I was on board with 9/11 a year after it happened, and then se things happened close to home where I could see how steel may not melt, but it certainly could bend under jet fuel temps (it did with grass fires in the area), so I figured the claims that the engineers were brilliant & designed it to fall in on itself must be accurate.
Everything else I have studied since finding Q Makes it clear 9/11 was an inside job & things were far worse than I had ever imagined, though lined up perfectly with what I had been taught about deep state problems growing up.
I know enough about architecture and structure built to know you cannot have it just collapsed like a pancake. You can collapsed but it will go slowly down. Then I was told the jet fuel came down the elevator and ignite from underneath was how I was being explained to. I said, then who light the match at the bottom?
A colonel from the Army told me I need to go work for the FBI. Sent me a recommendation letter there. No one wants me. It's good too because of what I understand now.
I am glad I never jumped on potential opportunities like that. In my younger years I couldn't stop my white knight syndrome & was way too outspoken. I would have been Clintoned.
This is very good page. I have read others very similar and engineers are saying the same.
Not claiming I am smart or anything, but if you have to collapse from above and nothing was exploding from the bottom, you have to collapse floor by floor.
It might be because this bridge carried an interstate highway over the harbor. Interstate highways are built and maintained by state governments with federal money..
Just playing devil's advocate here: The downed bridge is blocking access to one of the country's largest and most critical ports. As I understand it, no ships can get in or out of the port until the debris is removed, and a bridge is badly needed for logistical purposes in moving things in and out of the port once they are unloaded from the ships. I am sure there will be court battles with the insurance company, which will try and pay as little as possible, and these court battles could take years before there would be any money to begin the cleanup and rebuilding. The country can't afford to have that port out of operation for a long period of time.
It seems to me that it makes far more sense for a quick investigation, followed by the government paying for the salvage, cleanup, and rebuilding so as to get the port running again ASAP. Then when the insurance company eventually is forced to pay, the money would replace at least some of what the government spent.
Keep in mind, I could be completely wrong. I am assuming that WHs are in control of the response, and that may not be the case. Hopefully things will become clearer in the coming days and weeks.
That's not how this kind of insurance works - the policies respond and the claim is reinserted. Actually the insurers are incentivised to pay when the claim is clear cut as this is.
Key was a lawyer in Maryland and Washington, D.C. for four decades and worked on important cases, including the Burr conspiracy trial, and he argued numerous times before the Supreme Court. He was nominated for District Attorney for the District of Columbia by President Andrew Jackson, where he served from 1833 to 1841. Key was a devout Episcopalian.
Biden can say whatever he wants. Congress would have to make appropriations to cover that, right? He's a powerless incoherent mouthpiece anyway. Guess we shall see
I'll probably catch flack for this answer. Why? Critical infrastructure. Election year. Claim against insurance can still be made at later date. Federal contracts = lots of money to gift from.
because if they steal the shipping company's money or the insurance company's money they could get sued and have to pay it back when the bridge doesn't get rebuilt. this way they can say the bridge will cost a billion dollars and grease everyone they want.
Per Maritime Law, the ship owner and charterers are limited in the amount of their liability. In the United States, the limit, except as to claims for personal injury and wrongful death, is the value of the ship and the earnings of the voyage on which it was engaged at the time of the casualty.
The basic condition is that the party asserting it must be free from "privity or knowledge" in the words of the United States statute. The ship owner is entitled to limit his liability for the negligence of the master or crew, but not for his own personal negligence or the decisions of management personnel.
In other words... what is the value of that ship and cargo?
Since the cargo was containers full of trash... virtually zero value.
The ship may be worth $10 Million to $20 Million at most.
The bridge will likely cost over $1.5 Billion to replace. Per Maritime Law, as it applies to the U.S., since this wasn't a planned incident and it wasn't company negligence... the extent of their liability is the value of the ship.
Of course, the families of everyone who died can now sue the shipping company for Tens of $Millions each... and the city of Baltimore can try to sue the shipping company for shutting down the port and disrupting businesses... but that may fall under the limited liability.
They don't want ME on that jury. I would award every wrongful death $100 Million, and every injury $50 Million. The shipping company and their insurance carrier wouldn't get off with just the value of the ship.
