Yes. I am islamaphobic. ✅
Why aren't you?
(twitter.com)
Comments (81)
sorted by:
I am not phobic at all.
The word alone suggests " excessive or irrational fear, horror, or aversion".
Not my cup of tea, so to speak. My gripe is not with a god perspective, but with the subjugation of your own authority and strategy to other people or systems.
For a man to be a man, freedom is essential. Hence: Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Islam is of its very idea: totally irreconcilable with this view.
The question is then: what attracts them to here? Freedom? They can't handle freedom. They love subjection and being subjected. This leaves only one option: to subject.
while you are technically correct in your definition it is pretty clear that it is now used as hatred rather than fear. I would think that is what she was refering to.
The Left: Islamophile. And.... mo was a pedo with his 6 year old "wife", fondling along, and consummating it at 9.
Not even hatred, just being cautious, critical, or not putting the "protected" on a pedestal and singing its praise - means you are a "phobe".
Sharia law is an anathema to the US Constitution. Muslims must subject themselves to it if they want to live in the US. If not then we must have the courage to revoke their citizenship, green card, asylum & deport them. Send them back to their country of origin or another Muslim country.
Thanks for the explanation.
Disgusting.
It looks bad. They do all kinds of shit. You should see these historical vids b4 Iran Islamic Revolution.
https://x.com/moment_mirthful/status/1797504311628644585
Yes. I am sure people don't want to live like 2nd class citizens under tyrants no matter if the tyrants claim God/Allah or whatever for power.
Muhammad is a homo and was a kiddy diddler.
If he sucked a childs tongue that child would go to heaven apparently... allah knows best. Fucking degenerates
But you are describing RATIONAL aversion.
Phobia is IRRATIONAL fear.
Invalid conclusion :)
I’m not afraid of islam, I just don’t want it anywhere near Christendom.
At least Charles Martel’s enemies were men. Our Islamic enemies are weasels, begging for refuge.
Deport all Muslim’s from western countries, retake Constantinople, reestablish the Kingdom of Jerusalem as the Republic of Jerusalem.
I’m with you as far as Constantinople. Let the heathens duke it out for the levant.
I don’t need to be worried about anything. I simply don’t like sharia, islam, the fraudulent claims of peace, or the pathetic begging for refuge from their own dysfunction.
Who’s the dumb fuck? lol keep your story straight.
I didn’t accuse you of being muslim, I didn’t downvote any of your crap, and I probably won’t bother to downvote your future posts. I don’t care enough about your opinion to take offense at your uninspired insults, and I’m not moved by your uninformed assessment of my religious practice.
“I am a white Christian identifying individual” seems like a paradoxical phrase, because it’s the commies and deviants who go on about the “identifying” crap or the genderless “individual” crap. A white Christian man would say “I’m a white Christian man.” Maybe this observation will help in your future trolling and infiltration. I’m not worried about such activities because, like how some FBI agents assigned to stalk right wingers online end up getting redpilled and quitting the FBI, doing a better job of pretending to be a Christian online might make Christianity rub off on you. You’re welcome and good luck.
Also, takiya and kitman are faithless doctrines. If allah was real and was on their side, they wouldn’t have to lie about it. Jesus didn’t tell us to lie. The “ends justify the means” crap is for the satanic commies. Jesus said He is the way, the TRUTH, and the life. John 8:32: “The truth shall set you free”. Christian culture even has cliches about it, like “Tell the truth and shame the devil.” It’s because we have faith that even if telling the truth brings immediate hardship, we’ve already won the ultimate victory.
The historic invaders freely admitted that they were jihadis trying to conquer other people’s lands. They risked the coalescing of the enemies’ defenses in order to show faith in allah. There was some honor and masculinity there. These days only a minority of them are like that. The majority don’t believe their mission is holy so they don’t believe allah will help them, so in their worldly fear they resort to weasel tactics.
Look at the history of Islam around the world and you BETTER be afraid of them coming to power!
500 years only and subjugated better part of Europe and completely Middle East. I just don't want them around.
I appreciate this. I will see about getting this.
Do you honestly believe that anybody the deep state toppled were evil? I'd take the Taliban over DS controlled drug running child traffickers like Hamid Karzai any day. NATO/UN were the bad guys here, as usual. Wake up.
Waking. Well, I actually know the fundamentalists were bad.
