A very good point. And I agree. Punitive rulings need to be in place. Let's look at this. If say, Gun Owners of America filed a lawsuit against CA for the unconstititional law they passed, would they have standing? Having standing is the party that's injured and harmed by the law. IMHO, it would be the firearm manufacturers and gun shops that sell them would possibly have standing.. But, can the manufacturers and gun shops prove they were harmed and injured? The trends for higher firearm sales seems to suggest otherwise.
Secondly, if a lawsuit did survive the 'having standing' criteria, can a law passed 30+ years ago, be challenged with punitive action? Why did it take 30+ years to finally get a ruling? Would CA appeal this to the Supreme Court? There's a good likelihood CA will claim they established precedent and would hope to get it overturned.
I'm on-board with your thing about going after politicians that pass unconstitutional laws, but I also don't see an easy path to do it. I guess another law needs to be passed to hold politicians accountable..... Wait, I thought their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States was suppose to that. This is where the Brunson case again becomes so relevant.
These are valid questions needing to be asked. Are they grounds for injury? Or something else? Maybe, the injury is from a conspiracy of violating ones rights? Racketeering? What does GOA say in regards to this? I'd like to hear what their experience is. For some reason it seems the NRA hasn't really been in this arena fighting for our 2nd Amendment rights.
I recall being told by a lawyer that going after the government in a lawsuit was considered a career ending endeavor. This was after reading about a high-speed police chase that ended with causing an innocent party to be gravely injured during the pursuit.
Yes. Passing laws repugnant to the Constitution -- even trying to put them forth -- should yield removal from office at minimum, and harsh sentencing from there.
Yep, I realize by saying these things that I am acting like the TDS-infected mouthbreathers who always rant against Trump, but Newsom really is a corrupt cancerous stain on the great state of California. Now if they could only get rid of Inslee and Bob Ferguson up in WA state....
Ha I knew websites that would send mags to California and didn't care. I also knew of people who would send them. They didn't care because California can't do anything to them and the feds didn't really care at the time. Idk about now with the Biden DOJ.
Still have a handgun roster for now... literally, there is a list of approved handguns that they never add to, but if they do add a gun, they take two off.
This will realistically take years to implement if it isn’t overturned. Been trying to buy California legal high cap mags for a year since the decision. The law is slow.
So what happens to those who passed the law? Nothing.
We need consequences for politicians who pass or attempt to pass unconstitutional laws.
A very good point. And I agree. Punitive rulings need to be in place. Let's look at this. If say, Gun Owners of America filed a lawsuit against CA for the unconstititional law they passed, would they have standing? Having standing is the party that's injured and harmed by the law. IMHO, it would be the firearm manufacturers and gun shops that sell them would possibly have standing.. But, can the manufacturers and gun shops prove they were harmed and injured? The trends for higher firearm sales seems to suggest otherwise.
Secondly, if a lawsuit did survive the 'having standing' criteria, can a law passed 30+ years ago, be challenged with punitive action? Why did it take 30+ years to finally get a ruling? Would CA appeal this to the Supreme Court? There's a good likelihood CA will claim they established precedent and would hope to get it overturned.
I'm on-board with your thing about going after politicians that pass unconstitutional laws, but I also don't see an easy path to do it. I guess another law needs to be passed to hold politicians accountable..... Wait, I thought their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States was suppose to that. This is where the Brunson case again becomes so relevant.
When purchasing ammo in CA, I’m told they scan your drivers license and charge $1.00 each time “for the background check”.
These are valid questions needing to be asked. Are they grounds for injury? Or something else? Maybe, the injury is from a conspiracy of violating ones rights? Racketeering? What does GOA say in regards to this? I'd like to hear what their experience is. For some reason it seems the NRA hasn't really been in this arena fighting for our 2nd Amendment rights.
I recall being told by a lawyer that going after the government in a lawsuit was considered a career ending endeavor. This was after reading about a high-speed police chase that ended with causing an innocent party to be gravely injured during the pursuit.
If you need permission to exercise your rights, then you don’t have rights.
Brunson or Bruen?
Brunson v. Adams Case number 22-380.
Yes. Passing laws repugnant to the Constitution -- even trying to put them forth -- should yield removal from office at minimum, and harsh sentencing from there.
Bring back tar and feathering for rogue politicians
I don't know why this ever went out of style.
Needs to be public hangings for government officials violating the constitution.
"We need consequences for politicians who pass or attempt to pass unconstitutional laws."
The People are supposed to take their job away...
Fuck Newsom
You called?
😭😭😭
lol
Yep, I realize by saying these things that I am acting like the TDS-infected mouthbreathers who always rant against Trump, but Newsom really is a corrupt cancerous stain on the great state of California. Now if they could only get rid of Inslee and Bob Ferguson up in WA state....
I feel like this is the 20th or so time a Californian ban on magazine size has been overturned.
So, when can I order and buy a pistol with 15 round capacity?
Or a 30 round magazine for said AR?
Right now...
drummagazines. c o m
Ha I knew websites that would send mags to California and didn't care. I also knew of people who would send them. They didn't care because California can't do anything to them and the feds didn't really care at the time. Idk about now with the Biden DOJ.
Now do ny
lol chew soap you commie faggots
DC_Draino TS post - https://truthsocial.com/@DC_Draino/111268551017257313
Link in the post to article - https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/second-amendment-win-california-s-assault-weapons-ban-has-been-thrown-out/ar-AA1iA130
God Bless Saint Benitez
Moar Winning
Yay, California! Just in time to protect yourselves.
Exactly. They want everyone armed to kill each other when the invasions start. They only want death toll.
Ummm....that could be any state. This ruling puts California on the same footing as other states that have stood by the 2nd amendment.
Or…just in time for the imported invading army to arm themselves.
Still have a handgun roster for now... literally, there is a list of approved handguns that they never add to, but if they do add a gun, they take two off.
good now hang newsom
Now do New York!
Wow. Did hell suddenly freeze over momentarily?
This will realistically take years to implement if it isn’t overturned. Been trying to buy California legal high cap mags for a year since the decision. The law is slow.
Great - now do IL-annoy.