mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Peer-Reviewed Study
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
When Nuremberg Trials?
Nuremberg 2.0 everyone involved
ALL OF THEM
Start with the person whose signature is on the submission to the FDA and work in both directions. All the way back to everyone involved in creating it and all the way forward everyone involved in approving and mandating it.
ALL OF THEM
and don't stop there.
Every healthcare provider that refused to listen to dissent, Nuremberg them too. This isn't a joke. EVERYONE
Send the fucking message that these people are in a position of trust because they can think for themselves and not just brainlessly repeat the horse shit fed to them by fuckstain Fauci
but much License
yep, ALL THE MEDICAL BOARDS who revoked a doctor's license over this.
Including all the boards of states who used reciprocity clause to revoke based on another state revoking. ALL OF THEM. I don't give a fuck if the people on the board didn't even personally decide. THEY SHOULD HAVE.
ALL OF THEM
The nurses who talked shit on TikTok. every single one of them too
ALL OF THEM
And let’s not forget the presstitutes who pushed this shit and everyone who lied about immunity and alternatives.
Muh horse dewormer!
that was a US government entity
talking about a medicine that earned a Nobel prize for treating HUMAN illnesses
That's how insidious this whole thing is.
This also needs to apply to everyone involved in the covid scare, prior to the vaccines. There are idiots who still think getting covid is a death sentence.
Putting everyone in that "I'm gonna die..." mindset made it that much easier to convince everyone they needed to be jabbed.
My small town school system has about 2700 students enrolled. 6 have died suddenly in the last 2.5 years.
And don't forget the media stooges who shilled for the jabs 24/7, with dire warnings and threats.
Sad. And totally not normal.
And yet people still can't or won't connect the dots.
Even though 2 out of 10,000 is paltry, I’m still skeptical. There are too many factors for a study to be really controlled. We don’t know what else is going on with the placebo group.
To do a proper study, you’d have to have people with the same DNA (identical twins), the same immune systems (exact same environment, nutrition, fitness levels, injury status, and stress levels), and then expose them in the same way to the exact same strain, strength, and concentration of c19, and then observe that the cleanblooded one was more likely to “need” hospitalization than the vaxxed one. Show me that study and I’ll grant you the 2.3 out of 10,000. Otherwise, it really looks like the vaxx has 0% efficacy toward any positive result.
The vaxx is risk without reward.
Whoa, easy there, Dr. Mengele!
<jk>
It’s a joke, but you raise a good point: there are ethical/ humanitarian limits to conducting experiments aboit which people respond better to infection, started with the necessity of having people possibly exposed to infectants in the first place. If social distancing was really the best practice and was universally needed, then there shouldn’t have been any infected people to study. Or, if the vaxx was really necessary to stop the spread, then the experimenters giving some people placebos instead of the vaxx were possibly endangering their lives. The reason these studies were ethical was because the social distancing and vaxx narratives were already understood to be false.
"...the social distancing and vaxx narratives were already understood to be false"
The instant that genocidal gnome put his imprimatur on the hundreds of violent, screaming, marxist terrorists (BLM and their brainless acolytes) rioting in the middle of a supposed dire health crisis was when anyone with even half a functioning brain should have woken up to the hoax. Logic would follow that since this alleged "health crisis" is a hoax, discussion should be directed at what might be the actual reason for pushing the experimental drugs on humanity.
I understand it's probably still "safest" for researchers to pretend that they're considering this study of efficacy to show that the drugs were dangerous so that it may deter future usage of them. That is ethical, IMHO. Pretend along with the genocidal beasts and their minions that you're just testing something that was (falsely) touted as beneficial under the narrative.
Unfortunately, too many bad players in the pharma-med industries have tainted the whole field so that the remaining ethical, decent, intelligent folks working under this umbrella, people who joined in with their hearts wanting to help humanity and relieve suffering, need to resort to feigned obeisance to get the information out. The FNM will quash it however it comes out, but every study like this that reaches even some of the brainwashed and steers them away from continued usage of these experimental drugs is a godsend.
Because it's genocide. We're only 3 years into this. We've only just begun to see the die off.
Of course it killed more than it saved, because COVID wasn't killing anyone. They simply CALLED everything COVID. Still, even by doing that, the shots killed more people. There is no nice way of putting this. It was on purpose. They damn well knew they were calling heart attack deaths COVID deaths JUST to inflate the numbers, get that money, induce fear, and push jabs, which was yet more money. They all deserve something terrible.
Remdesevir killed a lot. It almost killed my friend's 40 ish wife.
Actual Study
the bigger problem I have is that despite all of the peer-reviewed studies, despite findings of DNA fragments in the vaccines, despite Florida Surgeon General being the only sane decision maker, all the people I talk to are initially perplexed, then they Google search and see the headlines that this is fake news, that Florida Surgeon General is an alarmist, etc.. and then, they get the next booster shot
People will really start waking up when it becomes mainstream news.
Exactly. Someone actually said, "yeah he's sick again, and he just got his booster". Then went on to say, "yeah I have to get mine, but I was just sick for 3 weeks, so I have to wait". ... and this was just today. These are "smart" people, too.
These studys are being quashed by the cabal's propaganda arm, which is still too long.
I felt like that too.. This person, she's really smart to. I was so tempted to send her this study, but held back because I know she and her family just got their latest booster shot. I had been telling her about the DNA fragments found in the vaccines and that she should avoid getting her 5-year old the booster because it is more risk than good. No use though
Well, to be honest, on a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero, regardless of any factor :)
Well then, Mr to be honest "over a long enough period of time" everyone leaves here with nothing. Despite this,I doubt you have no problem giving up what you have now. Especially when it's your life. They lied, people died. Nothing to make light of.
I'm making fun of the click bait tagline. Too many people try to get their articles clicked by using false and/or misleading headlines and/or tag lines like this.
I'm going to keep posting this. The CDC is knowingly, knowingly, knowingly continuing to mandate this: https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/panel-physicians/vaccinations.html#covid-19-vaccination. Not only are the jabs still on the market, but they are STILL BEING REQUIRED in 2024.
Remember when Trump said that the cure shouldn't be worse than the disease?
Not to mention those who have heart issues and cancer.