Retarded Doctor gets Red Pilled over Covid Injections
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
It looks like she didn't *puts on sunglasses* "do her own research". Four years into it she finally reads a research paper that shows the covid jab was a scam the whole time.
Props to her for finally admitting that she's wrong and making a video about it. I don't think the dam can last much longer with all of these quacks. I mean cracks.
Agreed. She was an adult and admitted her failure. More than I can say for most people.
To be fair, she was under more intense indoctrination for more years than most of us. In the "I'm an elite god" freaking with ignorant plebes program, nothing less. And when someone pays a lot of money for something, psychologically they're very, very unlikely to question its value.
Also, only inventive, research, pioneering, procedure-writing doctors had the mental freedom to consider that the official response could be wrong, because they were already accepting that improvements could be made to anything standard. Explainers are just parrots. So for this person to turn is actually a fairly huge indicator. Even Dr Kirsch didn't until he was vax-injured.
So, OP calls her retarded but I wouldn't say that about anyone who publicly admits having been wrong, especially when there are still professional, career-affecting consequences for contradicting the official narrative. I'm with you, props to her. Hope a lot of people get red pilled by her, too.
I call everyone retarded, and I don't exempt myself from that status. Knowing that you're retarded is knowing you can be wrong and learning to question things. It's the people who don't think they're retarded are the ones to worry about.
I loved the title tbh fren.
What a retard!
Cheers mate.
Poster of this message goes back to gnawing on shoe.
Don't be fooled by the "peer reviewed" label. They seldom, if ever, check the data. They are more likely to find your spelling mistakes!
If you want to see how successful peer review is you need to visit Retraction Watch to see just how many science papers have to be retracted.
In pursuit of the climate hoax, peer review is used as one way to reduce the number of "off narrative" papers that are published.
It really comes home with the fact that Dr. Boz and so many of our health professionals are just sheeple that blindly follow what the big corrupted organizations feed them, and never actually do the research when they are clued in that there may be a problem.
Doctors are plug and play now-a-days I think. They plug in the symptoms, see the diagnosis, and pharmaceutical product recommended, and write it, or suggest what ever the screen tells them to do. And they operate within the constraints of what ever system they are working for.
She's a variant. I know this YT channel pretty well. She's deep on the keto diet path, so that automatically makes her not like 99% of all American doctors, who do not have the first clue about nutrition.
In general I find her to be a seeker and not a dummie.
With all of that said, that perhaps makes this admission even worse. That she knows so much of the MIC (the other MIC... the Medical Industrial Complex) is full of shit but she still bought into this vaxx crap.
She has children. I expect she got them the shots and the boostahs. She will learn a very powerful, painful lesson.
If GPs are obsolete in the practice of medicine, and rather are barely baseline data-entry clerks, and the companies and hospitals that pay GPs lots of $ know this, its a matter of time before these 'systems' become a paid-subscription service for anyone to use, and 'doctors' are no longer in the loop at all. And if one specific institution refuses to, some competitor will and undercut their pricing so badly they have no remaining customer base or business imperative any longer.
Paramedics, surgeons, therapy specialists and so on have a purpose, but the average GP apparently no longer does. And thats before AI even starts to flex in diagnostics.
Open-source downloadable 'doctor AI' when?
Oh they've been working on that for a very long time- how many are already on the path of, let me enter your symptoms from the list here on my tablet, okay here's the meds you get right now. Rest of future meds to treat the side effects we know the first set will give you are automatically downloaded to your chart.
In the book Robopocalypse by Danial H. Wilson there is a thing called the AutoDoc.
It's a Robot machine that has different programs that are installed, or can be downloaded to enable different medical specific functions.
Get here.
I'll only leave the link open for a short time, so tell me if/when you grab it please.
They assume, as they've been taught, that the research was done, and done properly. See how much of a shock it was to her that the original research was crap? That is key for breaking the "experts" myth.
