I've been following Linda Moulton Howell since 1996. She is a Stanford-trained American investigative journalist, author, HBO documentary film maker and Regional Emmy award-winner best known for her work as a ufologist and advocate of a variety of theories, including her investigation into abductions, crop circles, and animal and cattle mutilations, of which she is considered perhaps the world's foremost authority on.
She has obtained hundreds/thousands (?) of interviews with military persons, alleged 'alien abductees', cattle ranchers, farmers, police officers and myriad others over the years. Her thoroughness in vetting her interviewees and witnesses is top notch and can be relied upon.
She has put together numerous coffee-table-sized books with photographs of cattle mutilations, animal autopsies, crop circles, witness interviews, etc. She has audio and video tapes of interviews that you can watch or purchase. She also has a vast library of data on her website if you become a member.
Based on my own personal experiences and investigations and those I've seen of Linda's, I fully believe there are non-human entities that are working with or beside our government officials and are being covered up for very good reasons.
If they don't originate from this planet, they are alien. Doesn't matter what you classify them as. And those beings aren't all demons. If that were th case, Yahweh/Jehovah, Enlil and Enki, Quetozocoatl, etc would all be classified as demons, yet they are all credited by ancient peoples as being our creators and benevolent not demonic by nature.
It's not even remotely controversial at this point to observe that the US govt has had ongoing contact with ETs for decades. Linda Howe has shown the official Majestic-12 manual on how to deal with extraterrestrial life forms and craft. We have recovered spaceships with occupants inside that top-level US govt personnel sworn to secrecy have described in rich detail, now that they're in their 80s and have nothing to fear.
The idea that we have to keep it secret still because "earthlings couldn't handle the truth about this and would go stark raving mad" or something is just ridiculous, moronic bullshit.
Nearly everyone on earth already suspects there are alien civilizations out there, we've obtained photo evidence of their craft and buildings on the moon and Mars, etc. NASA has admitted they caught UFOs on camera, the Navy has admitted jet fighter pilots caught craft on camera flying at impossible speeds and making 90-degree turns, etc.
The idea that we have to keep it secret still because "earthlings couldn't handle the truth about this and would go stark raving mad" or something is just ridiculous, moronic bullshit.
Umm... you need to go get your nails done somewhere local and watch Home Shopping Network for a couple hours!
a bunch of commies invented the bahai religion in the late 1800s and youre letting their influence spread to you and set set you up for project blue beam
As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of Man
~ Jesus
The days of Noah were evil, and the Nephilim (Hybrid beings created with genetic manipulation from fallen angels) walked the earth in those days (Genesis 6 and Enoch). Will the Nephilim be returning during this age that we live in?
I seriously wonder if we have succeeded in recreating the Nephilim genetic line with all the advancements in DNA manipulation we’ve been doing since the 50’s.
Are we keeping them hidden in the Antarctic regions? Are we consulting them for knowledge? Post Humanists want to merge man and machine (hybrids) for the next phase in their human “evolution.” That’s very coincidental. And we all know the powers in charge worship Satan and are in communication with his demons.
This type of “disclosure” makes sense if the powers in charge are warming us up for the re-emergence of the Nephilim.
Ugh hate to bring up her name but within the last few years someone squealed about Hillary's FOIA request pertaining to the most recent grave of a Nephilim. This among "grave of last remaining Nephilim found" talk. I feel what she is really after is DNA of supposed Nephilim. But also, there is a former employee of a gov below- ground facility high sec area where "monsters" were locked away and among them a giant human. I would say that area is for givernment chimera experiments. (Tragic) We are finding out that some very preposterous sounding things are true after all, lately. So I don't just dismiss things so easily. I mean who would have thought there would be indisputable evidence of a global 6000 year old death cult waging war on us via bioweapons and chemicals. Yet here we are. Edited to add: There is video of a story about a group of US military special op while on a mission in Afghanistan being attacked by a gigantic human who charged them from a cave, and killed two before being taken down. He was dressed primitively and was red-haired. I'll see if I can again find that video.
... and the Nephilim (Hybrid beings created with genetic manipulation from fallen angels) walked the earth in those days (Genesis 6 and Enoch)
Genesis 6:4:
"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them ..."
But as you point out, the original word used was "Nephilim," which does not translate to "giants." It more accurately translates to "fallen ones," as in the fallen angels.
