I have heard a million compelling reasons as to why JFK was assassinated, and the truth is probably a mixture of all of them, but this is the first time I am hearing this reason.
The accuracy of the timing in this post seems to be wrong. It was not Nov 21st, but Oct 11th. So not the day before the assasination, but rather a couple weeks before the assassination - which makes a lot of sense since it would take some time to set the plan in motion.
This is where I got that date November 21st, 1963, when the Department of Justice had ordered that the AZC be required to register as an Israeli Foreign Agent. I was shocked to find out this happened the day prior to the JFK assassination.
Delay, delay, delay The American Zionist Council (and AIPAC, which was AZC’s unincorporated lobbying committee) were ordered by the Kennedy administration to register in 1962. This followed a massive propaganda campaign targeting congress and the American public funded with foreign money aimed at winning unconditional foreign aid and diplomatic support for Israel. AZC strung along the Department of Justice until 1965, long enough to orchestrate a paper “restructuring” of its operations that led to the incorporation of AIPAC as a separate entity.
On November 21, 1963, the day before Kennedy's assassination, the N.Y. Times had two news stories that exemplified the discord between Washington and Tel Aviv. A report from the United Nations is titled "Israel Dissents as U.N. Group Backs U.S. on Arab Refugees." It begins, "A United States resolution calling for continued efforts to resolve the predicament of the Palestinian Arab refugees was approved tonight 83 to 1... Israel cast a single negative vote....The issue centers on a 1948 resolution whose key section, paragraph 11, concerns the future of the Arabs who were displaced from their homes by the Palestine conflict. They have been living in the lands bordering Israel.... The revised United States text calls on the Palestine Conciliation Commission to 'continue its efforts for the implementation of Paragraph 11′."
The second NYT story is titled "U.S. Stand Angers Israel." It reports from Jerusalem that "Premier Levi Eshkol expressed extreme distaste today for the United States' position in the Palestine refugee debate.... Israel's anger was conveyed 'in the strongest terms' to the U.S. Ambassador.... The Israeli government is upset about the American resolution before the U.N. Political Committee and by American maneuvers over the issue." Israel was angered and objected because the Kennedy administration was trying to resolve the Palestinian refugee situation, including the right of return.
J. Walter Yeagley to FBI Director “..registration was originally solicited by letter dated November 21, 1962…Pending a determination as to whether further letter should be written insisting on registration no investigation will be required. You will be kept advised of developments in this matter.”
10/11/1963
DOJ Demand for AZC Registration “the Department expects a response from you within 72 hours with regard to this matter.”
Thanks for pointing this out. My bad. I had just finished writting this up and the app closed on me. I lost it all and I had to rewrite it. I wish I had caught this mistake.
The next day thing is a coincidence, they were definitely going to kill him anyways. Because there's no way they decided that day to kill him the next day and pull it off.
This has to do with the silver certificates and treasury money that was not backed by the Federal Reserve. That's what I believe is the real reason. I mean, the real reason is he was the first "Trump" president.
This is the first time I’ve ever seen this. I’m also surprised Rumsfeld had been working for the government that long. This makes me wonder how much influence Israel had/has over the CIA. Damn. This is the most in depth movie I’ve ever seen!
The conspiracy to kill JFK began long before this decision on the AZC. As mentioned above, there were a million motives. JFK's decision to move all clandestine operations from the CIA to MI was itself enough to greenlight the conspiracy. But he pissed off so many DS factions that they were all recruited to share and dilute the culpability among each other. And it worked.
Also, I think we need to get off the idea of Isreal pulling the strings of the US when we know there are higher level puppetmasters pulling the strings of both nations.
There is no denying there are Jews and Israel involved. The problem is how some here fail to recognize that 99% of Jews are good people who have no idea these conspiracies exist, yet they get painted with the same brush. It's no different than the left declaring all cops are bastards because of the actions of a few bad cops.
