This video was released a little bit ago. March 8, 2022. But it was claimed it was AI and he never said that. BUT. DCMA verified that its impossible for this video to be AI.
in 2016 Roger Stone was filming a documentary when this was allegedly filmed.
It shows a lot of information in the video I commented below thats put together by the famous "Scotty Mar"
Roger Stone fired the person associated with this video / documentary & it got released.
Thats all I really know. But the fact that its real is probably going to arise WAY more questions about what Roger specifically says.
"Betrayed Rudy"
Is Rudy in a mask and the real Rudy at Gitmo with the Clintons? Rudy did cover up 9/11 Disaster by disposing of the rubble IMMEDIATELY before a thorough investigation could take place. But thats just my 2 cents. I got a video saved on that shenanigan.
BIG QUESTION for you, is how does Denmark fit into this all as portrayed by Scotty Mar video? I couldnt piece that together. Q talked about FIVE EYES, and allegedly FIVE EYES has a role here.
The research points to Roger Stone as leading the Proud Boys? What. This Movie could get interesting really soon. Flood Gates are Opening.
The burger flip was a sign!!! Its Habbening. Yuge
"The twist of the Video's truth was revealed when the Documentarian behind the footage sent out a DCMA (Digital millennium Copyright Act) Which cant be used on AI footage made a claim against the footage. Indicating that the video is infact real."
Also Jack Smith is involved? Isnt that who is attacking Trump? Is it all setting the stage for DEC[L]ASS?
Watching this crap gave me eye cancer. The entire thesis hinges on the assertion that since the "documentarians" filed a DMCA complaint against the clip, it MUST be real and not altered vi AI in anyway.
There are so many problems with that assertion, but I will just address the most obvious flaw in that logic, that seems to ZOOM past Scotty whoever.
Documentarians are adversarial to Roger Stone as per this video clip. Roger Stone claims the video is not real. Documentarian claims the video is real. Assuming all other arguments about AI content is valid (its not), if Stone's adversaries wanted to push the narrative that this is a real video - then filing DMCA claim is exactly what they would do.
If, however, it was Stone claiming it was fake and then it was himself who filed DMCA (as an example) then the logic that - "aha see he filed DMCA so according to himself it must be real" - would be atleast plausible.
This is such laughable garbage, makes me think why the Cabal is suddenly target Stone.
I know Stone is a very controversial figure and no one really can tell what he is up to, but I would say this particular video makes the point for him being on the good side.
Oh, and the idea that someone would say such blatantly crazy things about Trump while being video recorded for a documentary is beyond stupid.
Oh, and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording.
Oh, and the fact that claiming anything thats shown on AJ must be Intel narrative - that logic implies the fact that he said Election was stolen, that there is a depopulation agenda, and that vaccines were bad - all that is Intel narrative.
Oh, and the fact that some obscure "documentarian" from Denmark, wants to do a documentary about Roger Stone of all people, does not throw any red flags to any of these jokers?
Stone might very well be son of the Satan himself, but this video does nothing to prove anything.
I cant see his lips enough to even make an approximation whether the audio and video match.
Roger Stone started as a BS artist. A hanger on, a big talking name dropper.
Again, I am agreeing or disagreeing with any of this stuff. Like I already mentioned, Stone is one of those people who make me vaguely disturbed when I watch them, without being able to put my finger on.
But this clip provides nothing, except the feeling that someone is doing a very bad smear job on him.
My personal theory? Stone did leak something to Smith, that he used in his indictment. They now realize that whatever he leaked is bogus and panicing. They are covering themselves by getting ready to throw Stone under the bus for this debacle. And this theory still does not rule out whether Stone is good or bad. He could be good and did this on purpose. He could be bad, and got manipulated into doing this.
I agree. I have been told a few times here that Badlands media had a podcast about how Rudy, Mueller and Stone worked together to take down the Mafia in NY. Haven't watched it, so no idea how good the theory is, but honestly, this story is filled with "Schrodinger's Characters" people who could be both good or bad, and we will only know the truth once the credit rolls.
