Worldwide there was a decidedly de-consolidating result that appeared to affect the largest colonial country left which was Great Britain. This appears to have forced the British Crown to pivot into the "Commonwealth" which was defacto continued stealth colonization and control via British currency and/or installation of Central Banks in all former colonies. This may have been done to conceal the direct ownership of so much land by the British Royal Family, specifically the Queen; Also, note the resulting destruction of the British Pound as the world reserve currency which was long-in-the-tooth, but does not seem to be an optimal outcome for a British Royal family and their banker buddies that were supposedly in FULL CONTROL.
Overall, the effects of WW II appeared to be a "taking away" of lots of formerly British-controlled assets if one assumes that strong man Stalin (control of Eastern Europe) was a quasi-nationalist and MI-6 had not fully penetrated and taken control of the Secret Police/KGB until after Stalin's death on March 5, 1953 (age 74) [which may have been an assassination by the same MI-6].
Note that Stalin was first celebrated by Time magazine and New York Times (1920s-30s) while they thought he was a globalist puppet. But once he got off the chain (unknown date) they reviled him as an evil Totalitarian dictator (see similar treatment of Hitler).
RELEVANCE TO Q OPERATION AND CURRENT WORLDWIDE EVENTS
I think this is relevant to NOW because it appears that the rest of the Commonwealth being dismantled is underway. Here is sauce from 2021 when Barbados left the Commonwealth and became and independent Republic: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/29/barbados-set-to-become-a-republic-ditching-british-queen ;There are some breadcrumbs that Reagan and Thatcher were attempting to dismantle parts of the Commonwealth in the early 1980s, but their efforts got blocked/interrupted.
Pharaonic ruler colors of blue and gold in Commonwealth flags:
Barbados Flag is Interesting with some familiar colors: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqskP27Y/barbados-a-likely-human-traffick/c/
Commonwealth Flag is Quite Interesting: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aT36JyAl/presenting-the-flag-of-the-briti/c/
Nauru Flag has same colors: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXbNZut8/mr-pindar-sir-the-qtards-have-di/c/
Ukrainian Flag for comparison: https://patriots.win/p/16aANFwvZR/happy-presidents-day-to-the-pres/c/
Additional parallel to NOW is the pending WW III which appears to be getting used to dismantle the US "debt dollar" as the world reserve currency AND dismantle US control of numerous countries worldwide that have had governments "installed" by the US via CIA/State Department operations (Ukraine being the prime example). Note the creation of BRIC and the nationalist-oriented alliance that is developing there to counter the US "debt dollar". BRIC by BRIC post:https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAJemTbi/gold-will-destroy-the-federal-re/c/
The more and more I have been trying to understand history, the more I am realising that every Cabal operation that could not be stopped by the White Hats of that time, were used by these WHs to take down part of the Cabal itself.
And in each time, somehow, they got the Cabal to pretty much go down that path only for things to not exactly work out at the last minute.
Another recent example that comes to mind was 9/11 and the Patriot Act, which ended up giving all the intercepted data to the NSA/Good Guys.
Re:Stalin
I was just talking about this the other day!
There are a lot of similarities between Crown colonies being allowed to go free, while secretly being chained via central banks after WW2, and all the countries being allowed to go free from the Central Banks while secretly planning to enslave us via CBDC.
Only difference is, in 1940s-50s-60s not a single person even udnerstood how central banks worked, whereas now a huge threshold has been reached in terms of this udnerstanding, and its impossible to put the Genie back into the bottle.
More to the story on almost all big historical events compared to what "history books" are trying to say. The Encyclopedia Britannica (1963) and Encyclopedia Americana (1949) editions published just after World War II are absolutely fascinating with the level a detail of all the related events that were going on throughout the world at the time.
And by the way, the 1949 Encyclopedia Americana has the "flat Earth map" (same as UN logo map) embossed on the front inside cover of every volume.
This recent Substack article by PrussiaGate is probably one of their best articles and explains the current world financial system and ties together several of their other series. Past articles get into the background of Europe's Royal Families, including the British (Prussian) Crown, the founding and infiltration of the USA, creation of the WEF, etc. Apologies in advance if you've already read this: https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/havens-horse-heads-and-hermann-part-11d I stumbled onto them on their third article of their first series. Very compelling IMHO.
Thank you for this article. This one got me started on all of the rest or his articles. They should be a must read for all.
Thank you. It's a lot of reading but well worth it.
Nice sauce! ty.
Thanks. That entire Substack series is well sauced. There is so much material one could write an entire history curriculum off of it, and probably be the only one close to what actually occurred.
