Not really, the media wants us to believe that all we care about is appearances. That is crap, I am seeing less and less makeup, mostly long lashes. My fashion is now called Boho, but I got to get my clothes out from high school. I am 65, and have always been part hippie, the ones my family hung out with were totally conservative.
I disagree with you on this. My husband is more emotional than I’ve ever been. He’s a strong man inside and out but he and his entire family will start crying over anything like weddings, graduations, funerals, milestones etc. Not me, I’m the one at the family funeral and functions making sure everything from the food, dishes and everything is taken care of. Even my own family’s funerals. I’m a damn rock and cry weeks later. Of course I care about people and things but in stressful times nope! It’s because I grew up fast in a verbal abusive family and had to be tough to survive. I know several men like my husband who shows empathy. If we start saying women can’t be vote because they are emotional where do you stop? Old people can’t vote because they don’t have the brain capacity as a thirty year old, 20 year olds can’t vote because they lack maturity, a person in psychiatric care can’t vote because they are unstable? I’m not trying to start an argument. I can disagree and respect your opinion.
They're doing what they've been programmed to do, plain and simple. Home school women aren't a different breed, for example, but they've been raised different. Put logic and reason back into the curricula, scientific method, investigation, teach proper research and critical thinking, everything resolves differently. MSM, social media, farming out our opinions to "experts" are what enslaved minds to the controlled narrative. Remove that and let people think again, both men and women. Now, on the flip side I'd say that only tax paying households should vote, and combat vets vote twice. But that's just me.
No- I don't think we should be paying taxes anyway. Trump will probably not have to pay taxes due to so many financial attacks. I think he should be able to keep his right to vote.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
I am for freedom and not taking away our rights. So if I can't pass your test I can't vote? I am for Getting our rights back, not taking more away. And I am not talking Jim Crow,
What your actual political leaning is absolutely irrelevant, on purpose, to the discussion. If it's fair, it doesn't matter whether we agree or not, we could agree the method is indeed fair. To be fair, it must provide for voting capability by a fair segment of people. Since we're voting on who will administer our funds for the common good and common defense, I believe that it's only fair that those who provide the funds or defend our liberty with their lives should vote. Education must be canonical and provide the best, honest, objective information about the design of our Republic and the purpose of every part of it. Those who can't or won't learn what makes this nation unique and great should not be allowed to mess it up.
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
Not any woman I know. We discuss candidates pros and cons. If my husband tried to tell me who to vote for, let's just say he won't. He and I are unified politically. I got involved first and then he did. He serves on committees and I do the research.
I think the family division began in earnest in the 1970s when every show on tv made SAHMs look stupid. Cannot tell you how many arguments I've had with people who told me I should work outside of our home.
I am a woman. I HATE feminism!!! Every woman should do what makes her happy. Some choose careers, some prefer not to work outside the home. Some HAVE TO work when they don’t want to. We are a mixed bag but FEMINISM is equal to communism!! My 74 year old humble opinion.
That was a HUGE one - I have been saying that on X for quite a while. There is no reason for them to give 100% loyalty to the state anymore. No consequences to not voting as the state wants either. That amendment is definitely one that imo needs to be put back in. And we could decide if they deserve a raise or not too.
I believe I already spoke my piece about the 17th amendment - we need it back. Imo THAT was the cause of many of our issues - state reps at fed level no longer being answerable to the state they supposedly represent. No consequences for not voting as the state they supposedly represent would like. They used to be easily replaced by governor decision or legislative vote. We need that back.
Imo we need quite a few changes in the amendments. Need some new ones added, old ones added back, and some newer ones deleted, or fixed. EDIT:adding on - states need to regain their sovereignty and get the balance of power between states and the fed govt back in proper alignment. It's backwards.
It's a tough call between the 14th, 17th and 19th, but I think the 14th is the worst of them all.
