A reminder from the Q team
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Follow Nobody
problem solved
READ and DIG
that's how you attain the 40k ft. view
:)
Ditto that!
That Q Drop #1295, the other posts quoting it are also interesting:
https://qalerts.app/?q=Be+careful+who+you
Does that app link all those together when searching? Or did you do that? Either way that's awesome
The qalerts site will return all the posts containing the string in red. Most recent first. Begin from the bottom.
That being said I bought a hat from Dave as I thought he deserved my business after following him since he started the b section to his daily drops. I ad block I never donate thought he was due.
Money is not the problem. The love of money is the problem.
He apparently has some epic plush real estate for someone who is not big on the money side.
I would expect nothing less considering the knowledge on offer in the "A" portion of the broadcast as his daily financial reporting mixed with a distaste for Obama is how he started when X22report got going.
^
Source?
That Q post was not directed at Dave. Look at Educating Liberals, the Fulcrum News guy (I think his name is David Seaman), and especially Jerome Corsi. I watched his crap on YouTube for a while. "CF... That stands for the Clinton Foundation. Alright, if you wanna hear more analysis, you need to follow me behind my paywall." Dave has offered his news for free. I have been watchig him from years and have not given any money to him at all, especially since I live in America and can't afford shipping on his collagen and whatnot. Unfortunately, that InTheMatrixxx guy was getting tons of money from that crazy lady with her imaginary friend that's an ancient god or something Rendezvous with Rama. I forget that crazy bitch's name. Anyhow, he sure didn't mind mooching off that psychopath. NeonRevolt called him out on that relationship. But NR is another example. He wrote that big book on Q which is informative, but after the Mike Pence debacle, his predictions on how Jan 6th would play out were wrong and he jumped off the Q bandwagon. He stopped updating his great Q blog, only posting on Gab "blah blah blah, Bitcoin blah blah" and teetering on white nationalism. He was also caught passing off some analysis as his own.
Simon parks
Doug billings
Nicholas Veniamin
David Wilcock
Cory Goode
Gaia.com gigantic Larpfest
John DeSouza
David Zublick
Bill Wood aka William Brockbrader, "Project Looking Glass"
Keri Cassady (sp?)
Charlie Ward
Robert David Steele (RIP? who knows!)
David Nino Rodriguez (possibly just bad discernment...)
Scott McKay
Michael Jaco
Phil Godlewskie
Tarot By Janine
Jetson White
Gene Decode aka Marty
Brad Barton (possibly bad discernment...)
Austin Steinbart
Tore Says (possibly)
Joe Altman (sp?)
Jason Sherka (sp?)
GeorgeNews (possibly)
TheRealKimShady
Jennifer Mac
Mel Q :(
JohnHereToHelp
SantaSurfing
BigRedWaveNow
Juan O Savin AnonUp (Wayne Willot, "W The Intel Insider"(2013))
Negative48 (Michael Protzman) RIP
QAnon John :(
Dustin Nemos
Alex Jones (the legend)
Stew Peters (the apprentice)
Mike Adams
Lin Wood
Jack Maxey
American Intelligence Media (AIM)
E. The Friend, "E"
Ghost Ezra tg (and all his other socials)
Whiplash 357 tg
TS SCI Majestic 12 tg and twitter
John McAfee tg, McAfeeAfterlife TS
NeonNettle
Vancouver Times
RealRawNews
IngersolLockwood
Benjamin Fulford "The Fulford Report"
Conservative Beaver
ThePeoplesVoice
LogicBeforeAuthority YT
RichieFromBoston YT
InTheMatrixx and ShadyGroove (sad)
Richard Citizen Journalist (sad, possibly bad discernment..)
and numerous TikTokers / YT / IG'ers with wild bullshit claims to get clicks.
Good list. I'd add Jerome Corsi to that list. He hid behind a paywall and insisted that everyone pay him for his lackluster analysis of Q posts. David Seaman was the one who introduced me to Q, but he turned out to be a letdown. At the time, I was following people like him and David Zublick, whom you have on your list.
I watch for the people asking for money or making you subscribe to their accts./channels. Freedom is priceless so that why I'm a hang around here. But you do have to admit to a sense some of the grifters are getting good. It would be hard for an average normie to point them out hell it's hard for me sometimes. I like to kinda wait and see if a post is to good to be true and give it a few days.
I mainly try to see if they are just being duped into promoting bullshit or if they know that it's bullshit and still promote it. If they never recant their bullshit claims, or even double down on them. Also if they react with hostility to people questioning them or ignore the questions entirely. And to your point about asking for money, the way social media works right now you can get money for clicks, follows, and views, so that does play into things
Beautiful list though
Impressive list.
FWIW, I'm sure that one or two of those on the list are legit, but I have no idea who. ;p
I'd give Steele a listen with an open mind. Dustin Nemos I am undecided on, and if my memory serves, I think he might be OK.
The rest? sigh. Disinformation is a big business for small time operators....
I really only trust Catturd
I been here doing this stuff for more than 30 years, I will be looking for a payout on the exit of the revealed mystery, you can count on that. I have been assure there will be a payout to those Soldiers, you know who you are and why you were called. Not called of Man, but of God to do what we do. He said, He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him. This is Military(White Horse) & Biblical(Rider). I have only 1 leader and I only follow 1. Patriots are selfless, so was Jesus.
Amen to that. We know this fight is about good vs. evil and God wins. When you trust in the Lord, you're on the winning side.
There are lots of paytriots.
They're not much different than the 'charities' the celebes sponsor after every disaster. The honesty and morality of a whole swath of the nation is in the shitter. It has become dog eat dog, which is just what the enemy has been working toward.
Not sure it means anything at all, but ....
"Those" requires "have", not "has". Can anyone run-to-ground this "s" to "ve" thing?
Or just laugh and call me a crazy polak.
Grammar pedantic
You're correct. But it's a relatively small error, and the meaning is clear. Given the general inattention to grammar in the schools, I'm assuming it was a simple error without any strategic intent at secret meaning. In other words, a mistake.
Had to check. Seems to me that Q is more intelligent than that, so perhaps it was intentional. Maybe this is a hint at Q's age? (In my experience, younger people seem to adhere less to "proper" English.)
I believe there are multiple authors. Maybe someday we'll know.
Interesting. May I ask your theory on this belief?
Q stated that a team exists. And in addition to the fact that different types of posts exist, there have been a few subtle changes in tone, as if the writer were a different person. Obviously subjective, but many others have made that observation.
It would require a tripcode to be shared, and I imagine it would be controlled by a small communications team within a psyop unit. Given that it's a military operation, it is only sensible to assume that redundancy exists in every position including the writer(s).
Thank you for your explanation.
And if you really want to be correct, it should read "whom you follow".
Let's talk about your health.
Funny you're getting downvoted despite a solid 15% of his podcast being ads.
STEVE BANNON