It is a stretch even to say he insinuated. He said there's a lot of people like Kimmel that don't want the client list released. He could be a pedophile, he's definitely a creep, and he is also definitely protecting the people pulling his strings, in my opinion of course.
I never said my opinion was informed. I was simply saying Aaron Rodgers never insinuated that Jimmy Kimmel is a pedo. Aaron Rodgers insinuated that Jimmy Kimmel was amongst the people that don't want the client list from coming out.
It is dangerous to say that he insinuated he's a paedophile, because that's not what he said, and that's what the media is trying to say happened. From my regular Joe point-of-view, it is the trap they are trying to set for Aaron Rodgers. If somehow, someway, Jimmy Kimmel is not a pedo, he could potentially come after Aaron Rodgers for slander. Kimmel has no right to come after Aaron Rodgers for slander for insinuating that he doesn't want the client list released, because it can easily be inferred that Kimmel has no interest in the client list being released.
That's all. No hard feelings, I didn't try to put you down, I just wanted to make that part clear and I don't know if I did a good job in my original comment.
Kimmel had a show on tv where he would put weird things down his pants, and then asked young women to feel his crotch to determine what was in his pants. Enough of these weirdo's.
The highlight of the cretin's talent was on The Man Show.
His big spotlight for each episode was to introduce (a) a guy named Fox who would then guzzle an entire beer in one half second and (b) the Grand Finale: a clip of women with big boobs bouncing on a trampoline.
Oh yeah, thanks--I'm accidentally confusing Man Show with Ben Stein. (Sorry Ben!) I remember nothing the sidekick did on Ben Stein's show. Fixing it now
USA Today reporter Mike D. Sykes II writes like a fag, using the poodle whistle “baseless” at least three times including in the article title. He qualifies it as “seemingly baselessly” at one point, which is in line with his claim that Epstein was an “alleged” sex trafficker. I suppose Sykes uses “seemingly” as cover for himself, because to other people there seems to be plenty of basis for Rodger’s suspicion of Kimmel. Kimmel went out of his way to insult Rodgers for talking about the Epstein list. More importantly, as Liz Crokin pointed out, Kimmel has ties to the Clinton Global Initiative which was co-founded by Epstein. That’s a solid base for Rodgers’ claim that Kimmel doesn’t want the Epstein list to come out.
Sykes’ other use of “baseless” is a call back to Rodgers’ “baseless” claims about the vaxx, but thousands of vaxx casualties are a solid basis for vaxx skepticism.
Epstein's personal Chef was a guest on his show tons of times and they even did a sitdown interview about it. And Kimmel was asked "how they met" and he played coy and said, uh, he cooked a pig for us.
Hubby said Pat McAfee apologized for Aaron Rodgers' comments. I told hubby someone heeds to tell Pat to turn in his man card. He will get it back if and when he tells everyone who told him to do that to GFY and have Aaron on his show twice a week instead of once.
Liberals truly can't handle a differing opinion. They are clueless on our right of free speech. They can't debate because they are so empty headed and shallow.
lol for insinuating Jimmy Kimmel is a PEDO ? lol
You gotta be fucking kidding.
That faggot made a career out of slandering Trump.
And he also insinuated he and Tom Hanks were PEDO in this bit:
It is a stretch even to say he insinuated. He said there's a lot of people like Kimmel that don't want the client list released. He could be a pedophile, he's definitely a creep, and he is also definitely protecting the people pulling his strings, in my opinion of course.
Tom Hanks is a pedo, too.
Not a stretch.
It's a stretch to say your opinion is informed.
I never said my opinion was informed. I was simply saying Aaron Rodgers never insinuated that Jimmy Kimmel is a pedo. Aaron Rodgers insinuated that Jimmy Kimmel was amongst the people that don't want the client list from coming out.
