Durham Report misspells Comey 56 times (Corney)
Durham Report spells Comey correctly only once, with a footnote of 186 (Killed? Removed) Edit: I’m an idiot, that would be 187. Ignore the 55 / Storm part. Very sorry. Got confused by a humorous Urban Dictionary definition for a [failed] killing.
so 56-1
=55
Look to Twitter:
Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......."
Edit: everything that follows isn’t bullshit.
Single instance of Comey correctly spelled can be found on page 47. (Printed on page 47/ page 57 of pdf)
Dates of interest
Sept. 5, 2019 (I don't think Q posted in September '19)
Numbers found on page 47: A very conspicuous 2, 62, 63, 798 (We are moving up the timetable.), 828 (MAKE IT RAIN), 829 (Bring the thunder)
63
To those watching (you know who you are): You have a choice to make. You can stand up and do what you know to be right. Or you can suffer the consequences of your previous actions. Make no mistake, you are on the losing side. The choice is yours. If you decide to take down /pol/ and the net we will be ready.
4920-a 293883 zAj-1 0020192 Alice & Wonderland.
Drops 47 and 57 aren't too interesting.
Footnotes range from 180 to 188 suggesting that Rothschilds still need to be delt with, along with Godfather III.
184
Godfather III.
187
My actual conclusion is probably what's delayed me the most as it's been mind blowing understanding our country now.... I totally get it..
Current conclusions? so Titanic -> Rothchild screws America by making our money worthless -> crash of 29 -> Tons new government which doesn't fix the problem Rothchild created (but a war helps) -> cia -> everyone blackmailed with sex tapes -> media consumed cia -> Country forced hard left -> population to puppets -> Causes uprising by certain Patriots like Kennedy/Reagan/Trump and while they managed to kill Kennedy and outlast Reagan enough lessons were learned that we are now finally ready to clean house and become America again?
First time in about a hundred years.... wow...
Edit #2, new stuff:
I think this was covered in the great 2 hour video of Ultimate Q Proofs. Mueller report was revised, and as of now, Comey appears 654 times, and Corney only once. So Mueller and Durham are inverted, with one having a single error and the other ‘accidentally’ misspelling it in all instances save one.
Suspiciously, even though they revised Muellers report, the fixers weren’t able to fix one error. Maybe they calibrated the text generator as best they could in 2019. Or perhaps they were forced by White Hats to leave one mistake as comms, to direct our focus to one page. If someone wants to hunt down an archived Mueller report to see what the original split between RN and M was it could be worth digging.
I mean, the software only had trouble distinguishing rn from m in the word Comey but not words: [most similar] attorney, concerning, government, returns, learns, eastern, internal, internet, turn, fairness, tavern, learned, international, interned, returned, alternative, sworn, furnished, Warner, pattern, modern, Bernie, ….
So, I’m looking on page 397 of the Mueller report, which is suspicious because it’s the only page with the only Corney spelling error that somehow didn’t get corrected in the revision.
I see numbers, 3, 4, 5, 10, 17, 28, 509, 510, 515, 600, 3915 on page 397.
Some posts were boring, but if you cherry pick phrases corresponding to Q posts in increasing order, you get this:
Not about Republicans V Democrats at this stage.
Patriots are in Control.
Sit Back and enjoy the show.
Also many are thinking from one point of view, US only, this evil is embedded globally.
US is the first domino.
These people worship Satan _ Some openly show it.
Everything they do has been forecasted and prepared for.
Trump has had MI infiltrate Antifa and all the dissenting local govts.
Future proves past.
Difficult Truths will soon see light of day.
Interesting connections stemming from the 56-1=55. It really cant be ignored that it was spelled wrong 56 times and right only once and then relevant numbers on the page it was spelled correctly. Likely to be a comm. Nice dig.
I wonder if the misspelling of Comey was Durham's way of letting Comey know that his ploy to cover his tracks has been discovered?
Q told us years ago. This is Durham giving us an Easter egg, a humorous callback.
March 3, 2019: When discussing the Russian Collusion narrative, Q misspelled Comey as Corney
Q points out his misspelling on Dec 17, 2019 (See 3704, 3703, 2943) asking if anyone caught the misspelling. And asked if a document had recently been released by feds with Comey’s name misspelled. Implication that Q could only have known if he had security clearance and access to information before March 2019.
Q then impressed upon us spelling and sentence structure. Q also had to note future unintentional spelling mistakes when moving, on mobile. Anons would read into mistakes like warefare and Q had to say extra [e] was unintentional.
