“Q*Anon” - Elon Musk
(twitter.com)
Comments (32)
sorted by:
I don't get it.
Thanks. I hadn't heard of this before.
The beauty of its simplicity
So is Elon saying Q is just Artificial Intelligence?
Q from Star Trek was all knowing and can make anything happen. I think when the show referenced anything with civilizations, they mention the Prime Directive to not get involved.
Which is why we had to take action. Q can judge and give information up to a point.
https://youtu.be/UvEIXfy_Ga8?si=3I1cWgRFXyCHM4uT
I don’t know where to stick this in this thread, but the idea that Q is an AI is bullshit unless AI’s make mistakes.
https://qalerts.app/?q=on+the+move
Maybe a future Quantum Looking Glass style supercomputer could achieve a form of time travel via text?
The nature of reality is very weird.
The plot of an anime called Steins;Gate is that they were able to invent a time machine, not for physical time travel, but instead was able to send text messages to the past.
Imagine you built a drill, and you were able to scale it down more and more, down so small that you could 'drill' into an 'atom.' But once down at that scale, you scale it down a bit further until at some point, you run into another 'drill' that looks oddly similar to your own 'drill.'
You stop drilling to reveal a hole, you pass a small folded up note through the hole, and almost simultaneously, another little folded up note is passed back to you like a mirrored image, but the information contained in the note is different; you find out that you can process information through this exchange.
What would you do?
This speculation gets weird: from the other side's temporal perspective, you sending your first communication packet to them was not prior to them sending their first communication packet to you, which from your temporal perspective, it was perceived as being sent back to you. Said another way: your initial submission was the answer to their initial submission and vice versa, all of which occurred cross-temporally. Temporal cause and effect are blurred due to the incredibly tight spacial proximity.
What would be the implications of communicating/processing information across a boundary which hardly anyone (publicly) understands completely?
I’m not saying that they’re not using crazy ass computers to crunch immense amounts of data and arrive at possible outcomes to the point of being able to estimate the future. I am saying that the people making Q drops are human.
My take is that the AI isn't posting, but it is gameifying the future. By creating/prophesying the future based on human history, current trends, and future expectations, the AI was able to create a game plan for the Q team to go off of.
Remember: military tech is decades ahead of civilian commerical use. We had drones in the 60s, and I didn't really know about them until 2003 with the war. The military has 5G Humvees before we had 3G.
They probably had advanced AI, were able to create an outline plan, then by thend of the four years the AI technology jumped even more, and they were able to update their plan accordingly and go down one of the possible decision tree paths, hence the "Devolution ' theory.
I have been saying this for months. All I keep hearing about is ChatGPT and when they might create an AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) - there is a less than zero chance that if ChatGPT is just hitting the civilian market, that the Military hasn't had something similar for decades. At least two decades, probably longer.
Here's something else I've been pondering - we all know AI needs data to work and learn. CIA LifeLog\Facebook project? NSA\Patriot Act after 9/11? Collection of all texts, emails, phone calls? if you had a massively powerful AI and you wanted to feed it data to train it and learn, can you think of a bigger data stream? Was that one of the side goals of introducing the Patriot Act?
Did you ever see the movie Eagle Eye? It was analyzing data, movements and variables in realtime and formulating a path to achieve its goal. Able to plan many, many moves ahead. Sound familiar? Was this entire plan mapped out by an incredibly powerful AI that our Military has had access to for decades?
That’s pretty weak logic.
That’s a pretty weak comment.
Your assumption that because something an AI said made it sound like it made a mistake means it actually made that mistake rather than just wanting people to think it did. You really haven’t thought that far? Like do I really need to explain this concept to you like you’re a child?
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/
Been saying I believe Q is Quantum AI for years. It’s the only possibility that really makes sense to me.
And so it is.
There were theories floating around Voat years ago that Q was Army (Artificial?) Intelligence.
You won't believe who you've been talking to.
Is his post Q times Anon? Two separate things.
Maybe Elon is Q after all.
Following
Elon counter attack - crippling lawfare and soft disclosure.
I smell petrichor. Storm’s coming…
Q said you won't believe who you've been talking to ...