How many of you knew this??
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (118)
sorted by:
https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2022/04/16/the-cause-of-and-cure-for-cancer/
https://killcancercells.com/cancer-researchers/warburg/
This is an amazing read!
It's nice to have this in my home town:
https://www.carlsbadfoodtours.com/blog/history-of-carlsbad-alkaline-artesian-mineral-water/
👌👍
Thank you for this. I've saved this post. :)
👍👌
I can believe this. Far more plausible than "Viruses dont exist" crap that some people are pushing. Viruses dont exist in nature, but does not mean they have not been creating them in the lab.
I find it very interesting....
I used to believe this until 6 months ago during our winter when our whole family came down with a flu I have never experienced before. We were all on Zelensky protocol, my vitamin D levels were through the roof and still we caught the flu.
I do think we were healthy and we didnt get as badly hit as the vaccinated folks who repeated would go down for a week at a time and catch it multiple times.
Regardless, there is something - whether you call it virus or a bioweapon or something else, even if its man made.
Yeah, none of these explanations cut it. Its not like every now and then we get sick like that. this was a one off. And after we started getting healthy.
And yeah, we can feel the shedding effects, esp my wife. Not the same, it happens right after we spend any time in crowds. General pain, lethargy, uneasiness etc.
The flu was very different.
There's literally no such thing as viruses. However... in 1923 the scientific community used the term "virus" to describe a microbe smaller than a bacteria....that they all HYPOTHESIZED to exist as the electron microscope had yet to be invented in the mid 1930s. They literally lacked the technology to see such a thing in the first place.
Thus, all those alleged deadly outbreaks prior to the mid-1930s blamed on hypothetical viruses like rabies, spanish flu, polio, smallpox, etc. were nothing but speculation.
And here's the kicker; even thought the technology has existed to see something of this size for the past 90-odd years, this is still true today as nobody has ever found a so-called virus in the real world. Rendering the idea of a "man-made" virus even more ludicrous.
Noting that Spanish flu has already been proven to be bacterial meningitis. Conclusive especially after 'flu' victims were exhumed and analyzed.
Bacterial pneumonia to be precise not meningitis. Even Fauci admitted this. Perhaps the only truth he's ever told. And yes, pneumonia was a part of it - scare fright plus abandonment conflict is the cause. Tuberculosis was the larger part of it combined with pneumonia. A truly nasty double-whammy.
Bacteria existed even before we could see them. It doesn't mean they were never real.
Don't get yourself confused. We've had the technology, know-how and skills to SEE the mythical virus for over 90 years and have seen and isolated many objects of the same alleged size, structure and morphology as unicorn-viruses. It's not a "technical problem" I'm alluding to.
It's a GIGANTIC LIE. And it couldn't be more blatant. Viruses do not exist. Somebody would have found one long ago if they did.
I think those are all "artist's renderings."
....
You've seen electron microscope pictures of decayed monkey kidney cell particles and artistic rendering and CGI images of unicorn-shmiruses.
Nobody has ever found a mythical virus in the real world in the history of humanity --- because they don't exist.
I have sat in a room with 75 cardio-pulmonary specialists and listened to them being told by their peer at the podium that research shows the primary cause of lung cancer in smokers is radioactive particles in tobacco. None of them batted an eye. The reason is the tobacco plant readily takes up polonium in rock phosphate fertilizer and stores it in it's leaves.
I read some reports that vaping was causing cystalization of the lungs. I don't think they are harmless but again not enough study done on the long term effects.
Those reports are propaganda. They ARE harmless and the long term effects have been studied for nearly a century. People say 'not enough study on the long term effects' because they are uninformed. To clarify, there are three ingredients: nicotine is about as harmful as caffeine and well-tested, vegetable glycerine is known to be harmless (beneficial, actually - they pump its vapor into the lungs of sick newborns) also well-tested, and the last ingredient is the same flavors you inhale when you smell dessert baking. Inhaling these things is not new, all that is new is the portability (because of lithium battery technology). Nobody should take up vaping with nicotine from scratch, but all smokers should transition to it. (Nicotine harms adults about as much as caffeine, but is notably harmful to developing brains; so no kids or pregnant women should touch it. What harms grown smokers has never been the nicotine, even Nicoderm knows that.)