Exactly this. Each thing the cabal wants to do is a double-edged sword. But if the playbook is known, one can harness the cabal to do what they want to do anyway and then just infiltrate and snatch away control at the last moment. This appears to be the cabal's playbook used against them per their continuous infiltration and weaponization of institutions against the very people they were started to help.
Best example of this is blockchain/Bitcoin, imo. Aspects of it developed by both whitehats and blackhats back as far as 1978 from what I can trace. Blackhats wanted an "untraceable" currency for their money laundering and criminal activities; and for usage exclusively by the elites once CBDC implemented. Whitehats wanted a decentralized currency they could use to implode the Central Bank and harness to convertible gold at some point (to make it real currency).
Blockchain/BTC is also a perfect example of this, indeed.
Interesting theory.
Too complicated. The tribe of people who live in the illegaly formed country needs to eliminate the goy and implement eugenics but failed. So they are tryin again now. Bankers control the world, and the British Crown was competition to banks/EU/4th Reich.
Actually a pretty succint summary. History has been intentionally clouded to make it virtually impossible for most to identify the REAL enemy. Praying that our true history will be revealed soon.
The dismantling of the empire was well underway after WWI when air superiority began to be more important than naval forces. The freemasons orchestrated both the rise and fall of the British empire as was part of the greater "divine plan" so ordained on earth.
But technically speaking, the USA is a vassal state of the "British Empire" (aka Crown Corporation / Crown Temple / Inns of the Court / Central Banking hub in the City of London, Westminster). The United States was quietly re-admitted into the imperial empire by way of the Civil War (coup) and then the **LEGAL (Leige Lord) SYSTEM" in the 1870s, decimating the Constitution and all forms of Common Law that were in place for the previous 80 years.
Agreed with all of that. It appears that publicly the power center was intentionally shifted to the US during WW2, and it may be because they could not squeeze any more life out of the British Pound as it was largely fiat at that point and had been for a while.
Note that the semi-secret installation of a corporate/Nazi government in the US on March 6, 1933 (National Emergency) and the collateralization of all sovereign state assets on March 9, 1933 (Banking Act) was apparently the cabal "backup" to making sure they had a new player to transition to from Great Britain if their plans with Hitler for a "European Union" version 1 did not work out. They made sure to have all corporate state overlays and elimination of Constitutional/Common Law in all states done by January 1, 1939 well ahead of the September 1, 1939 planned kickoff of the war.
Yes, agreed. The same people/group own/run all the central banks, so it's really just a matter of "appearances", be it the pound or dollar. They milk it dry regardless as they sap our labor and energy through inflation.
3/9/33 was FDR declaring full bankruptcy of the US to the international banksters and thus pledging all the labor, life and property of the "U.S. Citizen" to them.
Their backing of Hitler enabled them to greatly deplete the powerful "white Christian nations" that were gaining too much economic and military power for their liking.
In the grand scheme, I don't think in terms of "countries" any longer. There are two powerful factions in this world embedded in all national governments. Both understand how this reality words, and both work hard to ensure we don't understand, which leaves them holding all the power, as our lack of understanding causes us to give all our power away to them. One of these groups works to maintain a positive force, the other a negative force. Their mandate is to maintain a 50/50 balance as best they can. Such is the place we find ourselves in - the world of duality/opposites/polarity.
That's right, you're well researched. Just a minor correction, I believe they instituted the "Rules of Civil Procedure" by uniting common law and equity in 1938 however. This lead to the maritime/admiralty "juris-diction", which in reality I think is more likely "In rem" jurisdction and paved the way for the single judge, once merely a "referee", to begin making determinations in both "law" and "fact". And at that point, they could and did do whatever they pleased. This was the final blow that then allowed them to move forward with the war as you suggest. And BTW, it was Japan attacking Russia that was the REAL start of WWII. But of course, the history books had to be re-written to blame it all on Hitler and the Nazis. Good times, eh?
Love these kinds of threads on GAW. Awesome to see Anons who are are so well versed in real history and can extract information out of obfuscation!
For those wanting a source for the "Rules of Civil Procedure" here it is.
While looking for it, this sentence stood out to me:
Okay, looks like we gotta dig into these amendments.
This is new to me. Never realised it was an important happening, but it seems you are correct:
https://www.historynet.com/world-war-ii-soviet-and-japanese-forces-battle-at-khalkhin-gol/
Interesting timing, considering Hitler attacked Poland in Sep 1939. I dont think that timing is a coincidence. Its almost like he was waiting for Soviets to be freed from their conflict with Japan before attacking Poland.
Bingo! Good digs my friend. I love people who are curious about my comments rather than telling me I'm bonkers...hahaha.
One other quick note, "Civil Procedure" is "Roman Civil Law" or "Contract Law" or "Commercial Law".... the "Justinian Deception" perfected by the emperor himself. It is a system of "Commercial Warfare", aka "Commerce".