Revelation 12:7-9:
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
"And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
So, Michael and his angels kicked Satan and his angels out of heaven and down to the Earth.
In Hebrew, "Satan" means "Adversary." It does not mean a little red guy with horns and a pitch fork.
They are the "ones in heaven" who rebelled against God and were cast out to the Earth.
They are NOT a part of the family tree of Adam.
They are represented in the Garden of Eden as the "Tree of Knowlege of Good and Evil."
These fallen ones already existed on Earth before Adam was created.
They are the ones who created the hybrid races.
If the Bible is true, and if we are constantly told (in indirect ways) of so-called "reptillian people," which could also be considered "aliens," then it is these hybrids that are really being talked about.
They have walked amongst us all along. But if they possess any advanced technology, it is not because they are from other planets or particularly brilliant. It is only because they have kept secrets from the rest of us.
"Occult" means hidden knowledge.
These people are the adversary of man, and although very much like us in biology, are not exactly like us -- especially in spirit or soul (or lack thereof).
That is, more or less, what the Bible is all about. But modern Christian denominations have been teaching alternative and watered-down stories for centuries.
It is no different than doctors who graduate from medical school and only know about selling drugs and surgery.
Or attorneys who graduate from law school who only know about legal strategies to win cases (or give in at the last minute because they don't want to offend their "colleagues" -- other attorneys and judges -- their client be damned), and they do not learn the fundamental law to achieve truth and justice.
Or police academy graduates who have no idea what the law is that they are supposed to enforce, but only know techniques on how to carry out orders, even unlawful orders.
So is true of modern seminaries, where men graduate to become clergy, but have only been taught a false version of what they will be preaching.
They are represented in the Garden of Eden as the "Tree of Knowlege of Good and Evil."
HIGHLY debatable.
The Nephilim were the hybrid offspring of the “Sons of God” (fallen angels, the “Watchers” in Enoch) intermarrying with the daughters of men. This is clearly stated in the text. The Nephilim were the great men of old, men of renown. The Sons of God (fallen angels) ruled the earth in those days by proxy through their offspring, the Nephilim.
A literal tree, made of wood, roots, leaves, bark, etc. canNOT have "knowledge" of anything.
Therefore, it is NOT a literal tree.
It is representative of something else.
In the Bible, a "tree" is often used to describe a family tree, with branches to describe its people, etc.
John 15, Jesus said:
"I am the vine; you are the branches."
Clearly, this was an analogy, not a literal statement.
Same as the Garden of Eden.
In the Garden of Eden,
"... out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food;"
AND ...
"the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil."
That is Genesis 2:9.
What does "in the midst mean?"
It means God did not create those. They were already there.
God created trees good for beauty and good for food.
But the Tree of Life (Jesus) and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Satan) were NOT literal trees. They could not have been.
The original meanings written in Hebrew have been changed over the years, to the point that modern English (and other language) versions appear to say and mean something they never did.
The Nephilim were the hybrid offspring of the “Sons of God” (fallen angels, the “Watchers” in Enoch) ...
Angels ("messengers") can be of God (good) or of Satan (evil).
The Nephilim MUST have been either (a) Satan's fallen angels themselves, or (b) the descendents of Satan's fallen angels, whether hybrid or otherwise.
It was ONLY Satan's angels who were "fallen," NOT God's.
Again, Revelation 12:7-9:
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
"And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
Do you just want to pretend that Revelation is not part of Christianity?
... intermarrying with the daughters of men. This is clearly stated in the text.
No, it is not clear in the text, because you are ONLY reading the English version of the text, which has come after 3,000 years of mistranslations.
The Nephilim were the great men of old, men of renown.
The Bible did not exactly say that, in the original Hebrew.
The Sons of God (fallen angels) ruled the earth in those days by proxy through their offspring, the Nephilim.
Revelation 12:7-9 tells us that Satan and his angels were the ones who fell from heaven. It is SATAN'S descedents who are the "fallen ones," and NOT God's angels.
If you continue to read to Genesis 6:5, you will see the RESULT of all this chaos in Genesis 1-4.
And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Now, WHY would THAT be? Why would God's creation become wicked?
If you are correct, and (a) the Nephilm are the angels of God (good), and (b) these angels mixed with the sons of God (also good), then (c) how could the world be FULL OF WICKEDNESS (evil) by God's own creation?
It does not fit the story of ALL of God's creation being "good."
The ONLY way the story makes any sense is if there was a MIXING of good and evil, with the result being evil.