I think Durham giving us an "Easter egg" reference to Q is significant by itself.
This
Brilliant decode! ✨👏👏👏🎖️
Astonishing, but then everything about the last 6 years has been mind blowing!
Jill's code name is Sanibel I think... that's in Florida
Weird. When I read Sanibel, all I can see is lesbian.
That's my guess
Quite the very interesting dig and seemingly correct. I am no digger, can others corroborate? This should be stickied!
EDIT: I’ve just verified on the computer, instead of the iPad and I have to agree with the post author now! I’m leaving the post for the history, but the conclusions are in the responses.
I’m afraid I have to be a “devil advocate” here. I hate doing so, but the assumptions that these conclusions are based on are just wrong.
We can’t made up facts just to prove the thesis we want. That’s not the reason we’re here.
The post says:
There is only one occurrence of Comey.
There are 56 occurrences of Corney.
I believe both are wrong.
Let’s establish the facts and I challenge the author of the post to split the work 50 / 50:
I will prove that the first one is false, that there is more than 1 occurrence of Comey (I have found at least 8 occurrences).
I believe the second is false too. The author is challenged to prove that there are 56 occurrences of Corney because … I couldn’t find even one. Maybe I didn’t spend enough time, so if I found 8 x Comey - the author can find 8 x Corney. I believe it’s a fair challenge.
Occurrences of Comey:
47 / 57-psd, 3 occurrences on the same page
67 / 77-pdf, in the footer 305
71 / 81- pdf, in the footer 331
84 / 94-pdf
199 / 209-pdf
226 / 236-pdf
Overall: Even if there is even 1 occurrence of Corney (that I couldn’t find) and the author would claim that there is some invisible pixel that turns “m” into “rn” on all 8 occurrences that I’ve found - there are no 56 occurrences of Comey that can all be claimed to be Corney, so even the invisible pixels won’t support he thesis.
Again: I hate doing so, but we’re here because we hate being lied to.
I’m not accusing the author of being a liar. Maybe the text was copied from the Internet and we’re both mislead by the same “source”.
The Source: https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf
You can search for Comey and Corney via the search bar. Search the official Durham PDF document hosted on government server. That’s the point I’m making. The different spellings look identical. You use the search bar in your pdf browser. You will find 56 misspelled Corney and only one result of Comey. But the 56+1 occurrences all look like Comey because the font makes it so both spellings look and read identical. 🤣
Ok, so I have to agree with you now!
I’ve done my previous check on the iPad and the Firefox viewer I use doesn’t support search. I just scrolled quickly.
Now I’ve checked on the computer using search function and you’re 100% right.
It’s 1 vs 56, as in your post.
The whole document looks like a scan but it has a text layer added to it.
It’s likely that the scan has Comey but the text layer has Corney instead.
Very interesting indeed! It’s like it points at this page.
nice to see 2 geniuses get a long :) -- i remember years ago the rn vs the m in the old website. good to see there are those as you guys still looking. just today i watched that show Silo and just around 10 minutes into the show the IT guy was in room 17.
it seems this stuff is literally all around us.
The text layer is probably OCR, and Comey would likely be misinterpreted by it as Corney. Still, interesting because of the drops. And perhaps the uploaded document scans might have been modified to show Corney through typical OCR a specific amount of times for autistic reasons.
I have enlarged the text on my desktop computer with flat screen huge monitor, and I can see that the PDF was not created from a text file or other computer file containing text. The letters in a PDF from a computer file would be smooth and well-formed at any size. Scanned letters enlarged are bumpy and uneven in weight.
But it is puzzling that the OCR only got Comey correct once out of 57 tries, when the visuals appear the same. I think the answer is that the OCR was manipulated to give us this result. That lends more weight to our "conspiracy."
Interesting. I hope it’s archived and someone can look, but the original Mueller report that was released in 2019 had many uses of Corney. Or so I heard. I think this was covered in the great 2 hour video of Ultimate Q Proofs. Mueller report was revised, and as of now, Comey appears 654 times, and Corney only once. So Mueller and Durham are inverted, with one having a single error and the other ‘accidentally’ misspelling it in all instances save one.
Suspiciously, even though they revised it, the fixers weren’t able to fix one error. Maybe they calibrated the text generator as best they could in 2019. Or perhaps they were forced by White Hats to leave one mistake as comms, to direct our focus to one page. If someone wants to hunt down an archived Mueller report to see what the original split between RN and M was it could be worth digging.