I knew of him in a different milieu, so can see his character as exaggerating his own importance and acquaintance. I also have huge respect for scotty mar10's work. And you're right. We will probably have to wait for the curtain to come down on this epic.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
Its 2016, pre Q.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
I’m saying it doesn’t matter. He could’ve been trying to impeach right away after 2 months of him being president because he realized Trump was going to go after the communist fucks
I’ve worked in video / audio production for 15 years and in my professional opinion the video is 100% real the audio I would need to do more research into on my computer to verify but it seems to be the original audio as well at first glance
Craziest part of it all ontop of this absolute suicide weekend contestant, is that Alex Jones is exposed as being the Intelligence Operative he is! Denying the video and protecting the traitor Roger Stone.
This is the video Roger has publicly denounced a few times that I saw. No way to provide sources because he spoke about it in long form interviews and it would take a lifetime for me to find again.
Go to the scotty Mar video. OF COURSE he will deny it. BUT. The documentarian made a copy right claim on it and it cant be done without RAW footage. YOU CAN DCMA footage from AI. DCMA confirmed this footage.
Doesn't make sense Stone is still battling all the legal troubles from his raid and being sapped financially trying to defend Trump if that video were authentic. Guess we'll see as this movie plays out.
If I was the deepstate that would be my cover story too!
Matthew 7:15-20
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
This scotty "proof" looks like it hinges entirely on the assertion the DMCA and documentarian both are iron clad. DMCA claims are just as malleable as anything these days and the Danes side with JB so this proof is not absolute and already raises red flags IMHO. I'll file this info as interesting but I'm not swayed.
Thats fine. But DCMA requires some proof. The footage is entirely compelling and ive NEVER, seen a AI video so accurate. Show me one that you can find of a celebrity or person talking as candidly and accurately as such, when you see full body motion and movement and not just a head / mouth piece.
You have a paper trail. Not just DCMA. You have the Documentarian RELEASING this footage. You have HIM making the DCMA claim. Its not a nobody. It didnt come out of the magic of the internet.
I knew when we got close to the truth people will come on these sites and on Reddit and say videos which are real are actually fake.
I think you’re fake or mislead. Roger Stone is a different man since finding Christ and risks insult and being mocked everywhere he goes. He still goes to church though and talks with Trump regularly.
This is truth- DMCA claims come down to whoever's lawyer is better, basically. We run an online business and have firsthand experience with this as a product of our design was taken down by a claim made by a competitor that the intellectual property belonged to him. It did not, btw, and we did eventually win and have our item restored. Pretty much anyone can file a claim with a platform (be it a sales platform or social media) and say, "this is mine" and that platform will remove the disputed item due to the claim, NOT due to any proof or documentation. Then as the fight progresses it can be restored or not- sometimes multiple times- depending on how the fight goes. So until the fight over this video is over, you can't really know anything based on the DMCA claims and even then it may be just who ran out of money first, not actual legal proof.
My gut tells me that Stone has been bad in the past, but I'm willing to give him a chance basically because of the Christians he's speaking with and what he is saying and doing NOW. I am a Christian and I'm sure that that has something to do with my opinion, but I'm always happy to see anyone make a change. Believing that if someone does something bad or have been bad at one time that they'll always BE bad goes against the very basis of Christianity and forgiveness. We can all be redeemed and change. It may be a ploy on his part, it may not be a ploy- I don't know. I'm not God. It's not for me to cancel someone who may be trying to do better without seeing how things play out. To me it seems like he's been awfully attacked by the left and and is very much still hated by them, so he has to pose at least some sort of threat to them somehow. Maybe it's what he knows, maybe it's something else. But I'll choose to extend a chance to someone who is publicly trying to do better until I see recent evidence that it's false, not something that is years old, whether it's real or not.
Roger Stone is a polarizing individual. He is a coarse, potty-mouthed, self-serving political activist with a Nixon tattoo on his back. What Trump saw in him I do not know. But Trump did commute his prison sentence (he always rewards loyalty).
I always saw Stone as a political liability and an rabid outlier to Trump's base. I never understood why Trump was so close to him.
Stone...You can glean a LOT about this mf'er right here by how he talks, carries himself and especially, what he says with this gestures and hands.
He's a real c%cksucker - DESPERATE to regain control he once had with all of the presidential elections he's handled over the years - AND you can bet he's rubbed shoulders with some REAL evil bastards over the years...