Thus, from 1933 to 1938 they undertook an UNLAWFUL CONVERSION of the "living man/woman and their PROPERTY", pledging it to the international bankster faction by way of the "strawman", the "artificial person" or "Legal person", which is a trust/corporation.
So "John Q Public", the natural person, was unlawfully converted to "JOHN Q PUBLIC", the artificial/legal person you see on all your legal documents, and became the PROPERTY of the CREATORS of the "LEGAL system" called "Rules of Civil Procedure". Maxim of Law -> "He who creates controls".
After we unwittingly "became", through ignorance, PROPERTY, they then took control of our primary property (homes/cars) as it is quite obvious that "Property cannot OWN property. This was when they instituted the split property title, the Mort-gage (death-pledge) as well as the automobile "Regis-stration" (give to the king). By "registering" your property with the state, you split the actual property ownership into two parts; the "Legal Title" which has full control of the property in question (house/car), and the "equitable title", which grants "use and enjoyment" privileges to its holder.
Understanding all of the above that the Constitution was based on English "Common Law", stemming from the Magna Carta of course as we were "sovereigns" equal to the lords, barons, earls, dukes (i.e. those who were sovereign in England holding their "title of nobility). This is what was usurped completely and finally in 1938.
There's more to the story of course that's a high-level overview. Check out the statement attributed, but can't be definitively proven, to Edward Mandell House, the Rothschild agent who Wilson called his "alter ego". https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/house.htm
This is exactly what happened, regardless of who really said it or not...
Do you happen to have any sauce or references for figuring out when state corporations were actually overlaid on top of the sovereign states? It appears to be all in 1933, but STATE CORPS are hiding their Articles of Incorporation that show they are domiciled in DC. Clearly the STATE BAR CORPS were the entity that created these STATE CORPS. For example STATE BAR OF CA CORP created in 1927, and then STATE OF CA CORP created in 1933 sometime after March 9, 1933.
One way I have been attacking this issue is to identify the date when the STATE BAR CORP was integrated into the Judicial Branch, and then attacking everything as being unconstitutional from that point forward per violation of Article IV, Section 4 (corporate gov't instead of Republican form of gov't). In the case of CA this means that from Nov 8, 1966 integration date of public corporation STATE BAR OF CA CORP (1927), ALL legislation, rules, actions, judicial decisions, amendments, etc are unconstitutional, ab initio (from the beginning). This implodes the 1974 13th Amendment that put into place the Income Tax in CA.
This vector of attack appears to have great potential for all "integrated bar states" to implode the state income tax (as unconstitutional per Article IV, Section 4 violation by inclusion of a public corporation into the judiciary branch of the State Constitution). I believe this would include CA, IL, NY, MA, CT, VA among others.
I don't have any references in particular, but I do know the state government and federal buildings were all handed to the international banksters after not being able to pay back the original $6million Franc loan to the French after the Revolutionary War. The Crown Corporation bought this debt from the French and it accrued to over $80Million USD in 1859. The original 13 states attempted to spread this debt around to the southern states and this is why they seceded.
From 1860-1880 we had the Civil War, the creation of the fictional legal entity "Corporation" (talking corpse), the 1871 Organic Act created "The United States of America Inc.", which was dissolved quickly but reincorporated a couple different times in the mid-1870s. All the while, the southern states were held under martial law and their senators/congressmen were simply proxy agents for the conquering victors.
During this time, the state capitals and buildings, along with the federal buildings were all pledged to the international banksters as collateral for the unpaid loan. Exactly when each State of State (e.g. "State of New York", "State of Iowa") corporation's paperwork was filed I do not know, but this was just a legal formality. The bankruptcy pledge was already in effect.
But I encourage you to keep doing your research along these lines to help better spread this information!
Your analysis about how we entered the maritime law and how sovereign humans became strawmen person, and hence bringing them under the jurisdiction of the maritime law.
I like to remind people that there are broadly 3 areas of law.
Common Law (Law of the Land) - applies to sovereign human beings and given to us from Bible. As long as you dont grievously hurt, rape or kill someone, you are not going to have anything to answer under Common Law.
Maritime Law (Law of water) - applies to contracts between fictitious entities. Currently, as long as we go accept our "all caps fictional personhood", we will be subject to this law.
Trust Law (Law of air) - is the most superior of all laws. When you are acting as a fiduciary for someone else or for a Trust, this law applies.
I think the slippery slop from sovereign humans to fictitious all caps personhood happened for a while, definitely from the time of the Civil war. By the time Fed, IRS and Birth certificate systems were implemented, we were technically already in this phase, but it would only work if all the judges, lawyers, politicians etc completely bought into this and believed this.
