"That's Officer Downey from the Special Secret Service. In order to have more inclusivity in the service they brought him on. We have purposely trained him wrong.. as a joke."
Yup. I think there was a Q post that once hinted that deepfakes were also meant to do the very same thing.
Even if you show what they did they'll claim it was fake.
However, this can also be used against them. After all they have likely been using fake footage and pictures for a while to push narratives. If people didn't know the above image was absurd it looks fairly close to believable.
How many events and images did they "fake" and use for actual narratives?
By forcing them to expose how easily video and pictures can be faked (in order to prevent their crimes from being exposed) they're also exposing just how easy it is to fake news stories.
What news stories actually happened and what didn't? Can you even be sure a photo is real anymore?
Well..no, no one's telling you that because this has been a pretty large push for a while and participants in the space would be able to tell you that this has been going on for the past few years, not months, and rolled out over a period of time.
Doesn't mean it can't be planned, but "the same few months" is just straight up false.
It's funny that AI art is trending on social media in the last few months. And that Chatgpt is also trending. And now Bing rolled out their AI, along with Google. Then deep fake voice videos are also trending. Along with face swapping.
Of course it's been out for a while. But it's "more popular" now, as in it seems to be a big coordinated propaganda push.
Actually, it's kindof unprecedented, because the establishment wanted full gated control over AI generated everything. Then a rouge tech guy just open-sourced it. Lefty big tech was and still is PISSED
Dunno about that. Most AI generated imagery has something uncanny that is easily detectable, like the barrel on the right guy, or the fact that both right and left guy has the same face, or that middle guy has a weird third hand or doesn't have the instincts required to use their hands properly (middle finger on the trigger).
Improving, sure definitely. But everything has something you can point out.
Hands and feet are notoriously hard to draw and is one reason (among several others lol) why they are focused so hard in art for uncountable years.
When the sample size includes an ass load of badly drawn hands and feet, it makes sense that it'd struggle.
Also, images (as in photos) tend to focus less on hands than faces or body, which means that it'd be much easier to artificially generate an image of, say, Trump with his mouth open as he charges with weapon in hand than "FBI glowie charging behind Trump practicing proper trigger discipline"
Arbitrary words because the best AI generated images have way more than just keywords but need to illustrate my point
Also, the guy on the right looks like he has a 4 inch barrel.
Looks a bit like Private Pyle.
Unfortunate boating accident.
It's the new AR7.5
PROOF he's from Planet Krypton
I had to go look.
"That's Officer Downey from the Special Secret Service. In order to have more inclusivity in the service they brought him on. We have purposely trained him wrong.. as a joke."
What is with this sudden explosion of AI generated imagery? Feels timed.
Is the DS trying to shape conditions such that video evidence cannot be used in court?
Yup. I think there was a Q post that once hinted that deepfakes were also meant to do the very same thing.
Even if you show what they did they'll claim it was fake.
However, this can also be used against them. After all they have likely been using fake footage and pictures for a while to push narratives. If people didn't know the above image was absurd it looks fairly close to believable.
How many events and images did they "fake" and use for actual narratives?
By forcing them to expose how easily video and pictures can be faked (in order to prevent their crimes from being exposed) they're also exposing just how easy it is to fake news stories.
What news stories actually happened and what didn't? Can you even be sure a photo is real anymore?
Yep, like maybe how they changed video footage of the planes on 9-11?
Oh 100%. You're telling me suddenly AI chat, AI images, AI voice replication, AI art, and AI deep fakes all release within the same few months?
Well..no, no one's telling you that because this has been a pretty large push for a while and participants in the space would be able to tell you that this has been going on for the past few years, not months, and rolled out over a period of time.
Doesn't mean it can't be planned, but "the same few months" is just straight up false.
It's funny that AI art is trending on social media in the last few months. And that Chatgpt is also trending. And now Bing rolled out their AI, along with Google. Then deep fake voice videos are also trending. Along with face swapping.
Of course it's been out for a while. But it's "more popular" now, as in it seems to be a big coordinated propaganda push.
The tech (stable diffusion) I think is part of the "reveal"
Actually, it's kindof unprecedented, because the establishment wanted full gated control over AI generated everything. Then a rouge tech guy just open-sourced it. Lefty big tech was and still is PISSED
u/#q1044
Very relevant, thank you.
OH HOW THE TURN TABLES! Eat some AI-generated lead, SDNY commies!
This has officially turned into a thing. One request. Trump needs his signature red tie on at all times
EDIT but, on a serious note, we won't be able to expose the pedos by exposing photos. The AI is too good and people will pretend everything is faked
So true. Photographic evidence can't be taken seriously anymore
Dunno about that. Most AI generated imagery has something uncanny that is easily detectable, like the barrel on the right guy, or the fact that both right and left guy has the same face, or that middle guy has a weird third hand or doesn't have the instincts required to use their hands properly (middle finger on the trigger).
Improving, sure definitely. But everything has something you can point out.
Wow, 6 fingers on his left hand.
AI is bad at hands, which seems a bit weird to me....
Hands and feet are notoriously hard to draw and is one reason (among several others lol) why they are focused so hard in art for uncountable years.
When the sample size includes an ass load of badly drawn hands and feet, it makes sense that it'd struggle.
Also, images (as in photos) tend to focus less on hands than faces or body, which means that it'd be much easier to artificially generate an image of, say, Trump with his mouth open as he charges with weapon in hand than "FBI glowie charging behind Trump practicing proper trigger discipline"
Arbitrary words because the best AI generated images have way more than just keywords but need to illustrate my point
Note to self: If I start to see 6 fingered people in real life, I'll know I'm in a simulation. 😃
Stable diffusion notorious for extra fingers arms etc.
Nice look..
Anyone know what AI tool creates these?
Stable diffusion
https://stablediffusionweb.com/#demo
Can it be used for free?
Yes, I'm generating images as we speak.
Yes!
Ty
kek https://files.catbox.moe/635hx2.jpg
It's too much fun!
I doubt this was stable diffusion. Probably Midjourney V5.
This should be posted on Truth Social...😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
It's crazy how AI can't figure out hands. You would think it could do that and consistently use 5 fingers instead of 6 or 4.
KEK, look up the 2nd latest Stone Toss:
https://stonetoss.com/comic/heavy-handed/
How well it does actually work is mind blowing
Looks damn good...
This is good.
u/#trumptank
Black Panther MCU voice "And someone get this man a gun!"
This whole thing is getting so much fun.
those are not NYPD patches on their shoulders. just saying.