We do not learn the KEYS to the Old Testament until we get through the New Testament. We cannot understand the OT without also including the NT.
THIS is what the clergy of today do not understand, and therefore do not teach. They also don't bother to research the original Hebrew and Greek, much like today's doctors don't bother to research the actual science of health and nutrition.
In Genesis 6:1-5, you CANNOT have God's angels (good) mixing with God's sons (good) and arrive at wickedness (evil) that is so bad that God wants to wipe them out. He even wants to wipe out the animals, too, who have no soul and cannot be good or evil.
What gives?
A false understanding that has been perpetrated for many generations is what gives.
In the original Hebrew, there is more than one word for "man." In these passages, the English words "man" and "men" are used ... BUT ... these are TRANSLATIONS. The original Hebrew words were DIFFERENT in different passages ... and THAT changes the meaning entirely.
Also, we have to keep Revelation 12:7-9 in mind, as well.
There are TWO Hebrew words for "man" in the Bible (and some variations of those, as well), used in different places in the Bible.
Most of Genesis 6 uses the Hebrew word "adam" for "man."
However ... the phrase "men of renown" uses the word "enosh," not "adam."
This signifies TWO DIFFERENT types of man.
Yes, this OTHER type of man (enosh) was well-known ("of renown"), but that does not mean thought of in high esteem. The word enosh is a derogatory word, not one of respect.
Where "adam" is used, it is a man descended from God's creation of Adam.
But where "enosh" is used, it describes NON-ADAMAIC man -- NOT a creation of God.
NOT ALL humans are of Adam (i.e. not created by God).
SOME are something else, though genetically very similar -- which is where Satan's fallen angels enter the picture.
This is all assuming you want to believe that the Bible is true, which we are doing here.
If we believe it is true, then we should understand what it ACTUALLY SAID ORIGINALLY -- and not the bastardized version we have today.
The original Hebrew tells us that these two types of "man" are NOT the same.
THIS is why God saw all the wickedness that he hated.
His own creation was MIXING with His non-creation (Satan's seed of the fallen ones). Such people still exist today, as well -- and are the source of MUCH of the world's troubles.
You will also note that Noah was chosen to build the ark SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE he was "perfect in his generations," which means perfect in his ancestry, which means he did NOT mix with these hybrids of the fallen ones (satanic seed).
Noah was not randomly chosen, and his story was not detailed for no reason. There is a REASON he was chosen, and THIS is the reason.
God was angry at the mixing of His creation with the fallen ones, and wiped out the offspring of this mixing.
He chose Noah, because Noah did not do this.
So ...
Let's compare your interpretation of Genesis 6 with mine.
YOU: God's creation had sex with God's creation ... and the result was so evil that God wanted to wipe them out.
ME: God's creation had sex with Satan's seed ... and the result was so evil that God wanted to wipe out the descendents and start over.
Which interpretation makes more sense, objectively?
Forget what you THINK you know, or what you have been TAUGHT ... but which one makes more sense, objectively?
And before you answer, don't forget Revelation 12 or the original Hebrew text of Genesis 6.
But that is enough for me today. I have other things to do.
I'm familiar with the work of Linda Moulton Howe, along with Jacques Vallee, John Keel, Stanton Friedman, Zechariah Sitchin, Lloyd Pye, and many other writers and scientists who take this field of study seriously. Taken as a whole, the subject definitely deserves our attention.
The media and government has certainly been actively dissuading us from looking at it, having painted the subject as "tinfoil hat conspiracy material" not worthy of serious thought. For that reason alone, it seems we should keep an open mind about the probability that we are not alone in the universe.
Well... I actually knew Sitchin when he was alive, and attended several of his conferences. I know that his interpretations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets are "controversial" in the archeology world, but they were originally interpreted back in the 1800s when no one knew of flight and astronomy was in its infancy.
His later interpretations are intriguing to say the least. His first book, "The Twelfth Planet" is so well researched and referenced / cited that it made an impression on me. I don't dismiss Sitchin so casually.
Who is downvoting? Probably just someone who isn't deeply familiar with the material and who simply reacts rather than researches. It doesn't bother me.
I've been following Linda Moulton Howell since 1996. She is a Stanford-trained American investigative journalist, author, HBO documentary film maker and Regional Emmy award-winner best known for her work as a ufologist and advocate of a variety of theories, including her investigation into abductions, crop circles, and animal and cattle mutilations, of which she is considered perhaps the world's foremost authority on.
