"We had... the military what they've done, our Generals, all of the people what they've done is incredible, but remember, you know, we took care of a lot of people, including I guess on Dec 21st we took care of Joe Biden. Because he got his shot. He got his vaccine, he...."
What do you guys make of this? Is he talking about getting the vaccines out to everyone? Getting the PPE out to every hospital during the early Pandemic?
IMO, Trump mentioning the vax is cover for the real message, that the real FJB was executed ... apparently on 12/21 (think mirror). Otherwise why mention the Generals?
That vax "out" is the meaning of the Optics comment.
I’m still digesting this, but I like the path you are on. One thing we all need to keep in mind is, she said “optics”. Not hidden message. Optics refers to the perception of something, that may or may not be true.
Oddly, that very word has come up recently in a delta to GEOTUS’s court date:
Optics of GEOTUS saying “we took care of joe biden — he got his shot.”
The literal meaning is, we looked out for pedo-joe and gave him a vaccine.
The optics are GEOTUS is more powerful than pedo-joe and could be viewed as, we put him on the playing field (gave him a shot) and now we’ve effectively removed him (took care of him). Moves and counter moves? A war like posture?
So is she just riding the coat tails of the movement to gain some sort of notoriety? I don't see any semblance of so called "cashing in", aside from being on a few shows.
My eyes can't believe what I'm seeing, and usually that means there's a reason.
Yes...she is still under contract to DOD with a Security Clearance which she cannot reveal what level and she was on POTUS' Transition Team.
She's A Patriot.
Those are claims she has made. But what can actually be verified?
She used to be the Vice-president of the Overseas Republicans a group based in the UK.
Because of that she got on TV shows in Britain.
The Overseas Republicans sent her a cease and deceased letter in 2016 for saying/ or implying she was still affiliated with the overseas Republicans after she had left the group.
Some places she said she was a member of the Trump transition team and some place. She said she was a consultant to the Trump transition team.
This seems to be the company at the top of her LinkedIn.
Yep, that is always true at all levels of access. Think of it more as levels of verified trust, not as blanket access tiers.
I was a contractor of a contractor once, and by the nature of their business I had to get some low level clearance. I never saw anything even remotely secret, as my job had nothing to do with that part of the business. And it was made very clear to me that I was to stay away from that part of it.
Anyway, point being that her explanation of all levels of clearance still being compartmentalized is accurate with my understanding and experience.
She was on DJTs transition team. That's about it. If she cannot reveal what security clearance she has, or who she is reportedly contract with, or what task force she is on, WHY is she revealing supposed secret content?
For a professional she uses too many inside buzz words that the MAGA anons use . She is dropping little bits of "truths" here and there. She may be the real deal and that would make us all feel vindicated....but my antenna is up as everyone's should be. Fool me once shame on you, But Twice shame on me.
Either these are secret comms, or DJT is just using plain and common language.
"How's your car? it's totally shot" - broken down, useless, defunct. (Doesn't mean someone took out a rifle and shot my car.)
"We took care of Joe Biden"
Context: "We did operation warpspeed, we were amazingly successful, even to the point that we even took care of Joe, inasmuch as we got him his covid19 vaxxine."
"take care of" - keep someone safe, provided for, etc. Of course, the idiom "to solve, resolve, get rid of (a problem)", but which one actually fits the context?
So either this is direct comms, or its just a bunch of different, easily explainable statements that make perfect sense in the contexts used.
Personally, I think people's confirmation bias is kicking in a LOT over here.
maybe its the length of the course. We've been in it for ages now, and maybe a lot of anons simply are suffering from mental and emotional war exhaustion, so any idea that someone is coming out now and its the beginning of high level exposure is indescribably attractive.
Me? Please take no offense, but I'm really skeptical about Halper. What do we really know about her? She says shes on a spaceforce task force, but which one? When?
Possibly Halper may be a joker, a distraction inserted by White Hats to confuse and bamboozle the enemy, but me? As juicy as it all seems, I'm HIGHLY skeptical.
I gave up hopium a long time ago. Now I only ingest hopermectin.
NB: By saying I'm highly skeptical, that's NOT to say I'm a doomer or that I don;t have buckets and bucjkets of grounded, solid hope and optimism. I totally do. But disinfo operatives in the public sphere who offer "hopium" content are the flipside of the doomers, in my opinion.
Both play more to emotional 'grabtivity', (emotions grabbing gravitas and activity) than to grounded logical and empirically based optimism.
I've never been more solidly optimist and super high charged vibewise about the plan and DJT and the good guys than I am right now. Maybe that's why Halper rings a few alarm bells for me?
