💥🏞🔥 WATCH LIVE: HUGE BREAKING NEWS – Kari Lake’s Historic Trial In Election Contest Lawsuit At 9 AM MST 💥🏞🔥
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
LIVE VIDEO & CHAT
Comments (166)
sorted by:
Worker: “You couldn’t possibly have a 19 inch ballot on 20 inch paper.”
Lawyer: “It’d be crazy if you did, huh?”
Worker: “Yuppp.”
Expert: “19 inch ballot on 20 inch paper!”
Other lawyer: “It’s ok, though, right?”
Expert: “Nah, man. It’s pretty fucking far from ok.”
One day we can say Hobbs lost by an inch
That's bonkers, they had one more witness they could have started.
I think Richard Barris will be a good witness. Top pollster. Knows his numbers. Knows his data. I think a fresh start in the morning with him is a good idea. Everyone seems tired out for the day.
Is that the People's Pundit (poll) guy?
Yes, it is. He is on Bannon's War Room often.
Literally when doing business with the STATE or Maricopa County, the workers literally stop, and empty the buildings at 5, damn it if you are still waiting in line to file and have been for over an hour. Thy are out of there.
They stopped for the day?
You have to understand ... working more than 4 hours a day is too hard.
Did Katie Hobbs get out of testifying?
If so, was it the judge who let her run and hide?
Kari Lake withdrew the subpoena.
The case is about Maricopa's incompetence. If they got Hobbs up on the stand she could just claim no direct oversight of Maricopa elections. They would waste their time getting her to squirm and spit out non-answers and endless denials. I think Team Kari made a strategic decision to not have her testify.
My understanding is that Lake filed a Complaint with 10 counts.
The judge threw out 8 of the 10.
Due to that, Lake's attorneys withdrew the Hobbs subpoena because her testimony was not relevant to the 2 remaining counts.
But is this reversible error by the judge?
WTF did the judge throw those 8 out?
We want to know if it was a VALID election. We don't give a fuck about WHY. If it was NOT valid, then Lake won. Let's focus on what is important.
Judge seems nice and fair, but is that only on the surface? Did he already stack the deck in a corrupt way?
I actually think the judge made the right call. He tossed 8/10 to narrow the scope of the trial and for expediency. He chose to want to rule on the most relevant and germane part of Lake's suit. The 2 issues are the machine problems leading to voter disenfranchisement and Maricopa not following proper chain of custody. Those would be relatively simple legal issues and easiest to adjudicate in a timely manner.
My understanding that the Lake team in order for time and substance of evidence allowed decided to let her stay hiding in the County Bathroom.
A few days ago there was something about Hobbs claiming she was sued in her official capacity, not her personal capacity, so rather than press it, the plaintiff dropped their request for Hobbs to personally testify.
I believe it was an effort to get the first election fraud case, since before 2020, underway and not delay it any further.
Judge: I can't have my poor court reporter ...
Me: Then get another fucking court reporter and let's get on with it!
No kidding! Our nation is on the line.
I think he was just using his reporter as his excuse. He was tired out himself.
All in all, he seems pretty balanced. I'm used to seeing pure snark from biased judges so this seems nicer.
I get a good feeling about this judge, which of course doesn't guarantee anything. We'll see.
Hopefully I'm not the only one praying hard!
I am praying too.
Since you asked for it, here's a feel good meme.
u/#feelsgood
I don't understand why he can't have two. They are trying to keep on a "trial track" of days that Superior Court does. This seems to be pretty important, voting rights. Who cares if it goes until Friday?
Oh great, is that Liddy back?
Gee Tom, problems, problems, but deny, deny
All they have is "not intentional", do you have any "evidence".....blah
When they said, do you have any evidence that the Maricopa Board intended to mislead with their statement, I would have said yes. I have evidence. You are holding it right there. Is that not official Maricopa board letterhead? Have we not agreed it is authentic? Was it not their Intent to make that their official statement?
The evidence is in the very document they drafted and approved for public consumption. It's filled with lies and misstatements. We all have the evidence that they intended to misslead because they wrote and disbursed the document to millions of people themselves.
Unfortunately that is the standard the Judge set. They need to prove it was intentional and on a massive scale.
Which means as usual, NOTHING will be done and Status Quo is the verdict.
Sounds like reversible error by the judge.
Lake can appeal if she loses. This could go to SCOTUS.
Can't prove intential crime by criminals when the criminals can hide the evidence.
Was the election VALID or not? THAT is the question.
Judge seems to be working hard to allow plaintiff to present their case, and avoid defense an easy appealable issue.
Defense trying to throw shit against the wall and distract to meaningless red herrings, but judge seems to be threading the needle decently.
The defense attorney asked Miss Honey if she had any evidence of injection of ballots.
A great answer would have been:
"If we had proper chain of custody records, injection of ballots would be clear as day, but since we don't have those records there is way no telling how ballots additional to the 50 we know about, were injected. As such, we can only rely on eye witness testimony, video evidence, or other sources which I do not have."