She has obtained hundreds/thousands (?) of interviews with military persons, alleged 'alien abductees', cattle ranchers, farmers, police officers and myriad others over the years. Her thoroughness in vetting her interviewees and witnesses is top notch and can be relied upon.
She has put together numerous coffee-table-sized books with photographs of cattle mutilations, animal autopsies, crop circles, witness interviews, etc. She has audio and video tapes of interviews that you can watch or purchase. She also has a vast library of data on her website if you become a member.
Based on my own personal experiences and investigations and those I've seen of Linda's, I fully believe there are non-human entities that are working with or beside our government officials and are being covered up for very good reasons.
they are demons not aliens.
Multidimensional beings, yes. easier to travel dimensions than vast distances.
u/#q2222
Fun Fact: The creatures in the movie “Signs” were demons; not aliens. Now the movie should make sense.
If they don't originate from this planet, they are alien. Doesn't matter what you classify them as. And those beings aren't all demons. If that were th case, Yahweh/Jehovah, Enlil and Enki, Quetozocoatl, etc would all be classified as demons, yet they are all credited by ancient peoples as being our creators and benevolent not demonic by nature.
It's so goofy watching someone talk about UFOs in this tone
yeah I think so too.. or beings from other realms, like realm of hell breaking into this world.
Finally, someone connecting some dots. ☝️
upvoted
It's not even remotely controversial at this point to observe that the US govt has had ongoing contact with ETs for decades. Linda Howe has shown the official Majestic-12 manual on how to deal with extraterrestrial life forms and craft. We have recovered spaceships with occupants inside that top-level US govt personnel sworn to secrecy have described in rich detail, now that they're in their 80s and have nothing to fear.
The idea that we have to keep it secret still because "earthlings couldn't handle the truth about this and would go stark raving mad" or something is just ridiculous, moronic bullshit.
Nearly everyone on earth already suspects there are alien civilizations out there, we've obtained photo evidence of their craft and buildings on the moon and Mars, etc. NASA has admitted they caught UFOs on camera, the Navy has admitted jet fighter pilots caught craft on camera flying at impossible speeds and making 90-degree turns, etc.
Umm... you need to go get your nails done somewhere local and watch Home Shopping Network for a couple hours!
Don't you wish that evil on anyone, Ricky Bobby!
a bunch of commies invented the bahai religion in the late 1800s and youre letting their influence spread to you and set set you up for project blue beam
LOL fantasy is fun.
Have never read two words about the commie religion. I know less of what you're talking about than you do, which is saying something.
They believe everyone needs to be an exemplary global citizen to appease the aliens
~ Jesus
The days of Noah were evil, and the Nephilim (Hybrid beings created with genetic manipulation from fallen angels) walked the earth in those days (Genesis 6 and Enoch). Will the Nephilim be returning during this age that we live in?
I seriously wonder if we have succeeded in recreating the Nephilim genetic line with all the advancements in DNA manipulation we’ve been doing since the 50’s.
Are we keeping them hidden in the Antarctic regions? Are we consulting them for knowledge? Post Humanists want to merge man and machine (hybrids) for the next phase in their human “evolution.” That’s very coincidental. And we all know the powers in charge worship Satan and are in communication with his demons.
This type of “disclosure” makes sense if the powers in charge are warming us up for the re-emergence of the Nephilim.
Just thinking out loud here…
One wonders if they're not already here, now. There's no question that Satan is directly guiding our leaders
this makes the most sense to me tbh
Thinking and brainstorming is always a good idea.
The secrets our gov keeps in Antartica are beyond huge. It's the proverbial platter that if flipped can set us free as only truth really can.
Ugh hate to bring up her name but within the last few years someone squealed about Hillary's FOIA request pertaining to the most recent grave of a Nephilim. This among "grave of last remaining Nephilim found" talk. I feel what she is really after is DNA of supposed Nephilim. But also, there is a former employee of a gov below- ground facility high sec area where "monsters" were locked away and among them a giant human. I would say that area is for givernment chimera experiments. (Tragic) We are finding out that some very preposterous sounding things are true after all, lately. So I don't just dismiss things so easily. I mean who would have thought there would be indisputable evidence of a global 6000 year old death cult waging war on us via bioweapons and chemicals. Yet here we are. Edited to add: There is video of a story about a group of US military special op while on a mission in Afghanistan being attacked by a gigantic human who charged them from a cave, and killed two before being taken down. He was dressed primitively and was red-haired. I'll see if I can again find that video.