I'd be willing to bet the "cause" of cancer is the additives to tobacco. We have nicotine receptors for a reason, it actually causes a flushing reaction in the body. If you grow your own I'm sure you'd be fine.
surprisingly to most people, it’s the tobacco plant that has harmful chemicals and heavy metals. You are exposed to them when you burn and inhale the smoke of the the leaves. The tobacco plant itself attracts the radioactive isotopes of lead and cadmium etc as its growing. it’s similar to how the sunflower plant works which the Russians used to decontaminate chernobyl after the accident.
So basically you are filling your lungs with tar and radioactive nano particles when you smoke. The average smoker is exposed to more radiation than astronauts. That’s why they tend to get cancer.
So if the tobacco is grown organically, naturally, in clean soil, it would not have any heavy metals? Like from weird fertilizers, pesticides etc?
Yes, logically, it would most likely be far less if it was grown in an environment that was largely free of those things.
Nailed it
So, sunflower seeds fed to birds and the packaged ones sold to humans may contain the radioactive isotopes as well?
I don't think it concentrates in the seeds but does in other parts of the plant it does.
This is quite factinating, thanks for the info. I agree that smoking it is not the best choice. I believe it does have many medicinal purposes, primarily as a salve.
Says your science degree or what? People have used tobacco for 1000s of years. Cancer has been prevalent for what, about 100? So what about this plant kills you, exactly? Here is a hint...the FDA tells you it's bad...And They also approved the covid jab. We have nicotine receptors for a reason, and I don't think that reason is to kill us.
Tar in the lungs from the way tobacco burns. It's not a big quandary. Why do you think cancer rates went down when they introduced filtered cigarettes?
And cancer has been around for thousands of years, there are many descriptions of even native Americans dying from cancer like lung illnesses.
Wait, vaping has been studied for a century?
Yes, each of the ingredients in their liquid and vapor phase have been studied for a century and found harmless (except the minor nicotine concerns I mentioned). Vaping was designed to be safe, and so was built around safe ingredients. To be clear, I'm talking about regular vaping (nicotine e-liquid) - I can't speak to vaping weed or other random crap people have been experimenting with.
Yes, liquid and vapor, but that's not how people smoke cigarettes, you're being purposefully naive on this.
Who cares how they smoke cigarettes? Smoking kills. But when they vape, it is liquid that is vaporized into vapor, a vapor whose ingredients do not chemically interact and whose ingredients have been well-tested individually for almost a century.
Then why do I get all these ads that repeatedly berate vaping for being toxic? "Metal, in your lungs!"
Damn, even being awake it's difficult to find truth in this fubar world.
I've been vaping weed and it's okay I guess.
I remember a web MD article noting the fact that smokers were hospitalized less than non smokers from COVID and they thought it had something to do with the nicotine 🤷♀️
Interesting considering when vape first came out I was mid thirties and decided to quit smoking and start vaping. Six months later in the summer months I was hospitalized with blood clots in my lungs.
All tests came back inconclusive on how the clots came to be. The ONLY thing in my life that was different was the vape.
Needless to say I quit vaping and started smoking again. Neither are good for you but now im.on blood thinners for life.
The Popcorn Lung controversy was from a butter flavoring that was absolutely delicious in nearly every flavor mix - kind of like how butter is in cooking. Industrial popcorn workers got popcorn lung from lifetime exposure at the factory a while back and it was awful; so out of a MASSIVE abundance of caution, the e-liquid community decided to abandon its use voluntarily. Nobody ever got popcorn lung from vaping.
The states insist that the feds support smoking, not vaping, because of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement of 1998: you can sell cigarettes in this state but it will kill our citizens so you must pay us millions every year; in return, we will ensure that none of them can sue you. The states have already borrowed against this income for years to come and cannot afford diminishing payouts.
So many carcinogens in them screwing with circulation
They're what now? Don't you know anyone with asthma that smokes to help open their airways and breathe easier?
I found this about 10 yo when FIL was healthy then diagnosed with cancer, was ‘treated’ and was dead, in a very short 6 months.
Also, my firm belief the hospital was trying to euthanize the most amazingly sane granny, by use of psychotropics, they induced crazy and did not give her water. We demanded her off drugs and put on water and SOaB she was out of there in a couple days.
