There are tons of stuff related to scientific discoveries that are coming put lately indicating that a general declas is round the corner. Fo instance the Big Bang theory being not plausible. Most scientists have their heads in the sands but the implications are enourmous. My guess is that pretty much all the scientific "research" in the past hundred years will be wiped clean and we have to start over.
Scientific method has not been great even from the days of Newton. Honestly, I don't think any scientists even are able to imagine what the correct scientific process is.
We all know scientists will report only findings that satisfy their sponsors.
I tend to agree that the scientific method has been co-opted by corruption since perhaps Newton's time. But most definitely it's been absolutely corrupted since the time of Edison!
Science is like a peer to peer network in search of knowledge, and scientists are the nodes. As long as majority of the nodes understand, care about and apply scientific process with passion, this network can never be corrupted.
The fact that the academic world has been gamed, though, proves that majority of the scientists and academicians - even if they understood the scientific process - just never cared enough to apply it consistently.
The correct scientific method is observation and replication. If you observe a phenomenon, and can use your theory to predict all stages of said phenomenon and/or replicate it, then you're on to something. We are imperfect, as individuals, and so we must collaborate to obtain ever-higher levels of understanding, as one single human isn't capable of understanding it all, alone. We must allow ourselves to trust one another, to build knowledge that is beyond ourselves. But for that to work, for said trust to work, we must adhere to it, literally, religiously. God made the Truth part of his armor for a reason: a collective of God fearing men will unlock more secrets of the universe than a thousand generations of heathens. Our problem is we correlate "science" with godlessness, not realizing that both concepts are not mutually exclusive.
The dissing of the big bang, I believe, is solely because having a beginning to time, space, and matter requires a cause that exists outside time, space, and matter. In other words, God. The scientific community just can't have that. They know that the big bang could not have happened without God, so they're leaning toward steady state now. In other words, the universe has always existed and will continue to exist forever. They explain away the existence by doing away with the beginning and end that really does exist.
But they just now starting realizing that beginnings must have external causes. Philosophers throughout history have said this. The scientists just refused to explain how the marble-sized ball of all the universe's matter and energy came into existence and was compressed that small. Or how it exploded at just the right power for everything to work, including physical constants.
Even as a normie before being redpilled, I never understood why the scientists were always focusing on assuming there was no God rather than follow all possibilities to rule out each one.
Afaik, not a single scientist did any serious research with the assumption that the universe was created by some external force and see where it takes us.
Perhaps that's why there's been a recent move to discredit it. No matter what they do, when trying to discover scientific truths, it will always 'circle back' to God.
Yup. Reality is made up of energy that is directly subjugate to the whims of consciousness. If you believe you can make the waveform collapse, you believe in spirit, therefore you believe in God. ST was really moving in that direction, so I believe is why it got nuked.
The single fact of entropy DeBunks this idea.
If things were already in perpetual existence, how do stars still have energy? How is there hot and cold?
The astronomers and physicists can just write a bunch of formulas on the blackboard that no one can understand and then just wave away anything you point out to them.
You mean to say "steady state," not "solid state." There was a lively competition between the two theories. The astronomer Fred Hoyle was a prominent proponent. The "Big Bang" theory was proposed by Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian priest. It involved the assumption that the distance-red shift relationship was based on Doppler Shift, but the discoverer of that relationship, Edwin Hubble, argued against it on grounds of incompatibility with other astronomical observations. In more recent years, Halton Arp seems to have discovered a steady-state process of galaxy creation going on all around us.
Sorry about the typo. I'm getting old, and an occasional type escapes me when I read through before posting. I learned touch typing back in the late 60s, so I can type very fast. Sometimes the wrong words come out. They're spelled correctly, but they're the wrong words.
Since God created the universe, it could have been created to appear to us as bang or steady, whichever He wanted. So we may be allowed to discover the real process of the universe or not. I don't know yet.
~I do Remember the shaft in the 90s. but as far I recall, it was rectangular, not like this one with a roof like feature. Back then, they allowed a mini Rover type of remote vehicle with a camera go up until the end of the shaft, where they found a closing stone with two rusty handles on it. The team wanted to make a perforation to push a tiny camera tru the hole. Thats when Zahi Awass, the top Dog of antiquities in Egypt stopped it all.