And who told you they were fundamentalists? George W Bush? Tony Blair? The Mockingbird MSM? Their concern was for the opium fields (which the Taliban destroyed) and their ability to traffic children through the crossroads of Eurasia (which the Taliban shut down). When did the opioid pandemic really blow up? Coincidence?
Not Talibans, I was awake then. Shiite Muslims of Iran.
The US was founded by and for people "longing to be free". While Americans have always welcomed legal immigrants, Islam's foundational beliefs are entirely incompatible with American foundational beliefs. They don't believe in freedom of religion, and they believe they are completely justified in executing anyone who doesn't convert to Islam. "Peaceful" Islamists are not following the tenants of their own religion. They should not be allowed in this country, period.
I agree. They convert by the sword.
Phobic denotes fear. I do not fear these animals.
Amen.
"Phobia", as has been pointed out, means excessive or irrational fear, horror, or aversion to something.
There is nothing irrational about not wanting these goat-fuckers to be alive.
No, it is not a "fear" of this backwards, crypto-satanic political movement that I have. What I have is hatred and disgust.
Yes, Phobia is one of many incorrect and overused words.
Got you. I understand.
The REASON the muzzie men demand that the women wear coverings and be accompanied by males is because they believe/know that they cannot control their impulse to rape.
This is the type of animals these muzzies are.
Disgusting creatures.
Now, that sure makes sense. My goodness.
This will not be popular but condemning all Muslims as terrorists is the same as saying all Christian’s are dumb Jim Jones followers. I have personal friends who are Muslim. The wife dresses with no hijab. They are both naturalized citizens of 10+ years and came here to the US to escape the extremest in their country. We were founded on freedom of religion, not freedom of Christian religion. Yes I’m a Christian but I have the ability to tolerate people who were raised differently and to try and understand their culture. There is no place for stereotype hate for an entire group of people based on their radical counterparts. Everyone and I mean everyone should be judged on the content of their character, period. I know Christian’s who I believe to be as evil AF. Every group has extremists.
My area has been taken over by Muslims and East Indians who refuse to assimilate. Yes you may have a friend or two who is proud to be American and puts America first but 95+% of those people don’t so I would rather not them here in the first place.
It’s not America’s job to be the world police, day care and sugar daddy.
Right, we should never make decisions based on the rare exception to the rule.
We should base our decisions on the general rule that generally applies.
Their holy book says different. You and these "moderate" Muslims are ignoring that the Koran says it alone is the supreme law for islamicists, and not the law of whatever land they inhabit. Only the Koran is the law. They who disobey, regardless of their professed religion, are marked for destruction BY OTHER HUMAN BEINGS—who are defined by the Koran as the good people. You're good if you kill infidels.
Isn't it funny how the Bible doesn't say that?
Sure, it suggests you can go to hell for committing sins and not repenting. But that's GOD dishing out the punishment, not other humans.
I’m guessing you have never read Deuteronomy
Part of Islam is to LIE to non-believers if it gains an advantage for the muslim.
I bet your muslim "friends" won't tell you about that.
Deuteronomy doesn't encourage us to lie to infidels.
Correct. It says to kill them. You can’t lie to a dead person.
13:6-10 (anyone who worships another God should be killed including those in your family)
6 But that prophet or that dreamer shall be put to death, because, in order to lead you astray from the way which the LORD, your God, has commanded you to take, the prophet or dreamer has spoken apostasy against the LORD, your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of slavery. Thus shall you purge the evil from your midst.
7 If your brother, your father’s child or your mother’s child, your son or daughter, your beloved spouse, or your intimate friend entices you secretly, saying, “Come, let us serve other gods,” whom you and your ancestors have not known, 8 any of the gods of the surrounding peoples, near to you or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: 9 do not yield or listen to any such person; show no pity or compassion and do not shield such a one, 10 but kill that person. Your hand shall be the first raised to put such a one to death; the hand of all the people shall follow
20:12-15 (kill all the males and take the females to enjoy as you like if they don’t agree with you)
12 But if it refuses to make peace with you and instead joins battle with you, lay siege to it, 13 and when the LORD, your God, delivers it into your power, put every male in it to the sword; 14 but the women and children and livestock and anything else in the city—all its spoil—you may take as plunder for yourselves, and you may enjoy this spoil of your enemies, which the LORD, your God, has given you.
15 That is how you shall deal with any city at a considerable distance from you, which does not belong to these nations here.
Sure doesn't seem like it.
There is a difference, and yet a similarity, between Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
All 3 start with the first 5 books of the Old Testament.
