They have to deceive the TDS leftists with THE CARROT (Trump is guilty of the same thing) otherwise these people won’t read the article. They will accuse the author of being a Trump supporter. We should simply start accusing them of this and…..someone make a meme!
Anyone who believes such a lie is a fool. Do you really think that if they had ANYTHING on President Trump, it wouldn't have come out already. I mean - really?
No, this is the press's old trick of "misleading headline". The part they leave off the headline, which is in the article 95% of the people who see the headline won't read, is this woman recanted her statement and also admitted to another publication that she lied about there being tapes of it.
Why would the DS spend countless millions trying to find dirt on President Trump if these tapes and witnesses exist? We live in a surveillance state where the government knows everything it wants to know. A surveillance state where the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein were widely known. Every electronic device the guy owned was being monitored.
Would I be open to changing my mind if irrefutable evidence is made public? Of course. Right now I’m inclined to believe Julian Assange regarding the dirt that exists on Donald Trump.
The documents show that Sarah Ransome may not have been the most credible witness. One of them details the inconsistencies between her recorded testimony and the few materials she actually provided (though more were requested). The sensationalist claims re: Trump were made in an email chain to a reporter Ransome wanted to engage in telling her story. At one point in the emails she curses out the reporter (seems the reporter did not do something Ransome wanted her to do); at another point in the chain she says that she wants to ensure neither Clinton nor Trump get elected. Of course the MSM will leave out the questions that surround her story.
I am not saying she is a liar, but she does seem to have a history of manipulating circumstances to her advantage. If Trump was involved, it would have come out years ago.
More liars coming out of the woods, Trumps name was added to the list by the dirty FBI and DOJ, would not be the first time they fabricated fake documents and rounded up fake witnesses, Russiah, Russiah, Russiah. Dirty feds won't give up, they have all our tax dollars to waste to try to make their lies stick. Its all bovine excrement!
Trump's name is not on "the list." "The list" is supposed to be a list of the names of clients of Epstein confirmed by court documents, and sworn testimony.
All this is, is some BS someone allegedly said in an email, about a rumor they heard from someone else, plus a bunch of retracted statements from the so called accuser.
It is utterly irresponsible to use that title given this part of the article:
They know most idiots on the left get their news from headlines and never read the articles.
NPC typically don’t read at all.
MSM will call The New Yorker 'right wing media' just to get this to stick.
Its the Mail, they don't care what they publish.
If those tapes exist, they would have been used by doj 8 years ago.
nah.. they planted her there. There is no way. These DS are so evil , don't be deceived!
They have to deceive the TDS leftists with THE CARROT (Trump is guilty of the same thing) otherwise these people won’t read the article. They will accuse the author of being a Trump supporter. We should simply start accusing them of this and…..someone make a meme!
Anyone who believes such a lie is a fool. Do you really think that if they had ANYTHING on President Trump, it wouldn't have come out already. I mean - really?
No shit
If they had anything on DJT he never would have run against Hilary in the first place.
Her name isn't Ballsey Ford is it??
MSM can’t proclaim it validates Trump is a pedo without saying the same for all the others.
They would, though. They'd trade 50 of their people for Trump.
No, this is the press's old trick of "misleading headline". The part they leave off the headline, which is in the article 95% of the people who see the headline won't read, is this woman recanted her statement and also admitted to another publication that she lied about there being tapes of it.
It's a media trap.
Why would the DS spend countless millions trying to find dirt on President Trump if these tapes and witnesses exist? We live in a surveillance state where the government knows everything it wants to know. A surveillance state where the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein were widely known. Every electronic device the guy owned was being monitored.
Would I be open to changing my mind if irrefutable evidence is made public? Of course. Right now I’m inclined to believe Julian Assange regarding the dirt that exists on Donald Trump.
They are trying their damndest to tie Trump to Epstein and they are failing miserably!🤣🤣
If there was even one tape or any dirt like this it would have been out either when he ran for president or during his presidency.
Look into her finances
Dum
Fake news. Trump is so clean he squeaks. That drives the democrats/DS crazy. Which is a very short drive.
The documents show that Sarah Ransome may not have been the most credible witness. One of them details the inconsistencies between her recorded testimony and the few materials she actually provided (though more were requested). The sensationalist claims re: Trump were made in an email chain to a reporter Ransome wanted to engage in telling her story. At one point in the emails she curses out the reporter (seems the reporter did not do something Ransome wanted her to do); at another point in the chain she says that she wants to ensure neither Clinton nor Trump get elected. Of course the MSM will leave out the questions that surround her story.
I am not saying she is a liar, but she does seem to have a history of manipulating circumstances to her advantage. If Trump was involved, it would have come out years ago.
So Ran-Some or Ransom .... I am confused.
By her deeds it can be both.
It glows ...
More liars coming out of the woods, Trumps name was added to the list by the dirty FBI and DOJ, would not be the first time they fabricated fake documents and rounded up fake witnesses, Russiah, Russiah, Russiah. Dirty feds won't give up, they have all our tax dollars to waste to try to make their lies stick. Its all bovine excrement!
Trump's name is not on "the list." "The list" is supposed to be a list of the names of clients of Epstein confirmed by court documents, and sworn testimony.
All this is, is some BS someone allegedly said in an email, about a rumor they heard from someone else, plus a bunch of retracted statements from the so called accuser.
That's how it is with these people, always misleading and creating the semblance of truth through rumours and hearsay and not facts.