I'd bet the epstein employee story is mostly true...
"He turns to me, I’m just standing in shock, and says quite angrily, “DO YOU MIND?” and I slam the door shut. As I’m closing the door I get a glimpse of my coworker’s face and he is crying. I googled nixon back tattoo later and realized that man was Roger Stone, who I’d never even heard of up to that point. I knew I was in deep shit."
I think I pooped a little bit when I read the part about 4th of July because I fucking lived in Ned in my 20s and used to go to the waterfall there to clear my mind several times a week...Gave me chills...
Okay so many questions.
Why is it that for the whole video we can barely see his lips move ?
Who took this video sitting next to him?
Who released this video now?
Why now?
This video was released a little bit ago. March 8, 2022. But it was claimed it was AI and he never said that. BUT. DCMA verified that its impossible for this video to be AI.
in 2016 Roger Stone was filming a documentary when this was allegedly filmed.
It shows a lot of information in the video I commented below thats put together by the famous "Scotty Mar"
Roger Stone fired the person associated with this video / documentary & it got released.
Thats all I really know. But the fact that its real is probably going to arise WAY more questions about what Roger specifically says.
"Betrayed Rudy"
Is Rudy in a mask and the real Rudy at Gitmo with the Clintons? Rudy did cover up 9/11 Disaster by disposing of the rubble IMMEDIATELY before a thorough investigation could take place. But thats just my 2 cents. I got a video saved on that shenanigan.
BIG QUESTION for you, is how does Denmark fit into this all as portrayed by Scotty Mar video? I couldnt piece that together. Q talked about FIVE EYES, and allegedly FIVE EYES has a role here.
The research points to Roger Stone as leading the Proud Boys? What. This Movie could get interesting really soon. Flood Gates are Opening.
The burger flip was a sign!!! Its Habbening. Yuge
"The twist of the Video's truth was revealed when the Documentarian behind the footage sent out a DCMA (Digital millennium Copyright Act) Which cant be used on AI footage made a claim against the footage. Indicating that the video is infact real."
Also Jack Smith is involved? Isnt that who is attacking Trump? Is it all setting the stage for DEC[L]ASS?
EVEN CRAZIER! The Documentarians Account https://twitter.com/JasonIsAbroad
IS BANNED FOR POSTING THE CONTENT! HOLY SHIT HOW BIG DOES THIS GO? HOW CONNECTED IS ROGER STONE?
Why does no-one recall Stone's connection to NXVIM or the Clinton campaign?
I always wondered why you guys thought he was a hero for being raided given his past connections.
exactly
Julian Assange recently claimed Stone was a plant.
Source?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17r995HjPE/julian-assange-talks-about-roger/c/
Old clip from 5 years ago and Julian said Stone was merely trolling the Democrats. Nothing about Stone being a plant.
Never trust a silver hair
https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9N9HBo6/scotty-mar10--elvis-presley--sus/c/
Watching this crap gave me eye cancer. The entire thesis hinges on the assertion that since the "documentarians" filed a DMCA complaint against the clip, it MUST be real and not altered vi AI in anyway.
There are so many problems with that assertion, but I will just address the most obvious flaw in that logic, that seems to ZOOM past Scotty whoever.
Documentarians are adversarial to Roger Stone as per this video clip. Roger Stone claims the video is not real. Documentarian claims the video is real. Assuming all other arguments about AI content is valid (its not), if Stone's adversaries wanted to push the narrative that this is a real video - then filing DMCA claim is exactly what they would do.
If, however, it was Stone claiming it was fake and then it was himself who filed DMCA (as an example) then the logic that - "aha see he filed DMCA so according to himself it must be real" - would be atleast plausible.
This is such laughable garbage, makes me think why the Cabal is suddenly target Stone.
I know Stone is a very controversial figure and no one really can tell what he is up to, but I would say this particular video makes the point for him being on the good side.
Oh, and the idea that someone would say such blatantly crazy things about Trump while being video recorded for a documentary is beyond stupid.
Oh, and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording.
Oh, and the fact that claiming anything thats shown on AJ must be Intel narrative - that logic implies the fact that he said Election was stolen, that there is a depopulation agenda, and that vaccines were bad - all that is Intel narrative.