I believe those final stages of converting all institutions, officially, to treat us as fictional entities and make us subject to maritime law was fully accomplished in 1938. Of course the world war that broke out conveniently after that was the perfect way to ensure no one had a chance to realise this.
Yes, you've got it right. L.A.W (Land->Air-Water).
The amazing trick they're pulling off now is their "In Rem" jurisdiction however. This is like next level legal trickery. The judge can put on the appropriate hat of any of the 3 at any given time during a proceeding, always in an effort to benefit he and his benefactors the most.
So basically, you never know what's going on from word to word, moment to moment in a court proceeding. The judge can agree and say "sure, you're a "natural person" living man I'm looking at and talking to" in one moment, and then in the next ask you to agree you're the person named John Q Public on your driver's license? And you of course say, "well yes, that's me". But in that moment, although he agreed the he was looking at and talking to the natural person you think you are, which would make this a common law proceeding, in the next breath, via verbal words alone, he got you to admit you're the artificial person "JOHN Q PUBLIC" on your driver's license, and then BAM, your case has now been converted to Special Admiralty/Maritime in that split second, you none the wiser for it.
This is "In Rem" jurisdiction, meaning by the choice of the judge.
Juris-Diction -> Oath/Law-Spoken. Do you see that it's words? In the olden days of European feudal lords, the serf/peasant declared his oath, with words alone, to his feudal lord...as there weren't pens and paper readily handy all the time in those days. You swore your oath in front of witnesses by saying you agreed to follow the rules/laws of Lord Such-And-Such in return for his protection and benefits. This was your "Juris-Diction". You "spoke" that you swore your oath to follow your leige lord's rules.
And this is what's happening today. This is why the judge always first gets you to agree to the name (strawman) at the beginning of the court proceeding and why the police officer always needs your driver's license (strawman) and registration (property handed over to the king) before he can proceed with ticketing you.
You're literally "Swearing an oath" to the feudal lords that run the show today.
Quite a deception, eh? You gotta hand it to 'em though, it's bloody ingenious!
I always thought LAW meant Lying As Work. I like it the elemental analogy though. The trickiest thing with trust law are finding good resources and navigating the morass of potential missteps. Ive study these topics as much as I am able to and I find the widest knowledge gaps I am still working through are for trust formation and maintenance. There are a lot of different opinions out there
Correct. This In-Rem is nothing but trickery, but listening to David Straight, it seems that you can avoid falling into the trap by answering questions carefully.
When asked this, you are supposed to say that you are here to represent the Trust name "JOHN Q PUBLIC" in such and such capacity (Administrator? Trustee - I think it depends on the situation as to whats best)
You never accept that you are the same person on your DL or Birth Certificate etc.
You literally make sure the Judge has to put aside his three hats, one after another, and then he will have no choice but to dispose the case.
fyi...it appears that the FRCP were UNCONSTITUTIONALLY modified by the House and their lobbyists/plants. All court rules are supposed to be created/modified/amended by the Supreme Court (Article III), and it appears that Article I (Congress) has usurped judicial authority using unconstitutional bill "Judicial Procedure Reform Act of 1937" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform_Bill_of_1937
In fact, it appears that almost all legislation passed 1933-1938 is actually unconstitutional.
Kinda makes sense why they needed a WW2 right after that. To make sure no one had the time or energy to notice and start questioning this.
Would be awesome to have a powwow to trade theories and ideas back and forth as to how badly our system of laws has been destroyed.
Agreed. Would be glad to participate.
Step one. Statutes, codes, acts, decrees, mandates, ordinances, executive orders, etc. are NOT LAWS, these are all CORPORATE POLICIES. The question is, what corporation are you unwittingly agreeing that you work for?
Laws are immutable and self-evident.
We are tricked by semantics and language. In our lack of precision, we are captured and suffer accordingly.
Good details. Thank you. The actual date of bankruptcy #2 of the US appears to be on September 11, 1931 believe it or not. International Bankers set that date as the 70 years for debt repayment from a date in 1861 (bankruptcy #1). They apparently provide some time to "work out" the reorganization and this explains the time lag between the 1861 bankruptcy, resulting Civil War, and the Organic Act of 1871 which was the official re-collateralization plan that pledged all Federal Lands and Property as collateral for National Debt. 1861 is +70 years from the initiation of the debt refinance of the colonies in 1791, so key banker dates are 1791, 1861, 1931, 2001, and 2021.