It's been used to rationalize anchor babies. It made everyone citizens of The United States and destroyed the idea of State citizenship. Worst of all, it extended the right to vote to every adult male who isn't a criminal. Not everyone should have the right to vote, regardless of their sex. Once the short-sighted and those with no skin in the game started voting, all the other terrible amendments were almost a given.
Correct. We are finally getting montages of women realizing the scam, forced to work when they could be chilling at home. We'll get back to it. The collapse is brought to you by woman (and liberals) and it is the conservatives that have to put it back together. Women will be back in the home pronto during this time. Love it or hate it, that is what is coming.
I bought into the "independent woman" trap and now, especially the older i get, wish nothing more than being barefoot in the kitchen. Wish I knew then what I know now.
Sounds like you should be making her your wife. Part of the problem is people cohabitating and acting as though they are committed without the actual commitment. Absurd.
Known since 11 and she 9, liked each other then, but she moved away. 16 years later, on happenstance, reconnected. Now 18 years later, still together. Getting married soon
Marry a woman that has a biblical view of marriage. Wife should submit to husband but husband should submit to God. Problem is too many people expect submission without being worthy of it. Be a man worthy of submission and then man's marriage laws don't matter.
I greatly dislike when someone take a single topic and places the blame for humanity’s failures on its shoulders. There are too many contributing factors to feminism - that have created the world we live in.
WW1 was a huge contributing factor to the 19th amendment. WW1 & WW2 were implemented. Yes I said implemented. The bankers wars were a way to break down the nuclear family, buy separating families via death of fathers, sons, uncles … etc. This also forced women to start working full time jobs to support their families AND to support War efforts and thus Rosie the Riveter was born. Once men began to come back from the war, women were already established in the work place, and many did not want to go back to traditional roles. This was an actual thing.
There are so many other psychological facets to where we have gotten in our lives and society now. The 19th amendment, may be a contributing factor, but it’s not the only reason why.
When can we stop blaming one group of people or one thing that happened on all of our problems. The psychological operation that’s been going on for at least 100 years, has so many tentacles. 🤷♀️
The prohibition movement was anti-immigrant esp. anti German and Irish. Because they were Catholics. And hence, they were allowed to enjoy the fruit of the vine, and many made their livings that way. The Know Nothings and anti Catholics,
the MEN with the BUCKS recruited (YES!) and funded those femi-nazis who even took hatchets to neighborhood gathering places of peaceable families which served beer. Went on to fund, promote the vote for women. MEN voted in the vote for women BTW.
BTW though, after WW II the women were encouraged to go back home, because the millions of vets needed jobs to come back home to. Hence the glorious 1950s, when a man could raise a family with a house and a car on his income. And women were happy to raise their children, and shared recipes, and Betty Crocker and Father Knows Best were standards in the home.
I grew up then. We were HAPPY then! But then someone had to come along and ruin it all . . . feminism and corporatism forcing wives and mothers into the LABOR WORK FORCE for an INCOME which has in the meantime become ESSENTIAL for a decent family standard of living. SHEESH!
The alcoholism rate went from 25% to 10% after that. Personally I think alcoholism is destructive, so its reduction was a good outcome. There has been a big campaign against smoking too, and now it's much reduced. Another good outcome. But opinions denigrating women in general or men in general are bs manipulations to create divisiveness, IMHO. In other words, both are attacks on humanity in general.
Have you heard about all the deaths from bad alcohol? My Dad said you couldn't believe what happened during Prohibition, there were fights, people were crazy. After it was repealed, things went back to normal.
Not all women are the same. Yes, there are those bleeding heart, social justice, weak minded, and "I am equal" women, but there are also a lot of patriotic, constitutional, save our nation, and will to do anything to protect our country women. A lot of great things came about when women had the right to vote. It ended a lot of barbaric practices that where forced on women and children.
