Trump team requests three-day extension to respond to DOJ protective order
Lawyers representing former President Donald Trump issued a court filing requesting a federal judge to grant the legal team a three-day extension to respond to a protective order filed by the Justice Department that would block the former president from sh...
It doesn't seem odd to the normies that they are trying to stop the person being charged from presenting proof that they're innocent? Shouldn't that scream bogus charges?
I don’t think normies are even aware of details like this, MSM certainly doesn’t cover that part.
I think they are fine with presenting it to the court, they do not want him disclosing to the public, to protect witnesses, is my understanding of it.
Bullshit on it being about "protecting witnesses". They know that Trump is getting huge gains in popularity because of these sham indictments. They are trying to mitigate that by preventing Trump from taking about it with the public.
I agree, I was not supporting the courts reasoning, just clarifying why they are trying to silence the discovery for the general populace, that was their excuse for doing so.
Muh National Securitayyy.
Muh Sources n' Methods.
Faggot loser liars.
This would fly in the face of having a public trial, where court reporters would be present. What are they going to do? Search the reporters for notes, or forbid recordings? (Odd, if the trial would be on camera.) Whether or not there may be "precedent," I think this stands out as suppression of the defense. Since when has evidence been made secret to the disadvantage of the defense? Since when has the identity of witnesses been secret?---inasmuch as the defendant has the right to challenge witnesses in trial.
I think they should refuse to do it on the basis of Constitutional protection of the rights of the accused and the right of free speech---and let them all be sent to prison to stop the trial. That would get public notice. "Your honor, we decline to follow this request. It violates our client's rights under the Constitution. What are you going to do? Throw us all in jail?"
hopefully there are some that can " seem " or " feel " or " sense " for themselves anymore, because a lot of them certainly can't ponder things on their own.
I have no doubt that Trump is prepared for these types of shenanigans.
Bingo
That ‘evidence’ belongs to the American people. That is why!
This judge wants to hang Trump very badly. She is going to be very pissed at Jack Smith if he fucks this up. Which he is.
I'm hearing that the indictment opens up Trump having subpoena power for everything regarding the 2020 election....true?
Since the charges include his making false claims, if he’s not allowed to prove the truth of his statements it’s not a valid trial.
Didnt Schiff introduce a bill to block military intelligence from being used in court. If they have it all, the cabal was trying to block that Avenue
What was it that Q said....
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📁 Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)
............"Think logically. How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? Who has everything?"........
I don't think Q is too afraid of any particular countermove…
u/#q578
As long as the judge allows it.
From what Ive read, it is true.
IANAL, but that definitely does not seem like normal practice.
Anal is certainly not a normal practice.
I laugh every time I see that acronym, but my mind goes to 'The Anal Retentive Chef'! 😂
I don't think this kind of thing would work, the transcripts would be public record anyway, and any materials could be open to FOIA.. Judicial Watch's speciality.
2nd source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/obama-judge-who-worked-hunter-biden-gives-trump/
AND THAT RIGHT THERE IS CAUSE TO BRING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT...A person has a RIGHT to a fair trial and should NOT be coerced into anything...which is what this is...
Can't wait until this hits the SC Docket...going to suck to be smith and this runaway judge!!!!
It's getting to be just about popcorn time!!!!!!
I wonder if some of this maneuvering isn’t setting the stage for ensuing military trials of the DS beast minions. Think of it… the goal is to get the trial venue moved into the military tribunal realm, no outside (FNM) cameras allowed in. There are various ways this can happen. One is to have a “dangerous situation” where the military must be present to protect all involved. Because of the enormity of what’s transpiring with President Trump, this would qualify.
They can boot the FNM out under the umbrella of “national security” and the leaks and such. The issue described in the post may be used to move the venue out of the public square. So now you have military-controlled trials (tribunals) being conducted where only the military will release information to the public. Purely hypothetically, if someone were to have already been arrested and tried in this manner, the resultant information on the evidence presented, testimony given, etc could be released in a way which would clearly show the public that justice was upheld and that the beasts were as bad as the conspiracy theorists always claimed they are.
I had originally thought that the Potatus would be decreeing that we won’t have (the 2024) elections (still a distinct possibility, imo), that he and his ilk will be seizing and maintaining control of the country and the military will step in that way. They aren’t ever going to put the Potatus on trial publicly (for obvious reasons), but renegade, dubya, side of beef, slick Willy, shifty shiff, fancy Nancy, gruesome Newsome and so many others could easily fall under the military tribunal umbrella both for the safety of everyone involved as well as for informational “national security” issues once the dredging out of the crimes (as a result of the disclosure-discovery) begins in earnest.
This particular maneuver of addressing NS issues and the need for careful handling of that information would help move this into the military trials (tribunals) realm - the goal.
Keep your pimp hand strong meme in order
https://tenor.com/search/pimp-hands-gifs
This will go to the Supreme Court. It’s so obvious they are trying to stack the court like this. Constitution guarantees fair trial!
And Trump has the money to fight it where normal joes would have to suck it up because they don’t have the funds to file the proper docs.
This will fail, as when the Trump rallies ramp-up, all Trump has to do on the podium during his speeches is do like the Q posts. He'll simply ask questions like; " what happened 4 yrs ago in the 2020 election?' We know how the crowd will respond! Keep that narrative going & going all campaign season long!!
they will try but they will fail
Of course the DOJ wants to practice it's evil in the dark.
If that judge allows it, then the proper response would be to do what the DOJ does every time in suits them.
DAILY LEAKS of every detail of the trial.
I had been wondering if one of the goals of the dems is just to censor Trump during the election...and charge him of he slips up and mentions the evidence of 2020 election fraud. Seems like that is likely now.
Why would [they] seek to block this evidence? Find that answer and find the reason for all these indictments.