Or, right on schedule for a newly awakening public. Again, these drips aren’t for us, they’re for the normies who never would have listened to a word of this, previously.
Alex Jones sat Tucker down and showed him Building 7 and all sorts of stuff over 15 years or so ago (I can't remember when). At the time, Tucker was still dealing with cognitive dissonance. But as he said a year or so ago, he's come to realize that he was part of the problem, working in media.
Many have questioned it and remain adamant the whole thing was on purpose by our own government. This is the primary reason most of us woke up back then. We know what our own government is capable of.
Yeah but that ended up being in (relatively) hushed whispers as the leftist decay took over the internet forums and it became a point to mock rather than actual interest in finding out the truth.
This, except I didn't notice it for years and fully believed everything I was told and shown. Simple truth? It never occurred to me that anyone or any group of government departments could be that level of pure evil. The number of evil people needed to pull this off is stupefying.
Wasn't that where the financial data was held that pointed to the loss of the $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld was set to testify to when all this happened. Then, just like that it was all forgotten about. There was a video yesterday I watched and there a gentleman doing a video and he worked for the OMB, which would (I think) oversee those types of dollars.
The 2.3 Trillion audit trail was all at the Pentagon.
Building 7 was CIA and War on Drugs / DEA records. And Whitewater. Mena.
Hilary (Rodham) Clinton family owned a gun manufacturing plant and the weapons were smuggled to South America. The cartels paid for the guns by cooperating with CIA in drug smuggling operations into the Southern US. The drugs were pushed to Africans in the inner cities. The money from the 80s Crack and Cocaine addiction was then laundered to fund Middle East terrorism and 9-11.
All the evidence and know-how and personnel (agents and assets) were killed during 2001 terror attacks. Because that particular supply chain was old and compromised. 9-11 allowed for a new and more streamlined system. This new system was more compartmentalized, unmonitored, undocumented, and largely outside US legal jurisdiction.
Please take twos minutes and look at this please; GELATIN and E-TEAM
I want to call your attention to the artist groups (GELATIN & E-TEAM) who were selected to be part of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council (LMCC) World Views / Studioscape programs that allowed them and other artists to work and live in the WTC in the four years leading up to 9/11 on different floors, including 91 and 92 of the North Tower. Additionally, they were given seven day a week construction access to the WTC that allowed them to freely move all sorts of materials in and out of the complex……. https://peakd.com/conspiracy/@budz82/9-11-and-the-israeli-bomb-expert-infiltrated-art-groups-gelatin-demo-wiring-team-and-e-team-sol-gel-team
Interesting that the thing that turned me off of Carlson, and caused me to stop watching his show, was when several years ago there was an impromptu interview of him on the street somewhere questioning him about 9/11 and Building 7. Carlson became rude and ridiculed the person asking him questions. I didn't save this interview, but I think it can still be found...maybe on BitChute.
In my honest opinion, Tucker is blackmailed (he has made some very weird comments about sex with young teens in the past) and now is being forced to play his part in the Great Awakening.
They were well over a decade ago...but if you want to search for it, it was something along the lines of "I heard that guy had sex with a 14 year old girl, frankly I'm all for that if it's consensual."
yep...I get why people on the right like him...he says a few reasonable things. But ultimately I think he's a compromised puppet like the rest of them.
High school physics says that the government story is wrong.
WTC7 fell at free fall. (NIST says so in writing.)
Expressing this using vector calculus, it is complex, but expressing this using energy, it is simple, as follows.
Note that this analysis is so simple because (1) energy is conserved and (2) free falling is the asymptotic edge case of ways structures can fall. At the asymptote there is no wiggle room, so additional confounding complexities simply go away.
Doing any work requires energy. (1) Accelerating the building downward is work. (2) Deforming a building is work.
Falling is the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy. The falling is free falling when the efficiency of this conversion is 100%.
Therefore, if the only energy available is the potential energy of the mass suspended at height in a force field, then when free falling there is NO additional energy to do ANY other work.
That is, when free falling, you spend ALL of the energy accelerating the mass downward; in particular, no energy remains to do the work of deforming the building.
You could say that the building fell, and then stopping falling deformed the building, but then time goes in the wrong order: you have to deform the building so that it will fall.