What a fricken circle jerk! Not having the evidence IS the evidence assholes! Wow...
Man, these defense attorneys have NOTHING.
Stephen Richer and his merry band, messed up the election, "but not intentially".
Yep ...
Changing to 19" ballots that all got rejected ... just an accident.
Separating the ballots and images so they could not be reconciled ... just an accident.
300,000 mystery ballots injected in and counted, not from drop boxes or precincts ... just an accident.
Chain of custody ignored, making those ballots invalid by law ... just an accident.
Katie Hobbs threatening prosecution for not certifying a questionable election result ... just a coincidence.
Funny how ALL the coincidences work in only ONE direction.
Pima County about 10 years ago when Wendy Rodgers was running for Rep (I think), magically found ballots in a car trunk. Seriously if that is how election workers treat votes, they shouldn't be allowed to work or volunteer again.
Ironically the sound is working at the same percentage as the PRINTERS election day. LOL
https://www.12news.com/video/news/live_breaking/kari-lakes-election-challenge-proceeds-to-trial/75-69f60a14-da66-4739-8e6a-d6e4126d1385
That link is dead, Jim.
why does the audio keep cutting out/
she gone
Objection from the "elected gov". Geez, no prejudice there Katie Hobbs attorney
That witness was effective. Showed that there was no chain of custody for 275,000 ballots, which means those ballots were invalid.
Next!
That last attorney is a real slime.
He might have been one of Katie Hobb's minions that were posting prolifically on twitter without the disclaimer that he worked for her. I Had to look up names on LinkedIn
Doing his job well.
Imagine what kind of piece of shit a human would have to be in order to agree to try like hell to prevent any revelation of an illegal election.
That's the problem with today's law schools. They do not promote justice. They promote a "no such thing as right vs. wrong, so go try to win at all costs, even though you destroy your country in the process."
Viewable from outside this courtroom. Engraved into the South Tower (bldg) at the top, in very large letters.
"The First Duty of Society is Justice" - Alexander Hamilton
How many lawyers see this engraving every day and ignore it?
Fukin A right doggie
Truth < what you can convince someone to believe.
That would be false truth.
Truth would be what can objectively be proven to be true.
hobbs attorney, lol lord
"intentially" broke the law
doesn't want to go to them not mainting custody, not providing forms, "not evidence"
Hey, officer, do you have any evidence that I intentionally made a decision to do 110 mph on the highway?
Uh, yeah ... the fact that you did is evidence that you decided to take that particular action.
I hope Lakes attorney ****not shoot, but shoot down that crappy point he was trying to make
LOL!
Witness just told the defense attorney what the law is!
Defense attorney: uh ... uh ... uh ... ok ... no further questions, your honor.
Yes. That looked pretty bad. She took him out at the knees!
HAHA!
Defense attorney is asking quesions that the judge previously said could not be discussed, having to do with illegal ballots.
Plaintiff attorney objects, and says we will agree that 50 illegal ballots were cast (as the defense is trying to argue), as long as defense agrees that illegal ballots WERE counted in the election.
Judge has to hold back his laughter.
yes, his face said it all now, county attorney is doing it again
lol, even the judge laughed
LOL. Defense attorney is trying to trap the witness, and the witness is shooting down everything he tries.
Professional witness was in the courtroom for one hour, he wasn't supposed to be. The threw him out. Seems like he still be allowed to testify? WTH
No, defense attorney thought it was a witness, but she was wrong.
Thank you!
Miss Honey, have you worked at a McDonald's?
The long haired lawyer seems extremely tired - his short-term memory seems shot.
Did I hear that right?
Q: If County Recorder said it was not his responsibility ...
A: It is my understanding that it is the responsibility of the County Recorder's DESIGNEE ...
So, Couty Recorder Richer is parsing words and claiming it is not HIS responsibility, but NOT then saying who's responsibility it is?
Unless I missed something, it sounds like Lake's attorney did not expect that answer.
A great last name which sounds like it came out a James Bond movie, "Miss Honey".
💯%
We just need Frau Galore to enter the court room next!
lol Stephen's tweets
So there was a 'winning' margin by Hobbs of about 20,000 votes, yet 292,000 election day Dropbox ballots have zero chain of custody? Sounds legit.
Fact Check: TRUE
Add to the mix earlier evidence that somebody simply inserted 300,000 ballots, not from drop boxes and not from any polling locations.
Also, somebody (WHO?) ordered the county to report how many ballots had been cast (so far) WHILE the election was ongoing and BEFORE anyone was counting anything. Only one reason they would want that information: to know that 300,000 was the magic number needed.
Makes it clear what happened.
Now, WHO ordered it?
No ballot box drop off forms on election day? Were all the drop box locations on election day (exception of vote centers) Locked and Closed, did they change the name of the forms, or did they just not comply with requests? Fudge forms?