No, it just forced them to deal with the world which made them tough, hard, cynical, and "strong." The exact opposite of what men look for in women. The family is meant to protect that which is most valuable, i.e. women and children. Men are supposed to deal with the hardships of the world. Women can but the only acceptable situation is if the men are dead/cowards/idiots, in which case they have no choice. Now you have all these toxic strong women with colored hair running around. Women's suffrage wasn't meant to protect them, it was meant to extract them from the safety of the family and out from under their husbands protection and made vulnerable to attacks from the demonic and the world itself. Men being immoral / stupid / cowards is also responsible for this situation but much of it is contrived. It's just the Garden of Eden all over again with women seizing at the forbidden fruit and men being cowards and letting it happen.
I see a possible way to get rid of the 19th amendment in a step by step process:
Publicly reveal the issue that women vote in order to be cared for (even at the expense of everyone else). And I mean have politicians actually say it out loud in public to spread awareness.
Backlash will be massive. Let the public whine and debate this.
To get the public onboard with the repeal of the 19th amendment, society would have to collapse (A storm) (economic collapse will suffice).
The collapse should last a year or more. People will not learn unless they suffer. The Q team knows this, hence why we are going through this operation.
During this one year you will also see a rise in relationships as women want to be cared for and protected. The struggle will be too great to do it all alone. Thus, it will become apparent that women with a partner will do better than women without one.
During the storm, it needs to come out that the collapse happened due to the policies passed that women historically voted for.
Once the economy is fixed you will see that naturally the men and women divided household labor in order to survive during the storm. If the storm lasted more than a year (preferable) you will see women staying home and being mothers to their children while the men work to provide for them.
After the storm it will be easier to remove certain amendments (like the 19th amendment) as they will be readily seen as detrimental to society.
Another more preferable way is to just repeal the 19th amendment during the storm Q talks about. The cabal always took advantage of chaos to pass their laws. Why can't the White Hats take advantage of chaos this time. Better to rip the band-aid off fast than to slowly do it. Because when the new asset-backed currency comes online and certain laws and policies are still in place, we are guaranteed to repeat history. Men and women will just go back to their bad habits.
Now for the problem of repealing the 19th amendment. Women in the workplace and the strong independent woman. It's going to be extremely difficult to convince these women to give up the vote and have to work and pay taxes. A small solution for the taxes would be to outlaw income taxes and go back to funding the govt with sales taxes and tariffs. The taxation without representation argument becomes less convincing when there is a general sales tax for the whole population. Still, our society has the independent mindset ingrained in the very core of our being. Taking away someone's right to vote will come at a huge morale cost to the collective psyche, especially in the United States. An alternative would be to keep the 19th amendment but remove all laws that help single mothers and their bad life choices.
You can't claim you're a strong independent woman when you are being bankrolled by big daddy government. You want the right to vote, take personally responsibility for your actions. If you don't want to take personal responsibility, then you should not have the right to vote, period. Society should not have to pay for the mistakes of an individual. I believe this solution to be more attainable than just repealing the 19th amendment. Heck, maybe women will vote to repeal the 19th amendment when the going gets tough and they just can't take being independent anymore, but that's a dream.
I am a widow living on Social Security and my husband’s pension. I am also a free-thinking, independent woman who definitely does NOT need a man in my home to feel safe and cared for!! Please don’t presume all women are cut from the same cloth…..a hard working life builds immense strength.
Sorry, I am a woman and I read up on them, listen to what they have to say, and don't give a rats ass about what they look like. I listened to Obozo, knew instantly he was full of shit. Golden tongue boy said a lot of nothing. Floored me when so few seemed to realize that. My best friend at the time told me he reminded her of Kennedy. Poor JFK
I think women needed to be represented but to me, the destruction of the family happened during WW2 when the women went out of the home to work in the factories to help the war effort and they never went home staying in the work place and letting daycare raise their children.
it's multiple factors, but the point is that there is a definite structure to the family and between men and women ordained by God. feminism is just communism for the family and make women equal to men when they are in-fact the social inferiors of men. being wives and homemakers is meant to protect them from the hardships of the world as much as possible. the ultimate end-point of feminism and letting women into the world on their own is just onlyfans prostitution, bc it's the easiest and most lucrative. women will end-up serving men, whether as a prostitute or as a beloved wife and mother, this is inevitable.
