I feel like the same was said during the trials for election fraud, and we would get a mass declas then. The longer they keep saying this but never releasing or declassifying anything, it just feels like a carrot on a stick. Especially with judges throwing gag orders at him left and right.
Last time I checked, there were tons of evidence. No one seems to want or be able to do anything about it.
There was something like 236 counties in 26 states that had over 100% Voter turnout. We have been around a 55% avg turnout rate over last 50 yrs.
Seems to me that's about as much evidence you need to show fuckery a foot
That 22yo pot head that sleeps in until 2pm, eats taco bell, and plays x-box? He got up the initiative to go vote.
That guy on a ventilator that's been in the ICU with COVID for the last 6 weeks? He checked out of the hospital against medical advice and went and voted.
That sweet but senile old woman in your neighborhood, prone to getting lost while walking, and wears Depends? She remembered to vote.
That workaholic guy that forgets his wife's birthday and is at the job 100hrs a week? He took time out to vote.
All those people stuck in rush hour traffic? They knew in advance so voted by mail. Every single one.
that swing shift waitress that couldn't care less about politics? She voted.
And this scenario played out over and over, in 26 states. For the first time in history.
Yeah my moms friend has a brother in nursing home and a worker came around trying to sign him up to vote, she told them no he isn’t voting he can’t take care of himself
In fact one of the lawsuits Trumps campaign had legal victories (all in Pennsylvania) which led to throwing out of 270 provisional ballots lacking signatures, separated Election Day provisional ballots from those cast afterward, and moved back Pa.’s deadline for absentee voters to present voter ID by three days.
Sorry, that is still incorrect. Trump, nor his campaign, ever made it into a trial over 2020 election results. People like Sydney Powell and others were operating independently of their own accord.
I am not aware of any trial on election fraud, specifically.
All cases I know of were filed but dismissed without looking at evidence, and without going to trial with witness testimony and evidence presented before a jury.
I would suggest the PA trial where the judge actually ruled in favor with Trumps campaigns request to throw out 270 provisional ballots without signatures on them. Sorry for the MSM link but here is some more details on the three cases Trump campaign filed that made it into court…
I see in that article a lot of opinions about this or that, but no judicial decisions (other than a few that were in Trump's favor).
If there were REALLY numerous election fraud cases that Trump lost IN COURT -- with evidence presented and witnesses testifying before a jury, with the jury voting against Trump -- then it should be very easy for the author of the article to cite those cases.
But no such cases are cited.
Because there are none.
One example from the article shows you what really happened. In Trump v. Boockvar, it says:
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania found for the defendants on all federal claims, declined to rule on state-law issues related to those claims, and dismissed the case.
There was no trial. There was no evidence presented IN A TRIAL. There was no witness testimony IN A TRIAL.
Most of these cases were DISMISSED WITHOUT TRIAL (and no evidence or witness testimony was presented ... AT TRIAL, because there was no trial). This is how most of them went.
Just because he withdrew out of 14 of the 47 cases, does not prove that they didn’t go to trial. 3 of them did go to trial, out of the 47 that were filed. One of them led to a judgement disqualifying 270 ballots with no signature. That is a judicial decision. There had to be a trial.
It was a fake and phony "election" it should have never, ever stood-even without a trial. Those who can not see this are just like the deniers in the George Floyd investigation. Mr. Floyd was not "killed" by Officer Chauvin, he had a huge amount of drugs in his system, which according to the medical examiner killed him. This was known prior to the trial, but the media and even some conservative pundits ignored it. The trial was not fair and if Chauvin can get an appeal, he should. Tucker Carlson was reporting on this either last night, or over the weekend, but it is a little too late to make much of a difference. Kind of reminds me of the election of 2020-the Dems/Commies have filed it under "old" news. Although it is not-it is more relevant today than ever and should be dealt with severely and as soon as possible!
Who said the evidence being put out legally was going to lead to arrests via courts? the public needs to be informed and on board with the idea that people could be held accountable. The courts are corrupt, people learn with each step made and that includes information getting out publicly about the sheer scale of corruption in our system that would lead people to understanding that military would indeed be the only way to progress.
Simple common sense and math should be introduced as evidence. It IS/Was IMPOSSIBLE for the hated/corrupt/incompetent biden and the moron harris to beat the best POTUS in history=Trump.
I feel like the same was said during the trials for election fraud, and we would get a mass declas then. The longer they keep saying this but never releasing or declassifying anything, it just feels like a carrot on a stick. Especially with judges throwing gag orders at him left and right.
Last time I checked, there were tons of evidence. No one seems to want or be able to do anything about it.
There was something like 236 counties in 26 states that had over 100% Voter turnout. We have been around a 55% avg turnout rate over last 50 yrs.
Seems to me that's about as much evidence you need to show fuckery a foot
Over 100%
In order for that to be legit it would mean:
That 22yo pot head that sleeps in until 2pm, eats taco bell, and plays x-box? He got up the initiative to go vote.
That guy on a ventilator that's been in the ICU with COVID for the last 6 weeks? He checked out of the hospital against medical advice and went and voted.
That sweet but senile old woman in your neighborhood, prone to getting lost while walking, and wears Depends? She remembered to vote.
That workaholic guy that forgets his wife's birthday and is at the job 100hrs a week? He took time out to vote.
All those people stuck in rush hour traffic? They knew in advance so voted by mail. Every single one.
that swing shift waitress that couldn't care less about politics? She voted.