Day of election I think you can only drop off at vote centers, drop boxes are closed at that point.
I also live in Maricopa.
That would be correct. Last day for mailed, Nov 1. If stamped after that, too bad. Election day drop offs in voting centers only. https://www.abc15.com/news/political/elections/where-to-drop-off-your-2022-election-ballot
So all chain of custody from County Day drop offs, to Runbeck, the forms are not in existance or have not been provided.
Is anyone else having audio issues, keeps going in and out? Edit (watching via rumble/rsbn)
I imagine Stephen Richer and Bill Gates pulling the audio plug. lol
At times, yes.
The sound is frequently out of sync with the person speaking as well.
yes
This seems a little better: https://www.12news.com/video/news/live_breaking/kari-lakes-election-challenge-proceeds-to-trial/75-69f60a14-da66-4739-8e6a-d6e4126d1385
Nice.
Shows the exibits, too, which is not shown on the RSBN stream.
Anyone with the money can buy voter registration lists. Identifiable information is on County websites. Signatures are on County websites. Maricopa County sells data.
And there is a reason why the Dems are constantly buying those lists, over and over and over, in the days, weeks, months leading up to an election:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZX3Mdfrs/
Liddy quoting Law, lol. When his clients didn't follow it.
Her attorneys are just sad.
Every time I see one of these Long Hair Attorneys I'm like, 🙄.
Why on Earth wouldn't she choose a Short Haired Attorney?
There should be an entire stable of attorneys helping with this.
I just went through a trial with a County Clerk exhibit list which did NOT have anymore an identification as to what it was, as Lake's attorney just stated. This was County generated exhibit list. It stayed non-descriptive.
However ...
It is still up to the attorney to disclose to the other party whatever evidence he will present. Of course, the defense attorney could be lying. Plaintiff attorney needs to be ready for that, since it is likely.
Sounds like plaintiff attorney sent a link to defense and said "here's my stuff." As judge pointed out, that is not disclosure. Judge is hearing all this stuff now with the ace in the hole that he can discard it all if he wants.
Judge does appear (at least) to be attempting to be fair on this issue, though.
Lake's attorney is not prepared.
He does not seem very sharp, and/or prepared. He keeps making mistakes
This would be a shocking error, BUT knowing the County system (Court) as I do, it would not surprise me that the Clerk/County made a mistake which should not prejudice the Plaintiff.
Possible.
Sounds like the Clerk refused to accept evidence that needed to be entered, and Plaintiff attorney was told it must be uploaded via website, which he says he could not do online.
Clerk is at fault for not accepting document. The courts have gotten lazy (because that's what corruption breeds).
But attorney still appears unprepared to argue his points.
He probably hasn't slept the last 4 days.
It is also possible that since this is the Maricopa County court system, the corruption extends into various clerk offices. It is possible that they are doing everything they can possibly do to throw wrenches into Kari's case, including being uncooperative and/or deceptive about specific procedures to make the attorneys look bad.
Is his barber in on it too?
Are you saying that you don't believe there are politically biased, corrupt employees in government offices at all levels all across the country, including many county clerk offices? Or are you simply being paid by the post?
My comment was a joke about her Attorneys long hair. As in the barber was paid to make this dude's head look silly so he ... Well you get what I meant by it now. I just thought it was a funny thing to say. Paid by the post? Gross.
And to further answer the question, however misguided, is that I absolutely believe, or rather I know, that everyone in those positions has a bias. Anyone that's taken a 1st level psych course knows that is something humans have. A bias. Many are honorable as they work hard to not let their political biases interfere with their commitment to the constitution and the law of our land. Unfortunately it only takes a few to fuck up the whole enterprise. I don't think any of that is controversial really anywhere.
Dont worry. I got and liked your joke, despite other buzzkills here haha.
In that case, I apologize for being snarky. Your comment just came across as very shilly to me.
VERY possible.
It seems the courts are trying to sabotage the hearing already.
The Maricopa County part of the courts certainly. I get a good feeling about this judge, but he stated that the court system they are in is a hybrid between the Maricopa County system and another system (I don't remember the name he said). Things apparently are entered into each system differently, and it doesn't sound like the two systems communicate well with each other. So you have to submit things to both systems separately, and I am not sure that Kari's attorney assistants were fully aware of that. They probably submitted to one system and thought that was all that was necessary. Anyway, that was my takeaway from the earlier exchange where the attorney claimed a document was submitted but the judge couldn't find it in the system. I could be misunderstanding the whole thing.
County Clerk's office received documents which then once filed/uploaded into the County's system, go to the County Court system. It can take 10 or more days from the time of filing (getting that stamp from the Clerk's office) to the document entering the Court. Why the delay's now that almost everything that they can do electronically, I have no idea. The usual excuses are given. Not enough personel, holidays, vacations, ......
This is an area where I see a lot of room for biased clerks to play games since this was less than a week from filing to trial.