Context matters. I have no problem with men who are into wearing make-up and 'feminine' clothes. Anyway, where does one draw the line? Even Scottish men wear skirts. War-paint is also make-up. It is a style objection. Are we going to say that only SOME face-paint is objectionable? No, no, no so-and-so spent too many hours applying make-up.
There is also a long tradition of gender-swapping on stage (think Pantomime - as a kid, I laughed uproariously at the clumsy ugly sisters (men) in Cinderalla stage-plays, or a 'Prince' who is a lady, singing a duet with the leading lady - too funny - it's just what happens in Pantos). It even happens Shakespearean comedies. So, Lake 'having a discussion' with some painted people, is something that must be evaluated rather than condemned. Beware of labels. What were they doing to be all dressed up?
Naturally, I object against those who wave their goolies at children in libraries. Nor should children attend sexually explicit shows or perform in them.
But some of the most creative YT make-up channels are from men. And women follow them and buy their products.
I would like to see someone picked based solely on their merit, without gender factoring into the decision whatsoever.
The last time I heard Trump talk about what gender he was considering picking, before he announced an appointment, we ended up with an establishment turkey named Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court justice.
When politicians start talking about a candidates gender, or color, or whatever, ahead of merit, (for political appointments) then we the people are destined for problems.
Because, it means that the campaign establishment is giving the orders for who to pick. And, the party doesn't give a flying shit about the real merit of a candidate, beyond which candidate is likely to get the votes the [republican] party thinks it needs to win an election, and secure power for itself.
This is really a very bad sign. It means Trump is still using the same republican party dim-wit advisor's who gave us the likes of Mike Pence, Bill Barr, Chris Wray, all 3 of our feeble SC Justices, and so many other useless, or outright traitorous turds during the Trump administration.
What Trump really needs to do- is to fire his campaigns trash Human Resources department, (figuratively named) that he acquired from the republican party, and hire a better group.
Sarah is the only one of the ladies who has lived MAGA in a true leadership capacity. Kari is a fighter but my spidey sense says no. Carlson is also a real fighter but unknown with his media ties if he can handle the abuse a conservative future president would get.
He wouldn’t be predicting her Presidency if he wasn’t going to provide the path for it to happen.
I’m not sure how I feel about her, but President Trump has a knack for sounding like he’s making a random comment, the thing is, he doesn’t really do random, everything is planned.
I'd say Kari but I think she is needed by AZ right now. She will be relentless on the border. Out of the rest, I would say Huckabee. But is she a successor?
The problem is, anyone doing good work as a governor is needed right where they presently are serving. Kari hasn't been elected yet and, given the political shenanigans going on in AZ, probably can't fully trust she'll win the office. So maybe she'd be the best.
KARI LAKE....she is as pissed as Trump about all the corruption and will do whatever is necessary to stop the cabal in their tracks.
Kari Lake celebrated and praised drag queens. I saw the video myself a few years ago. Don’t trust her. I’ll go with Sarah.
Hmmm, i never saw or heard that and would not expect that from her. But who knows....maybe some sauce will appear but for now i'm all in for KL as VP.
proofs? link? There are deep-fakes around too.
Yea, I’ll look tonight. It was during her time as a reporter. She gushed all over her drag queen friends. It wasn’t a fake. Its out there. Here is one: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/20/kari-lake-drag-queen/
Context matters. I have no problem with men who are into wearing make-up and 'feminine' clothes. Anyway, where does one draw the line? Even Scottish men wear skirts. War-paint is also make-up. It is a style objection. Are we going to say that only SOME face-paint is objectionable? No, no, no so-and-so spent too many hours applying make-up.
There is also a long tradition of gender-swapping on stage (think Pantomime - as a kid, I laughed uproariously at the clumsy ugly sisters (men) in Cinderalla stage-plays, or a 'Prince' who is a lady, singing a duet with the leading lady - too funny - it's just what happens in Pantos). It even happens Shakespearean comedies. So, Lake 'having a discussion' with some painted people, is something that must be evaluated rather than condemned. Beware of labels. What were they doing to be all dressed up?
Naturally, I object against those who wave their goolies at children in libraries. Nor should children attend sexually explicit shows or perform in them.
But some of the most creative YT make-up channels are from men. And women follow them and buy their products.
She really need good secret service prolly now too.
Sarah Huckabee.
Great pick but shes doing great work where shes at
Yes she is.
No Noem.
She denies voter fraud
She did a few other questionable things too.
I'd have to think quite a bit on this one, but I'm glad to see Lindsey Graham isn't on that list.
HA!
Sanders
Tucker Carlson, I'm going to go against the grain on this one.
I would like to see someone picked based solely on their merit, without gender factoring into the decision whatsoever.
The last time I heard Trump talk about what gender he was considering picking, before he announced an appointment, we ended up with an establishment turkey named Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court justice.
When politicians start talking about a candidates gender, or color, or whatever, ahead of merit, (for political appointments) then we the people are destined for problems.
Because, it means that the campaign establishment is giving the orders for who to pick. And, the party doesn't give a flying shit about the real merit of a candidate, beyond which candidate is likely to get the votes the [republican] party thinks it needs to win an election, and secure power for itself.
This is really a very bad sign. It means Trump is still using the same republican party dim-wit advisor's who gave us the likes of Mike Pence, Bill Barr, Chris Wray, all 3 of our feeble SC Justices, and so many other useless, or outright traitorous turds during the Trump administration.
What Trump really needs to do- is to fire his campaigns trash Human Resources department, (figuratively named) that he acquired from the republican party, and hire a better group.
Sarah is the only one of the ladies who has lived MAGA in a true leadership capacity. Kari is a fighter but my spidey sense says no. Carlson is also a real fighter but unknown with his media ties if he can handle the abuse a conservative future president would get.
I hope he picks another man. This is war.
Kari Lake
Sarah most compatible but I have concerns about her young family. Lake would probably be best overall
Kari or Sarah.
Sarah.
What about Mike Pence? She didn't make the cut this time?
Watch it be Ivanka
I would like to see Don Jr.
I have a sneaking suspicion President Trump has already told us who his 2024 V.P. Will be.
https://nypost.com/2022/01/12/trump-says-rep-elise-stefanik-could-be-president-in-2028-at-palm-beach-fundraiser/
He wouldn’t be predicting her Presidency if he wasn’t going to provide the path for it to happen.
I’m not sure how I feel about her, but President Trump has a knack for sounding like he’s making a random comment, the thing is, he doesn’t really do random, everything is planned.
u/#q1157
Kayleigh McEnany.
If I had a nickel...
Scavino. I like how Epsteins buddies think they control anything though. Very cute
I will go with Roseanne Barr, nobody currently apart of any government position.
Lake, Mace, Blackburn in that order.
David Barton (from Wall Builders), James Woods, Rand Paul, Ron Paul
I'd say Kari but I think she is needed by AZ right now. She will be relentless on the border. Out of the rest, I would say Huckabee. But is she a successor?
JFK Jr,
The problem is, anyone doing good work as a governor is needed right where they presently are serving. Kari hasn't been elected yet and, given the political shenanigans going on in AZ, probably can't fully trust she'll win the office. So maybe she'd be the best.
Kari
Candice Owens!!!
We’ll have black vp, but not her (please)
why not Candice?
I wish she could too before knowing she was control opposition.
Tucker Carlson
Lake. Hands down.
Stefanik