I think your count is wrong on both of those examples.
But regardless, the onus doesn't fall on those you're complaining about, it falls on those "good Jews" to stand up and point out the usurpers, en masse. The onus falls on the "good cops" to take that stand as well.
You're incorrect, and I have a real world example for you.
My family is Italian. Growing up we were accused of being connected, mafia style. My family is/was largely working class .
Most were in the military. Then they moved onto skilled labor. Concrete finishers, carpentry, roofers etc...
When I was accused of this as a child and teen, I would get mad and put them straight. And it wasn't just my family, but all of the Italian families had to constantly defend themselves against baseless accusations. We were blue collar families. Cash poor.
We all pushed back. Got in fights. Went to the local papers. Some of the stories went national{not mine obviously}.
So don't tell me they're clueless about what you are describing as slander.
I'm sure any black dude here could tell you the same thing. When you get lumped together with the bullshit, you push back. I've seen countless stories recently about just that.
Everyday learning more dimensions to the:
I have heard a million compelling reasons as to why JFK was assassinated, and the truth is probably a mixture of all of them, but this is the first time I am hearing this reason.
The accuracy of the timing in this post seems to be wrong. It was not Nov 21st, but Oct 11th. So not the day before the assasination, but rather a couple weeks before the assassination - which makes a lot of sense since it would take some time to set the plan in motion.
Full timeline
This is where I got that date November 21st, 1963, when the Department of Justice had ordered that the AZC be required to register as an Israeli Foreign Agent. I was shocked to find out this happened the day prior to the JFK assassination.
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee#:~:text=The%20American%20Israel%20Public%20Affairs,Isadore%20Breslau%20and%20Joseph%20Ottenstein
The time line says 11/22/62
Delay, delay, delay The American Zionist Council (and AIPAC, which was AZC’s unincorporated lobbying committee) were ordered by the Kennedy administration to register in 1962. This followed a massive propaganda campaign targeting congress and the American public funded with foreign money aimed at winning unconditional foreign aid and diplomatic support for Israel. AZC strung along the Department of Justice until 1965, long enough to orchestrate a paper “restructuring” of its operations that led to the incorporation of AIPAC as a separate entity.
On November 21, 1963, the day before Kennedy's assassination, the N.Y. Times had two news stories that exemplified the discord between Washington and Tel Aviv. A report from the United Nations is titled "Israel Dissents as U.N. Group Backs U.S. on Arab Refugees." It begins, "A United States resolution calling for continued efforts to resolve the predicament of the Palestinian Arab refugees was approved tonight 83 to 1... Israel cast a single negative vote....The issue centers on a 1948 resolution whose key section, paragraph 11, concerns the future of the Arabs who were displaced from their homes by the Palestine conflict. They have been living in the lands bordering Israel.... The revised United States text calls on the Palestine Conciliation Commission to 'continue its efforts for the implementation of Paragraph 11′."
The second NYT story is titled "U.S. Stand Angers Israel." It reports from Jerusalem that "Premier Levi Eshkol expressed extreme distaste today for the United States' position in the Palestine refugee debate.... Israel's anger was conveyed 'in the strongest terms' to the U.S. Ambassador.... The Israeli government is upset about the American resolution before the U.N. Political Committee and by American maneuvers over the issue." Israel was angered and objected because the Kennedy administration was trying to resolve the Palestinian refugee situation, including the right of return.
I found this.
J. Walter Yeagley to FBI Director “..registration was originally solicited by letter dated November 21, 1962…Pending a determination as to whether further letter should be written insisting on registration no investigation will be required. You will be kept advised of developments in this matter.”
10/11/1963
DOJ Demand for AZC Registration “the Department expects a response from you within 72 hours with regard to this matter.”
https://falastinstrong.wordpress.com/history-of-us-israel-relationship/john-f-kennedy-wanted-iapac-registerd-as-a-foreign-agency/
That article links to this source document which is dated Nov 21 1962, but the article says its Nov 21, 1963.