Genesis 6:4:
"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them ..."
But as you point out, the original word used was "Nephilim," which does not translate to "giants." It more accurately translates to "fallen ones," as in the fallen angels.
Revelation 12:7-9:
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
"And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
So, Michael and his angels kicked Satan and his angels out of heaven and down to the Earth.
In Hebrew, "Satan" means "Adversary." It does not mean a little red guy with horns and a pitch fork.
They are the "ones in heaven" who rebelled against God and were cast out to the Earth.
They are NOT a part of the family tree of Adam.
They are represented in the Garden of Eden as the "Tree of Knowlege of Good and Evil."
These fallen ones already existed on Earth before Adam was created.
They are the ones who created the hybrid races.
If the Bible is true, and if we are constantly told (in indirect ways) of so-called "reptillian people," which could also be considered "aliens," then it is these hybrids that are really being talked about.
They have walked amongst us all along. But if they possess any advanced technology, it is not because they are from other planets or particularly brilliant. It is only because they have kept secrets from the rest of us.
"Occult" means hidden knowledge.
These people are the adversary of man, and although very much like us in biology, are not exactly like us -- especially in spirit or soul (or lack thereof).
That is, more or less, what the Bible is all about. But modern Christian denominations have been teaching alternative and watered-down stories for centuries.
It is no different than doctors who graduate from medical school and only know about selling drugs and surgery.
Or attorneys who graduate from law school who only know about legal strategies to win cases (or give in at the last minute because they don't want to offend their "colleagues" -- other attorneys and judges -- their client be damned), and they do not learn the fundamental law to achieve truth and justice.
Or police academy graduates who have no idea what the law is that they are supposed to enforce, but only know techniques on how to carry out orders, even unlawful orders.
So is true of modern seminaries, where men graduate to become clergy, but have only been taught a false version of what they will be preaching.
HIGHLY debatable.
The Nephilim were the hybrid offspring of the “Sons of God” (fallen angels, the “Watchers” in Enoch) intermarrying with the daughters of men. This is clearly stated in the text. The Nephilim were the great men of old, men of renown. The Sons of God (fallen angels) ruled the earth in those days by proxy through their offspring, the Nephilim.
A literal tree, made of wood, roots, leaves, bark, etc. canNOT have "knowledge" of anything.
Therefore, it is NOT a literal tree.
It is representative of something else.
In the Bible, a "tree" is often used to describe a family tree, with branches to describe its people, etc.
John 15, Jesus said:
"I am the vine; you are the branches."
Clearly, this was an analogy, not a literal statement.
Same as the Garden of Eden.
In the Garden of Eden,
"... out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food;"
AND ...
"the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil."
That is Genesis 2:9.
What does "in the midst mean?"
It means God did not create those. They were already there.
God created trees good for beauty and good for food.
But the Tree of Life (Jesus) and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Satan) were NOT literal trees. They could not have been.
The original meanings written in Hebrew have been changed over the years, to the point that modern English (and other language) versions appear to say and mean something they never did.
Angels ("messengers") can be of God (good) or of Satan (evil).
The Nephilim MUST have been either (a) Satan's fallen angels themselves, or (b) the descendents of Satan's fallen angels, whether hybrid or otherwise.
It was ONLY Satan's angels who were "fallen," NOT God's.
Again, Revelation 12:7-9:
"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
"And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."
Do you just want to pretend that Revelation is not part of Christianity?
No, it is not clear in the text, because you are ONLY reading the English version of the text, which has come after 3,000 years of mistranslations.
The Bible did not exactly say that, in the original Hebrew.
Revelation 12:7-9 tells us that Satan and his angels were the ones who fell from heaven. It is SATAN'S descedents who are the "fallen ones," and NOT God's angels.
If you continue to read to Genesis 6:5, you will see the RESULT of all this chaos in Genesis 1-4.
Now, WHY would THAT be? Why would God's creation become wicked?
If you are correct, and (a) the Nephilm are the angels of God (good), and (b) these angels mixed with the sons of God (also good), then (c) how could the world be FULL OF WICKEDNESS (evil) by God's own creation?
It does not fit the story of ALL of God's creation being "good."
The ONLY way the story makes any sense is if there was a MIXING of good and evil, with the result being evil.