I think this is what most doctors and nurses assumed, that if a product has made its way into their hands, then the people upstream have done their due diligence for it to get there.
It says there in the Nuremberg codes, that if you're going to inject someone you have a personal responsibility to know what the effects of that will be.
What I found that was most telling was her "colonel friend" that's been trying to red pill her for years and she just keeps blowing him off, because she can't bother looking into it.
She is guilty. She promised - Safe and effective. It's ok that youre pregnant, says the DR..
This woman is on defense because she killed lot's of people. And lied to them.
Five points that stand out and go to what we’ve all known. They basically lied:
Should not have been called Vaccinations as they were mRNA shots, because once you put that in your body you CANNOT turn it off (vaccines do what they need and stop at that.). Explains the long term continued health issues,
Due to batches variability some batches had double-stranded RNA which triggers immune reactions. There was a lot of DNA Contamination, which even she asks “wth is that doing in vaccines”. Explains why some people had no effects and some did.
Foreign DNA is dangerous in your body, why was it put in there and how did that dangerous large-scale contamination escape scrutiny of public health officials.
Spike proteins are not supposed to be in us at all, but the jabs had them.
and bottom line, these jabs weren’t anymore effective as nature in stopping deaths.
Let the Nuremberg trails and prosecutions commence….
I can't wait
Quite the opposite. The unvaccinated have the best outcomes. It's like taking cyanide as a treatment for the common cold.
Actually you are correct, as we know, but the report didn’t cover that as it wasn’t the basis of their research.
Kudos to her for putting out the video but damn, even we unedumacated peons did OUR homework back then. Willfully ignorant or complicit - that's our doctors.
Scrambling for cover - hang them all.
I might be too soft, but I think the ones that realize they made a mistake and work to correct it have the possibility of life in prison.
How many people did she poison before departing from the approved pharma literature to actually research the shots?
Before the shots were even released Dr Mcollugh wrote articles describing how they would definitely cause heart damage, and describe the exact mechanism in which it would occur. We posted the article here. He was just one of many experts who predicted the outcome we have now.
I didn’t even go to fucking college and I was able to easily find dozens of articles from experts that were first dismissed as right wing conspiracy theorists, and are now being proven right.
I will never forgive these people. Either they are too stupid to understand research, or they are too cowardly to look for it. Either way, fuck them. The time for bravery was back then, not now when 60-70% of the population took this bullshit poison.
None of what the CDC or WHO said from the beginning made any sense. "We need to lock down and wait for a cure to a novel virus in 6 months for something that's not killing any homeless people".
So, around 33:00-34:30 or so she speaks to the difference between the "Process 1" purification used to get these jabs past the regulators and "Process 2" purification used to mass produce them. I'm guessing that while POTUS was on their asses daily ("they" being Fauci the genocidal gnome, Birx and the plethora of medical-pharma "experts" he called into his daily meetings) questioning everything they told him and getting "assurances" that the proposed jabs were "safe and effective", the Process 1 purification was being used.
The Potatus did nothing of the sort, didn't hold daily meetings with subsequent daily press conferences to inform the public, didn't question the pharma folks, nothing. That's when evil pharma slipped into the Process 2 purification which may be responsible for all the turbo cancers the jabs are causing. At least that's how I'm interpreting this though I'd need to see exact dates for this.
Here's a full interview about process 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1Ivk6JYyE. Process 1 was used for the trials and aside from a few batches, process 2 makes up 99.99999% of what was actually put into the general public.
The dsRNA tidbit at around 31:00 is pretty interesting. Definitely some stuff in here that's new for me.
Here's more information about process 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO1Ivk6JYyE. They basically used E. coli to make a lot quickly, threw it in a blender and then put that E. coli slushy inside of people.
She believes she is special, above others. F this bitch.
One thing that struct me from watching it, is that she's so much of a narcissist that she doesn't even make an attempt to appear remorseful.