Graham Hancock has some interesting and unconventional views of human history. He believes there was an advanced human civilization existed 13,000 year ago and was destroyed in a huge flood caused by the end of the ice age.
By "advanced" he is not claiming they had airplanes any flying saucers, but advanced, like the Egyptians were.
The hatred towards this man and his theories seem to be imbalanced for what he suggests. The MSM and establishment calls his theories "white supremacist" and "nazi" as they take credits away from cultures of "people of color". I'm pretty sure he never suggested any pigmentation or color of earlier civilizations.
The MSM and and archeology routinely claim that he says aliens brought technology to earth, etc, although I'm pretty sure he has not mentioned this.
So why so much animosity towards this? If it is true? So what? If it is false, so what? Is it archeologists who are threatened because they spent 50 years of their life teaching the world was one way, and now learning they may have been wrong?
Or is there some larger threat to the establishment here?
Edit: I'm only a little educated on this individual, so I apologize in advance if any of this is incorrect. Just that my experience is that when a person or idea receives many attacks by the establishment, it usually means they are over target.
It's because his theories and research coordinate perfectly with the Gen 6 Antidiluvian history/mythos.
He's 100% over the target with the geology & chronology. TPTB can't/won't throw him a bone because his work completely supports divine creation, the pre-flood world, and it's divine (Nephalim) ruled civilizations.
Of all the secrets in this world, this is one of the bigger ones that acts like the first domino to fall in the long time line of lies humanity has been spoon fed.
Many sciences are now moving toward creationism. Archeology is a big one and is proving biblical people, places, and events as part of the historical record more and more every day. The unlocking of DNA and how it functions completely obliterates evolution. Astronomy and the preciseness of physical parameters in space speak to intelligent design as well. As technology and knowledge increase so do facts that support the existence of God and the Bible as our true historical record. Cue the evolution trolls to come and make some willingly ignorant arguments. The Bible makes it very clear that those who fight against God always lose. Silly demons. 2 Peter 1:2-3
I have to wonder if either of you guys have ever actually read Hancock's books.
Answers:
A. Money. There is a river of grant money in every scientific endeavor. Projects that toe the party line get the money, those that buck the system don't. No one wants anyone else to mess with their money.
B. Prestige. It's a currency, same as money. Prestige gets you recognition and money. Anything that disagrees with a prestigious scientist's opinion is heretical and possibly tarnishes their reputation.
C. Hancock is not an archeologist, he's a journalist. He used to write columns for The Economist. Since he's not one of the annointed, he must be shunned.
D. Because he's probably onto something big.
It's very analogous to the medical industry and they way they demonize/ostracize anybody who dares to go against their narative.
That's by design via Rockefeller Medicine.
I just watched the 8-episode "season one" of Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse on Netflix.
It's a five-star presentation of a paradigm-busting theory. Hancock himself comes across as intelligent, thoughtful, open-minded, and as someone with integrity. During the series, we see his new paradigm coming together over decades as he researches sites around the globe and puts what he learns together in convincing fashion.
ANY entrenched paradigm generates resistance to being overthrown -- people were arrested and even tortured and burned at the stake for espousing theories that threatened prevailing scientific and religious paradigms during the Inquisition -- Nicholas Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, and Giordano Bruno come to mind -- but ridicule and censorship have been enough to do the job in more recent times.
The series is a red-pill because it shows solid evidence and perfectly reasonable theory being pointedly ignored and belittled by "experts" who should be engaging with that evidence and examining and attempting to falsify that theory.
Beyond that factor, Hancock's theory includes something I haven't seen mentioned yet: he believes the core REASON for the huge ancient monuments around the world -- all positioned to call attention to the heavens in one way or another and with other shared features -- is that a near-extinction event for humanity occurred near the end of the last ice age, about 12,600 years ago. The thin dark band of sediment in the geological record from that time, similar to the one marking the asteroid or comet impact 66 million years ago that ended the non-avian dinosaurs, is the piece of evidence that sealed the deal for me, but the vast man-made underground tunnels and living spaces at various places around the world also fit the framework.