Ephesians 5:23. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior.
1 Corinthians 11:3. But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God
What you speak of is only possible in a Christian home where the man does not lord over his wife as a taskmaster and looks at her as a partner in life---as one flesh. Won't work out too good for the woman in a fallen world.
Then women will, in time, be reduced to being near slaves like in pagan societies. Christianity elevated women to their highest dignity as wives and mothers. I think you're right as in only the re-Christianization of society could restore the proper order of the family.
During WW2 women worked the jobs that the soldiers used too. When the war ended, women were expected to leave their jobs and go home, even if their hubby died in the war. This happening so fast made women pissed off. Also if women were allowed in the work force there would be more TAX PAYERS, so it happened. It used to be legal to beat your wife to death with a stick as long as it was no wider than your thumb.(rule of thumb) The humane society was the first to stop it in NY city, they had passed laws protecting other animals first. Many women wanted birth control but it was illegal and many women died in childbirth, kind of like puppy miles.
The destruction of the US has been planned way before the 19th amendment, how about the 16th?
But the Articles of Confederation didn't allow for enough graft. So we have a bullshit Constitution where a bullshit court sees powers not there (the power to hand off legal tender creation to a private actors made of a partnership of foreign owned banks) and ignores what is obviously there (like "shall not be infringed")
Our Constitution is total failure because it is founded on a lie. The anti-Federalists were right. Federal powers were too much. Outcome is logical.
My favorite Jerry Clower: “When mama does get up and watch them soap operas she can watch it in three different rooms in the house, laying down, leaning or propped up.”
Woman here, been married 35 years and couldn’t agree more! I’m very proud I was a stay at home mom, took care of the house and had supper on the table every night. After my daughter was in school a few years I went back to work. She was always taken & picked up from school by me or her dad, no exceptions! I believe a woman should have independence but many women have taken it to far. We need strong masculine role models. Sure my marriage wasn’t perfect at times but we got through those bad times because we loved each other and wanted our child in a home with both parents. What marriage is perfect? None! I absolutely hate women’s lib. I remember my dad back in the 70s complaining about they had to teach a woman to climb telephone poles and do the job.
While I don't agree in principle, there is little doubt women lean more left than men. Social safety nets appeal more to them on average in every poll I've seen conducted about it and they will also place reproductive rights at the top of their list disproportionately more than other issues.
Really unbelievable that this is even a thing. Seriously folks. You want to disenfranchise over half the population? What about all the strong women who are now serving in political positions? Would you kick them all out? How horrible would it be if only men could serve in those positions?
Not all women are emotional basket cases. All men are not pillars of society. There has to be a balance between Alpha and Omega. That represents a true golden age of enlightenment.
I can be a mother, a wife, a sister, a daughter and a well informed member of my country. My spouse is not threatened by that. Just the opposite.
I am a woman and I agree. I always said women should never vote. They vote emotion and looks.
I disagree. I vote independently for candidates after thoroughly researching. I am Independent and love President Trump!
Me too! But hubbie would vote based on my input. Family vote.
You and I are a rare breed.
Just the two of you huh??
Nope me too. Female boomer Independent Trump voter.
She was the only one who replied.
You have to admit there are few and far between.
Not really, the media wants us to believe that all we care about is appearances. That is crap, I am seeing less and less makeup, mostly long lashes. My fashion is now called Boho, but I got to get my clothes out from high school. I am 65, and have always been part hippie, the ones my family hung out with were totally conservative.
Around me there is makeup like they ate Hollywood stars.
I am the same age range and I need some foundation because my skin color is so light now it looks awful.