LOL ... Not that good memory, but I'm in this Business since the age of 10 (1967) . And in 1969 I had the oportunitiy to interview Erich von Däniken in Bonstetten, Zurich, Switzerland, right after he came out of prison, where he wrote his first Bestseller "The Gods Were Astronauts" he also wrote some stuff about the pyramids in his other following books. But at the age of 12 I allready knew, that this guy just did some copy pasta from other authors.
He did in his first book that he wrote in prison. He made somuch money he could finace his travelings and do "research" himself. Allthough I allways found him using other ppls Ideas. But alas, nothing is new under the sun...
yes, I remember it well too. see my comment. I theorise there would be no need of "handles" in a tiny "vent" shaft (that is blocked?). Those two "handles" were the remnants of cables/wires that performed an electrical function.
No, they made the hole with a second rover, and revealed it on live TV.
I lived on the Giza Plateau for about 5 months last year. The locals know, for instance, that there's a lot of funny stuff going on near these pyramids. For instance, over the past few years they have had fireworks events, which the locals believe they are using as cover to hide the sounds of blasting underneath the ground. The he's a pyramid complex has extensive tunnels all through it, in fact, I know a man whose father claims to have walked Underground ~40 km from Giza to Saqqara.
While I was there, then Prince Charles visited. Which was weird. I watched his plane fly right over my head.
I also witnessed the Red Bull flying wing pyramid stunt, that was neat.
I'm pretty sure they don't want anyone discovering something that shouldn't be there that will finally put to rest the theory that the Gt. Pyramid is a tomb.
That assumes it hasn't been raided already. That prick in charge of Egypt's ancient antiquities looks, acts, and talks like a DS/left wing scientist. He almost looked giddy when he was walking Big Mike's lil' bitch Barry around the pyramids when he went on his boy wonder tour of the world back in the early days of his presidency.
He's not in charge as of 2018 or so, a new head of antiquities has been named, I believe. The new guy has made numerous changes that us amateur Egyptologists really approve of. I saw the new head in person, actually, at Karnak, in December last year.
This is good news :-). I thought he was still lingering around. He was one of those "the science is settled" people.
To be honest, I have to give him credit for getting me interested in some of these "alternate theories" out there ... Nobody sane and confident in their conclusions behave the way that guy behaved when anything outside of approved questions were asked. That told me he was hiding something.
Don't forget all the hostilities that sprang up in Egypt a while back that prevented any archeological studies going on at the time. Happens quite a bit when 'new' discoveries are made, weird co-incidence.
Definitely. There is a wide gap between what is known to the Cabal and what is told to us. Slowly the gap is reducing as we get close to the Great Awakening.
Egyptian archaeology goes very slowly. This void was first announced on October 15, 2016. I stood there watching them run their tests on the chevrons! So neat to see history like that.
The Sphinx closed its eyes which must have shaken the ghouls as all technology belonga them. Was it just the light or are the 'newly-discovered' tunnels part of internal machinery?
Maybe. I deleted it in case they were the same because in the image on the right, you can see the eyes, so the light could be responsible for the closed eye effect. Egypt was a different story, you couldn't see any painted eye, from several angles. However, could also be a publicity stunt, or more distraction.
every bit of 'science' from known 'scientists' is fake. They were all occult society members which promoted bogus 'theories' as fact when they were fiction. They built a prison of lies out of these falsehoods as they own all the awards and scientific journals (Robert Maxwell owned them all - Ghislaine's dead mossad dad - the same with the magazines and mainstream media that 'promoted' each falsehood, and the Nobel Prize committee voting members are all blackmailed...it is an illusion that was constructed around us all and all of our grandparents and their parents going back hundreds of years.
The same with medicine since Rockefeller institutionalized and monetized for profit treatments which do not cure. They killed and publicly shamed all the doctors who refused to join the AMA - they owned MSM and wrote and promoted lies to discredit and disparage.
It's best to assume that everything is false until it is independently proven true by someone non-affiliated and non-corrupted.
Every entity and societal structure is corrupted: the Bible and the Church especially.
Bubba and Earl were sitting around on the pyramid drinking beer, and said "Ya know, I don't know if we have actually ever gone in there and looked around."
