That's 2mm physical ballots, wait until they realize that there's 10-20x more ballots that never even existed physically, and were just created out of thin air digitally. Why are they so quick to destroy the ballots/evidence in so many of the swing states? Because it's easier to pretend you destroyed millions of votes, vs. admitting that those ballots never existed to begin with.
Elena Parent screaming at video of Ruby Freeman and gang multiple batch scanning from under the table, despite being repeatedly told it was the first time it was being disclosed ANYWHERE.
No it has not. They were Blacks & Black women, they were never going to be found guilty.
They hid those ballots, lied about water pipe burst, told poll watchers to leave, AS SOON as poll watchers left, ballots immediately came out from hiding, they were filmed scanning those same ballots more than once.
There was even a video of one young black man who was getting visibly upset by something. My guess is the number of Trump votes. Someone pointed him to the table where he peeked under, then did a "Yes!" victory pose. I want to say his name was Lawrence, but I can't recall. The damn fraud that night was just unreal. Removed all watchers then rolled out more ballots, and scanned them 2-3 times. Disgusting.
Some people tried to make excuses for them after they were caught, but none of their reasons made any sense.
But it’s normal for the same ballots regardless of the container to be brought out from under the tables after everyone has been made to leave and then scanned multiple times?
No that is not normal. I was just pointing out what people thought was "Debunked" was just the container, not the fact they pull them out after everyone left.
Most people think none of the court cases went anywhere because of lack of evidence. But in reality almost every case was thrown out due to having no standing. The courts didn't even look at the evidence.
Standing - In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case.
A party has standing in the following situations:
The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question, and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. In informal terms, a party must have something to lose. The party has standing because they will be directly harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief.
The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation, and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief. In the United States, this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected, the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law. This is known as the "chilling effects" doctrine.
The party is granted automatic standing by act of law. For example, under some environmental laws in the United States, a party may sue someone causing pollution to certain waterways without a federal permit, even if the party suing is not harmed by the pollution being generated. The law allows the plaintiff to receive attorney's fees if they substantially prevail in the action. In some U.S. states, a person who believes a book, film or other work of art is obscene may sue in their own name to have the work banned directly without having to ask a District Attorney to do so.
I'm still not sure how that was ever justified. In my opinion, every single voter would have standing, but the courts wouldn't touch this.
What that tells me is that we now have a fully corrupted Judiciary.
Freemasons take blood curdling oaths to pervert justice in favor of their brethren. That alone excludes them from any position of authority within our system of justice. Sadly, the opposite is true. It is infested, top to bottom, with those sworn to make unjust decisions.
Freemasonry isn't the only issue leading to injustice, but it is definitely a prime place to start the cleanup.
Over 50 courts blocked evidentiary hearings regarding lawsuits filed after the 2020 election.
Every other election contest in the past 25 years resulted in evidentiary hearings presented to a court of law.
So don’t tell me 2020 was a perfect election and don’t tell me “you all lost every court case.”
Both of those statements are bold face lies.
https://twitter.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1769176393257017496
That is one of the most important facts to make sure people learn.
That's 2mm physical ballots, wait until they realize that there's 10-20x more ballots that never even existed physically, and were just created out of thin air digitally. Why are they so quick to destroy the ballots/evidence in so many of the swing states? Because it's easier to pretend you destroyed millions of votes, vs. admitting that those ballots never existed to begin with.
"OMGGGZ IT'S BEEEN DEEEBUNKED!!!!"
Elena Parent screaming at video of Ruby Freeman and gang multiple batch scanning from under the table, despite being repeatedly told it was the first time it was being disclosed ANYWHERE.
Wait, I don't understand your comment... the video of the ballots under the table was debunked???
No it has not. They were Blacks & Black women, they were never going to be found guilty.
They hid those ballots, lied about water pipe burst, told poll watchers to leave, AS SOON as poll watchers left, ballots immediately came out from hiding, they were filmed scanning those same ballots more than once.
There was even a video of one young black man who was getting visibly upset by something. My guess is the number of Trump votes. Someone pointed him to the table where he peeked under, then did a "Yes!" victory pose. I want to say his name was Lawrence, but I can't recall. The damn fraud that night was just unreal. Removed all watchers then rolled out more ballots, and scanned them 2-3 times. Disgusting.
Some people tried to make excuses for them after they were caught, but none of their reasons made any sense.
Give Ruby a medal. Wait......they did.
I think what was misinfo was that they were suitcases under the table but were in fact the normal storage containers for ballots
But it’s normal for the same ballots regardless of the container to be brought out from under the tables after everyone has been made to leave and then scanned multiple times?
No that is not normal. I was just pointing out what people thought was "Debunked" was just the container, not the fact they pull them out after everyone left.
Oh ok. 👍
That's what I thought . Thanks. I just wasn't understanding the comment the way it was worded.
Unfortunately… i
Most people think none of the court cases went anywhere because of lack of evidence. But in reality almost every case was thrown out due to having no standing. The courts didn't even look at the evidence.
A party has standing in the following situations:
I'm still not sure how that was ever justified. In my opinion, every single voter would have standing, but the courts wouldn't touch this.
What that tells me is that we now have a fully corrupted Judiciary.
Freemasons take blood curdling oaths to pervert justice in favor of their brethren. That alone excludes them from any position of authority within our system of justice. Sadly, the opposite is true. It is infested, top to bottom, with those sworn to make unjust decisions.
Freemasonry isn't the only issue leading to injustice, but it is definitely a prime place to start the cleanup.
"BALD-FACED LIES" BUT WHO GIVES A RAT'S PATOOTY ABOUT USING LANGUAGE CORRECTLY ANYMORE. 🤷♂️🤦♂️🙅♂️
Bold-faced works too though. Makes it sound EVEN MORE brazen and shameless.
And one heavy duty rope at GITMO should be able to take care of all 923 of them.
And yet we still need to "expose" the election fraud. 🙄
The amount of republican Senators that are yelling at the top of their lungs there was voter fraud should tell you everything you need to know.
Perfectly Corrupt Election.