At the first press conference NIST gave after 9/11, someone yelled out to the head of NIST "WTC7 fell at free fall". The head of NIST responded like he was reciting something he learned long ago: "no, it can't have, because you cannot have a progressive collapse of a structure at free fall". (Above I just gave the conservation of energy proof of this statement.) (Link wanted for this interaction).
I think it was six months later that NIST published that WTC7 fell "at free fall for several seconds". It cannot fall at free fall for any number of seconds. (Link wanted for this document).
What got me into this was seeing a YouTube video of a high-school physics teacher plotting each frame of the building falling and getting -10 m/s^2, which is free fall plus a bit of fudge factor. (Link wanted for this video.)
My friends, roommates etc knew right away it was controlled demolition and we were attacked from within, early cnn had experts on saying it had to be controlled demolition. We had questions but never fell for the mainstream narrative. I used to pass out dvd's or have movie nights.....Zeitgeist, Loose Change etc trying to wake people up. Life in this matrix has always been one giant psyop after another.
23 and a half years too late there guys...
Or, right on schedule for a newly awakening public. Again, these drips aren’t for us, they’re for the normies who never would have listened to a word of this, previously.
I only learned about bldg 7 3 years ago. A lot of 911,.people have no clue of.
99/100 normies go, "what's building 7?"
WTC7 didnt Epstein itself
That's surprising because there was so much talk about it. But maybe not so much on TV.
I was glued to the TV so I remember it and the countless documentaries about it later
^This!
Yep !
Alex Jones sat Tucker down and showed him Building 7 and all sorts of stuff over 15 years or so ago (I can't remember when). At the time, Tucker was still dealing with cognitive dissonance. But as he said a year or so ago, he's come to realize that he was part of the problem, working in media.
Hmm, you're not wrong but I don't believe there is a strict time limit on questioning and understanding historical events.
I think it may end up actually saying something about how these questions are being asked now.
Agreed. I think the JFK assassination should still be hot news until we get to the bottom of that cesspool.
Absolutely.
No reason those records need to be kept secret
Many have questioned it and remain adamant the whole thing was on purpose by our own government. This is the primary reason most of us woke up back then. We know what our own government is capable of.
Yeah but that ended up being in (relatively) hushed whispers as the leftist decay took over the internet forums and it became a point to mock rather than actual interest in finding out the truth.
the mocking was from hasbara trolls who were trying to COINTELPRO the forums
Qposts on 9-11, 9/11; George “Dubya”s role? “Which exotic space weapon was used on the WTC?” MJ12. see comments
https://greatawakening.win/p/17shvp7RsO/qposts-on-911-911--george-dubyas/c/
Marvin Bush role? Security at WTC?
Ran out of space.
This, except I didn't notice it for years and fully believed everything I was told and shown. Simple truth? It never occurred to me that anyone or any group of government departments could be that level of pure evil. The number of evil people needed to pull this off is stupefying.
Once they realize what was in 7, it will all make sense to them
What was that? If I knew I can't remember
Financial records I believe. Records that were needed for an investigation into Wallstreet, all went bye bye
WorldCom I think.
Edit: it was Enron
Wasn't that where the financial data was held that pointed to the loss of the $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld was set to testify to when all this happened. Then, just like that it was all forgotten about. There was a video yesterday I watched and there a gentleman doing a video and he worked for the OMB, which would (I think) oversee those types of dollars.
The 2.3 Trillion audit trail was all at the Pentagon.
Building 7 was CIA and War on Drugs / DEA records. And Whitewater. Mena.
Hilary (Rodham) Clinton family owned a gun manufacturing plant and the weapons were smuggled to South America. The cartels paid for the guns by cooperating with CIA in drug smuggling operations into the Southern US. The drugs were pushed to Africans in the inner cities. The money from the 80s Crack and Cocaine addiction was then laundered to fund Middle East terrorism and 9-11.
All the evidence and know-how and personnel (agents and assets) were killed during 2001 terror attacks. Because that particular supply chain was old and compromised. 9-11 allowed for a new and more streamlined system. This new system was more compartmentalized, unmonitored, undocumented, and largely outside US legal jurisdiction.
Yes, but this was in the wing of the Pentagon that was hit - not in Building 7.