One way I discovered to help oxygenate blood cells is a hot bath with epsom salt. Hot as you can take for 45 minutes. The magnesium in the epsom will pull cells apart and allow more area on each cell to absorb oxygen. They clump, as I recall, mostly due to diet, particularly sugar. I quit sugar last fall, including bread and alcohol, slept for 3 days straight. After, energy levels are increased by several orders of magnitude. Pharma and phood are killing us.
I know about the alkaline versus acidic body which is why bicabonate of soda was promoted to prevent cancer or treat it by alkalining the body when taken daily.
So we should take baking soda? Ive heard it does a body good
Have a read of this https://www.feelgoodfamily.cz/baking-soda---true-enemy-of-the-pharmaceutical-industry/
Good stuff thanks!
Just to make sure, not baking soda, bicarbonate of soda. Make sure its food grade, no aluminium. See thread below of how to take it.
This must be why my mom started drinking alkaline water.
Do you know a good resource you can recommend to do this? Thankks
Check this older thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6zdpma7/another-inexpensive-and-easy-can/
Cut out sugar, cancer feeds on sugar. Small glass of hot water, 2 teaspoon of bicarb of soda, one teaspoon of maple syrup or honey. I watched a video of some seminar given by specialists in cancer, doctors etc and they described it as the trojan horse when taken with the sweet addition, the cancer cells want to absorb the sugar, the bicarb then is activated right in the cancer cell. Take this for a week solid and then have a break off for a week and back on. Some people boil up a mix of maple syrup and bicarb, to ensure its mixed well and then keep in a jar in the fridge, take a spoonful a day as a preventative. I think the point is that it definately alkalines the body and cancer cells don't survive in that environent.
Bless you. 6 years cancer free. Will study up and do as preventative.
There is a book by Dr. Mark Sircus... search Amazon for: B00QWQUCYA
Thanks you so very much for your kindness. On order.
Terrain theory is much more accurate than germ theory, thats all I know I'm just a knuckle dragger.
I literally deal with human, and chicken shit. Don't believe I've ever gotten sick from it, and I don't use hand sanitizer. Consider it anictodal evidence. But I rarely wash my hand unless I get into some really nasty stuff.
Seems like a good business model going forward for any anons that are ambitious.
Viruses have existed before history..and Dr. Warburg was not the discoverer of the cause of cancer
Back in 1923 they also thought blood letting was legit, that women needed to be masturbated by doctors to relieve them from hysteria, and that adding radium to water made for an excellent energy drink.
Whether viruses are real or not, trying to push that as a truth through a meme referencing 1920's medicine probably isn't going to get any traction.
No one used leeches in 1923.
And literal snake oil, shock treatments and lobotomies.
Do me a favor. Go research the earliest cases of smallpox and come back to me with how long ago they were recorded.
And then we'll have a discussion about how people actually could invent them that far back.
Admit it, the meme sucks. Don't shoot the messenger.
People use leeches now, what are you talking about?
There is mounting evidence that blood letting is actually useful. There is a reason billionaires are paying to be injected with blood from young people. Old rats injected with young blood healed quicker and showed benefits in basically all of the standard blood markers like cholesterol.
They are currently testing to see if removing blood periodically mimics the benefits by forcing the endocrine system to create replacement cells, refreshing the blood.
If I had the 8k dollar a treatment, I would absolutely go get blood transfusions from 18 year olds.
Blood letting is like the absolute opposite of infusions.
Of course. But it’s the idea of forcing creating of new blood cells that is the question.
Giving blood on purpose on schedule is already a common practice in bodybuilding and sports in which steroids and EPO are used. Steroids and EPO raise hematocrit. Once it gets above 50 the risk of excess clotting increases. Basically the blood becomes sludge. This is one of the risk factors that kills bodybuilders and wrestlers due to cardiac failure in their 40s. Years of steroids abuse without monitoring hematocrit. During the lance Armstrong years many of the bikers had so much EPO abuse and high hematocrit that they would go out for rides at midnight to keep the blood pumping and prevent dying in their sleep.
No coincidence that the clot shot is killing people in their sleep. The blood congeals and bam dead.
