Brunson vs Adams SCOTUS Case 22-380 scheduled for conference for 01/06/2023
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
January 6
Will
Be
Wild
time traveling trump. very interesting take
Wow. What if...
January 6th would be a great day to drop the hammer on the deep state traitors within our government and expose their ties to foreign governments and their election interference.
Yes, I was going to post this but you beat me to it. But what does this mean? They aren't going to do anything until the sixth of January?
I wonder if this will be one of those processes that happens under the radar, and putting it off until next month (and why the 6th?) is, like so many other parts of this unfolding, for optics...
I guess we have to wait and see what happens! Timing is everything!
This can't be stressed enough.
Trump cannot be reinstated before Jan 20, 2022 and still be eligible for 2024. The transfer back would have to happen after the 20th for him to be able to serve from '24-'28.
Hopefully this is just moving closer to the target date.
Good thing we are 11 months past Jan 20, 2022 and dont have to worry about that anymore!
ahah..2023... 🥸
Well I hear the .mil is in charge. Basically they want to put Trump in on the 20th. That way he can finish up two years and then serve 4 more.
I think this means that it may be a big decision.
If they wanted to they could have taken it into conference this week and dismissed it.
I am not expecting anything of this case, but the conference date is sure interesting at best, trolling at worst.
Does that mean they meet on the 6th to decide whether or not they hear the case, or have they decided to hear the case and this is when proceedings start? Not a law-type person, so not sure what's involved with a conference.
this? - https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx
Perfect, thank you!
yvw
what I've seen and heard suggests they will decide at this conference whether they want to adjudicate on it, or pass on it.
Vote todecide if it will move forward. It has been distributed tonthe justices, and the defendents have already been served.
Right in time for PDJT to come back to serve the final two potato's years and still be able to run for an additional 4 years.
January 6th, or June 1st? I am a YYYY-MM-DD nerd.🤓
I'm not sure whether its Jan, January, Jun or June either. Every other date format in this table clearly spells out the month rather than using DD-MM-YYYY or MM-DD-YYYY.
MM-DD-YYYY is just insane formating.
Doesn't really sense to me, either. Short period, longer period, longest period is how they do it in Europe. Day, month, year
Not that Europe does much of anything that benefits us, peasants; though.
This case is terribad and it is not going to be heard by SCOTUS. I wish people would realize this. And it isn't because I don't want it to be successful. It is because it cannot be successful. This is a pro se plaintiff who has no idea what they are arguing. They ask for relief the court could not grant even if it were so inclined.
In the odd event that SCOTUS takes this case, an even rarer event would be a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs. But even if they did this, it would not result in anything more than a finding that the district court does have jurisdiction, and it gets remanded back for further proceedings. That is all.
TLDR People are getting all excited about this when the absolute hail mary dream shot best possible decision that could come out of this is a remand to district court where they kick it out again for some other reason. They won't rule on the merits; they won't grant the relief requested; and they will not throw out most of congress.
Based on past behaviour, I have to agree.
Except they have taken the case to conference. The filing will do more than what you say. Word is it's happening and thats why you're seeing panic. Biden cut his recent international trip short. Pelosi, mccarthy, biden, and others had a meeting last week. I wonder what it was for? Probably the brunson filing.
Every single case that files a petition for a writ of certiorari gets taken to conference. That is standard operating procedure. Conference is where they decide if they will take it up or not. Mark my words: they will not vote to take this case. And I would bet they couldn’t get 1 vote to take it.
Just disconnect yourself from all the stuff they talk about - national security, election fraud, infiltration or whatever other stuff they are talking about. Then look specifically at their causes of action + why they got booted. This case can’t win. It is the product of someone who doesn’t know what they are doing. When you get kicked out for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and you spend your entire argument to SCOTUS on the seriousness of the allegations and the need to bypass having a district court trial and just get SCOTUS to grant the relief you were seeking in the original lawsuit, you are either (1) retarded or (2) a troll. That isn’t how our system works.
SCOTUS is not going to hear any evidence on this case. Because evidence has zilch to do with subject matter jurisdiction. There is no reason that all of these people would be remotely worried about this case, nor would they be meeting suddenly because of it.
I have to be negative about this.
I simply cannot believe the Supreme Court will do anything. They are scared, stupid, or corrupt. In what universe is our current Supreme Court capable of accomplishing something like this?
They allowed universities and city governments to impose medical experiments on people. Turned the cases down. Making it legal to force people to be experimented on to keep their job. The fucking jab isn’t even a regular drug. Still an experiment. And yet they think it’s constitutional to force it on people.
And you expect me to believe the SC will make a judgment against 3/4 of the government? No fucking way that happens. Even if they technically should, they won’t. They are not capable of it.
This doesn’t mean decision or action on 1/6. Am I wrong? What is usually done for distributed for conference? More likely scenario is this case is dismissed or dragged on till next election.
Tracy Beanz still says this won’t lead anywhere. What do you guys think?