The apparently much larger number of vast tunnels and underground living spaces constructed by militaries and others recently come to mind, including perhaps in Antartica. Is one purpose for those to prepare for and shield (the few) against an incoming bombardment of cometary fragments like the one that may have ended an advanced civilization (or civilizations) millennia ago? Not a high-tech, semiconductor-enabled civilization but rather an ancient Egypt-level civilization in a time where much of humanity remained at the Stone Age level? If so, that might be a major reason for keeping a lid on Hancock's theories all by itself.
I think the establishment is most scared of Graham Hancock triggering a red pill moment in the masses. When you start questioning the past, I imagine it can lead to a greater skepticism about the present as well. I'm sure the "brains" behind MSM have studied the psychology behind this. Whether Graham's theories are true or not, I'm not sure, but he brings up some very good points and they sure get you thinking.
If it’s true the Bible looks closer to being irrefutably historical to non believers. This is a battle for our souls. Just think how long they peddled the Big Bang theory. The narrative is we have been evolved over millions of years. That narrative collapses if anything else is proven true. Satan doesn’t need to get people to believe in him. He just needs people to not believe in Christ.
The idea of it.
There is the Golden Plates story that Mormons believe in. Why would Golden.Greenish mystery metal sheets (i.e. lighter than gold) be inscribed with Egyptian hieroglyphs appear in a hill in Palmyra NY? I don't know what to make of it, TBH. Nor the seer stone transcription, which amazingly produced a non-repetitive transcript, which was translated and then recorded by a second person. Imagine dictating a lengthy manuscript, longer than most PhD theses, without repetition? The most hardened forgers would have trouble making up such a long transcript. Of course none of it can be verified, which gives detractors ammunition.
Even Mormons themselves have disagreements about how this happened. Was there paganist magic involved - i.e. the use of seer stones? The story could all be part of a giant conspiracy to subvert Christianity, and the fact that Mormons become CIA agents lend credence to this. But then it was one man, with a trusted friend who created the transcript. Maybe. However, in their defense, everyday Mormons seem perfectly sincere, while toting a bible in their witnessing activities, and arguably Latter-day Saints set about doing Christian good works in the community - so one cannot criticize their faith.
Full disclosure: I am a Christian brought up with the King James bible, however, that story intrigued me, for a long time. The idea that something like that could turn up in the Americas, seemed ridiculous to me thirty years ago.
However, then Hancock comes out with the Serpent mound in Ohio documentation, and one has to go Hmmm.
This is why I think people feel threatened. Hancock is coming out with theories about a religion that predates modern religions.
"And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost."
Because he's a based patriot attempting to restore the ancient cult of kek.
Or, same reason the USA bombs Iraq and priceless artifacts.
Graham's work undermines the Holy Land narrative. It undermines dogma.
Look at how they have attributed two ancient symbols - Star of David and Swastika - to modern white culture (Jews and Nazis). Those symbols originate from India most likely. The cultural appropriation is supported for a particular purpose...to fool people about their origin story and origin of mankind.
Hint: India.
There is a larger threat.
Personally my view differs from others in that they have built up so much that our natural world around us is the product of millions years of processes like erosion and tectonics. If he's right our world was largely shaped over 1000 years and the melting of the old glaciers and impacts. Fucks up any claim of global warming being a threat imo.
when you are not part of THEIR system, you have a bullseye pointed at you, ready to fire at any moment you cross their line. the systems these people have in place are built upon the concept of CONTROL. everything else is a means to that control.
organized religion, the ufology (or u-fool-ogy) movement, the medical world (rockefeller controlled), etc. are all elements of CONTROL.
if you speak against their "science" or "already proven" statements, you are called out, targeted, financially ruined or even killed if you still persist against them.
the idea one sows, may never be allowed to grow big enough, so that it becomes a danger to their CONTROL.
that is why Jesus Christ was DANGEROUS... he exposed their system of control & manipulation to the people.
today, if you question the Pope, you're a heretic. if you question their political puppets, you're a nazi or racist. if you question their dark arts & religion, you're a conspiracy theorist.