I disagree with you on this. My husband is more emotional than I’ve ever been. He’s a strong man inside and out but he and his entire family will start crying over anything like weddings, graduations, funerals, milestones etc. Not me, I’m the one at the family funeral and functions making sure everything from the food, dishes and everything is taken care of. Even my own family’s funerals. I’m a damn rock and cry weeks later. Of course I care about people and things but in stressful times nope! It’s because I grew up fast in a verbal abusive family and had to be tough to survive. I know several men like my husband who shows empathy. If we start saying women can’t be vote because they are emotional where do you stop? Old people can’t vote because they don’t have the brain capacity as a thirty year old, 20 year olds can’t vote because they lack maturity, a person in psychiatric care can’t vote because they are unstable? I’m not trying to start an argument. I can disagree and respect your opinion.
Again the majority of woman vote on emotions and looks and don't forget abortions.
There are more of them than us.
They're doing what they've been programmed to do, plain and simple. Home school women aren't a different breed, for example, but they've been raised different. Put logic and reason back into the curricula, scientific method, investigation, teach proper research and critical thinking, everything resolves differently. MSM, social media, farming out our opinions to "experts" are what enslaved minds to the controlled narrative. Remove that and let people think again, both men and women. Now, on the flip side I'd say that only tax paying households should vote, and combat vets vote twice. But that's just me.
I agree with tax payers only voting and vets.
How was I able not to be programmed and think for myself?
I was pregnant at 20 and I had more sense than most including how I raised my two children.
No- I don't think we should be paying taxes anyway. Trump will probably not have to pay taxes due to so many financial attacks. I think he should be able to keep his right to vote.
I am confused with your comment.
It makes no sense.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
Can't say I disagree
The civics quiz requirement would indeed filter out a lot of bad quality votes.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
I am for freedom and not taking away our rights. So if I can't pass your test I can't vote? I am for Getting our rights back, not taking more away. And I am not talking Jim Crow,
What your actual political leaning is absolutely irrelevant, on purpose, to the discussion. If it's fair, it doesn't matter whether we agree or not, we could agree the method is indeed fair. To be fair, it must provide for voting capability by a fair segment of people. Since we're voting on who will administer our funds for the common good and common defense, I believe that it's only fair that those who provide the funds or defend our liberty with their lives should vote. Education must be canonical and provide the best, honest, objective information about the design of our Republic and the purpose of every part of it. Those who can't or won't learn what makes this nation unique and great should not be allowed to mess it up.
I agree excellent points.
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
What? Basic civics- what are the branches of government, who is your mayor, governor, senator, president...
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
Not any woman I know. We discuss candidates pros and cons. If my husband tried to tell me who to vote for, let's just say he won't. He and I are unified politically. I got involved first and then he did. He serves on committees and I do the research.
I think the family division began in earnest in the 1970s when every show on tv made SAHMs look stupid. Cannot tell you how many arguments I've had with people who told me I should work outside of our home.
I know there are many woman who think for themselves.
The MAJORITY don't.
I am a woman. I HATE feminism!!! Every woman should do what makes her happy. Some choose careers, some prefer not to work outside the home. Some HAVE TO work when they don’t want to. We are a mixed bag but FEMINISM is equal to communism!! My 74 year old humble opinion.
The exception is always the foot in the door that enables the more radical elements through.
Problem is half the time women don't really know what they want. 🤷♂️
Half the women out there are on mood altering drugs!
The 17 amendment also did a lot to destroy America.
The senators used to be appointed by the states and represented them. Not the people.
Been saying this one for many years - good point!
That was a HUGE one - I have been saying that on X for quite a while. There is no reason for them to give 100% loyalty to the state anymore. No consequences to not voting as the state wants either. That amendment is definitely one that imo needs to be put back in. And we could decide if they deserve a raise or not too.
This would be much easier to change than taking away the female vote.
Yep lol. I'd fight ya over my right to vote
Do you see how the 17th amendment destroyed America?
Or do you not care about that?
I believe I already spoke my piece about the 17th amendment - we need it back. Imo THAT was the cause of many of our issues - state reps at fed level no longer being answerable to the state they supposedly represent. No consequences for not voting as the state they supposedly represent would like. They used to be easily replaced by governor decision or legislative vote. We need that back.
