Iโm just convinced all bills should be no more than 1 double space typed page. If it takes more than that it is too complicated and prone to loopholes.
They should probably state an intention and an expiry as well. After the expiry, legislators can evaluate whether the intention was fulfilled and renew it if so.
If its 100x easier to make something than destroy it, you have a recipe for cancer
We don't need anymore bills. We need a purge. Its kind of funny how they have populations manipulated into thinking we constantly need more laws. What we really need is for everyone in congress, and DC as a whole, to meet and get familiar with unemployment.
It will eventually be ruled unconstitutional but we are going to have to deal with the bullshit for several years until itโs adjudicated by the SCOTUS.
A vote is support. They support unconstitutional things, they should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. Or worse. Treason is certainly to be considered.
What shocks me even more is how the RINOs are being revealed as Democrats in disguise at such a furious rate. Aside from MTG, Gaetz, and Rand Paul, are there any other patriots left?
I believe we're about to find out just how many people know what's coming, and are willing to do what's necessary to stop it, or not.
Word to the local DA's - I know you'll delay their trials until after the election. I don't care. I'll be here, lurking, waiting to be called up and exercise my 'jury nullification' option. That is, if you miss me on the first sweep, and I'm not locked up with the rest of the patriots.
I made sure that I posted enough Re: powerful people, so that they will not keep me around if they win. I don't want to live in the NWO, I'm already old with health issues, and I'm ready to do what I can. Guns aren't the only effective weapons.
I was jury foreman on a trial for a gang member. He was 100% guilty, caught red-handed violating an injunction that a previous court placed him under.
When we went to deliberation I was shocked that half the jury wanted to vote not-guilty, because they felt sorry for him, and he seemed (in court) like a nice kid. ๐คฆ๐ปโโ๏ธ
Long story short, it took three days of deliberation, and a hell of a lot of persistence on my part, but we finally got a unanimous guilty verdict on a Fridayโฆ but only because the hold out jurors didnโt want to return on Monday, and just wanted it to end. The correct outcome achieved the wrong way.
All this tells me is now that they have the ability to take peoples guns, thereโs no way theyโre gonna allow Trump to win. They have to disarm us to implement their plan. And they will do it.
โAnd how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more โ we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.โ
โ Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Also, it depends on what kind of sheriff you have. Mine in particular, will not uphold Covid laws much less confiscating peoples firearms. The federal government would have to have individuals to do that for them. Also, Iโm not sure how this applies to sanctuary cities and counties and states for second amendment. Iโm not sure what kind of protection that gives. But itโs a thing. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
We passed a law here in oklahoma,saying local police are prohibited from helping the feds. With unconstitutional laws..... may even have specified guns.
I donโt care about their bills anymore, they are not laws due to the ones who are creating them are criminals traitors to our constitution and country. Someday God will bring justice for the unjust.
They'll hide a law in a bill that Republicans "absolutely have to pass because reasons!" that if you lose your gun, you are automatically guilty of terrorism or something.
I think most of us aren't thinking big enough. Remember what Trump said paraphrased, if your going to be thinking anyway, you may as well think big.
DC needs to be turned into a museum. We should take all power away from our federal govt. There ONLY job should be to work to protect our country and our Constitutional rights. Our federal government needs to shrink by about 90%, and the 10% remaining can only remain if they understand they are not the boss of us, we are their boss.
I would set one caveat on that, and that is in the legislative branch. When practically one million Americans have one representative, we are a far cry from truly representative government. If we removed all the unConstitutional agencies (IRS, BTA, BLM, CIA, ATF and some more) that are part of the executive branch, and lowered congressional pay to a reasonable amount (and the pay of all the 'higher ups' ) we could afford to pay for more representation.
Most of these guys are lawyers, right? Best legal advice I ever heard was 'dont sign anything until you read it through and understand it.'
Just came to me ..... notice the titles of all these bills are the opposite of what they actually do. Wonder if politicians only read the heading and say it sounds good.
this statement is something I can agree with. and then when voting for reelection, people can look at voting records and see how many times they abstain. if the abstain or are not present, then we can see they are not doing their jobs.
Barring and extreme personal emergency they should HAVE mandatory attendance. I have missed less than 10 days of work via call off in my 45 years of working...
