I do not remember being used this way. This drop seems off. As if it is a different op
I liked the part of hedging. "Problems still remain"
Thought they were safe?
As long as the Q post point in the right direction it's a positive nod !!