Good answer, it was pushed through because the senate kept blocking probation.....
Imo we need quite a few changes in the amendments. Need some new ones added, old ones added back, and some newer ones deleted, or fixed. EDIT:adding on - states need to regain their sovereignty and get the balance of power between states and the fed govt back in proper alignment. It's backwards.
^^THIS^^
With no one represing the states and their rights, the fed govt has taken over everything.
This is much bigger than most people realize.
It's a tough call between the 14th, 17th and 19th, but I think the 14th is the worst of them all.
It's been used to rationalize anchor babies. It made everyone citizens of The United States and destroyed the idea of State citizenship. Worst of all, it extended the right to vote to every adult male who isn't a criminal. Not everyone should have the right to vote, regardless of their sex. Once the short-sighted and those with no skin in the game started voting, all the other terrible amendments were almost a given.
The two party system doesn't help things. Voting 3rd party is throwing away your vote...
Correct. We are finally getting montages of women realizing the scam, forced to work when they could be chilling at home. We'll get back to it. The collapse is brought to you by woman (and liberals) and it is the conservatives that have to put it back together. Women will be back in the home pronto during this time. Love it or hate it, that is what is coming.
I bought into the "independent woman" trap and now, especially the older i get, wish nothing more than being barefoot in the kitchen. Wish I knew then what I know now.
Agree. My husband and I are a good team, but I wish we could have afforded the 1950’s way of living.
I retired my girlfriend and she is now stay at home (for context of my perspective)
Sounds like you should be making her your wife. Part of the problem is people cohabitating and acting as though they are committed without the actual commitment. Absurd.
Known since 11 and she 9, liked each other then, but she moved away. 16 years later, on happenstance, reconnected. Now 18 years later, still together. Getting married soon
It doesn't help that marriage laws favor the women too much. The pendulum needs to swing back, too many men not wanting to commit due to this
Marry a woman that has a biblical view of marriage. Wife should submit to husband but husband should submit to God. Problem is too many people expect submission without being worthy of it. Be a man worthy of submission and then man's marriage laws don't matter.
I greatly dislike when someone take a single topic and places the blame for humanity’s failures on its shoulders. There are too many contributing factors to feminism - that have created the world we live in.
WW1 was a huge contributing factor to the 19th amendment. WW1 & WW2 were implemented. Yes I said implemented. The bankers wars were a way to break down the nuclear family, buy separating families via death of fathers, sons, uncles … etc. This also forced women to start working full time jobs to support their families AND to support War efforts and thus Rosie the Riveter was born. Once men began to come back from the war, women were already established in the work place, and many did not want to go back to traditional roles. This was an actual thing.
There are so many other psychological facets to where we have gotten in our lives and society now. The 19th amendment, may be a contributing factor, but it’s not the only reason why.
When can we stop blaming one group of people or one thing that happened on all of our problems. The psychological operation that’s been going on for at least 100 years, has so many tentacles. 🤷♀️
It was Prohibition, more than WW I.
The prohibition movement was anti-immigrant esp. anti German and Irish. Because they were Catholics. And hence, they were allowed to enjoy the fruit of the vine, and many made their livings that way. The Know Nothings and anti Catholics, the MEN with the BUCKS recruited (YES!) and funded those femi-nazis who even took hatchets to neighborhood gathering places of peaceable families which served beer. Went on to fund, promote the vote for women. MEN voted in the vote for women BTW.
BTW though, after WW II the women were encouraged to go back home, because the millions of vets needed jobs to come back home to. Hence the glorious 1950s, when a man could raise a family with a house and a car on his income. And women were happy to raise their children, and shared recipes, and Betty Crocker and Father Knows Best were standards in the home.
I grew up then. We were HAPPY then! But then someone had to come along and ruin it all . . . feminism and corporatism forcing wives and mothers into the LABOR WORK FORCE for an INCOME which has in the meantime become ESSENTIAL for a decent family standard of living. SHEESH!