We do not learn the KEYS to the Old Testament until we get through the New Testament. We cannot understand the OT without also including the NT.
THIS is what the clergy of today do not understand, and therefore do not teach. They also don't bother to research the original Hebrew and Greek, much like today's doctors don't bother to research the actual science of health and nutrition.
In Genesis 6:1-5, you CANNOT have God's angels (good) mixing with God's sons (good) and arrive at wickedness (evil) that is so bad that God wants to wipe them out. He even wants to wipe out the animals, too, who have no soul and cannot be good or evil.
What gives?
A false understanding that has been perpetrated for many generations is what gives.
In the original Hebrew, there is more than one word for "man." In these passages, the English words "man" and "men" are used ... BUT ... these are TRANSLATIONS. The original Hebrew words were DIFFERENT in different passages ... and THAT changes the meaning entirely.
Also, we have to keep Revelation 12:7-9 in mind, as well.
There are TWO Hebrew words for "man" in the Bible (and some variations of those, as well), used in different places in the Bible.
Most of Genesis 6 uses the Hebrew word "adam" for "man."
However ... the phrase "men of renown" uses the word "enosh," not "adam."
This signifies TWO DIFFERENT types of man.
Yes, this OTHER type of man (enosh) was well-known ("of renown"), but that does not mean thought of in high esteem. The word enosh is a derogatory word, not one of respect.
Where "adam" is used, it is a man descended from God's creation of Adam.
But where "enosh" is used, it describes NON-ADAMAIC man -- NOT a creation of God.
NOT ALL humans are of Adam (i.e. not created by God).
SOME are something else, though genetically very similar -- which is where Satan's fallen angels enter the picture.
This is all assuming you want to believe that the Bible is true, which we are doing here.
If we believe it is true, then we should understand what it ACTUALLY SAID ORIGINALLY -- and not the bastardized version we have today.
The original Hebrew tells us that these two types of "man" are NOT the same.
THIS is why God saw all the wickedness that he hated.
His own creation was MIXING with His non-creation (Satan's seed of the fallen ones). Such people still exist today, as well -- and are the source of MUCH of the world's troubles.
You will also note that Noah was chosen to build the ark SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE he was "perfect in his generations," which means perfect in his ancestry, which means he did NOT mix with these hybrids of the fallen ones (satanic seed).
Noah was not randomly chosen, and his story was not detailed for no reason. There is a REASON he was chosen, and THIS is the reason.
God was angry at the mixing of His creation with the fallen ones, and wiped out the offspring of this mixing.
He chose Noah, because Noah did not do this.
So ...
Let's compare your interpretation of Genesis 6 with mine.
YOU: God's creation had sex with God's creation ... and the result was so evil that God wanted to wipe them out.
ME: God's creation had sex with Satan's seed ... and the result was so evil that God wanted to wipe out the descendents and start over.
Which interpretation makes more sense, objectively?
Forget what you THINK you know, or what you have been TAUGHT ... but which one makes more sense, objectively?
And before you answer, don't forget Revelation 12 or the original Hebrew text of Genesis 6.
But that is enough for me today. I have other things to do.
Have a good day.
I'm familiar with the work of Linda Moulton Howe, along with Jacques Vallee, John Keel, Stanton Friedman, Zechariah Sitchin, Lloyd Pye, and many other writers and scientists who take this field of study seriously. Taken as a whole, the subject definitely deserves our attention.
The media and government has certainly been actively dissuading us from looking at it, having painted the subject as "tinfoil hat conspiracy material" not worthy of serious thought. For that reason alone, it seems we should keep an open mind about the probability that we are not alone in the universe.
In general, yes. But I'd cross Stitchin off that list.
Well... I actually knew Sitchin when he was alive, and attended several of his conferences. I know that his interpretations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets are "controversial" in the archeology world, but they were originally interpreted back in the 1800s when no one knew of flight and astronomy was in its infancy.
His later interpretations are intriguing to say the least. His first book, "The Twelfth Planet" is so well researched and referenced / cited that it made an impression on me. I don't dismiss Sitchin so casually.
Yes.
You could include Leslie Kean in the list of authors on the UAP data. It was the first book I purchased on the subject. WTF is downvoting you?
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record by Leslie Kean
Who is downvoting? Probably just someone who isn't deeply familiar with the material and who simply reacts rather than researches. It doesn't bother me.