There appears to be the 2 year lag between bankruptcy and re-collateralization in 1933 because they had to pass an Amendment in 1931 that allowed the installation of the new corporate/Nazi gov't which then would be inaugurated on Jan 20 instead of March 4. Once could argue that the re-collateralization plan was not fully complete until the 1938 FRCP as you noted. The point is that it all had to be COMPLETE prior to WW II for some reason.
A country is granted 3 periods of 70 years to payback national debt, and then there is either a jubilee or a 20 year extension to resolve, cancel, or re-organize another 210 year period.
US bankruptcy #3 was on September 11, 2001, and it appears that the re-collateralization occurred sometime in the 2009-2013 period where most of the US was pledged to or actually sold off to China and other countries, illegally. Still trying to figure out exactly what happened. For example, it appears that China has actually annexed California from what I can tell. Not sure how they can do this.
Excellent work.
I would only say, the "official official" start date was the signing of the Constitution, by the Constitutors (civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another;) as it was a contract written to pay back the debt. So 1789 -> 70 years = 1859 (right before the Civil War coup) and then 1929 (stock market crash and start of forced depression) and then 1999 (all assets transferred to the IMF).
That the documentation and paperwork follow by a couple years is merely a formality I believe. The debt restructuring negotiations takes years to work out by the looks of when it's all formalized in writing.
This is interesting. Yes, I was going by official dates that appear to have been used by International Bankers, but you are likely correct that the actual "practical bankruptcies" occurred shortly before. For the 1791 date I was also keying off the First Bank charter which was 1791-1811, and its non-renewal was likely one of the main reasons for War of 1812, imo.
It's akin to an individual or business declaring bankruptcy on such-and-such date. That just starts the clock basically. It can sometimes take many months, even years for all the asset distribution and forfeiture to be determined by the courts. But AS OF that date, the income/expenditures/revenues/ledger etc. of that person/business/government declaring bankruptcy are heavily scrutinized and must be accounted for. To wit, I declare bankruptcy today and then tomorrow I go on a one month vacation to Hawaii with my family, live extravagantly, no expense spared, etc. and blow a big pile of cash that would have otherwise been distributed to my creditors. The courts are going to make me reimburse the creditors for this adventure...
Whenever a power center was intentionally shifted, whether from Dutch to British, or British to USA, or now USA to China? - its always because one Ponzi scheme was inevitably collapsing and they had to start a new Ponzi scheme.
These transitions would always be pretty vulnerable time for the Cabal. Much like a crab shedding its shell is when they get caught more easily.
No wonder the Q Plan is coinciding with yet another shedding of the shell.
u/Morpheus11
Agreed, this is very well stated and I love the crab analogy.
It does look like China is their next "home base", doesn't it?
And if one continues the general 100 plans, 200 years of a single country dominance, and generally 100 year lifespan of a global reserve currency; one may project that China was expected to takeover until 2189 at which point they would start the 100 year demolishing if they convert to a Republic with their currency established as world reserve from around 2117-2217. It appears that the re-demolishing of Russia would likely have been the plan for 2089-2189.
But I think all of this was put on hold to do a big worldwide depopulation right now for some reason. Once the Great Reset is initiated it seems to apply worldwide, and this looks like the 3rd one that I can identify. Once whack-a-mole no longer possible, cabal just implodes the whole thing.
I believe the 100/200 year cyclewas not set in stone. It was typically how long before a ponzi financial system was expected to collapse, but the more exponential the scam, the quicker it would collapse.
There was every expectation that the current financial system of the American Petro Dollar was going to collapse by 90s, and coincidentally thats when the Biden started wooing China and bringing it into WTO etc started happening. The fact that the ponzi scheme kept going even after 90s, and in fact in 2008 it reached a point where it was absolutely impossible to continue any further - but yet it did ...
To me these are the doings of the White Hats. They were not ready for this yet, and allowing the take over to happen OR trying to bring them down at that point would have had a significant destructive effect on the world, probably more than great depression and the 2 world wars combined together.
Hence the WHs allowed the Cabal (or even tempted them on) to keep extending the scam and keep it going up until now. There is literally no economy left in the world. 90% of what we see around us is going along due to the money pump, and the ability to suppress the hyper inflation because of all this is quickly coming to an end.
Hopefully all the preparations by all the WH factions leading up to now has all confluenced perfectly for the Great Awakening. Hopefully there are no uncalculated variable in this ...
u/Morpheus11
The 100 year planning cycle does appear to be "set in stone" relatively going back to at least 1489 from what I can trace. The theory behind this is that a time period like that involves son, father, grandfather in their prime for a 3-generation plan execution, assuming they each contribute 33 years to the effort.
This is an excellent assessment I'm in full agreement with. I think there are forces at work that will ensure the least disruptive, albeit bumpy with guaranteed turbulence, transition possible.