All 3 have a new book that supercedes -- to some degree -- the first 5 books of the Old Testament.
Christianity has the New Testament.
Islam has the Koran.
Judaism has the Talmud.
The Talmud is a complete refutation of the OT, so jews don't actually follow the OT at all. Their Talmud overrules the OT completely, though they lie about that aspect of their religion to non-jews.
The Koran agrees with the OT in some respects, but overrules it in other respects. Kill the infidel is one of the areas that that Koran agrees with the OT. So yes, they believe in killing non-believers. And we see that with their ACTIONS.
The New Testament has a new rule with regard to sin, in Christianity. In the OT, sin was often punishable by death. In the NT, Christ paid the price of sin by dying, so that Christians would no longer kill each other for sinful acts. So, Christians no longer kill sinners, including non-believers. And we see that LACK of killing for sin in their ACTIONS.
That is the difference.
A simple reading of the text, without understanding the CONTEXT of the entire book, is an ignorant take. I was guilty of that, as well, for most of my life.
But you cannot understand the OT without putting it in context of the NT, and you cannot understand the NT without putting it in context of the OT.
I'm guessing you have never read the New Testament, where Jesus repudiates the barbaric punishments of the Old Testament, like those in Deuteronomy
Fascinating reading
Actually, that is not true.
The Founders' understanding of "freedom of religion" was to prevent one particular sect of Christianity from being the official religion of the state.
The word Christian or Christianity is nowhere in our founding documents. Yes the first step was to prevent a specific sect from being the official religion but our founding fathers were very thorough and meticulous and had they intended it to include only Christianity they would have said that.
True, and that is why you have to read other things they wrote, so that you can understand the full context.
Ben Franklin did not want to allow Germans into the USA. He thought it should be only for English. Both ethnicities are Christian, and White. Actually, the English are Germanic people, as well. So, why the disagreement?
All Founding Fathers were some form of Christian, unless you want to include Thomas Paine (which I do include), who was an atheist.
When Muslim pirates were killing and enslaving White Europeans and Americans off the Barbary Coast of Africa, Thomas Jefferson met with one of the Islamic leaders and asked why they were doing it. He was told that Islam allows it, so they do it. Jefferson was shocked by that response, and so he went to war against them (the words of the Marine Corps hymn include a passage about that era).
In 1790, the First Congress (just 1 year after the Constitution was officially ratified) created the first immigration act. The act said that only WHITE people could become US citizens. They were not talking about Muslims or Hindus.
There are numerous writings we can point to that indicate that the USA Founding Fathers intended that the White Christian was who they considered to be "our Posterity" in the Constitution's preamble.
The idea that anyone else would ever become an American was such a ridiculous concept, that they had no reason to be more specific. It was understood by all.
It does not matter whether you like it or not.
It is a FACT.
I agree. The left wants us to see every cultural/ethnic/racial group as a monolith...we can't fall into that trap.
Per "their" definitions, I'm: Islamaphobic Homophobic Transphobic Christian Nationalist..... and outright DEPLORABLE!
Count me in.
It is not unhealthy for non-Muslim women to steer clear of these misogynistic people.
You mean healthy to steer clear. Oh of course.
It's not a good idea to use groups that was created by the CIA as exampls here.
Muslims came a lot earlier than CIA.
The college kids who are pro Hamas do not realize that they would be stoned to death under Sharia law for also claiming gay rights, womens rights, girls wearing shorts, having a beer, sleeping around, eating ribs, etc. I am not afraid of them, but I thank God every day for giving me a safe place to live and for Christ the savior.
I am a Christian and not suppose to be violent but this is despicable.
It's time for ALL religion to just go away.
It's the number one cause of wars, conflict and divide and conquer schemes.
All of them are control mechanisms, completely devoid of directing people to connect to, truly acknowledge and live in Spirit.
They're the epitome of circle jerking in a culdesac. They keep dancing around, but never get around to matters of the Spirit.
Sure ... they'll quote words from some book and sort of talk about it in the mind, but never tell you or show you how to communicate with God directly, yourself... because you wouldn't need them anymore...
Welcome to modern day San Francisco.
Following that logic, we should all be shooting each other in the face with all these millions of guns around. Funny how it doesn't work that way though...
Right and wrong are naturally instilled in humans. Those who want to pretend it isn't, enable those who want to "act the fool" and blame it on some nature/nurture bullshit.
War isn't holy.
Good catch. Amen