Either she's legit, and part of an operation to peel off some onion rings and bring normie and maga into a lot more anon narrative layers, or she's a ringer, sent in as a distraction for the enemy at this point, or she's an opportunistic grifter, another "I've got inside information" operative, out to sow problems for the anons and the normies.
Am I convinced on any other these? not really, although I lean towards the latter two. In any case, I simply wish to avoid getting bogged down in confirmation bias.
What DJT is doing, and how everything else is going, is enough for me to be fully charged right now.
Well we DO know that John Fetterman or his handlers at least have been using body doubles of him. Would make perfect sense to do the same for Biden. Especially since he has a brother James who could easily stand in for Joe.
Questions. I have questions!
Here are Trump's words in that video:
"We had... the military what they've done, our Generals, all of the people what they've done is incredible, but remember, you know, we took care of a lot of people, including I guess on Dec 21st we took care of Joe Biden. Because he got his shot. He got his vaccine, he...."
What do you guys make of this? Is he talking about getting the vaccines out to everyone? Getting the PPE out to every hospital during the early Pandemic?
What is he referring to?
POTUS has said several times in Rallies, "He's shot!"..."He's not the same person"
Yes. And, there's this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXe4MWaJiqA
Transcript
Did anybody watch Liz? You watch both, of them, right? Yeah.
But I watch. I just wanna see.
Like how's he doing?
Not well. And remember this. They have nothing but to stand…
He's just a vehicle. Let's not kid ourselves. Joe is shot, okay?
He's shot. He is a vehicle. And he's got his vice president who is further left than crazy Bernie
Okay? Kamala. Kamala.
I remember that, too!
I think I remember seeing in the recent Glenn Beck interview, he said "Biden's gone" as well.
Aaaww... VERY dasting!
Shot dead for treason
Let's pray that's the case...
IMO, Trump mentioning the vax is cover for the real message, that the real FJB was executed ... apparently on 12/21 (think mirror). Otherwise why mention the Generals?
That vax "out" is the meaning of the Optics comment.
I like this angle...🧐
12/21/12 symbolic
12/21/17 Executive Order...
You are so transparent.
It's an accurate citation and word for word quote from Donald Trump and answers the question asked (shrug)
From reading her Twitter a bit, she doesn't appear to want to be taken literally/directly.
More like shell drop a hint and she wants us to ruminate on that.
I’m still digesting this, but I like the path you are on. One thing we all need to keep in mind is, she said “optics”. Not hidden message. Optics refers to the perception of something, that may or may not be true.
Oddly, that very word has come up recently in a delta to GEOTUS’s court date:
u/#q2961
EDIT - Thinking in real time….
Optics of GEOTUS saying “we took care of joe biden — he got his shot.”
The literal meaning is, we looked out for pedo-joe and gave him a vaccine.
The optics are GEOTUS is more powerful than pedo-joe and could be viewed as, we put him on the playing field (gave him a shot) and now we’ve effectively removed him (took care of him). Moves and counter moves? A war like posture?
That's why i love to make posts like this because I trust Halper-Hayes but not sure how to perceive her "Optics" comment.
Always like the brainstorming with family here...
I'm glad you did too. I love conversations like this.
Yes ...we help and support each other, this is the way.
Q is proud.
That's what I'm wondering...she's trusted so she's been chosen to drop facts for normies and perhaps a nod to anons.
So is she just riding the coat tails of the movement to gain some sort of notoriety? I don't see any semblance of so called "cashing in", aside from being on a few shows.
My eyes can't believe what I'm seeing, and usually that means there's a reason.
Has there been an anon deep dive on her?
{And yes I know about Trump returning her}
Yes...she is still under contract to DOD with a Security Clearance which she cannot reveal what level and she was on POTUS' Transition Team. She's A Patriot.
Well then this is crazier than all get out
That's not a deep dive.
Those are claims she has made. But what can actually be verified?
She used to be the Vice-president of the Overseas Republicans a group based in the UK.
Because of that she got on TV shows in Britain.
The Overseas Republicans sent her a cease and deceased letter in 2016 for saying/ or implying she was still affiliated with the overseas Republicans after she had left the group.
Some places she said she was a member of the Trump transition team and some place. She said she was a consultant to the Trump transition team.
This seems to be the company at the top of her LinkedIn.
She wrote a book in 1988 but I can't find it right now. I did see it on Amazon last week. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08761699
I had already read about some of that, but good into.
I'm leery of her to be honest.
She's telling us what we want to hear. When that's happening it means there's another shoe to drop, usually to make her "followers" look ridiculous.
The only aspect that's out of whack is the media hasn't pounded on her.
It would seem to be easy pickings
me too.
You should be leery.
I was referencing Timothy Leary you dolt.