Zahi Hawass is a crooked man, just like an American politician. He is paid to be the face of the lies and official narrative the govt and Academia push. He keeps the new knowledge & evidence from making the news.
I remember the last time they found a doorway in a "vent" shaft. It had two dots in it which were described as a "copper handle" that had corroded away.
Then they said "Oh yeah we will try to find out what is behind it NEXT YEAR" this was about 20 years ago. No hurry chaps.
Anyway, second point, there is no way there would be a "handle" on a block of stone half way along a 9inch by 6inch shaft. No, those were not vents (what kind of vent has a solid block of stone blocking it?) they were cable ways. The two holes filled with copper likely guided twin copper conductors all the way through the shaft to the side of the pyramid. Wiring! Seems to support the electrical function of the machine.
It is SO FRUSTRATING they take so long and are so secretive about those pyramids. My pet theory is the pyramid created pure water, by first creating electricity then in the underground lake cracking oxygen and hydrogen into gas, piping it up to the kings chamber and recombining it to make completely pure water that cascaded down the gallery and out to be used by people. Meanwhile excess electricity used to light artificial lamps (there are hieroglyphs that indicate large light bulbs). It might have had a lamp on the very top too, cap"stone" is missing.
This guy knows! There have been several missions exploring the shafts and chambers of the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt, including the use of robots.
In 1993, a robot named Upuaut-2, designed by the French robotics engineer Rudolf Gantenbrink, was sent up the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber in the Great Pyramid. Upuaut-2 discovered a limestone door with copper fittings, which is now known as the "Gantenbrink Door". However, the robot was unable to proceed further due to the narrow and angled nature of the shaft.
In 2002, a National Geographic expedition used a robot called Pyramid Rover to explore the same southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber. The robot was able to penetrate a small distance beyond the Gantenbrink Door, but encountered a blockage of limestone "doors" that prevented further exploration.
In 2011, a team of scientists from the University of Leeds and Cairo University used a robot called Djedi to explore the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber. Djedi was equipped with a miniature camera and various tools, including a drill, which was used to explore behind a small door in the shaft. The team was able to take pictures and video footage of the previously unexplored space behind the door.
To my knowledge, there hasn't been a robot mission that explored the shafts of the King's Chamber.
I've been inside that pyramid twice in the past year. To me the biggest proof that it's a machine is the "choke" area between the king's chamber and the Grand gallery.
Want an interesting read? Apprehend Christopher Dunn's book, "The Giza Power Plant"
It's a great find but what happens when they open that corridor what's been sealed in that Corridor for all these years? And maybe it was hidden for a reason. You know all of these ancient discoveries and the way this world is going somebody's let a curse out somewhere in my opinion
I think they’ve known about this for centuries. Some believe the pyramids were ancient power generators. There’s way more to them than “fancy tombs”. The Egyptians were the Jetsons, we’re the Flintstones.
There are tons of stuff related to scientific discoveries that are coming put lately indicating that a general declas is round the corner. Fo instance the Big Bang theory being not plausible. Most scientists have their heads in the sands but the implications are enourmous. My guess is that pretty much all the scientific "research" in the past hundred years will be wiped clean and we have to start over.
After the Fauci Fraud, what can we trust?
Trust what can actually be proven, rather than what has been accepted by consensus.
Make the Scientific Method Great Again!
Scientific method has not been great even from the days of Newton. Honestly, I don't think any scientists even are able to imagine what the correct scientific process is.
Fair point.
We all know scientists will report only findings that satisfy their sponsors.
I tend to agree that the scientific method has been co-opted by corruption since perhaps Newton's time. But most definitely it's been absolutely corrupted since the time of Edison!
What. Yes, they can. The gaming of the academic world tho, you're right, is pretty awful
I know, it sounds scandalous right?
Science is like a peer to peer network in search of knowledge, and scientists are the nodes. As long as majority of the nodes understand, care about and apply scientific process with passion, this network can never be corrupted.
The fact that the academic world has been gamed, though, proves that majority of the scientists and academicians - even if they understood the scientific process - just never cared enough to apply it consistently.