Oh, and the fact that some obscure "documentarian" from Denmark, wants to do a documentary about Roger Stone of all people, does not throw any red flags to any of these jokers?
Stone might very well be son of the Satan himself, but this video does nothing to prove anything.
Car camera and I can see his lips moving for most of video. And why? Roger Stone started as a BS artist. A hanger on, a big talking name dropper.
I cant see his lips enough to even make an approximation whether the audio and video match.
Again, I am agreeing or disagreeing with any of this stuff. Like I already mentioned, Stone is one of those people who make me vaguely disturbed when I watch them, without being able to put my finger on.
But this clip provides nothing, except the feeling that someone is doing a very bad smear job on him.
My personal theory? Stone did leak something to Smith, that he used in his indictment. They now realize that whatever he leaked is bogus and panicing. They are covering themselves by getting ready to throw Stone under the bus for this debacle. And this theory still does not rule out whether Stone is good or bad. He could be good and did this on purpose. He could be bad, and got manipulated into doing this.
I appreciate what you are saying and have great respect for your analysis. Stone goes back a long, long way.
I agree. I have been told a few times here that Badlands media had a podcast about how Rudy, Mueller and Stone worked together to take down the Mafia in NY. Haven't watched it, so no idea how good the theory is, but honestly, this story is filled with "Schrodinger's Characters" people who could be both good or bad, and we will only know the truth once the credit rolls.
I knew of him in a different milieu, so can see his character as exaggerating his own importance and acquaintance. I also have huge respect for scotty mar10's work. And you're right. We will probably have to wait for the curtain to come down on this epic.
Honestly, havent seen scotty mar much, but this one is really bad.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Connect the dots. I know I have.
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Its literally as simple as sending a letter/email
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
Nixon, ON TAPE, referred to Bohemian Grove as, and I quote, "The goddamn faggiest thing I've ever seen." Keep it straight, yo...
Although Stone strikes me as a sneaky creep, I find it hard to believe he’s stupid enough to be caught on video like this.
"Don't interrupt your enemies while they're making a mistake'
This was 2016. Before Q. This was setup by FIVE EYES. He probably thought he had supreme protection.
Q Post #4763
THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID
If this video was 2016, then who was Stone talking about impeaching? Trump wasn't president until Jan 20, 2017.
Doesn’t disprove anything
Who said anything about proof of disproof? I'm asking for clarifcation, you donut.
I’m saying it doesn’t matter. He could’ve been trying to impeach right away after 2 months of him being president because he realized Trump was going to go after the communist fucks
wow what a cunt this guy is, look at the rage and they way he talks
In the Matrixx started exposing Stone a couple weeks ago. He seems to think Flynn is in question as well. I’m a suspicious observer for sure.
I stand with Flynn Trump. This is not the first time MG crew has stirred shit up.
Definitely not AI, this dude is a piece of shit. Roger Snake.
I’ve worked in video / audio production for 15 years and in my professional opinion the video is 100% real the audio I would need to do more research into on my computer to verify but it seems to be the original audio as well at first glance
Link to Scotty Mar video https://twitter.com/Allenma15086871/status/1701732266076942792
Craziest part of it all ontop of this absolute suicide weekend contestant, is that Alex Jones is exposed as being the Intelligence Operative he is! Denying the video and protecting the traitor Roger Stone.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
SHOTS FIRED.
EPIC PLAY
6:33 in VIDEO -> ROGER STONE 666 ALEGIANCE. PANIC
Thanks for posting the Scotty Mar10 Video...
BTW: Findsen - If you blew right past "Findsen" in the video...Ericsson???
This is the video Roger has publicly denounced a few times that I saw. No way to provide sources because he spoke about it in long form interviews and it would take a lifetime for me to find again.
Go to the scotty Mar video. OF COURSE he will deny it. BUT. The documentarian made a copy right claim on it and it cant be done without RAW footage. YOU CAN DCMA footage from AI. DCMA confirmed this footage.
The Flood is coming. Its about to get WILD!
Doesn't make sense Stone is still battling all the legal troubles from his raid and being sapped financially trying to defend Trump if that video were authentic. Guess we'll see as this movie plays out.
