Had a convo with a moderate democratic female one time. she told me she has guy friends who are "straight" but love crossdressing into women dresses and skirts. I said it's literally mental illness and the guy is a faggot with issues, but she insisted that's just my opinion.
She said "I just feel bad for them, I want them to feel good about themselves. They're not hurting anybody! but I feel bad. I dont necessarily like it myself, I just think it's cute when they can find happiness in doing what they like."
I told her when you "support but deep down pity" these people, you're hurting them more. you're enabling them to be delusional and mentally ill because you feel so sorry for them that you can't encourage them to get help.
Also, apparently the term for this is called "tranvestism" aka "Tranvestic disorder" where some men get a sexual arrousal from wearing women's clothing. Gay shit dude.
So my question is, WHY THE FUCK is it always the women who are easily sympathizing and pitying this shit? It was the "women and feminists" who allowed men to get into female sports..... why?
Because in our reality that's a woman's job is to be the nurturing type. Women are a bizzilion times more empathetic than men.
Most of us anyways…
In my original post, I was in a rush so I sorta mistakenly generalized all women. There's based women out there and not all of them do that. But I'd like to know what you mean by more empathetic. Are you saying because women are more empathetic than men, it means it's okay for women to pander to mental illness and be afraid to tell people with mental illness to get proper help?
I'm not worried about what others do. My opinion is yes, it might be a mental health but it's none of my business how people deal with their own mental health. Period.
It goes back to the very first woman, Eve. She was duped by satan and then persuaded her husband. It's crucial that Godly men take charge, protect themselves and their wives and families from their women's susceptibility to being fooled / tricked / deluded. Not all men are capable of this because not all are Godly. All the more reason for the Godly men to be on the watch.
Yeah, and satan controls the industry and the media, so it makes sense...... women are often easily fooled and manipulated by satan himself.
And their own sin nature gets them into plenty of trouble, even without his help.
This is the real answer. Women are weaker to deceivers than men. Men are not as easily lied to, but many men sin like Adam and just go along with the lie the woman was tricked into.
I find it interesting that scripture testifies that through Adam sin entered the world. It doesn't say through Eve. It makes me wonder if Eve believing the serpent wasn't a sin, since she was always weak in that regard, it wasn't her job to resist Satan's lies, it was Adam's.
A few "progressive" men I know have confessed that they know a lot of these "progressive" things are lies, but you have to pretend to believe them so women will accept you.
That is why I used the caveat, GODLY men. Yes, men are often easily waylaid by women. They often have to be strong and have a sound relationship with God in order to resist the wiles of women. And I don't buy that justification at all about Eve. That sounds ridiculous to me - that she wasn't responsible. How convenient. Except, God told them personally not to eat of the fruit of that tree. She had no justification other than her willingness to sin and disobey God.
My empathy stops where males and females think they are something else!!!
Exactly. Encouraging someone doing evil to do more evil is not empathy.
Encouraging someone who is destroying themselves to destroy themselves more is not empathy either.
I think it is much more repeating a lie, because we are told we will gain increased social approval and social standing if we repeat the lie.
"I said it's literally mental illness and the guy is a faggot with issues, but she insisted that's just my opinion."
I got a good laugh from this hahaha
The social engineers target women heavily, to then influence men by proxy, watch Mark Passio’s current segment on YouTube of the “Unholy Feminine” it is very informative
Thanks for sharing I'll check it out.
According to Simon Baron Cohen (a cousin of the actor) who is a world class psychologist, "Autism is the extreme form of the male brain."...
So males tend to protect themselves and their pack until they form a shielding bubble around them whilst women tend to do the opposite, especially being our social equivalent.
That's my 2-cents-answer to your WHY-THE-F question..
What does autism have to do with anything? Also, females can be autistic too? I dont even believe in autism.
Don't generalise. I get into arguments with men who defend that garbage too. And this is the problem with soft parenting
It has nothing to do with empathy. Women , generally speaking, are natural followers and rarely leaders. Their nature is to get along because that’s the survival strategy they’ve been programmed for. A woman going it in her own in the wild won’t last long. Women conform by psychological predisposition.
You said the key word several times when quoting your friend: feel.
It's an emotional pandering because women (generally speaking) aliken social engagement and acceptance as something paramount.
Someone else here said women are more empathetic than men by tons. But I'm not sure what they mean. Does that mean a women's empathy can be manipulated and corrupted by social pandering and social justice? It seems like normal straight guys can speak up more against the gay stuff, because they are unafraid of hurting feelings and can address truths more directly.
In short, yes by default. As for the straight dudes metric, sure. That would make sense as far as correlating generalities. But, one must consider the decades of social engineering at play here regarding this topic. A large percentage of normies have literally been brainwashed into accepting, promoting, or remaining silent on this issue. Social engineering knows no bounds and effects both sexs equally.
This is the same as giving an alcoholic more to drink. It's going to kill him, but you feel totally ok with supporting him in drinking because it "make him happy".