And this scenario played out over and over, in 26 states. For the first time in history.
For Joe Biden.
Sure.
It's fucking insulting.
Yeah my moms friend has a brother in nursing home and a worker came around trying to sign him up to vote, she told them no he isn’t voting he can’t take care of himself
“ it’s fucking insulting “ plain and simple !
Nothing worse then someone treating us like we’re stupid !
I’m so friggin pissed ! Ty for comment , somehow makes me feel better !
And it’s also a lot of people in a massive fraud network.
For election fraud? Yes - even for election fraud during midterms.
For Trumps indictments, we’re in the midst of the first trial and Trump has already received a gag order.
So I guess the answer would be yes.
Not where Trump was the plaintiff. He has gone to court, but they always dismissed it, thus no trial.
True, it was his campaign, not Trump himself.
In fact one of the lawsuits Trumps campaign had legal victories (all in Pennsylvania) which led to throwing out of 270 provisional ballots lacking signatures, separated Election Day provisional ballots from those cast afterward, and moved back Pa.’s deadline for absentee voters to present voter ID by three days.
Even MSM covers the three cases (out of 47) filed by Trumps campaign that made it into trial: https://www.witf.org/2022/09/01/these-republicans-did-a-deep-dive-into-2020-election-lawsuits-including-in-pa-heres-why-most-of-them-failed/
Sorry, that is still incorrect. Trump, nor his campaign, ever made it into a trial over 2020 election results. People like Sydney Powell and others were operating independently of their own accord.
Depends if you count Nov 27th 2020 court case filed by Trumps campaign In Pennsylvania. Or the one were the judge granted throwing out 270 provisional ballot without signatures.. https://www.witf.org/2022/09/01/these-republicans-did-a-deep-dive-into-2020-election-lawsuits-including-in-pa-heres-why-most-of-them-failed/
Okay… I guess that was my point - that what he’s said before.
Trump hasn’t gone to trial on any of this indictments yet.
I am not aware of any trial on election fraud, specifically.
All cases I know of were filed but dismissed without looking at evidence, and without going to trial with witness testimony and evidence presented before a jury.
I would suggest the PA trial where the judge actually ruled in favor with Trumps campaigns request to throw out 270 provisional ballots without signatures on them. Sorry for the MSM link but here is some more details on the three cases Trump campaign filed that made it into court…
https://www.witf.org/2022/09/01/these-republicans-did-a-deep-dive-into-2020-election-lawsuits-including-in-pa-heres-why-most-of-them-failed/
Thank you for making my point.
Which means they never went to trial.
Which means they never went to trial.
I see in that article a lot of opinions about this or that, but no judicial decisions (other than a few that were in Trump's favor).
If there were REALLY numerous election fraud cases that Trump lost IN COURT -- with evidence presented and witnesses testifying before a jury, with the jury voting against Trump -- then it should be very easy for the author of the article to cite those cases.
But no such cases are cited.
Because there are none.
One example from the article shows you what really happened. In Trump v. Boockvar, it says:
There was no trial. There was no evidence presented IN A TRIAL. There was no witness testimony IN A TRIAL.
Most of these cases were DISMISSED WITHOUT TRIAL (and no evidence or witness testimony was presented ... AT TRIAL, because there was no trial). This is how most of them went.
Just because he withdrew out of 14 of the 47 cases, does not prove that they didn’t go to trial. 3 of them did go to trial, out of the 47 that were filed. One of them led to a judgement disqualifying 270 ballots with no signature. That is a judicial decision. There had to be a trial.
I think you misread that.
47 cases were dismissed.
The 3 you are referring to were not dismissed. And they sided with Trump.
So, we have 47 cases that never went to trial, never had any rigorous analysis of the evidence.
That is the point.
The trial in NYC is a civil suit, not a criminal case. So there was no criminal indictment.
I love snorting a line of hopium with my morning covfefe. Gets the freedom flowing.
u/#classywow
That's not hopium, fren. That's pure-grade rarefied top shelf hopermectin, right there.
It was a fake and phony "election" it should have never, ever stood-even without a trial. Those who can not see this are just like the deniers in the George Floyd investigation. Mr. Floyd was not "killed" by Officer Chauvin, he had a huge amount of drugs in his system, which according to the medical examiner killed him. This was known prior to the trial, but the media and even some conservative pundits ignored it. The trial was not fair and if Chauvin can get an appeal, he should. Tucker Carlson was reporting on this either last night, or over the weekend, but it is a little too late to make much of a difference. Kind of reminds me of the election of 2020-the Dems/Commies have filed it under "old" news. Although it is not-it is more relevant today than ever and should be dealt with severely and as soon as possible!
"Riggers" is kinda funny.
"Rigging dogs?" That seems to be comms.
Its as if he is whipping his cock out, slapping them in their faces…. While saying… “yup, thats my cock slapping you”
Just leak it all publicly. That's what I would do.
Who said the evidence being put out legally was going to lead to arrests via courts? the public needs to be informed and on board with the idea that people could be held accountable. The courts are corrupt, people learn with each step made and that includes information getting out publicly about the sheer scale of corruption in our system that would lead people to understanding that military would indeed be the only way to progress.
Did anything like Voat ever come to be? I want my pizzagate peoples back.
Simple common sense and math should be introduced as evidence. It IS/Was IMPOSSIBLE for the hated/corrupt/incompetent biden and the moron harris to beat the best POTUS in history=Trump.