Ok thanks for pointing this out
No probs fren, nevertheless this is an excellent find, thanks!
Thanks
https://twitter.com/davincentjames/status/1727105597190078571?s=20
The same Rumsfeld that was Secretary of Defense and allowed 9/11 to happen. Yea, ok.
No coincidences
That letter is to RFK, not JFK.
"Details matter."
Thanks for pointing this out. My bad. I had just finished writting this up and the app closed on me. I lost it all and I had to rewrite it. I wish I had caught this mistake.
No worries, fren! Thanks for digging!
Thanks
Akshuallyyy ...
I stand humbly corrected...
After I made my comment, I started worrying that I might have spoilt the second season for you!
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that he received a complimentary hole in the head, the day after pissing off the jews.
The next day thing is a coincidence, they were definitely going to kill him anyways. Because there's no way they decided that day to kill him the next day and pull it off.
This has to do with the silver certificates and treasury money that was not backed by the Federal Reserve. That's what I believe is the real reason. I mean, the real reason is he was the first "Trump" president.
This is the first time I’ve ever seen this. I’m also surprised Rumsfeld had been working for the government that long. This makes me wonder how much influence Israel had/has over the CIA. Damn. This is the most in depth movie I’ve ever seen!
High quality post! This is an interesting lead 🤔
Yea Israel killed JFK
Jfk, no nukes for Israel https://twitter.com/davincentjames/status/1727105597190078571?s=20
https://www.laprogressive.com/the-middle-east/from-dallas-to-gaza
Here is an interesting article
What a great post and bunch of comments! You guys crushed this
I wonder how far in advance of the decision being issued....that the decision was leaked?
An early Rumsfeld "snowflake", as they were called?
The conspiracy to kill JFK began long before this decision on the AZC. As mentioned above, there were a million motives. JFK's decision to move all clandestine operations from the CIA to MI was itself enough to greenlight the conspiracy. But he pissed off so many DS factions that they were all recruited to share and dilute the culpability among each other. And it worked.
Also, I think we need to get off the idea of Isreal pulling the strings of the US when we know there are higher level puppetmasters pulling the strings of both nations.
Exactly. It makes us look retarded to try to blame da Jooz for everything.
Your comment is very insightful and well awate of what went down
It's not all da jooz {we're all 6 years old now!}. But why is it, everything done to this country ties directly to a Jew?
We should ignore that because...racism?.... The Holocaust? ...
Ignorance is bliss, eh?
There is no denying there are Jews and Israel involved. The problem is how some here fail to recognize that 99% of Jews are good people who have no idea these conspiracies exist, yet they get painted with the same brush. It's no different than the left declaring all cops are bastards because of the actions of a few bad cops.
I think your count is wrong on both of those examples.
But regardless, the onus doesn't fall on those you're complaining about, it falls on those "good Jews" to stand up and point out the usurpers, en masse. The onus falls on the "good cops" to take that stand as well.
I'm willing to bet most of your family members have no idea what the new world order is. Why would you think regular Jews would?
You're incorrect, and I have a real world example for you.
My family is Italian. Growing up we were accused of being connected, mafia style. My family is/was largely working class .
Most were in the military. Then they moved onto skilled labor. Concrete finishers, carpentry, roofers etc...
When I was accused of this as a child and teen, I would get mad and put them straight. And it wasn't just my family, but all of the Italian families had to constantly defend themselves against baseless accusations. We were blue collar families. Cash poor.
We all pushed back. Got in fights. Went to the local papers. Some of the stories went national{not mine obviously}.
So don't tell me they're clueless about what you are describing as slander.
I'm sure any black dude here could tell you the same thing. When you get lumped together with the bullshit, you push back. I've seen countless stories recently about just that.
So yes, you're incorrect.
Thanks. I get exhausted with the Jew bashing too. I've found though there are more here who agree with us.