The WH (Venutians) & BH (Luciferians) have always been at work creating this realm and making it go - pushing and pulling between each, neither getting too much of an edge, yet a pendulum swinging of sorts.
I think this time, the first in many millennia, we're heading toward breaking the pendulum completely. And this definitely "won't be for everyone"! :)
But i digress, my thoughts are up in the clouds in comparison to your well-grounded reasoning. You've got a rock solid perspective of the situation anon!
Okay, this is piquing my interest. Are you referring to the collective "soul entity" that supposedly ascended on Venus? Do you think these are the ones that control the WHs? This is the first time I am hearing this, and would love to learn more.
Love to look at the clouds. I think its far more fun than being well-grounded, lol!
So the current project I am trying to embark upon is to look at all these historical events via the balance sheets of the various entities. I believe thats the only true history - the real reason for wars, revolutions, etc has always been to balance the books. This is proving very hard because just starting with contemporary Fed balance sheet has so many tons of entries that I have no idea. I am feeling that there is a simpler way to look at it.
One idea was to look at purely balance of Gold and ignore everything else. Would the movement of Gold tell a different story as we trace it through all thee events? How would one do that?
The reason is pretty simple. The Federal Reserve system fattens their widely held public interest trusts and reaps them at different times according to the periodic events. We’re in a big one with these shots putting patented programs into people and either collapsing them at best for them or at worst having a pretty good case to patent altered dna or place agricultural liens.
I disgress; house joint resolution 192 Public Law 73-10 from 1933 pertains to the remedy for the removal of constitutional collateral from the currency. There is an active obligation for the system to support the beneficiaries within it but few have the know how. When we the people abandon property they are fed.
This is most interesting. I’m trying to figure out how to fix the deed back to original land grant for a small test property so I can buy it from my LLC with silver and get the full title.
Thats on my to do list as well but I need to get my estate in order before I start making credible demands. The more I learn about these processes the more I appreciate the system they built on top of us.
Everything was thwarted due to a change in the spiritual progression of humanity. A nice nifty name for this is "The Great Awakening". :)
But yeah, you're absolutely right in your reasoning above. The cabal wasn't planning for the harmonic convergence.
And all of these shifts start to get executed on the '89s. 8+9 = 17 and appears to be whitehats weaponizing a cabal symbol against them. Note the historical events of 1489 (N/S America conquest), 1589 (full takeover of England?), 1689 (destruction of Dutch Republic), 1789 (destruction of French Republic), 1889 (destruction of Russia), 1989 (destruction of American Republic). Cabal appears to have 100 year operational plans.
I think it goes back to at least 889 when the Italian maritime Republics got fully taken over/co-opted.
My attempt at a decode: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Ir27hJv4/repost-the-q-year-on-the-89s-891/
Very interesting, will read it.
Makes sense as Churchill was the consummate bought and paid for Zionist who created the alliance with the Soviets.
Yeah. The big giveaway on Churchhill being cabal was his reaction to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which basically short-circuited all of his plans to isolate and destroy Germany as part of a targeted and quick controlled demolition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
Both sides were playing each other as Stalin made lots of promises to Churchhill as well that he did not adhere to.
I am still trying to understand the real reasons behind Soviets attacking Poland and Hitler attacking USSR. The former - I suspect was pushed by some Generals and my gut tells me Stalin would not have wanted this. As for the latter, again my gut tells me it was Hitler helping Stalin to purge the Soviet ranks of Cabal loyal army.
I agree with your thesis here. All of the Soviet and German moves that were obvious mistakes were likely done by Generals who were either threatened or controlled by the cabal.
It appears to me that the back and forth German-Soviet battles through Ukraine was intentional demolition of the Khazarian homeland (western half). This indicates that cabal players had taken control of Ukraine S.S.R. after Lenin "gifted" land from Russia to the Ukrainian S.S.R., and Stalin was using the German army to demolish his enemies, and then he went back through and took out whatever was left.
This is why the "Jews" were screaming about the genocide of the "Ukrainian people" because they were the REAL historical enemy of both Germany and the USSR, imo. The Ukraine and Kiev were key geographical areas for the formation of a consolidated Russia, and they had been infiltrated and taken over by cabal people who called this their historical homeland. This same thing has happened now (since 2014 in full effect).
Spot on. And the fact that it is happening now, since 2014, is not a coincidence either. It is part of the Great Awakening. I personally would have had a real hard time understanding all this, but for the special military operation and everything it started exposing. What a time to be alive!
But churchill won and remained in power. This is completely backwards.
Because the bad guys won the WW2.
Why the downvote? If churchill was a Zionist puppet then wouldnt the people who tried to displace him be the good guys? And the people who helped him be the bad guys? Pretty simple concept.