Gramham Hancock is the man, but he is outside the establishment, and those outside voices must be squashed.
So called “Egyptologists” are nothing more than historical interior decorators. They don’t have a background in mathematics, masonry, geology, engineering or astronomy. All of these fields, when applied to Egypt and the plateau which the pyramids lay on, point to irrefutable evidence that something bigger is going on and with the help of Hancock and others like him, has opened up questions as to why the pyramids were built. Simply Egyptologists are angry because their work comes now where close to answering any of these questions.
When people find out they been fooled once, they start to question things…
I just watched his documentary series and his theory is totally plausible to me, I think this dude is onto something
Hancock is and always has been controlled oppo. The media been instructed to attack him to make him look legit. If he's "in the news" that's because they want him in the news which means they want you to look at him.
If you want an honest assessment of history, you want to listen to Jason Bresheers or read his books. He also demonstrates, quite clearly, how many of Hancock's theories and assertions lack even a basis in historical fact.
You can find him here:
https://www.youtube.com/@Archaix138/videos
https://www.amazon.com/stores/Jason-M.-Breshears/author/B01ND35Y5I?ref=ap_rdr&store_ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true
Jason will blow your mind in short order. He's the real deal, pulls no punches and is, in my experience, undoubtedly the most well-researched, well-rounded historian I've ever come across.
Thank you so much for this...had a quick look and he sounds the real deal. Truth is hard to find.
I was beginning to doubt Hancock because he is on Netflix ....deep state network😂
You're correct uk9994. Brashears will blow your mind. Former convicted murderer on a drunken rampage as a teenager. Spent 30 years in prison and read every book under the sun. Redemption at its finest. He's as well-rounded an historian as there exists today IMHO.
He's the real deal and regularly points out that Hancock's arguments are always flawed as he continues to uphold much of the mainstream lies in his theories.
His time in jail was well spent...
Are you the Morpheus who had a chat with me?
Probably, I recognize your handle. Probably on viruses?
Jonathan seagull etc.
Ah yes, that was it. Great book for a young mind!
Illusions..the next one is better in a way...seagull is what you read into it..in my case reincarnation which I was coming to believe without seeing anything about it but on levels of intelligence in people or not as the case may be.
Illusions taught me to question..something I didn't do a lot of...did not do a lot of thinking ..mainly right brain intuition etc so illusions for me was valuable although thinking once I started was annoying at times!!
Q also taught me to think in a different way...
Young people need to learn critical thinking....illusions is good at that. I spent years on four lines in that paperback...
Nice to bump into you again
If you have any website gems please let me have them .
Totally gripped....watched four...conversation with ??one of Clif highs recommends I have never watched.. .a q and a session. ..phoenix for dummies This amazing world of anomalies
I have been on this guys trail for a while....had to finish off my childhood pattern first
He is so interesting..he keeps going off on tangents which is maddening but they are interesting too!
How can people say life is boring!
Interesting take however wave handing, Hancock off, as controlled opposition here with the examples provided is disingenuous. Even a small sample covering what this Breshears discusses about the great pyramids, specifically construction and details of origin are all ideas presented by Hancock nearly 30 years ago.
I started that journey in the early 90s researching many different unorthodox viewpoints. Some have come to pass some have evolved and are clear the hypothesis of those times does not lend itself to evidence found today.
Im typing this so anyone reading your comment doesn't take this as an authoritative perspective even though their is an attempt to "sound" this way as presented.
Everything I saw this Breshears cover in regards to the Pyramids is 30 year old regurgitated information presented and spearheaded by Hancock/ and others in the mid 90s.
Nobody said Hancock never presented anything that wasn't true. What Hancock does is invent timelines and time periods with no basis in reality nor providing the slightest bit of evidence to back them up. Timelines that support the mainstream narrative I might add.
The very definition of "controlled opposition" is that many things presented are indeed true but the well is poisoned with subtle, hard-to-detect lies that become accepted due to the existence of other truthful information in the presentation. And it doesn't help him one bit that he relies on other fraudulent historical information to form his theories.