Yes, prohibition was definitely a contributing factor. I had forgotten about that one. There are so many.
Yes, prohibition empowered the women's movement, and those "ladies" were NOT NICE!
They wanted to impose THEIR views on other people who were enjoying their beers and wines peaceably. THEY WERE WRONG! Prohibition HAD to be repealed!
AFTER destroying so many legitimate businesses, heck entire industries!
But the women's movement has not been rolled back accordingly.
The alcoholism rate went from 25% to 10% after that. Personally I think alcoholism is destructive, so its reduction was a good outcome. There has been a big campaign against smoking too, and now it's much reduced. Another good outcome. But opinions denigrating women in general or men in general are bs manipulations to create divisiveness, IMHO. In other words, both are attacks on humanity in general.
Have you heard about all the deaths from bad alcohol? My Dad said you couldn't believe what happened during Prohibition, there were fights, people were crazy. After it was repealed, things went back to normal.
Soooooooo AGREE!!
Catholics are still a problem. Do you think it is a coincidence that so many Democrats are Catholic?
They call themselves Catholic. They are traitors from within.
Ofc the situation is more complicated, but the 19th amendment is a major one of many contributing factors.
Not all women are the same. Yes, there are those bleeding heart, social justice, weak minded, and "I am equal" women, but there are also a lot of patriotic, constitutional, save our nation, and will to do anything to protect our country women. A lot of great things came about when women had the right to vote. It ended a lot of barbaric practices that where forced on women and children.
AGREE 100%
Yes!!
No, it just forced them to deal with the world which made them tough, hard, cynical, and "strong." The exact opposite of what men look for in women. The family is meant to protect that which is most valuable, i.e. women and children. Men are supposed to deal with the hardships of the world. Women can but the only acceptable situation is if the men are dead/cowards/idiots, in which case they have no choice. Now you have all these toxic strong women with colored hair running around. Women's suffrage wasn't meant to protect them, it was meant to extract them from the safety of the family and out from under their husbands protection and made vulnerable to attacks from the demonic and the world itself. Men being immoral / stupid / cowards is also responsible for this situation but much of it is contrived. It's just the Garden of Eden all over again with women seizing at the forbidden fruit and men being cowards and letting it happen.
Boooooo, you lady haters need to GO.
A House divided cannot stand
Good luck taking that away. Men are outnumbered statistically since when it came to abortions women (specifically feminazis) told women to abort boys.
I agree. As a woman, I agree.
The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
I see a possible way to get rid of the 19th amendment in a step by step process:
Another more preferable way is to just repeal the 19th amendment during the storm Q talks about. The cabal always took advantage of chaos to pass their laws. Why can't the White Hats take advantage of chaos this time. Better to rip the band-aid off fast than to slowly do it. Because when the new asset-backed currency comes online and certain laws and policies are still in place, we are guaranteed to repeat history. Men and women will just go back to their bad habits.
Now for the problem of repealing the 19th amendment. Women in the workplace and the strong independent woman. It's going to be extremely difficult to convince these women to give up the vote and have to work and pay taxes. A small solution for the taxes would be to outlaw income taxes and go back to funding the govt with sales taxes and tariffs. The taxation without representation argument becomes less convincing when there is a general sales tax for the whole population. Still, our society has the independent mindset ingrained in the very core of our being. Taking away someone's right to vote will come at a huge morale cost to the collective psyche, especially in the United States. An alternative would be to keep the 19th amendment but remove all laws that help single mothers and their bad life choices.
You can't claim you're a strong independent woman when you are being bankrolled by big daddy government. You want the right to vote, take personally responsibility for your actions. If you don't want to take personal responsibility, then you should not have the right to vote, period. Society should not have to pay for the mistakes of an individual. I believe this solution to be more attainable than just repealing the 19th amendment. Heck, maybe women will vote to repeal the 19th amendment when the going gets tough and they just can't take being independent anymore, but that's a dream.