Men raise boys to continue the success of the tribe. Women see boys as babies even when male is a productive adult.
MOTHERFUCKING TRUTH.
Give you five on that.
i have no idea why women do or say some of the things they do lol i have often wondered myself why women are so easily manipulated into the LGBTABC123 shit. they have to know they are being used to erase themselves out, just as the alphabet people are trying to do to men. they want a "baphomet" system (as above, so below) no male, no female, etc.
as a straight guy, i would imagine dudes who cross dress do so, because they are insecure & its some kind of coping mechanism. i have no other idea why they would do that, even for comedy. its fucking weird
maybe they got bullied or punked earlier in life, never recovered & have succumbed to hollyweird in that "you'll find happiness in dressing up, all your favorite compromised, sad actors are doing it, so you can too!!"
i suppose its similar to children who dress up as their favorite super hero. they don't feel confident or as tough as their heroes, but when they dress up, they do. i myself used to climb on the couch arm, with boots, toy gun & all, to act like Walker Texas Ranger. I was like 6 yrs old, not 36 or 46, etc.
peoples brains are weird. propaganda is massively influential to most people. when it all comes together, you get dudes dressing in skirts (like John Cena & others do) & you get other people dressing up like animals or having plastic surgery to look like Ken & Barbie toys...
No children? Agreeable and avoid conflict…
Women generally work from a merciful perspective. Men are usually more "rule based", and this is the difference. This was brought our years ago in the book "Another Voice". I don't remember the author. So, when a woman sees a trans-gender person, she does not initially condemn, but tries to empathize. She pities them in their mental disarrangement.
Also the correct terminology is heterophobic. Women get women and men get men, but understanding and dealing with the other sex is hard work. Some of the alphabets are too afraid and some can’t compete in the heterosexual world and drop out.
I am a female and I support whatever someone’s sexual orientation is as long as it doesn’t involve children. As for men who get arousal out of wearing women’s clothing , that is obviously more of a fetish, which I also don’t necessarily denigrate. But call it what it is, sexual arousal, it’s not appropriate as “ Drag queen story hour”. You have to draw the line but it affects children, otherwise we have to extend the olive branch if we want to grow as a patriot movement .
Men and women are meant to complement each other, it’s often single women or women with liberal beta male types. I think women who are married or have a strong male role models do not easily fall into it. I’m raising 5 boys and 1 daughter but I’m teaching her it isn’t kind to go along with a delusion or mental illness- or for that matter sexual fetish. The cult of nice is destroying our society. You can be kind to someone without going along with insanity. These men will find it very hard to have happy healthy relationships/futures so how is it kind to go along with it? AWFL’s are the worst especially single ones. 20+ years ago I would have been “nice” my dad died when I was 7 raised by a single mom but I met my husband and been married 21+ y and we both help each other to see things from a different perspective. My mom is still single and watches MSNBC and is team “nice”. I’m not about blaming women or blaming men, raising boys and one girl I see how important gender roles are but the genx part of me thinks we need to make it acceptable to for lack of a better word “bully” again. Boys don’t wear dresses unless it’s you’re cultural attire. Frilly ballgowns and sexy lingerie are not for males especially worn in public 🤦♀️
It's called gender inequality. Ask some female 'faggots' why they wear t-shirts and jeans. Seem a bit unfair to look at it in reverse? A look at DSM 5 will explain that the majority of crossdressers are heterosexual men with wives and kids. So wearing female clothing doesn't necessarily designate any kind of orientation. And women generally get a waiver on orientation when wearing men's clothing because?
Have you ever tried to work in a skirt? I love wearing dresses, more comfortable, but sometimes that skirt is just a pain in the ass and downright dangerous, such as when repairing a roof. And yes, I have done that.
This...and just think how life was when you had to wear a corset, 5 layers of petticoats and a silk dress when it was 98 degrees and 90% humidity, and you were maybe pregnant or after those years, having a hot flash. And then there was riding side saddle...women's clothes were not historically designed for comfort and practicality. And in Scotland, men still wear skirts.
Side saddle is actually very comfortable, but you have to have a well behaved horse. Silk and corset in the heat, no thank you. Loose linen. I don't mind dressing like grandma for the sake of comfort! Got my hubby a Scottish outfit, very sexy! And definitely not in the least feminine. He says it's comfortable.
Side saddle gives you half of the control over the horse, which is very big and very high. Two legs give you much better odds of staying in the saddle.
Absolutely. Personally prefer bareback, except for the dirty butt from the sweat. If using saddle, Australian style is the way to go, comfy and light.
No but as I type this I'm sitting here wearing a very rugged looking yellow bonnet.
Oh good. 😆
Cross-dressing is weird, i wouldnt even do it for comedy. but I'm talking about guys who do it getting off on it. Those are even weirder.
Look at the categories. They are all women or women want to be’s.