Just kidding. Thanks for pointing that out.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2WEcgxJ/x/c/4TwSiQ9dVdj
I know...this entire past 7 years has been mind blowing! 🤯
On the last interview I watched (Big MiG Show), she said it “was the lowest level”. So I assume it’s a Public Trust.
Could be...not sure..she also said that you could only communicate with the people on your project, not others on other projects.
Yep, that is always true at all levels of access. Think of it more as levels of verified trust, not as blanket access tiers.
I was a contractor of a contractor once, and by the nature of their business I had to get some low level clearance. I never saw anything even remotely secret, as my job had nothing to do with that part of the business. And it was made very clear to me that I was to stay away from that part of it.
Anyway, point being that her explanation of all levels of clearance still being compartmentalized is accurate with my understanding and experience.
Thanks for the explanation fren!
So she says. Any facts to back this up?
She was on DJTs transition team. That's about it. If she cannot reveal what security clearance she has, or who she is reportedly contract with, or what task force she is on, WHY is she revealing supposed secret content?
Signed, skeptical.
"Facts matter." Q
She claims to work for gov and never heard of REAL ID is all I know
Just WOW!
I'm sure I've seen this before and it didn't sink in.
Joe got his shot on winter solstice no less
OMG! I didn't realize it was the Winter Solstice! Went right over my head about the date... great catch!
Symbolism will be their downfall...literally?
Multiple meanings!
For a professional she uses too many inside buzz words that the MAGA anons use . She is dropping little bits of "truths" here and there. She may be the real deal and that would make us all feel vindicated....but my antenna is up as everyone's should be. Fool me once shame on you, But Twice shame on me.
I agree, be cautious and question everything, but I believe she's the real deal.
Jeepers. Okay. Devils Avocado here.
Either these are secret comms, or DJT is just using plain and common language.
"How's your car? it's totally shot" - broken down, useless, defunct. (Doesn't mean someone took out a rifle and shot my car.)
"We took care of Joe Biden"
Context: "We did operation warpspeed, we were amazingly successful, even to the point that we even took care of Joe, inasmuch as we got him his covid19 vaxxine."
"take care of" - keep someone safe, provided for, etc. Of course, the idiom "to solve, resolve, get rid of (a problem)", but which one actually fits the context?
So either this is direct comms, or its just a bunch of different, easily explainable statements that make perfect sense in the contexts used.
Personally, I think people's confirmation bias is kicking in a LOT over here.
maybe its the length of the course. We've been in it for ages now, and maybe a lot of anons simply are suffering from mental and emotional war exhaustion, so any idea that someone is coming out now and its the beginning of high level exposure is indescribably attractive.
Me? Please take no offense, but I'm really skeptical about Halper. What do we really know about her? She says shes on a spaceforce task force, but which one? When?
Possibly Halper may be a joker, a distraction inserted by White Hats to confuse and bamboozle the enemy, but me? As juicy as it all seems, I'm HIGHLY skeptical.
I gave up hopium a long time ago. Now I only ingest hopermectin.
NB: By saying I'm highly skeptical, that's NOT to say I'm a doomer or that I don;t have buckets and bucjkets of grounded, solid hope and optimism. I totally do. But disinfo operatives in the public sphere who offer "hopium" content are the flipside of the doomers, in my opinion.
Both play more to emotional 'grabtivity', (emotions grabbing gravitas and activity) than to grounded logical and empirically based optimism.
I've never been more solidly optimist and super high charged vibewise about the plan and DJT and the good guys than I am right now. Maybe that's why Halper rings a few alarm bells for me?
Either she's legit, and part of an operation to peel off some onion rings and bring normie and maga into a lot more anon narrative layers, or she's a ringer, sent in as a distraction for the enemy at this point, or she's an opportunistic grifter, another "I've got inside information" operative, out to sow problems for the anons and the normies.
Am I convinced on any other these? not really, although I lean towards the latter two. In any case, I simply wish to avoid getting bogged down in confirmation bias.
What DJT is doing, and how everything else is going, is enough for me to be fully charged right now.
Time will tell.
No offense take fren...updoot for use of "jeepers" 😺
Well we DO know that John Fetterman or his handlers at least have been using body doubles of him. Would make perfect sense to do the same for Biden. Especially since he has a brother James who could easily stand in for Joe.
Correct...and the most recent Fetterman on the scene is so obviously NOT him that it's almost an insult to our intelligence!
Remember crazy Joe speaking in “inauguration” day. Camera cut away and inserted a bloody head wound. Yes. I saw it.
I didn't see that ,have a link ?
I didn't see that either! Please provide link, screenshot, something!!
WH's are unbelievably clever...almost subliminal.
Dang