I suspect that the theory here would say that Churchill was still in power, but only of a crumbling empire
Changing of the guard was to QE on Feb 6, 1953. Churchill was probably just a figurehead after some point. I think he largely became irrelevant after UN Charter got implemented. This was the main objective of WW II was to create the UN as the see for a One World Government. Create the problem (WW II) with the solution (UN) already preplanned to put in place. They ran this same play for WW I, but they were unable to pull off the League of Nations because WW I appears to have been cut short. This is why they unleashed the 1918 "pandemic", imo.
Post on Barbados: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqskP27Y/barbados-a-likely-human-traffick/c/
The cabal started world war two for the same reason they started both World War One and the Russo Japanese war, 1904-1905 also known as World War Zero).
The reason for starting these three wars was the same reason they funded two attempts at a russian revolution, unsuccessfully in 1905 and successfully in1917.
The reason the cabal did all of this was to weaken and take control of the Russian landmass, and with it, all of it's vast natural resources.
I got this information from a talk called Spy Factory Sweden
And that is still the goal. They wish to breakup up Russia into a dozen or more easily controlled "Republics". That is the fate they wish for the US too. With that accomplished their one world fascist, neo feudal system can reign supreme.
Correct. Same play was run on the Christian Roman Republic (empire). Split it, so it is more easily controlled.
I like this "World War Zero" designation. It appeared to be a practice run timed to cover for the First attempted Russian Revolution of 1905 which has been pre-planned from the first cabal attack on Russia in 1889 via the "flu pandemic" cabal attack. Note they ran the exact same play regarding Russian with the 1917 Revolution.
It appears that the 1914 and 1939 dates for War may have been preset by the cabal as these are 1889+25=1914 and 1914+25=1939, using the 25 year planning cycle of the cabal. It appears that WW III attempt #1 was stopped just prior to 1964 (cuban missile crisis prior to that), but the intent was nuclear exchange between US and SU starting no later than 1964. Note 1964+25=1989 which was NWO kickoff. There are also 16 year plans embedded as well, imo.
''We defeated the wrong enemy'' -General George S. Patton
This ^^^, tells the real story.
Most people think Patton was referring to the Soviet Union as the REAL enemy. My opinion is that Patton spent enough time in Great Britain watching the British trying to extend the war as long as possible to know that the British were the REAL enemy referred to in his quote.
imo it was the bolsheviks
Yes. I used to think this as well. But it appears that Stalin is the one that actually killed Lenin to take over, and then he proceeded to murder almost all of the Bolsheviks who appeared to be cabal plants just as Lenin. I think Stalin actually was waging war against the die hard Bolsheviks who kept trying to infiltrate. Thus, his numerous brutal purges. Stalin was NOT a good guy by any means, but he infiltrated the cabal apparatus by brute force and then murdered them all, repeatedly.
BRICs info - Counter to US "debt dollar"
Jul. 25 2022, Published 7:59 a.m. ET; "BRICS Is Working on a New Global Reserve Currency": https://marketrealist.com/economy-and-politics/new-global-reserve-currency/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
Official website gets flagged by globalist "security": https://infobrics.org/
How does Brazils capitulation to the pedo death cult affect BRICS? Putin cant possibly view Lula as an ally can he? Brazil has done a 180 about face.
Unclear what is really going on in Brazil. Possibly devolution of some control to military as a "safety" with Lula constrained similar to US. It is quite strange that Brazil has not pulled out of BRICs. You would think this would be one of the first things he would do if he was fully in control.
Maybe he just switched strings from US to China, not realizing that the CCP has been co-opted by Xi and his band of nationalists. Or maybe he just views it all as one and the same master.
This is completely backwards. Germany was an attempt to end the cabal. Hence why they were made to look like the bad guys afterwards.
The US military stepped in to save the cabal. After the war the US general said they fought the wrong enemy.
The British Royal Family WERE German. They were all inbred and interrelated. "Both" sides were funded by the Rothschild banking families.
If you go back even further they are from Northern Italy and came to British Isles by entry into Scotland. They share lineage with Germans who were also from Northern Italy (a different branch of same family from Ukraine/Khazaria). It appears that some Italian families were planted in Scotland to integrate Roman Civil Law (which allowed slavery and NO individual rights) into Scottish Law with the plan to replace English Common Law with Scottish Law/RCL derived from maritime admiralty law. Note that England/Scotland were Roman colonies, so this would not appear to be unusual.
Scotland effectively took over England per the creation of Great Britain and attempted to inject Roman Civil Law to supplant English Common Law in order to allow slavery. They appear to have been largely successful in the elimination of all individual natural rights enshrined in English Law.