And lastly I'll add, anybody who can get their work onto Netflix is UNDOUBTEDLY being supported by the establishment cabal. This is beyond obvious, is it not?
What timelines and time periods with no basis in reality or evidence are you referring to? I am not aware of a single instance of this. Some are proposed as "to consider" many are presented based on cosmo-archaeological alignments that are repeatable, some are presented based on geological surveys and review of materials. I am not aware of a single mainstream narrative supported by any timelines hes presented. In fact it should be clear his career has been rife with ridicule because of this.
Again, relies on fraudulent historical information, what exactly is fraudulent? based on what? Alot of accusations, with no context. Is it because some internet influencer "debunked" something in a video or blog? Other than that, again I am unaware of any fraudulent historical information used in any of the information presented.
Netflix. I dont know. It is odd. Ive also seen a trending change of content on Netflix that seems to be "not expected" from a woke company. Without being a executive savy of internal decisions and communications of content allowed, this is all simply speculation.
Would take hours upon hours to discuss this. You can keep listening to the Netflix-endorsed historians or go to listen to Brashears. The choice is yours. He will answer every one of your questions, backed up with mountains of references.
He's the expert historian, not me. I'm just pointing out what to me, and several others who have DM'd me, is the obvious. Hancock is a "limited hangout" "controlled oppo" researcher, whether he realizes it or not.
Cool. However I already ran that track nearly 30 years ago and thousands of books. Im open to any source. Doesnt matter to me the source, ill use my discernment as I always have when taking in information. I responded originally because someone less discerning and reading your comment may take it as presented, matter of fact, rather than disingenious opinion.
Yep, fair enough. No offense taken. I've got a pretty discerning eye for facts vs fictions however, rated just slightly higher than "disingenuous opinion".
I think the big problem with Hancock is that he ACCEPTS AS TRUE far too many mainstream historical books and sources. Brashears points out that this is his biggest mistake as is the case for just about any field of research. You read a book by the top historian in 2022 who adds some of his own research based on "endorsed" books written in 2002, 1992, 1972, 1952, and 1922 for example. And all of those books are based on say a book from 1902 and 1882. And so it goes. All of them referencing each other as "factual sources accepted by mainstream academia".
But Brashears references THOUSANDS of different books far outside the scope of mainstream academia that either pre-date or contradict these academia-endorsed, peer-reviewed sources. He discusses how they differ, what their contradictions are and how he sees certain historical events being whitewashed, dismissed or inappropriately inserted or removed into the accepted timelines. This is invaluable.
Best of all, he tries to harmonize this "hidden history" by cross-referencing sources of different cultures and eras by looking for commonalities in their historical references. Many times he is unable to come to firm and irrefutable conclusions of which he clearly states so and this "lack of absolute certainty" makes him the most truthful historian I have ever found.
If you're regularly visiting GA you should be more than well aware that we have been lied to about virtually everything we can't easily verify for ourselves that gives the ruling cabal an advantage over their servents.
I highly recommend Rudolf Steiner as well for his insights into Lemuria & Atlantis (pre-history completely whitewashed from the mainstream) as well as how the Free Masons shaped the fate of the world during his lifetime (1850-1925), especially how they manipulated European affairs to incite WWI to their wishes. It's some eye-opening material that speaks all that followed his death right up to this very moment in time should you be interested.
My basic stance is this; unless proven otherwise, virtually everything we accept as fact that can't be readily confirmed is a deception on some level, whether half-truth or outright lie. Furthermore, if something "stands as fact" according to mainstream sources, I presume it is a deception at some level --- Without exception.
That might all sound negative-Nancy or depressing to some, but from my standpoint it is incredibly liberating once this is realized. And this is largely because all these lies generate insane and irrational beliefs in the populace that are the fundamental source of all the world's problems.
I appreciate the in depth response. Most do not go to this extent. I'll check out the sources you mentioned. Im a open book. I've gone down these paths so many times for so many years but I do not pretend to be a know it all. If something in those references resonates true with me. I will be the first to dig all the way through it.