The correct scientific method is observation and replication. If you observe a phenomenon, and can use your theory to predict all stages of said phenomenon and/or replicate it, then you're on to something. We are imperfect, as individuals, and so we must collaborate to obtain ever-higher levels of understanding, as one single human isn't capable of understanding it all, alone. We must allow ourselves to trust one another, to build knowledge that is beyond ourselves. But for that to work, for said trust to work, we must adhere to it, literally, religiously. God made the Truth part of his armor for a reason: a collective of God fearing men will unlock more secrets of the universe than a thousand generations of heathens. Our problem is we correlate "science" with godlessness, not realizing that both concepts are not mutually exclusive.
Trust in Jesus.
The dissing of the big bang, I believe, is solely because having a beginning to time, space, and matter requires a cause that exists outside time, space, and matter. In other words, God. The scientific community just can't have that. They know that the big bang could not have happened without God, so they're leaning toward steady state now. In other words, the universe has always existed and will continue to exist forever. They explain away the existence by doing away with the beginning and end that really does exist.
Big bang theory has been around for decades and for all these decades the scientists have had no problem accepting it while also rejecting God.
Last day of Chemistry II final the professor held up two books...
Then he held up the books and said..."IF you believe in this (chemistry book), you had best believe in this (The Bible)....
Not all scientists are atheists.
The ones who really seek the truth, aren't.
Of course not all scientists are, but the proportion of them who are atheists is far higher than general public. Almost half according to this survey
Willfully ignorant.
But they just now starting realizing that beginnings must have external causes. Philosophers throughout history have said this. The scientists just refused to explain how the marble-sized ball of all the universe's matter and energy came into existence and was compressed that small. Or how it exploded at just the right power for everything to work, including physical constants.
Even as a normie before being redpilled, I never understood why the scientists were always focusing on assuming there was no God rather than follow all possibilities to rule out each one.
Afaik, not a single scientist did any serious research with the assumption that the universe was created by some external force and see where it takes us.
In fact, when the BBT was initially introduced, it was met with that very argument, that it was proof of God's existence.
And when you get into String Theory you have no choice but to believe in God, otherwise none of it makes any sense at all.
Perhaps that's why there's been a recent move to discredit it. No matter what they do, when trying to discover scientific truths, it will always 'circle back' to God.
Yup. Reality is made up of energy that is directly subjugate to the whims of consciousness. If you believe you can make the waveform collapse, you believe in spirit, therefore you believe in God. ST was really moving in that direction, so I believe is why it got nuked.
The single fact of entropy DeBunks this idea. If things were already in perpetual existence, how do stars still have energy? How is there hot and cold?
Oh .. you.. and your logic.
The astronomers and physicists can just write a bunch of formulas on the blackboard that no one can understand and then just wave away anything you point out to them.
You mean to say "steady state," not "solid state." There was a lively competition between the two theories. The astronomer Fred Hoyle was a prominent proponent. The "Big Bang" theory was proposed by Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian priest. It involved the assumption that the distance-red shift relationship was based on Doppler Shift, but the discoverer of that relationship, Edwin Hubble, argued against it on grounds of incompatibility with other astronomical observations. In more recent years, Halton Arp seems to have discovered a steady-state process of galaxy creation going on all around us.
Sorry about the typo. I'm getting old, and an occasional type escapes me when I read through before posting. I learned touch typing back in the late 60s, so I can type very fast. Sometimes the wrong words come out. They're spelled correctly, but they're the wrong words.
Since God created the universe, it could have been created to appear to us as bang or steady, whichever He wanted. So we may be allowed to discover the real process of the universe or not. I don't know yet.
It's an understandable unconscious substitution. Your meaning was clear to anyone who understood.
I invite you to read about Halton Arp's work. It opens a whole new door, based on observed facts. https://www.amazon.com/Seeing-Red-Redshifts-Cosmology-Academic/dp/0968368905
https://twitter.com/kmkeed/status/1631989385171279873
Who is going to the Grand Lecture for the Great Pyramid of KHUFU?? 217 views lol
~I do Remember the shaft in the 90s. but as far I recall, it was rectangular, not like this one with a roof like feature. Back then, they allowed a mini Rover type of remote vehicle with a camera go up until the end of the shaft, where they found a closing stone with two rusty handles on it. The team wanted to make a perforation to push a tiny camera tru the hole. Thats when Zahi Awass, the top Dog of antiquities in Egypt stopped it all.