Why wouldn’t it be beneficial to artificially drive up the creation of new red blood cells? Seems likely there would be some benefit on a long enough timeline. The infusion of young blood giving positive health results leads me to think there is possibly a benefit to doing with one’s own body.
You're confounding the time period versus the honest science. Stop being a time snob- the average IQs haven't changed that much over time; charlatans always existed as did philosophers. Alkali systems and treatments that worked versus radium and cocaine had clear evidence.
As far as I know, you're 100% correct about Alkali systems.
Why in the world would you jeopardize the promotion of such a beneficial system as Alkali systems by posting it next to something so absolutely ridiculous, that people reject the whole thing without a second thought?
Do you really think all viruses are "created" by men? Pox diseases has been around for thousands of years. If you don't agree with that statement, then you should also be objecting that people are making Alkali systems look ridiculous by promoting it next to complete nonsense.
Well I'm not sure there are such things as viruses, since they've never actually been isolated or proven IRL, so there's that.
You're making a viruses aren't real argument on a thread that contends viruses are real, but they're man-made and patented.
You have sauce that the thousands of photos of virus under microscope are fake or you taking the 100% "trust me bro" route?
Haha, there's no photo of a virus, lots of cgi though. I'm a biochemist, used to accept the declarations of "experts" until I started reading the papers. There is not one scientific paper pricing isolated virus, nor validated sample of isolated virus. Many universities and research labs have requested them and are told there is none. The procedure these witch doctors use generate fragments of cell damage DNA debris, which they manually assemble into what they claim is a virus. There is no isolate. The debris can be recreated without even introducing infected tissue, better the process they use kills the cells!
Again, you don't have to trust me, but you do have to read the densely technical stuff. I can't prove a negative, but I can point out that the industry and scientism have no proof. It's hard to unwind years of trust and assumptions, I totally understand, but the gaping holes in their work speak for themselves.
I was going to refute you point by point, but after considering how ridiculous your arguments are I've decided it's beneath me.
Found Clot Adams!
Worked with a cancer surgeon for many years. At one point we were getting lots of young moms (approx 22 yo). Many died with standard treatment. Boss told us 'there is a cure out there but we're not allowed to use it'.
Knew about Warburg Nobel prize in cancer of lung then 2 years later stomach cancer. Tried to track down his research in a university medical library and couldnt find anything. All info was confiscated.
Yeap. Keep stating once people understand patents it makes sense. Im usually pushing it is specifically on cannabis / cancer. BUT by stating cannot patent nature, means if viruses are patents. . . . explains exactly this. 'Colds' are just the body detoxing. I guess its like the germ theory meme, a fish in dirty water: clean it vs a fish in dirty water: medicate it
The last small print line.
No wonder they’ve pushed the masks.
There's a reason Brad Pitt and all these asshole celebs speak about an alkaline "diet" .
They're in the know. Then the media spins it off as "those crazy celebs".
It's done intentionally to cause at the very least distrust and confusion in the process.
How can we ALKINATE our body?
Celery
Awesome. I love celery. Any other options?
Has to be something like drinking baking soda and water....
8oz with one tblsp soda one tblsp molasses. Heat until dissolved. I believe I saw the recipe posted here.
Wait- molasses? We're supposed to be cutting sugar...?
All i can say is I tried it. I had good results with it. I don't do it daily as it suggested but did notice results.
Tastes much better with maple syrup....
Check this older thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6zdpma7/another-inexpensive-and-easy-can/
I think it’s teaspoon not tablespoon. I tried with molasses and couldn’t tolerate it. I actually found just drinking the warm water with dissolved baking soda easier to get down.
Edit: the sugar is to act like a trojan horse, I think. Same concept if you’ve heard of sugar with pure gum spirit turpentine.
Get into juicing , Celery, Kale , coriander , turmeric and garlic some tomatoes but not many as they are acidic.
Whole (with skin) lemon or whole grapefruit and whole orange spun in a blender thin it with water drink daily
Thank you for that, I’ll try.
I heard about a lemon in water to start your day (without skin)
I figured it would wreck havoc on teeth enamel
The properties in the skins are the most beneficial check this out , https://youtu.be/1Z-EOytgEhA
ALL the viruses that HAVE patents started with AIDES and ends with COVID...
Someone posted a graphic depicting that between AIDES and COVID, those viruses and the vaccines are PATENTED...