It is just like the court system. They have complicated the court system so much that you must hire a lawyer for anything. It is not supposed to be that way. As far as Bill's, its supposed to be easily understood. If they just sign off on it, time for a block of instruction.
Iโm just convinced all bills should be no more than 1 double space typed page. If it takes more than that it is too complicated and prone to loopholes.
Sounds like a good way to limit bills to me.
If Iโm being honest I think it should be no more than 4 sentences, one of which is the title. Kek.
Then you will love downsize DC's Read The Bills and Write The Laws Acts:
https://downsizedc.org/end-delegation-and-usurpation/
https://downsizedc.org/act/read-the-bills-act-2/
https://downsizedc.org/?s=One+Subject+At+A+Time
https://downsizedc.org/?s=Write+The+Laws
They should probably state an intention and an expiry as well. After the expiry, legislators can evaluate whether the intention was fulfilled and renew it if so.
If its 100x easier to make something than destroy it, you have a recipe for cancer
We don't need anymore bills. We need a purge. Its kind of funny how they have populations manipulated into thinking we constantly need more laws. What we really need is for everyone in congress, and DC as a whole, to meet and get familiar with unemployment.
It will eventually be ruled unconstitutional but we are going to have to deal with the bullshit for several years until itโs adjudicated by the SCOTUS.
A federal Court in oklahoma, has already ruled it unconstitutional.
They will not be seizing guns in this state.
I'm happy yet again to be Oklahoman!
Okies are Okie Doky with me;-)
Hawaii Judge will send to SCOTUS..............but OKLAHOMA wins the Draw.
When a lawmaker tries to push an unconstitutional law they should be removed immediately.
Yup, with a bang
Or, as I prefer, several bangs and a possible mag change.
๐๐ผ
RECALL!
A vote is support. They support unconstitutional things, they should be tarred and feathered and run out of town. Or worse. Treason is certainly to be considered.
What shocks me even more is how the RINOs are being revealed as Democrats in disguise at such a furious rate. Aside from MTG, Gaetz, and Rand Paul, are there any other patriots left?
second time today I saw the reference to tar and feathering politicians. it's a policy that should be brought back
What kills me is when Trump or anyone refers to RINOs as cowards or folding. They know exactly what they are doing. They aren't Republicans at all.
Thank you! I wouldn't even call them democrats. They are socialists and oligarchs.
I believe we're about to find out just how many people know what's coming, and are willing to do what's necessary to stop it, or not.
Word to the local DA's - I know you'll delay their trials until after the election. I don't care. I'll be here, lurking, waiting to be called up and exercise my 'jury nullification' option. That is, if you miss me on the first sweep, and I'm not locked up with the rest of the patriots.
I made sure that I posted enough Re: powerful people, so that they will not keep me around if they win. I don't want to live in the NWO, I'm already old with health issues, and I'm ready to do what I can. Guns aren't the only effective weapons.
I will do Jury duty anytime, I have been called twice in Florida since I moved here and I canโt wait to be called again.
I was jury foreman on a trial for a gang member. He was 100% guilty, caught red-handed violating an injunction that a previous court placed him under.
When we went to deliberation I was shocked that half the jury wanted to vote not-guilty, because they felt sorry for him, and he seemed (in court) like a nice kid. ๐คฆ๐ปโโ๏ธ
Long story short, it took three days of deliberation, and a hell of a lot of persistence on my part, but we finally got a unanimous guilty verdict on a Fridayโฆ but only because the hold out jurors didnโt want to return on Monday, and just wanted it to end. The correct outcome achieved the wrong way.
Thank you for being a good patriot. Criminals never change and we can't allow them to be free, they should be hanged.
All this tells me is now that they have the ability to take peoples guns, thereโs no way theyโre gonna allow Trump to win. They have to disarm us to implement their plan. And they will do it.
A bill doesn't give them the ability.
Thry will send people out and they won't come back.
โAnd how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more โ we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.โ โ Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Also, it depends on what kind of sheriff you have. Mine in particular, will not uphold Covid laws much less confiscating peoples firearms. The federal government would have to have individuals to do that for them. Also, Iโm not sure how this applies to sanctuary cities and counties and states for second amendment. Iโm not sure what kind of protection that gives. But itโs a thing. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
We passed a law here in oklahoma,saying local police are prohibited from helping the feds. With unconstitutional laws..... may even have specified guns.