I was told my name is fitting because I need to educate myself regarding harbor pilot. Unfortunately for this particular person, I used to work with the doctors of the Columbia River pilots all the time when I was working in Portland.
Those were specially trained pilots navigating the mouth of the Columbia by Astoria. None of them would voluntarily crashed the barge. Just like the pilots in the sky wouldn't want to do that.
Is it vax, or maybe sabotage. Someone said sabotage.
**Well at least your username is fitting.
Because the SHIPPING COMPANY... DIDN'T DO IT!
The SHIP
was PILOTED
by THE GOVERNMENT
As is ANY ship being taken in and out of harbor.
Educate yourself, you'll sound less dumb in the future.
Also, why rebuild a toll bridge (other Anons claimed it was on here). Is it a private toll bridge? Is this a federal property grab?
Insurance should pay for this & do a proper investigation at the very least. What are the feds hiding?
Same as 9/11
I was on board with 9/11 a year after it happened, and then se things happened close to home where I could see how steel may not melt, but it certainly could bend under jet fuel temps (it did with grass fires in the area), so I figured the claims that the engineers were brilliant & designed it to fall in on itself must be accurate.
Everything else I have studied since finding Q Makes it clear 9/11 was an inside job & things were far worse than I had ever imagined, though lined up perfectly with what I had been taught about deep state problems growing up.
I know enough about architecture and structure built to know you cannot have it just collapsed like a pancake. You can collapsed but it will go slowly down. Then I was told the jet fuel came down the elevator and ignite from underneath was how I was being explained to. I said, then who light the match at the bottom?
A colonel from the Army told me I need to go work for the FBI. Sent me a recommendation letter there. No one wants me. It's good too because of what I understand now.
I am glad I never jumped on potential opportunities like that. In my younger years I couldn't stop my white knight syndrome & was way too outspoken. I would have been Clintoned.
Exactly. You and me both.
This is very good page. I have read others very similar and engineers are saying the same.
Not claiming I am smart or anything, but if you have to collapse from above and nothing was exploding from the bottom, you have to collapse floor by floor.
My business partner said on the video, you can see the fire even b4 the plane hits. She knew.
Aah, yes. Thanks for pointing out this one.
Appreciate that.
University of Alaska Fairbanks engineering department did the study.
It found the official findings incorrect. (https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/UAF-Final-Report-Release-03-25-2020.pdf)
"Building 7 didn't kill itself!"
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/DCA24MM031.aspx
https://mdta.maryland.gov/TollRatesTables
NTSB covers for the DS.
Thank you for this. My understanding of toll systems is not accurate it seems. We don't have anything outside of carpool lane tolls in my area.
Money laundering.
Oh you think. Of course. Cannot pass enough money to launder thru Ukraine war, got to hit somewhere to get money for it.
Expect that money to build nothing back.
Exactly what I was about to comment....reeks of it.
Imagine if they start pulling containers off the ship to find a bunch of dead Mexican kids.
I would not be at all surprised.
Funny how fast the FBI said it wasn't terrorist related....
Whatever they said, think the opposite.
Maybe they can say this, because the FBI were the ones that planned it.
3 letters wouldn't do a terror. They operate for the protection of America and her people...... kek
They don't want the insurance company doing the investigation.
This.
Of course.
Insurance companies don't pay for intentional acts.
Now, that's the most logical and sensible answer I have gotten.
It might be because this bridge carried an interstate highway over the harbor. Interstate highways are built and maintained by state governments with federal money..
So is the border but you know how much dedication Biden's government has maintaining and managing that
Thanks. Appreciate your info.
Just playing devil's advocate here: The downed bridge is blocking access to one of the country's largest and most critical ports. As I understand it, no ships can get in or out of the port until the debris is removed, and a bridge is badly needed for logistical purposes in moving things in and out of the port once they are unloaded from the ships. I am sure there will be court battles with the insurance company, which will try and pay as little as possible, and these court battles could take years before there would be any money to begin the cleanup and rebuilding. The country can't afford to have that port out of operation for a long period of time.
It seems to me that it makes far more sense for a quick investigation, followed by the government paying for the salvage, cleanup, and rebuilding so as to get the port running again ASAP. Then when the insurance company eventually is forced to pay, the money would replace at least some of what the government spent.