I am a widow living on Social Security and my husband’s pension. I am also a free-thinking, independent woman who definitely does NOT need a man in my home to feel safe and cared for!! Please don’t presume all women are cut from the same cloth…..a hard working life builds immense strength.
Sorry, I am a woman and I read up on them, listen to what they have to say, and don't give a rats ass about what they look like. I listened to Obozo, knew instantly he was full of shit. Golden tongue boy said a lot of nothing. Floored me when so few seemed to realize that. My best friend at the time told me he reminded her of Kennedy. Poor JFK
I think women needed to be represented but to me, the destruction of the family happened during WW2 when the women went out of the home to work in the factories to help the war effort and they never went home staying in the work place and letting daycare raise their children.
it's multiple factors, but the point is that there is a definite structure to the family and between men and women ordained by God. feminism is just communism for the family and make women equal to men when they are in-fact the social inferiors of men. being wives and homemakers is meant to protect them from the hardships of the world as much as possible. the ultimate end-point of feminism and letting women into the world on their own is just onlyfans prostitution, bc it's the easiest and most lucrative. women will end-up serving men, whether as a prostitute or as a beloved wife and mother, this is inevitable.
You are so wrong…..
What you speak of is only possible in a Christian home where the man does not lord over his wife as a taskmaster and looks at her as a partner in life---as one flesh. Won't work out too good for the woman in a fallen world.
Then women will, in time, be reduced to being near slaves like in pagan societies. Christianity elevated women to their highest dignity as wives and mothers. I think you're right as in only the re-Christianization of society could restore the proper order of the family.
During WW2 women worked the jobs that the soldiers used too. When the war ended, women were expected to leave their jobs and go home, even if their hubby died in the war. This happening so fast made women pissed off. Also if women were allowed in the work force there would be more TAX PAYERS, so it happened. It used to be legal to beat your wife to death with a stick as long as it was no wider than your thumb.(rule of thumb) The humane society was the first to stop it in NY city, they had passed laws protecting other animals first. Many women wanted birth control but it was illegal and many women died in childbirth, kind of like puppy miles. The destruction of the US has been planned way before the 19th amendment, how about the 16th?
All amendments have been failures.
But the Articles of Confederation didn't allow for enough graft. So we have a bullshit Constitution where a bullshit court sees powers not there (the power to hand off legal tender creation to a private actors made of a partnership of foreign owned banks) and ignores what is obviously there (like "shall not be infringed")
Our Constitution is total failure because it is founded on a lie. The anti-Federalists were right. Federal powers were too much. Outcome is logical.
My favorite Jerry Clower: “When mama does get up and watch them soap operas she can watch it in three different rooms in the house, laying down, leaning or propped up.”
Jerry Clower She Coon of Women’s Lib
Woman here, been married 35 years and couldn’t agree more! I’m very proud I was a stay at home mom, took care of the house and had supper on the table every night. After my daughter was in school a few years I went back to work. She was always taken & picked up from school by me or her dad, no exceptions! I believe a woman should have independence but many women have taken it to far. We need strong masculine role models. Sure my marriage wasn’t perfect at times but we got through those bad times because we loved each other and wanted our child in a home with both parents. What marriage is perfect? None! I absolutely hate women’s lib. I remember my dad back in the 70s complaining about they had to teach a woman to climb telephone poles and do the job.
I actually believe it was the 17th amendment that is causing problems.
While I don't agree in principle, there is little doubt women lean more left than men. Social safety nets appeal more to them on average in every poll I've seen conducted about it and they will also place reproductive rights at the top of their list disproportionately more than other issues.
Really unbelievable that this is even a thing. Seriously folks. You want to disenfranchise over half the population? What about all the strong women who are now serving in political positions? Would you kick them all out? How horrible would it be if only men could serve in those positions?
Not all women are emotional basket cases. All men are not pillars of society. There has to be a balance between Alpha and Omega. That represents a true golden age of enlightenment.
I can be a mother, a wife, a sister, a daughter and a well informed member of my country. My spouse is not threatened by that. Just the opposite.