It is dangerous to say that he insinuated he's a paedophile, because that's not what he said, and that's what the media is trying to say happened. From my regular Joe point-of-view, it is the trap they are trying to set for Aaron Rodgers. If somehow, someway, Jimmy Kimmel is not a pedo, he could potentially come after Aaron Rodgers for slander. Kimmel has no right to come after Aaron Rodgers for slander for insinuating that he doesn't want the client list released, because it can easily be inferred that Kimmel has no interest in the client list being released.
That's all. No hard feelings, I didn't try to put you down, I just wanted to make that part clear and I don't know if I did a good job in my original comment.
Noted. I thought you were referring to the video provided, where Hanks and Kimmel partake in grooming, for comedy.
Kimmel had a show on tv where he would put weird things down his pants, and then asked young women to feel his crotch to determine what was in his pants. Enough of these weirdo's.
what a loser
The highlight of the cretin's talent was on The Man Show.
His big spotlight for each episode was to introduce (a) a guy named Fox who would then guzzle an entire beer in one half second and (b) the Grand Finale: a clip of women with big boobs bouncing on a trampoline.
That was the pinnacle of his career.
EDIT: Man Show, not Ben Stein's Money
Girls on trampolines was a Man Show bit, I don't ever remember it being a bit on Ben Stein's show, but it's not like I watched a lot of that show.
Oh yeah, thanks--I'm accidentally confusing Man Show with Ben Stein. (Sorry Ben!) I remember nothing the sidekick did on Ben Stein's show. Fixing it now
IMO Aaron was tasked to make IVM more popular, now he's continuing his role w/ more red pills
Over the target, kek.
They always know what's baseless or debunked, but they never tell you how.
USA Today reporter Mike D. Sykes II writes like a fag, using the poodle whistle “baseless” at least three times including in the article title. He qualifies it as “seemingly baselessly” at one point, which is in line with his claim that Epstein was an “alleged” sex trafficker. I suppose Sykes uses “seemingly” as cover for himself, because to other people there seems to be plenty of basis for Rodger’s suspicion of Kimmel. Kimmel went out of his way to insult Rodgers for talking about the Epstein list. More importantly, as Liz Crokin pointed out, Kimmel has ties to the Clinton Global Initiative which was co-founded by Epstein. That’s a solid base for Rodgers’ claim that Kimmel doesn’t want the Epstein list to come out.
Sykes’ other use of “baseless” is a call back to Rodgers’ “baseless” claims about the vaxx, but thousands of vaxx casualties are a solid basis for vaxx skepticism.
Epstein's personal Chef was a guest on his show tons of times and they even did a sitdown interview about it. And Kimmel was asked "how they met" and he played coy and said, uh, he cooked a pig for us.
Thanks for the additional base
Good eye.
And I'm going to start using "poodle whistle". 😅💪
They'll call him a man to be silenced.
But they'll never call him a liar.
Ever notice that?
How bout all the baseless Trump claims?
What are you insinuating?
All the lies kimmel says about trump
OK thank you. I didn't understand.
No problem texts are not precise
We must save democracy by preventing people speaking things we don't want to hear. At least that's what my Harvard professor told me.
Poor Aaron Rogers
He won't be forced to endure insipid, banal questioning from ESPN wobbleheads.
Go ahead. When liberals cancel, they increase the person's popularity. When patriots cancel, the target declares bankruptcy.
With all the kurfuffle they are emphasizing just how bad it is to be Epstein Connected. Dumbasses.
yawn
Hubby said Pat McAfee apologized for Aaron Rodgers' comments. I told hubby someone heeds to tell Pat to turn in his man card. He will get it back if and when he tells everyone who told him to do that to GFY and have Aaron on his show twice a week instead of once.
Pats just not trying to get sued again lol.. he's a real one
Liberals truly can't handle a differing opinion. They are clueless on our right of free speech. They can't debate because they are so empty headed and shallow.
Let's ban alll.liberals
I’ll see your Aaron Rogers and raise you a Hillary Clinton.
Freedom of Speech! Keep talking Aaron!