Keep in mind, I could be completely wrong. I am assuming that WHs are in control of the response, and that may not be the case. Hopefully things will become clearer in the coming days and weeks.
That's not how this kind of insurance works - the policies respond and the claim is reinserted. Actually the insurers are incentivised to pay when the claim is clear cut as this is.
More info regarding this bridge and its name author
https://keyt.com/news/2024/03/26/named-for-star-spangled-banner-author-the-francis-scott-key-bridge-was-part-of-baltimores-identity/
Key was a lawyer in Maryland and Washington, D.C. for four decades and worked on important cases, including the Burr conspiracy trial, and he argued numerous times before the Supreme Court. He was nominated for District Attorney for the District of Columbia by President Andrew Jackson, where he served from 1833 to 1841. Key was a devout Episcopalian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Scott_Key
Why is Andrew Jackson important. Andrew Jackson got rid of the 2nd central bank in U.S.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Bank-War
Ahem…..you mean WE are paying for it, NOT the insurer.
So they can launder to somewhere else.
Exactly.
Biden can say whatever he wants. Congress would have to make appropriations to cover that, right? He's a powerless incoherent mouthpiece anyway. Guess we shall see
Yes, we shall see.
They don't care about an investigation....all they want is more $ to launder through government contracts.
I would believe so.
I'll probably catch flack for this answer. Why? Critical infrastructure. Election year. Claim against insurance can still be made at later date. Federal contracts = lots of money to gift from.
Now that is a good idea. Got to launder the money somehow.
Money laundering to somebodies!
Thinking the same.
Good darn question.
LOL
because if they steal the shipping company's money or the insurance company's money they could get sued and have to pay it back when the bridge doesn't get rebuilt. this way they can say the bridge will cost a billion dollars and grease everyone they want.
You got it.
They'll charge the insurance and shipping companies and launder the taxpayer money.
You will not see another bridge or "infrastructure." It will go to Zelensky.
Per Maritime Law, the ship owner and charterers are limited in the amount of their liability. In the United States, the limit, except as to claims for personal injury and wrongful death, is the value of the ship and the earnings of the voyage on which it was engaged at the time of the casualty.
The basic condition is that the party asserting it must be free from "privity or knowledge" in the words of the United States statute. The ship owner is entitled to limit his liability for the negligence of the master or crew, but not for his own personal negligence or the decisions of management personnel.
In other words... what is the value of that ship and cargo?
Since the cargo was containers full of trash... virtually zero value. The ship may be worth $10 Million to $20 Million at most.
The bridge will likely cost over $1.5 Billion to replace. Per Maritime Law, as it applies to the U.S., since this wasn't a planned incident and it wasn't company negligence... the extent of their liability is the value of the ship.
Of course, the families of everyone who died can now sue the shipping company for Tens of $Millions each... and the city of Baltimore can try to sue the shipping company for shutting down the port and disrupting businesses... but that may fall under the limited liability.
They don't want ME on that jury. I would award every wrongful death $100 Million, and every injury $50 Million. The shipping company and their insurance carrier wouldn't get off with just the value of the ship.
Thanks for the information. Great info here.
Appreciate you.
I think more and more people are asking this very same question.
I was told my name is fitting because I need to educate myself regarding harbor pilot. Unfortunately for this particular person, I used to work with the doctors of the Columbia River pilots all the time when I was working in Portland.
Those were specially trained pilots navigating the mouth of the Columbia by Astoria. None of them would voluntarily crashed the barge. Just like the pilots in the sky wouldn't want to do that.
Is it vax, or maybe sabotage. Someone said sabotage.
**Well at least your username is fitting.
Because the SHIPPING COMPANY... DIDN'T DO IT!
The SHIP
was PILOTED
by THE GOVERNMENT
As is ANY ship being taken in and out of harbor.
Educate yourself, you'll sound less dumb in the future.
https://www.cruisehabit.com/what-are-harbor-pilots**
Wow
Did you see the background of Francis Scott? Lots of history and background.
Going to look at it now. Edit: A great read so far!
Please do.
Andrew Jackson's pic has been behind Trump all the time.
Probably don't even know what "infrastructure" means.