LOL ... Not that good memory, but I'm in this Business since the age of 10 (1967) . And in 1969 I had the oportunitiy to interview Erich von Däniken in Bonstetten, Zurich, Switzerland, right after he came out of prison, where he wrote his first Bestseller "The Gods Were Astronauts" he also wrote some stuff about the pyramids in his other following books. But at the age of 12 I allready knew, that this guy just did some copy pasta from other authors.
I loved his books. You're saying Eric did copy pasta?
He did in his first book that he wrote in prison. He made somuch money he could finace his travelings and do "research" himself. Allthough I allways found him using other ppls Ideas. But alas, nothing is new under the sun...
Thanks for the info! Something new to read about!
yes, I remember it well too. see my comment. I theorise there would be no need of "handles" in a tiny "vent" shaft (that is blocked?). Those two "handles" were the remnants of cables/wires that performed an electrical function.
No, they made the hole with a second rover, and revealed it on live TV.
I lived on the Giza Plateau for about 5 months last year. The locals know, for instance, that there's a lot of funny stuff going on near these pyramids. For instance, over the past few years they have had fireworks events, which the locals believe they are using as cover to hide the sounds of blasting underneath the ground. The he's a pyramid complex has extensive tunnels all through it, in fact, I know a man whose father claims to have walked Underground ~40 km from Giza to Saqqara.
While I was there, then Prince Charles visited. Which was weird. I watched his plane fly right over my head.
I also witnessed the Red Bull flying wing pyramid stunt, that was neat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj_ZEDISBnA
Cool. I did not remember the second rover... perhaps because it revealed nothing?
I'm pretty sure they don't want anyone discovering something that shouldn't be there that will finally put to rest the theory that the Gt. Pyramid is a tomb.
I agree they’ve known about it for centuries probably. Not sure the reasoning. It’s either distraction or declassification is coming.
Those pyramids contain many inner tunnels and rooms. That has been known for a long time. OK so they found a new one.
Heard the Egyptian Hall of Records is underneath the right paw of the Sphinx. If true, that'll be the discovery of the century.
Untill everyone forgets about it in a month
That assumes it hasn't been raided already. That prick in charge of Egypt's ancient antiquities looks, acts, and talks like a DS/left wing scientist. He almost looked giddy when he was walking Big Mike's lil' bitch Barry around the pyramids when he went on his boy wonder tour of the world back in the early days of his presidency.
He's not in charge as of 2018 or so, a new head of antiquities has been named, I believe. The new guy has made numerous changes that us amateur Egyptologists really approve of. I saw the new head in person, actually, at Karnak, in December last year.
This is good news :-). I thought he was still lingering around. He was one of those "the science is settled" people.
To be honest, I have to give him credit for getting me interested in some of these "alternate theories" out there ... Nobody sane and confident in their conclusions behave the way that guy behaved when anything outside of approved questions were asked. That told me he was hiding something.
The “Apology Tour”
Don't forget all the hostilities that sprang up in Egypt a while back that prevented any archeological studies going on at the time. Happens quite a bit when 'new' discoveries are made, weird co-incidence.
u/JonathanE Zahi Hawass on that bullshit
I love me some Ancient Aliens!!!!
Haha beat me to it.
Maybe they knew for a long time, but just now released the info as new to us. It doesn't make sense that they just discovered this.
Definitely. There is a wide gap between what is known to the Cabal and what is told to us. Slowly the gap is reducing as we get close to the Great Awakening.
Agreed
Well the new scanning technologies could be a hint
I think that’s why the Hawass (sp) Guy got fired. He wanted to tell us 15 years ago!
Egyptian archaeology goes very slowly. This void was first announced on October 15, 2016. I stood there watching them run their tests on the chevrons! So neat to see history like that.
I read about this corridor back in 2001 when I fell into a rabbit hole after 9/11.