Please take twos minutes and look at this please; GELATIN and E-TEAM I want to call your attention to the artist groups (GELATIN & E-TEAM) who were selected to be part of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council (LMCC) World Views / Studioscape programs that allowed them and other artists to work and live in the WTC in the four years leading up to 9/11 on different floors, including 91 and 92 of the North Tower. Additionally, they were given seven day a week construction access to the WTC that allowed them to freely move all sorts of materials in and out of the complex……. https://peakd.com/conspiracy/@budz82/9-11-and-the-israeli-bomb-expert-infiltrated-art-groups-gelatin-demo-wiring-team-and-e-team-sol-gel-team
Interesting that the thing that turned me off of Carlson, and caused me to stop watching his show, was when several years ago there was an impromptu interview of him on the street somewhere questioning him about 9/11 and Building 7. Carlson became rude and ridiculed the person asking him questions. I didn't save this interview, but I think it can still be found...maybe on BitChute.
He discusses his thinking on that back then often now, basically “coming clean” on bad viewpoints.
In my honest opinion, Tucker is blackmailed (he has made some very weird comments about sex with young teens in the past) and now is being forced to play his part in the Great Awakening.
What were his comments on that?
They were well over a decade ago...but if you want to search for it, it was something along the lines of "I heard that guy had sex with a 14 year old girl, frankly I'm all for that if it's consensual."
Wow. I immediately arrived at the same exact opinion you had. They do have dirt on him are and forcing him to expose the cabal.
yep...I get why people on the right like him...he says a few reasonable things. But ultimately I think he's a compromised puppet like the rest of them.
5d chess and warfare
Must have been this
https://www.fastcompany.com/90318065/tucker-carlson-under-fire-for-defending-statutory-rape-among-other-things
Ghosts in the machine don’t reveal their identity now do they?
High school physics says that the government story is wrong.
WTC7 fell at free fall. (NIST says so in writing.)
Expressing this using vector calculus, it is complex, but expressing this using energy, it is simple, as follows.
Note that this analysis is so simple because (1) energy is conserved and (2) free falling is the asymptotic edge case of ways structures can fall. At the asymptote there is no wiggle room, so additional confounding complexities simply go away.
Doing any work requires energy. (1) Accelerating the building downward is work. (2) Deforming a building is work.
Falling is the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy. The falling is free falling when the efficiency of this conversion is 100%.
Therefore, if the only energy available is the potential energy of the mass suspended at height in a force field, then when free falling there is NO additional energy to do ANY other work.
That is, when free falling, you spend ALL of the energy accelerating the mass downward; in particular, no energy remains to do the work of deforming the building.
You could say that the building fell, and then stopping falling deformed the building, but then time goes in the wrong order: you have to deform the building so that it will fall.
At the first press conference NIST gave after 9/11, someone yelled out to the head of NIST "WTC7 fell at free fall". The head of NIST responded like he was reciting something he learned long ago: "no, it can't have, because you cannot have a progressive collapse of a structure at free fall". (Above I just gave the conservation of energy proof of this statement.) (Link wanted for this interaction).
I think it was six months later that NIST published that WTC7 fell "at free fall for several seconds". It cannot fall at free fall for any number of seconds. (Link wanted for this document).
What got me into this was seeing a YouTube video of a high-school physics teacher plotting each frame of the building falling and getting -10 m/s^2, which is free fall plus a bit of fudge factor. (Link wanted for this video.)
My friends, roommates etc knew right away it was controlled demolition and we were attacked from within, early cnn had experts on saying it had to be controlled demolition. We had questions but never fell for the mainstream narrative. I used to pass out dvd's or have movie nights.....Zeitgeist, Loose Change etc trying to wake people up. Life in this matrix has always been one giant psyop after another.
Weird how some of the top videos online used to be 9/11 conspiracies but now it’s complete blackout on those movies.
obligatory 9-11 repost
the sauce - https://www.bitchute.com/video/mYQtQySldxyz/
the spice - https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
I'm guessing neither Rogan nor Tucker would dare have Ryan Dawson on their shows to talk about 9/11.
What was Marvin Bush's role at WTC? Something about security?
he had very b recently taken over security for World Trade Center buildings and for Logan Airport...go figure
Israel
Please believe in the science we tell you to believe. Yours truly.
You are right and we’ve been pushed into neutrally trying to describe what our eyes and hearts scream out as obvious evil embodied.
They are going down. Countdown started years ago and now we can see it coming. Capital Punishment for Treason and 3vil.