If I was the deepstate that would be my cover story too!
Matthew 7:15-20
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
This scotty "proof" looks like it hinges entirely on the assertion the DMCA and documentarian both are iron clad. DMCA claims are just as malleable as anything these days and the Danes side with JB so this proof is not absolute and already raises red flags IMHO. I'll file this info as interesting but I'm not swayed.
Thats fine. But DCMA requires some proof. The footage is entirely compelling and ive NEVER, seen a AI video so accurate. Show me one that you can find of a celebrity or person talking as candidly and accurately as such, when you see full body motion and movement and not just a head / mouth piece.
You have a paper trail. Not just DCMA. You have the Documentarian RELEASING this footage. You have HIM making the DCMA claim. Its not a nobody. It didnt come out of the magic of the internet.
I knew when we got close to the truth people will come on these sites and on Reddit and say videos which are real are actually fake.
I think you’re fake or mislead. Roger Stone is a different man since finding Christ and risks insult and being mocked everywhere he goes. He still goes to church though and talks with Trump regularly.
This is truth- DMCA claims come down to whoever's lawyer is better, basically. We run an online business and have firsthand experience with this as a product of our design was taken down by a claim made by a competitor that the intellectual property belonged to him. It did not, btw, and we did eventually win and have our item restored. Pretty much anyone can file a claim with a platform (be it a sales platform or social media) and say, "this is mine" and that platform will remove the disputed item due to the claim, NOT due to any proof or documentation. Then as the fight progresses it can be restored or not- sometimes multiple times- depending on how the fight goes. So until the fight over this video is over, you can't really know anything based on the DMCA claims and even then it may be just who ran out of money first, not actual legal proof.
My gut tells me that Stone has been bad in the past, but I'm willing to give him a chance basically because of the Christians he's speaking with and what he is saying and doing NOW. I am a Christian and I'm sure that that has something to do with my opinion, but I'm always happy to see anyone make a change. Believing that if someone does something bad or have been bad at one time that they'll always BE bad goes against the very basis of Christianity and forgiveness. We can all be redeemed and change. It may be a ploy on his part, it may not be a ploy- I don't know. I'm not God. It's not for me to cancel someone who may be trying to do better without seeing how things play out. To me it seems like he's been awfully attacked by the left and and is very much still hated by them, so he has to pose at least some sort of threat to them somehow. Maybe it's what he knows, maybe it's something else. But I'll choose to extend a chance to someone who is publicly trying to do better until I see recent evidence that it's false, not something that is years old, whether it's real or not.
Look at the FBI informants on J6. They cooperated and still got lengthy prison sentences.
Roger Stone is a polarizing individual. He is a coarse, potty-mouthed, self-serving political activist with a Nixon tattoo on his back. What Trump saw in him I do not know. But Trump did commute his prison sentence (he always rewards loyalty).
I always saw Stone as a political liability and an rabid outlier to Trump's base. I never understood why Trump was so close to him.
Keep your friends close ....
Stone...You can glean a LOT about this mf'er right here by how he talks, carries himself and especially, what he says with this gestures and hands.
He's a real c%cksucker - DESPERATE to regain control he once had with all of the presidential elections he's handled over the years - AND you can bet he's rubbed shoulders with some REAL evil bastards over the years...
I'd bet the epstein employee story is mostly true...
"He turns to me, I’m just standing in shock, and says quite angrily, “DO YOU MIND?” and I slam the door shut. As I’m closing the door I get a glimpse of my coworker’s face and he is crying. I googled nixon back tattoo later and realized that man was Roger Stone, who I’d never even heard of up to that point. I knew I was in deep shit."
I think I pooped a little bit when I read the part about 4th of July because I fucking lived in Ned in my 20s and used to go to the waterfall there to clear my mind several times a week...Gave me chills...
RE: https://www.cabaltimes.com/2020/07/25/4chan-epstein/
https://twitter.com/Allenma15086871/status/1701732266076942792
I literally commented the video above. There it is again.
Fake
Before y'all dig your heels in and claim that this can't be fake, y'all need to catch up on some Bad Lip Reading videos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9t-slLl30E&list=RDCMUC67f2Qf7FYhtoUIF4Sf29cA&index=1
Deep Fake