I’ll edit my original post to add my insight to the Mueller report page 397, the page that glows.
I have the original Mueller report stashed somewhere. Maybe I can find it this week. "CORNEY" was a big deal in our community back then, as well as his cornfield photos.
I just looked at one tweet of his from 10-20-2017 saying "Good to be back in Iowa." It's almost dark, and he's standing in the cornfield. Notice that this was 8 days before the very first Q post.
Comey was misspelled so searches wouldn’t show his name, but reading it you would see ‘corney’…..the attention to detail to hide the corruption is pro level. Every pede should take warning that our actual enemies are not stupid. The whacked out liberals are the cannon fodder
Not trying to be a dick, but there is something I just don't understand.
Why are you subtracting 1 from 56? I get that it was spelled correctly once, but why would you subtract the one time it was spelled correctly from the 56 times it wasn't? Or why not add it?
Because that gives the answer they were looking for: 55. That number shows up a lot, such as communications that are 5 by 5.
Knowing that 55 is around so much makes the 56 and 1 stand out immediately to those attuned to it.
Certainly I’m reaching to a conclusion that I want. But my thinking was that the only time the name was spelled correctly, it was accompanied with a superscript notation of 186. Which has a connotation of removal, rubbing out, disappearing, going into the grave, subtracting from the living, negation.
So, 56 units of corn and yes, technically a 57th mention of a guy, but not really because it’s a different unit of measure (Comey is different unit from Corney), so it makes more sense to consider the 57th mention to be a call to subtract 1 from 56 than to add to get 57 total.
Or, looking at it another way, only 1 real mention, and -56 phantoms. The sum of 1 and -56 being -55.
Look, I play too much Magic The Gathering. When both +1/+1 and -1/-1 counters are present on the same creature, they are immediately removed in matched pairs until only one or the other remains. I guess I’m looking at this like a creature with 56 +1 counters and a -1 (Scar) counter, and the -1 counter is removed with a single +1 counter, leaving you with 55 counters.
That's 187, the penal code for murder
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/29/187-comms-history/
Thank you. I’m an idiot. I googled 186 and a result was 186 on urban dictionary for a [failed] assassination attempt. I’ll update my original post to ask forgiveness and headline my stupidity.
As I was following prominent decoders in 2021, they showed us many instances of “delta plus one” in major Trump-associated figures sending definite Q references. I don’t know how they developed the concept of using this but every time someone asked them why they were making a connection using a particular method they could back it up convincingly from the drops, so if those folks were using it, it’s not a far-out concept.
The match on “Corney” strongly confirms that there are comms here, never mind the Q drop stating simply “Durham.”
Ok. That actually does make a bit of sense. Context is important. Thanks for taking the time to give a serious answer.
The Wonderland of Alice
https://www.ornl.gov/news/wonderland-alice-qa-thomas-m-cormier
Ehehehehehehe
I caught the 56 and the 1.
It was literally screaming at me to investigate.
Nice work!
James 8. Corney? The #8 instead of his true middle initial B along with Corney. I wonder what this Q post misspelling means? ----> https://qposts.online/post/2943
This was Q making what appeared to be a spelling error in March 2019. Then a few months later, the Mueller report was released with that same error. At the time, I believe the error occurred numerous times, including the 8 instead of B. Today the revised Mueller report has the rn instead of m spelling mistake but I believe the 8 was fixed. The only explanation being that it was just a coincidence or Q had to have access to the Mueller report months in advance and had reason to believe spelling mistake (or OCR issue) would be included in final draft. So apparently no one but Q saw the error for months, or for technological reasons the government can’t figure out how to properly do optical character recognition scans.
In Durham’s report, Attorney is misspelled 8 times as Attomey on pages 2 ,3, 102, 119, 120, 124.
Company is misspelled Cornpany on page 269, 252.
Instead of .com .corn is found on page 153. Coming is misspelled twice as corning on page 71.
So perhaps they just have OCR scan issues.
I’m not sure if we have Wikileaks to confirm this, maybe other anons can go deeper or have more knowledge, but the mythology is that Comey and others used agreed upon spelling mistakes to mask their identities from showing up in FOIA or NSA searches. But I don’t have knowledge of raw emails where the cabal did this.
So all this because some dude didnt want to get in trouble for financial or sex crimes and his solution was to blackmail everyome and push the world to communism so he could finally come out of the closet
Wowsers. I hope you’re right.
don't you also want to look into who is running your cities and hoa's?