Same with Arizona. Iโm not sure if itโs statewide, but I know there are several counties, Maricopa, being one of them oddly enough.
Apparently itโs the whole state of Arizona
https://azmirror.com/briefs/gun-control-advocates-urge-ducey-to-veto-gun-sanctuary-bill/#:~:text=Doug%20Ducey%20signed%20a%20bill,urging%20him%20to%20veto%20it.
https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2023/02/litigation-highlight-western-district-of-oklahoma-strikes-down-the-federal-ban-on-gun-possession-by-unlawful-users-of-controlled-substances#:~:text=On%20February%203%2C%20a%20federal,Harrison.
Oklahoma federal Court already ruled that they can't take guns. Their are also very interesting positions in that.
I think there is a line in the sand that alot of Americans have just stepped across.
People say this, but they have families to provide for same as contracting injectivitis.
Of course.
But many will not.
I donโt care about their bills anymore, they are not laws due to the ones who are creating them are criminals traitors to our constitution and country. Someday God will bring justice for the unjust.
Fight for the truth then.
Thatโs what I am trying to do everywhere I can and tell everybody what I believe.
While they pass laws giving illegals the right to vote and buy guns.
Citizens are being treated as criminals and criminals being treated like citizens. ๐คก ๐
Damn Mirrors , always the EVIL mirrors
FTFY
๐๐๐๐ Iโm feeling less doomy today
The people have to vote to change the Constitution
i predict that there will be many guns "lost" in "boating accidents".....
Oddly enough, I lost my gun in just such a way yesterday...
I can't lose guns that I don't have... ;-)
MOLON LABE Is a better response.
They'll hide a law in a bill that Republicans "absolutely have to pass because reasons!" that if you lose your gun, you are automatically guilty of terrorism or something.
I think most of us aren't thinking big enough. Remember what Trump said paraphrased, if your going to be thinking anyway, you may as well think big.
DC needs to be turned into a museum. We should take all power away from our federal govt. There ONLY job should be to work to protect our country and our Constitutional rights. Our federal government needs to shrink by about 90%, and the 10% remaining can only remain if they understand they are not the boss of us, we are their boss.
I would set one caveat on that, and that is in the legislative branch. When practically one million Americans have one representative, we are a far cry from truly representative government. If we removed all the unConstitutional agencies (IRS, BTA, BLM, CIA, ATF and some more) that are part of the executive branch, and lowered congressional pay to a reasonable amount (and the pay of all the 'higher ups' ) we could afford to pay for more representation.
At least prosecuted for high crimes....
We need to make them Read The Bills! https://downsizedc.org/act/read-the-bills-act-2/
and, Write The Laws, https://downsizedc.org/act/write-the-laws-act-2/
and limit them to One Subject At A Time! https://downsizedc.org/act/one-subject-at-a-time-act/
and be held to the same laws they pass for us, which is here: https://downsizedc.org/end-delegation-and-usurpation/
Most of these guys are lawyers, right? Best legal advice I ever heard was 'dont sign anything until you read it through and understand it.'
Just came to me ..... notice the titles of all these bills are the opposite of what they actually do. Wonder if politicians only read the heading and say it sounds good.
this statement is something I can agree with. and then when voting for reelection, people can look at voting records and see how many times they abstain. if the abstain or are not present, then we can see they are not doing their jobs.
Barring and extreme personal emergency they should HAVE mandatory attendance. I have missed less than 10 days of work via call off in my 45 years of working...
agreed!
It is just like the court system. They have complicated the court system so much that you must hire a lawyer for anything. It is not supposed to be that way. As far as Bill's, its supposed to be easily understood. If they just sign off on it, time for a block of instruction.
Then add this. https://archive.ph/xVhSa
Work CPU won't let me load it. Will try at home in the morning.
Its it isnt you or your work computer....link sucks.
I've got 1gb download and a personal computer that'd blow your socks off...and the link stayed in perpetual "loading" phase.
Is this in HR 4366 or HR 2882? Both of these are the spending bills.
Just got it secondhand from several posts on this site. First sentence holds valid... The second may or may not...
Do you understand treason? Donโt over use the word it cheapens it.