The Northern Italian families appear to be transplants from Khazaria, so it may be that both the German and Italian branches are traceable back to there.
This is far more complicated and I have posted extensively on this. Just as a TL;DR - Germans were funded by the Cabal, but Hitler turned against them. And I dont mean the normal ways in which people think of this - boycotting Jewish goods or attacking Poland etc. Those were his designated tasks that he was doing dutifully.
No, I think the real way he turned against the Cabal was by restricting the real activities of the Nazi scientists. He stopped them from building atomic weapons. He curtailed them from doing human experimentation and other evil research. I also suspect he did not provide enough cover to the Nazis to allow a German victory.
This is why "Hitler" was defeated whereas "Nazis" were relocated to US and elsewhere, continuing what has become the contemporary Cabal operations - CIA/NASA/Weather Weapons/Mind Control etc etc.
The Hitler vs Nazis is the only theory that fits all evidence we can find about WW2 events.
One could argue there was a Nazi Deep State pursuing their own agenda outside of Hitler's nationalist direction to them (sound familiar?). And sabotaging Hitler's nationalist agenda at every opportunity when he tried to rein them in.
Okay, I been trying to articulate this properly, but you hit the nail on the head. Yes, I totally agree. Do you have any insights into who were loyal to the Nationalist direction, and who were the Deep State puppets? I am assuming anyone executed in Nuremberg trials were the nationalists.
My guess is that at the top level Hitler did have mostly loyal people, but the deep state subverted underneath that at various levels.
I have only been able to ferret out that Hitler's top advisor kinda acted as his handler and he was definitely a cabal plant. All of the dudes doing the atrocities in the camps and the SS (possibly one and the same) appeared to be a very tight group and possibly cabal clique, imo. They were satanists and appeared to enjoy the brutality they inflicted on other humans.
Looks like possible control of Nazi party and bureaucracy by cabal players placed in key positions and they had a fair amount of time to infiltrate since Hitler's rise in late 20s early 30s. Clearly some of the generals were cabal, bought off, or blackmailed.
And that correct enemy was likely the British. There appears to have been a British plan to allow Germany to implement a "European Union v1" that they would either infiltrate or control via planted people (similar to EU v2), but Hitler got off the chain, apparently, and US military sent in to put down a bad cabal doggie.
It appears that any whitehat victories during this period were very temporary and not long lasting. By the 1953 Coronation of QE, the British had largely re-constituted the main colonies of the British Empire under cover of the British Commonwealth, and they appeared to be in partial control of the US, and full control of the Soviet Union as well as Israel and large portions of the Middle East.
By 1989 through the Commonwealth and other means such as Central Banks, it appears that the British fully controlled all but 2 or 3 countries. Note that 1989 was the official kickoff of the full destruction of America and implementation of One World Gov't known as "The New World Order".
I don't think the whitehats became organized until after the cabal had the chutzpah to kill John F Kennedy. I think they had stepped so far over the line at that point the those in a position to do something begin to organize.
I now suspect that some of the earlier "whitehats" of which both Eisenhower and Kennedy may have been a part of were most likely the founders of the "modern whitehats" that were triggered into a permanent, not just wartime, organization to continuously monitor and attempt to counter the cabal after the JFK takeout.
Prior to that it appears they just came together during "wartime", and were not organized to counter the "continuous warfare" of the cabal.
You think it's just a theory eh? More people need to watch this: https://odysee.com/@KnowledgeBase:e/Bill-Still-The-Money-Masters-Full-Documentary-1996:7
Just a theory to me at this point. I am just starting to get into much of the WW II historical events now that I have acquired full sets of Encyclopedia Americana (1949) which has a bit more detail on WW II than the Encyclopedia Britannica (1963). They started rewriting history immediately after 1949 it appears.
Stalin once remarked to the Indian ambassador, while sketching wolves, that if the Ambassador made himself into a sheep he would see the wolves closing in. He (Stalin) was poisoned later that year.
Stalin did himself no favours by executing his friends though.. Beria was right in the end.
Agreed. Stalin was a thug, and used brute force thug tactics because that is all he knew to be successful.
Interesting note that the timing of Queen Elizabeth becoming Queen on Feb 6, 1953 and all of the weird events that made that possible, but the delay of the coronation until after Stalin was "poisoned" and MI-6 effectively took control of the Soviet Union appear to be significant timing. It was an official changing of the cabal guard, imo.
The US fought the wrong enemy.
PLEASE GO HOME! AND STAY THERE FOR A LONG WHILE!
OTHER FISH ARE IN THE KETTLE NOW!
Historical context is important when the cabal uses the same plans over and over.
The big bads from WW2 are still in power and have turned us into Weimar 2.0.
We are living thru an echo.