The Sphinx closed its eyes which must have shaken the ghouls as all technology belonga them. Was it just the light or are the 'newly-discovered' tunnels part of internal machinery?
https://youtu.be/9_0gs2yyU0s
Those are two different Buddha statues
Maybe. I deleted it in case they were the same because in the image on the right, you can see the eyes, so the light could be responsible for the closed eye effect. Egypt was a different story, you couldn't see any painted eye, from several angles. However, could also be a publicity stunt, or more distraction.
every bit of 'science' from known 'scientists' is fake. They were all occult society members which promoted bogus 'theories' as fact when they were fiction. They built a prison of lies out of these falsehoods as they own all the awards and scientific journals (Robert Maxwell owned them all - Ghislaine's dead mossad dad - the same with the magazines and mainstream media that 'promoted' each falsehood, and the Nobel Prize committee voting members are all blackmailed...it is an illusion that was constructed around us all and all of our grandparents and their parents going back hundreds of years. The same with medicine since Rockefeller institutionalized and monetized for profit treatments which do not cure. They killed and publicly shamed all the doctors who refused to join the AMA - they owned MSM and wrote and promoted lies to discredit and disparage. It's best to assume that everything is false until it is independently proven true by someone non-affiliated and non-corrupted. Every entity and societal structure is corrupted: the Bible and the Church especially.
just moar distraction,.!!
Around 100 years ago, Edgar Cayce, the Sleeping Prophet, alluded to this type of disclosure eventually coming to light...
There is this, it was broadcast yesterday and is amazeballs.
Unfortunately it's 3 hours long but if you stay with it its well worth it.
The comments are just as good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GO_3A8hcwc
Bubba and Earl were sitting around on the pyramid drinking beer, and said "Ya know, I don't know if we have actually ever gone in there and looked around."
Zahi Hawass is a crooked man, just like an American politician. He is paid to be the face of the lies and official narrative the govt and Academia push. He keeps the new knowledge & evidence from making the news.
I remember the last time they found a doorway in a "vent" shaft. It had two dots in it which were described as a "copper handle" that had corroded away.
Then they said "Oh yeah we will try to find out what is behind it NEXT YEAR" this was about 20 years ago. No hurry chaps.
Anyway, second point, there is no way there would be a "handle" on a block of stone half way along a 9inch by 6inch shaft. No, those were not vents (what kind of vent has a solid block of stone blocking it?) they were cable ways. The two holes filled with copper likely guided twin copper conductors all the way through the shaft to the side of the pyramid. Wiring! Seems to support the electrical function of the machine.
It is SO FRUSTRATING they take so long and are so secretive about those pyramids. My pet theory is the pyramid created pure water, by first creating electricity then in the underground lake cracking oxygen and hydrogen into gas, piping it up to the kings chamber and recombining it to make completely pure water that cascaded down the gallery and out to be used by people. Meanwhile excess electricity used to light artificial lamps (there are hieroglyphs that indicate large light bulbs). It might have had a lamp on the very top too, cap"stone" is missing.
I REALLY want the truth
This guy knows! There have been several missions exploring the shafts and chambers of the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt, including the use of robots.
In 1993, a robot named Upuaut-2, designed by the French robotics engineer Rudolf Gantenbrink, was sent up the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber in the Great Pyramid. Upuaut-2 discovered a limestone door with copper fittings, which is now known as the "Gantenbrink Door". However, the robot was unable to proceed further due to the narrow and angled nature of the shaft.
In 2002, a National Geographic expedition used a robot called Pyramid Rover to explore the same southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber. The robot was able to penetrate a small distance beyond the Gantenbrink Door, but encountered a blockage of limestone "doors" that prevented further exploration.
In 2011, a team of scientists from the University of Leeds and Cairo University used a robot called Djedi to explore the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber. Djedi was equipped with a miniature camera and various tools, including a drill, which was used to explore behind a small door in the shaft. The team was able to take pictures and video footage of the previously unexplored space behind the door.
To my knowledge, there hasn't been a robot mission that explored the shafts of the King's Chamber.
I've been inside that pyramid twice in the past year. To me the biggest proof that it's a machine is the "choke" area between the king's chamber and the Grand gallery.
Want an interesting read? Apprehend Christopher Dunn's book, "The Giza Power Plant"
It's a great find but what happens when they open that corridor what's been sealed in that Corridor for all these years? And maybe it was hidden for a reason. You know all of these ancient discoveries and the way this world is going somebody's let a curse out somewhere in my opinion
I think they’ve known about this for centuries. Some believe the pyramids were ancient power generators. There’s way more to them than “fancy tombs”. The Egyptians were the Jetsons, we’re the Flintstones.